Open Access

Modulation of human endogenous retrovirus (HERV) transcription during persistent and de novo HIV-1 infection

  • Michelle Vincendeau1, 2,
  • Ingmar Göttesdorfer1,
  • Julia M H Schreml3,
  • Armand G Ngounou Wetie1,
  • Jens Mayer4,
  • Alex D Greenwood5,
  • Markus Helfer1,
  • Susanne Kramer1,
  • Wolfgang Seifarth3,
  • Kamyar Hadian2, 6,
  • Ruth Brack-Werner1 and
  • Christine Leib-Mösch1, 3Email author
Retrovirology201512:27

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12977-015-0156-6

Received: 5 June 2014

Accepted: 5 March 2015

Published: 24 March 2015

Abstract

Background

The human genome contains multiple LTR elements including human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) that together account for approximately 8–9% of the genomic DNA. At least 40 different HERV groups have been assigned to three major HERV classes on the basis of their homologies to exogenous retroviruses. Although most HERVs are silenced by a variety of genetic and epigenetic mechanisms, they may be reactivated by environmental stimuli such as exogenous viruses and thus may contribute to pathogenic conditions. The objective of this study was to perform an in-depth analysis of the influence of HIV-1 infection on HERV activity in different cell types.

Results

A retrovirus-specific microarray that covers major HERV groups from all three classes was used to analyze HERV transcription patterns in three persistently HIV-1 infected cell lines of different cellular origins and in their uninfected counterparts. All three persistently infected cell lines showed increased transcription of multiple class I and II HERV groups. Up-regulated transcription of five HERV taxa (HERV-E, HERV-T, HERV-K (HML-10) and two ERV9 subgroups) was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR analysis and could be reversed by knock-down of HIV-1 expression with HIV-1-specific siRNAs. Cells infected de novo by HIV-1 showed stronger transcriptional up-regulation of the HERV-K (HML-2) group than persistently infected cells of the same origin. Analysis of transcripts from individual members of this group revealed up-regulation of predominantly two proviral loci (ERVK-7 and ERVK-15) on chromosomes 1q22 and 7q34 in persistently infected KE37.1 cells, as well as in de novo HIV-1 infected LC5 cells, while only one single HML-2 locus (ERV-K6) on chromosome 7p22.1 was activated in persistently infected LC5 cells.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that HIV-1 can alter HERV transcription patterns of infected cells and indicate a correlation between activation of HERV elements and the level of HIV-1 production. Moreover, our results suggest that the effects of HIV-1 on HERV activity may be far more extensive and complex than anticipated from initial studies with clinical material.

Keywords

Human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) Human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) HERV transcription profiling Retrovirus-specific microarray siRNA

Background

Approximately 8–9% of the human genome is composed of endogenous retroviral elements (HERVs). Endogenous retroviruses are found in all phyla and homologues of most HERVs are present among primates, which represents 70 million years of evolutionary time [1]. It is hypothesized that during the course of primate evolution, exogenous progenitors of HERVs inserted themselves into germ-line DNA, where they expanded via reinfection and/or retrotransposition [2,3]. Full-length HERV sequences possess a genomic organization similar to proviruses of exogenous retroviruses. Therefore, HERVs were classified in three major classes according to sequence homologies with the polymerase (pol) gene of exogenous animal retroviruses. Class I HERVs show sequence similarities to gammaretroviruses, class II HERVs are related to betaretroviruses and class III HERVs display a limited similarity to spumaviruses [4]. Endogenous homologues to lentiviruses have not been detected in the human genome. There is no evidence to date that infectious HERVs are produced in humans, suggesting their genetic material replicates exclusively as part of their host’s genome. This is in sharp contrast to many other mammals, particularly rodents, in which the lines between endogenous and exogenous retroviruses can become very blurred [5]. Nonetheless, in some instances only a few mutations or recombination events would be required to reconstitute a replication competent provirus in humans [6-8].

Some HERV elements code for individual gene products [9,10] that could be pathogenic. For example, two small regulatory proteins, Rec and Np9, that are encoded by the HERV-K (HML-2) group are suspected to be involved in some human cancers [11-13]. Other examples for potentially pathogenic HERV gene products are the envelope (Env) proteins, which possess fusogenic properties and have been associated with several chronic diseases such as autoimmunity and neurological disorders [14-16].

Most HERVs have been silenced by mutations and/or epigenetic control e.g. methylation of DNA or chromatin modifications. However, they may be reactivated by environmental stimuli such as radiation and chemicals [17-19] or by infectious agents such as exogenous viruses [20-24]. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and human herpes virus 6 (HHV-6), for example, have been shown to transactivate expression of a potential HERV-K18 encoded superantigen that stimulates T-cell activation [23,25-29]. This process might be crucial for the establishment of long-term infection by EBV and HHV-6 and play a role in the development of associated diseases. Similarly, expression of HERV-W Env protein has been proposed to be induced by Herpesviridae in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and hypothesized to be linked with MS pathogenesis [22]. We have recently shown that human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) activates a number of HERV groups including HERV-K (HML-2) [30]. Because of the association with a multitude of complex diseases, a better understanding of the influence of exogenous viruses on the expression of HERVs in human cells is necessary in various pathogenic contexts.

Lentiviruses and HERVs share many structural and functional features like the LTR as key director and regulator of transcription. The potential complementation of HERV and HIV encoded proteins provides additional interaction points reviewed in [31]. For example, regulatory HIV-1 Rev protein has been shown to substitute for HERV-K (HML-2) Rec (cORF) protein in functional assays [32-34]. On the other hand, HIV-1 infection may compromise intracellular defense mechanisms normally down-regulating HERV activity [35,36]. Data from several reports support an influence of HIV-1 infection on HERV expression. Thus, antibodies against Env proteins of HERV-K102, a member of the HERV-K (HML-2) group, have been found to occur with higher frequency in HIV-1 viraemic patients than in healthy individuals [37]. Another study identified T cells responding to HERV epitopes of various HERV groups in HIV-1 infected individuals [38-41]. Furthermore, HERV-K (HML-2) RNA was reported in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) or plasma of HIV-1 infected patients [42-45].

To gain more insight into the influence of HIV-1 infection on HERV expression on the cellular level, we investigated HERV transcription patterns in persistently HIV-1 infected cell lines with different HIV-1 production levels, in cells infected de novo with HIV-1 and in the corresponding uninfected cells. Simultaneous profiling of a large number of HERVs was enabled using a retrovirus-specific DNA chip based on a conserved region within the pol gene that covers major HERV groups from all three classes [46,47]. We hypothesized that, if a direct link between HIV-1 and HERV transcription exists, removal of the stimulus (i.e. HIV-1 gene products) should result in a corresponding decrease of the stimulated HERV transcription. Thus, we used siRNAs directed against HIV-1 transcripts as well as a cellular inhibitor of HIV Rev activity to observe their effects on HERV transcription. Furthermore, we identified transcribed HERV-K (HML-2) loci with differential activity in persistently and in de novo HIV-1 infected cells. Our data demonstrates up-regulation of several class I and class II HERV groups and links HERV transcription with expression and production of HIV-1 in persistently infected cells.

Results

HERV transcription profiles of HIV-1 infected human cell lines with different levels of HIV-1 production

The present study was initiated to explore a possible influence of HIV-1 infection on the transcriptional activities of various HERV groups in HIV-1 infected cells. To this end we used a retrovirus-specific, pol-based microarray that allows simultaneous transcription profiling of multiple HERVs and discriminates between 49 HERV subgroups derived from 20 prominent groups representing al three HERV classes [46-48].

First we examined three persistently HIV-1 infected cell lines, TH4-7-5, LC5-HIV and KE37.1-IIIB. All persistently infected cell lines contain infectious proviruses. The provirus copy numbers are shown in Figure 1D. We chose these cell lines because they differ in their HIV productivity [49] and thus could be used to determine a possible correlation between levels of HIV-1 production and HERV transcription. The corresponding uninfected cell lines 85HG66 (astrocytes), LC5 (a derivative of HeLa cells [50]) and KE37.1 (T-lymphoma cells), respectively, were used as controls.
Figure 1

Productivity of different persistently HIV-1 infected human cell lines. (A) Intracellular p24-production in the infected cell lines TH4-7-5, KE37.1-IIIB and LC5-HIV. (B) Extracellular p24-production in the infected cell lines TH4-7-5, KE37.1-IIIB and LC5-HIV. Quantification of p24 antigen in infected cells and in the supernatant was performed as described [82] using a p24 ELISA. (C) HIV-1 transcript levels in the persistently infected cell lines TH4-7-5, KE37.1-IIIB and LC5-HIV. (D) Provirus copy numbers of the infected cell lines TH4-7-5, KE37.1-IIIB and LC5-HIV measured with quantitative PCR. Absolute quantification of HIV proviral copies was performed as described in [82].

The infected cell lines were analyzed for their ability to produce viral proteins by measuring levels of the HIV-1 capsid protein Gag p24 in samples of cell lysates (intracellular p24) and in culture supernatants (extracellular p24) harvested after 24 hours virus production. The three cell lines TH4-7-5, LC5-HIV and KE37.1-IIIB differed clearly in their p24 production levels (Figure 1A). TH4-7-5 cells exhibited the lowest p24 production. The LC5-HIV and KE37.1-IIIB cells produced approximately 10 to 40 fold higher levels of intracellular p24 than the TH4-7-5 cells. In agreement, release of p24 protein was detected only in culture supernatants of LC5-HIV and KE37.1-IIIB cells, but not in supernatants of TH4-7-5 cells (Figure 1B). Using specific PCR primers, we could further show that the infected cell lines produce specific HIV-1 transcripts, whereas the uninfected control cells do not (Figure 1C). This data correlates with the p24 protein levels.

To get a general overview of HERV expression in HIV-1 infected and uninfected cells a retrovirus specific microarray was used. Microarray analysis was conducted in triplicates according to a standardized chip hybridization protocol [46,48,51]. Three house keeping genes served as internal controls for RNA quality. The HIV-1 capture probe served as a control to show that all infected cell lines (KE37.1-IIIB, LC5-HIV, TH4-7-5) are HIV-1 positive and all uninfected cells (KE37.1, LC5, 85HG66) are HIV-1 negative. The microarray consists of 49 representative HERV pol (RT) sequences derived from 20 major groups of class I (gammaretrovirus-related), class II (betaretrovirus-related), and class III (spumaretrovirus-related) HERVs [46,47]. Depending on deletions within the targeted pol sequence and on sequence variability, the microarray may detect about half up to two third of the elements belonging to a HERV group. The 49 sequences spotted on the chip represent HERV subgroups that are defined by about 20% sequence divergence from each other within the analyzed pol region [4,52]. For microarray analysis, conditions were used that require at least 80% sequence identity for hybridization [48,53]. Thus, each HERV subgroup may consist of about 10 to 100 closely related proviral loci with sufficient sequence similarity that individual elements cannot be distinguished. Depending on the size of a subgroup and its transcriptional activity, one or more transcribed loci may hybridize to one spot of the microarray, and in a few cases cross-hybridization between related subgroups is observed. False positive signals cannot be ruled out completely, but were minimized by amplifying the hybridization probe with HERV-specific primers before microarray hybridization. Despite of the limitations this method allows a fast and comprehensive screening of overall HERV activity in a cell type.

Figure 2A displays an alignment of the hybridization patterns obtained with RNA from persistently HIV-1 infected cell lines compared to the corresponding uninfected cells. Members of 7 HERV groups, HERV-T, HERV-E, HERV-W, ERV-9, HML-3, HML-4 and HML-10, belonging to class I and II HERVs were found up-regulated in virus producing cells when compared to uninfected control cells (marked in red in Figure 2A). The more ancient class III HERV elements remained unaffected in all cell lines. A significant increase of HERV-K (HML-2) transcripts, previously associated with HIV-1 infection in patients [38,42] was not detected in any of the persistently infected cell lines by microarray analysis. Up-regulation of HERV-F, HML-1 and HML-5 was observed only in the HIV-1 infected lymphocytic cell line KE37.1-IIIB. Comparison of the HERV transcription profiles of the three infected cell lines with each other suggests that the up-regulation of HERV transcription may be connected to HIV-1 production levels.
Figure 2

HERV transcription profiles of HIV-1 infected cell lines examined by a retrovirus-specific microarray. False color mapping was used for image visualization. The house keeping genes ubiquitin, glycerinaldehyde-3-phosphate-dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) served as a quality control and internal standard. HIV-1 oligonucleotides are also spotted on the chip as a positive control and to demonstrate HIV-1 infection. HERVs are grouped in class I, II and III elements. It should be noted that each positive spot on the microarray can represent multiple HERV proviruses of one multicopy HERV subgroup with sufficient sequence similarity that individual elements cannot be distinguished. (A) Comparison of persistently HIV-1 infected cell lines with the corresponding uninfected cell lines. Up-regulated HERV subgroups are indicated by red letters. HERV subgroups marked with a green asterisk were additionally analyzed by qRT-PCR. (B) Comparison of de novo HIV-1 infected LC5-RIC cells with uninfected cells.

To analyze the influence of de novo HIV-1 infection and to determine, whether HERV transcription patterns in de novo and persistently infected cells differ, we infected LC5 cells expressing a fluorescent HIV reporter (LC5-RIC) with the HIV-1 patient isolate P-891 described in [54,55]. The de novo HIV-1 infected cells showed a HERV transcription pattern partially similar to that of persistently infected LC5 cells. Both, de novo and persistently infected cells displayed increased transcription of HERV-E and ERV9 subgroups (Figure 2A and B). However, enhanced transcription of members of groups HERV-T, HERV-W, HML-4 and HML-10 was observed only in persistently HIV-1 infected LC5 cells but not in de novo infected cells. Stimulation of HERV-K (HML-3) transcription was much weaker in de novo infected cells than in persistently infected cells. On the other hand, the de novo HIV-1 infected LC5-RIC cells showed a stronger activation of HERV-K (HML-2) transcription than persistently infected cells.

Quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR confirms differential transcription of HERVs in HIV-1 infected and uninfected cells

Differences in the transcription levels of five representative HERV subgroups in infected and non-infected cells were subsequently analyzed by qRT-PCR using primers that bind specifically to the pol region of the up-regulated HERVs. These primers are located in a region of the reverse transcriptase gene that exhibits only marginal similarity among HERV-taxa with one primer matching the sequence of the corresponding microarray capture probes [46,48]. Figure 3 shows the relative transcript levels of the selected HERV taxa S71pCRTK-1 (group HERV-T), E4-1 (group HERV-E), ERV9 and Seq59 (both group ERV9), and HERV-KC4 (group HML-10) in the HIV-1 infected cells compared to the uninfected control cells. Transcript levels of HERV subgroups S71pCRTK-1 (Figure 3A) and Seq59 (Figure 3C) were only slightly increased, whereas levels of E4-1 (Figure 3B), ERV9 (Figure 3C) and HERV-KC4 (Figure 3D) were up to 15fold higher in HIV-1 infected cells than in uninfected cells. This result was in agreement with the microarray data (Figure 2A). The cell lines with high HIV-1 production (KE37.1-IIIB and LC5-HIV) demonstrated higher HERV transcription than the non-productive TH4-7-5 cells. Thus, the results obtained by two independent methods indicate that persistent HIV-1 infection increases transcription of at least one member of each of 5 HERV subgroups and that transcription levels of these HERVs are related to HIV-1 production.
Figure 3

Relative transcriptional activity of selected HERV subgroups. Relative transcript levels of (A) HERV taxa S71pCRTK-1 (group HERV-T), (B) E4-1 (group HERV-E), (C) ERV9 and Seq59 (both group ERV9) and (D) HERV-KC4 (group HERV-K (HML-10)) were determined by qRT-PCR. The Y-axis shows the x-fold relative expression of HERV-transcripts in infected cells referred to uninfected cells. Relative transcription was quantified according to [85] and normalized to RNA Polymerase II (RPII) transcript levels. Standard errors for triplicate experiments are indicated.

HIV-1-specific siRNAs reverse HERV up-regulation

To demonstrate that the observed alterations are indeed associated with HIV-1 infection, we investigated if the up-regulated HERV transcription could be reversed by silencing of HIV-1 transcription using RNA interference assays. The siRNAs against HIV-1 transcripts were selected according to ter Brake and Berkhout [56]. An overview of the HIV-1 transcripts, which are silenced by the selected siRNAs is shown in Additional file 1A. The siRNA sigag is predicted to silence all gag and pol transcripts, sitat/rev all transcripts except nef, and sienv together with sinef all HIV-1 transcripts. HIV-1 contains three major RNA splice variants coding for all proteins. These RNAs harbor overlapping sequences making it impossible to design siRNAs that are unique for knockdown of individual proteins. An exception is sigag targeting a gag sequence that is exclusively present in unspliced, late mRNA. Contrary to expectation however, sigag has been shown to down-regulate all transcripts, possibly due to nuclear targeting of HIV-1 mRNAs prior to splicing [56]. As control, a non-silencing siRNA was used, and an experiment without siRNA (mock experiment) was performed to control for unspecific silencing effects by siRNAs in general and by the transfection reagent, respectively. The capacity of the siRNAs to inhibit HIV-1 production was tested in LC5-HIV cells. All HIV-1-specific siRNAs efficiently decreased levels of full-length HIV-1 transcripts (Additional file 1B) and of the Gag p24 protein (data not shown) 72 hours after siRNA transfection. The knock-down effect of these siRNAs on spliced HIV-1 transcript was not tested in this study, but has been demonstrated previously [56].

The five HERV taxa S71pCRTK-1, E4-1, ERV-9, Seq59 and HERV-KC4 activated by HIV-1 in previous experiments were analyzed by qRT-PCR 72 hours after transfection of the siRNAs. Figure 4 shows the relative transcription levels of the HERV subgroups in the HIV-1 infected HeLa cells (LC5-HIV) transfected with specific siRNAs against gag, rev, nef and env compared to control cells transfected with non-silencing siRNA. Knockdown of HIV-1 in LC5-HIV cells resulted in a loss of HERV transcription in four of five HERV subgroups (Figure 4A-D). Only Seq59, a subgroup of ERV9 elements (Figure 4C), appears to be only partially diminished. Thus, we can show that knockdown of HIV-1 transcripts by RNAi reverses activation of specific HERV elements in infected cells. Moreover, overexpression of a natural inhibitor of HIV-1 production, the Rev-interacting human protein family (Risp) [57], was found to reverse HERV activation in HIV-1 infected LC5 cells (Additional file 2). Taken together, our results indicate that HIV-1 infection is associated with the activation of several taxa of class I and class II HERVs.
Figure 4

Down-regulation of HIV-1 induced HERV activity by siRNAs targeting HIV-1 transcripts. LC5-HIV cells were treated with the RNAiFect transfection reagent (mock), non-silencing siRNAs (sin.s.) or with siRNAs against gag (sigag), rev (sirev), nef (sinef) and env (sienv). Relative transcript levels of (A) HERV taxa S71pCRTK-1 (group HERV-T), (B) E4-1 (group HERV-E), (C) ERV9 and Seq59 (both group ERV9) and (D) HERV-KC4 (group HERV-K (HML-10)) were determined by qRT-PCR. The Y-axis shows the x-fold relative HERV transcript levels in LC5-HIV cells transfected with non-silencing siRNA (sin.s) and HIV-1-specific siRNAs (sigag, sitat/rev, sinef, sienv) referred to uninfected control cells. The data were normalized to the house-keeping gene RNA Polymerase II (RPII). Standard errors for triplicate experiments are indicated.

Differential HERV-K (HML-2) transcription in de novo and persistently HIV-1 infected cells

Plasma of HIV-1 infected individuals has been reported to contain elevated levels of HERV-K (HML-2) RNA [38,42,43]. In our microarray experiments we observed a significant increase of HERVK (HML-2) transcription only in de novo infected cells but not in the persistently infected cell lines (Figure 2) suggesting that an up-regulation of group HERV-K (HML-2) proviruses occurs preferentially within a short period after infection. To investigate, which HERV-K (HML-2) loci contribute to the observed up-regulation, we cloned and sequenced HERV-K (HML-2) gag transcripts and combined the data with qRT-PCR analysis.

Since most commonly used primers designed to amplify HERV-K (HML-2) co-amplify HML-3 sequences [42], we generated new gag derived primers for qRT-PCR that are highly specific and amplify exclusively members of the HERV-K (HML-2) group. Analysis by qRT-PCR revealed an approximately 8fold higher overall level of HERV-K (HML-2) transcription in de novo HIV-1 infected LC5-RIC cells compared to uninfected cells, whereas in persistently infected LC5 cells the HERV-K (HML-2) transcript level increased only about 1.8fold above the transcript level in uninfected cells [58] (Figure 5). This data suggests that up-regulation of HERV-K (HML-2) proviruses may be largely restricted to de novo HIV-1 infection.
Figure 5

Transcriptional activity of HERV-K (HML-2) proviral loci in de novo and persistently infected cells. The Y-axis shows the x-fold relative expression of HERV-K (HML-2) gag transcripts in infected cells referred to uninfected cells. Relative transcription was quantified according to [85] and normalized to RPII transcript levels. HERV-K (HML-2) transcripts were amplified using gag-specific primers, cloned, sequenced and assigned to proviral loci as described previously [58]. For each HERV-K (HML-2) locus the relative cloning frequency of cDNA is shown as percentage of the total HERV-K (HML-2) transcription level determined by qRT-PCR.

To investigate the contribution of individual proviral loci to increased HERV-K (HML-2) transcription in HIV-1 infected LC5-RIC cells, HERV-K (HML-2) transcripts were amplified using the same HERV-K (HML-2)-specific forward primer as applied for qRT-PCR in combination with a downstream located reverse primer amplifying an about 650 bp gag gene derived PCR product. This gag region contains a sufficient amount of nucleotide differences to allow a clear discrimination between different proviral loci [58].

Sequence analysis of cloned RT-PCR products derived from uninfected cells showed predominant transcription of a single HERV-K (HML-2) locus on chromosome 11q23.3, ERVK-20. Transcripts from this locus comprise 94% and 85% of total transcripts in LC5 and LC5-RIC cells, respectively (Table 1, Figure 5). In addition, different HERV-K (HML-2) loci show minor activity in both cell lines. LC5-RIC cells are a subline of LC5 cells generated by introducing the CD4 receptor gene and a DsRED1 reporter, and therefore may show alterations of HERV transcription compared to the original LC5 cells. In persistently infected LC5-HIV cells an additional HERV-K (HML-2) provirus on chromosome 7p22.1, ERVK-6, is activated that presumably accounts for the approximately 1.8fold increase of HERV-K (HML-2) transcription observed by qRT-PCR (Figure 5). Interestingly, ERVK-6 has intact open reading frames for all retroviral genes [59]. In contrast to the single locus up-regulated in persistently infected cells, analysis of de novo HIV-1 infected LC5-RIC cells revealed five transcriptionally active HML-2 loci with ERV-K15 on chromosome 7q34 comprising about 75% of total transcripts (Table 1, Figure 5). In the T-lymphoma cell line KE37.1 the basal HML-2 transcription pattern (Table 2, Figure 5) resembles more that obtained with PBMCs from healthy persons (Additional file 3) than that of the epithelial LC5 cell line (Table 1, Figure 5). Persistently infected KE37.1-IIIB cells show predominant activation of a locus on chromosome 1q22, ERK-7 (Table 2, Figure 5). Taken together, these data demonstrate that activation of HERV loci by HIV-1 is also cell type-specific and may depend on epigenetic control of HERV loci differing in various cell types.
Table 1

Differential HERV-K (HML-2) transcription in de novo and persistently infected LC5 cells

Provirus a

Chromosome band

Location of amplicon in genome b

Number of clones (% cloning frequency)

   

LC5-RIC

LC5-RIC-HIV c

LC5

LC5-HIV d

ERVK-7e (c1_B, K102, K50a)

1q22

153870020–153870613

-

2 (7.1)

-

-

ERVK-18 (c1_C, K110, K18)

1q23.3

158928993–158929564

1 (2.1)

-

-

-

ERVK-3e,f (c3_B, K106, K68)

3q13.2

114232740–114233333

-

2 (7.1)

2 (2.2)

-

ERVK-4e (c3_C, K (I))

3q21.2

127093474–127094067

1 (2.1)

1 (3.6)

2 (2.2)

-

ERVK-6e,f (c7_A, K (HML-2. HOM), K108)

7p22.1

4604296–4604932

-

-

-

44 (47.3)

4595814–4596407g

    

ERVK-14e (c7_B)

7q22.1

104179245–104179826

1 (2.1)

-

-

-

ERVK-15 (c7_C, K (OLDAC004979))

7q34

141101009–141101702

-

21 (75.0)

1 (1.1)

-

ERVK-17e (c10_B)

10q24.2

101576433–101577026

-

2 (7.1)

-

-

ERVK-25e,f (c11_A, K36, K118)

11q22.1

101072651–101073244

3 (6.4)

-

-

-

ERVK-20 (c11_B, K37)

11q23.3

118103858–118104446

40 (85.1)

-

84 (94.4)

49 (52.7)

ERVK-21 (K (C12), K41, K119)

12q14.1

58728458–58729051

1 (2.1)

-

-

-

Total number of clones

47 (100)

28 (100)

89 (100)

93 (100)

aDesignation according to [87], aliases are in parentheses.

bAccording to the March 2006 assembly (NCBI36/hg18) of the human genome sequence at the Human Genome Browser [88].

c de novo infected LC5-RIC cells.

dpersistently infected LC5 cells.

eHuman-specific HERV-K (HML-2) proviruses [89].

fPolymorphic in the human genome [89].

gThe human reference genome sequence harbors a tandem provirus [90]. Due to the lack of sufficient sequence differences the detected cDNA sequence may stem from one or the other provirus.

Table 2

Differential HERV-K (HML-2) transcription in the uninfected and persistently infected human T-lymphoma cell line KE37.1

Provirus a

Chromosome band

Location of amplicon in genome b

Number of clones (% cloning frequency)

   

KE37.1

KE37.1-IIIB c

ERVK-1d,e (c1_A, K116, K4)

1p31.1

75617005–75617599

1 (2.9)

-

ERVK-7d (c1_B, K102, K50a)

1q22

153870019–153870613

18 (51.4)

40 (87.0)

ERVK-18 (c1_C, K110, K18)

1q23.3

158928865–158929429

7 (20.0)

-

ERVK-3d,e (c3_B, K106, K68)

3q13.2

114232739–114233333

1 (2.9)

1 (2.2)

ERVK-4d (c3_C, K (I))

3q21.2

127093473–127094067

-

-

ERVK-12 (c4_A, K5)

4q32.2

161800867–161801461

1 (2.9)

-

ERVK-10d (K107, K10, c5)

5q33.3

156024233–156024827

1 (2.9)

1 (2.2)

ERVK-9e (c6_A, K109, envK4)

6q14.1

78490569–78491163

-

1 (2.2)

ERVK-15 (c7_C, K (OLDAC004979))

7q34

141101012–141101702

6 (17.1)

2 (4.3)

ERVK-28

19q12

32827928–32828522

-

1 (2.2)

Total number of clones

35 (100%)

46 (100%)

aDesignation according to [87], aliases are in parentheses.

bAccording to the March 2006 assembly (NCBI36/hg18) of the human genome sequence at the Human Genome Browser [88].

chuman T-lymphoma cell line KE37.1 persistently infected with HIV-1IIIB/LAI.

dHuman-specific HERV-K (HML-2) proviruses [89].

ePolymorphic in the human genome [89].

To study the transcriptional activity of HERV-K (HML-2) proviruses in the time course of de novo HIV-1 infection, a subclone of the original LC5-RIC cells was infected with HIV-1IIIB/LAI. This subclone yields a high proportion of infected cells (Additional file 4) superseding the removal of uninfected cells by cell sorting. Although the LC5-RIC subclone shows a basal HERV-K (HML-2) transcription pattern that differs from that of the original LC5 as well as the parental LC5-RIC cells, infection with HIV-1 leads to a very similar HERV-K (HML-2) activation pattern (Table 3, Figure 6) compared to that of the infected parental LC5-RIC cells (Table 1, Figure 5). As in these cells, locus ERVK-15 (7q34) shows the highest increase of transcriptional activity. Furthermore, minor activation was also detected for ERVK-7 (1q22), which has been shown to be preferentially transcribed in persistently infected KE37.1-IIIB cells. After thirteen days a decline of HERV-K (HML-2) activity and a decrease of HIV-1 provirus copies was observed (Figure 6, Additional file 4), presumably due to HIV-1 cytotoxicity.
Table 3

Time course of HERV-K (HML-2) transcription in HIV-1 infected LC5-RIC cells

Provirus a

Chromosome band

Location of amplicon in genome b

Number of clones (% cloning frequency)

   

Day-0

Day-3

Day-13

Day-22

ERVK-7c (c1_B, K102, K50a)

1q22

153870020–153870613

4 (13.3)

9 (23.1)

3 (9.4)

6 (16.7)

ERVK-2 (c3_A, K11)

3p25.3

9869046–9869639

1 (3.3)

-

-

-

ERVK-3c,d (c3_B, K106, K68)

3q13.2

114232740–114233333

14 (46.7)

2 (5.1)

3 (9.4)

5 (13.8)

ERVK-4c (c3_C, K (I))

3q21.2

127093474–127094067

-

-

2 (6.3)

5 (13.8)

ERVK-6c,d (c7_A, K (HML-2. HOM), K108)

7p22.1

4604296–4604932

-

-

-

1 (2.8)

4595814–4596407e

    

ERVK-15 (c7_C, K (OLDAC004979))

7q34

141101009–141101702

8 (26.7)

25 (64.1)

19 (59.4)

19 (52.8)

ERVK-16 (c10_A, M3.8)

10p14

6913372–6913968

3 (10.0)

2 (5.1)

4 (12.5)

-

ERVK-17c (c10_B)

10q24.2

101576433–101577026

-

1 (2.6)

1 (3.1)

-

Total number o f clones

30 (100)

39 (100)

32 (100)

36 (100)

aDesignation according to [87], aliases are in parentheses.

bAccording to the March 2006 assembly (NCBI36/hg18) of the human genome sequence at the Human Genome Browser [88].

cHuman-specific HERV-K (HML-2) proviruses [89].

dPolymorphic in the human genome [89].

eThe human reference genome sequence harbors a tandem provirus [90]. Due to the lack of sufficient sequence differences the detected cDNA sequence may stem from one or the other provirus.

Figure 6

Time course of HERV-K (HML-2) in de novo HIV-1 infected LC5-RIC cells. The Y-axis shows the x-fold relative expression of HERV-K (HML-2) gag transcripts in infected cells referred to uninfected cells. RNA was isolated from LC5-RIC cells prior to infection and from cells infected with HIV-1IIIB/LAI at day 3, 13 and 22. Relative transcription was quantified according to [85] and normalized to RPII transcript levels. HERV-K (HML-2) transcripts were amplified using gag-specific primers, cloned, sequenced and assigned to proviral loci as described previously [58]. For each HERV-K (HML-2) locus the relative cloning frequency of cDNA is shown as percentage of the total HERV-K (HML-2) transcription level determined by qRT-PCR.

In contrast to HERV-K (HML-2), the transcription pattern of HERV-K (HML-3) elements detected with HML-3 env-specific primers is similar in de novo, persistently infected and in uninfected LC5 cells (Additional file 5). Transcripts of the two prevailing HERV-K (HML-3) loci 1q21.2 and 3q21.3 were found with cloning frequencies in the range of 40–50% and 17–30%, respectively, in persistently and de novo infected cells, as well as in uninfected cells. The 10 additional, minor active HERV-K (HML-3) loci likewise showed only slight transcription variation suggesting a less differentiated influence of HIV-1 infection on the HERV-K (HML-3) group.

Cellular transcription factors are potential mediators of HERV activation

To address the question, whether HERV transcription may be up-regulated via activation of cellular transcription factors by HIV-1 gene products, we stimulated Jurkat T-cells by treatment with PMA/Ionomycin or by CD3/CD28 antibody ligation [60]. PMA possesses structural similarity to diacylglycerol (DAG) and can therefore activate PKCθ and thus NF-κB in T cells. Ionomycin induces Ca2+ influx from intracellular Ca2+ storage compartments and therefore mainly influences the activation of NFAT. Crosslinking of the co-stimulatory receptor CD28 and the CD3 subunits of the T cell receptor by specific primary and secondary antibodies mimics the receptor aggregation, which under physiological conditions is induced by the T cell/APC (antigen presenting cell) contact. This leads to activation of antigen-receptor-specific signaling cascades.

Using RetroArray analysis, the HERV activation pattern of stimulated T-cells was compared with that obtained after HIV-1 infection (Figure 7 and 2). A variety of HERV groups derived from all three HERV classes was found to be up-regulated after addition of both stimuli, PMA/Ionomycin and CD3/CD28 (Figure 7). Interestingly, the transcription pattern in stimulated T-cells includes HERV groups also affected in de novo (HERV-E, ERV9, HERV-K (HML-2), HERV-K (HML-3)) as well as in persistently HIV-1 infected cells (HERV-T, ERV9, HERV-K (HML-3), HERV-K (HML-4), HERV-K (HML-10)). Since IL2 is a major target of the transcription factors induced by PMA/Ionomycin or CD3/CD28, we verified successful stimulation of the cells by measuring IL2 mRNA (Additional file 6). The data suggests that major transcription factors like NF-κB, NFAT and AP1 may be involved in the activation of at least some HERV taxa in HIV-1 infected cells.
Figure 7

HERV transcription profiles of PMA/ionomycin and CD3/CD28 stimulated Jurkat T-cells. False color mapping was used for image visualization. The house keeping gene HPRT served as a quality control and internal standard. Up-regulated HERV subgroups are indicated by red letters.

Discussion

Interactions between HIV and endogenous retroviruses in infected patients may have implications for intracellular defense mechanisms and immune response and thus may influence the pathogenic process in many ways (reviewed in [31]). However, the study of HIV-HERV interactions in clinical samples from HIV-1 infected individuals is associated with several problems. A major difficulty is the limited amount of HIV-1 infected cells. Analysis of the mean HIV-1 integrated DNA in CD4+ T-cells from individuals under antiretroviral therapy (ART) revealed less than 1100 copies per 106 cells [61,62], indicating infection frequencies < 0.2% of CD4+ T-cells. An additional problem is that basal HERV transcription in PBMCs may mask activation of HERVs by HIV-1. Several class I and class II HERV groups are typically transcribed in blood cells of healthy people [46,47,63]. In particular, transcripts of the HERV-K (HML-2) group have been identified in PBMCs derived from healthy individuals in several studies [64-66] in agreement with our recent results revealing transcription of at least 12 different HERV-K (HML-2) loci in PBMCs from healthy donors (Additional file 3). Finally, HERV transcription profiles may exhibit among individual variability independent of HIV-1 infection. In every tissue type investigated so far, we detected HERVs differentially transcribed between individuals in addition to the constitutively active HERV groups [51,53]. Therefore, blood samples of patients before infection with HIV-1 would be needed for an exact and reliable assessment of HIV-1 mediated HERV activation and these are usually not available.

To overcome these difficulties, we conceived a systematic study using well-defined cell culture systems consisting of various HIV-1 infected cell lines. This approach offers a much more homogenous genetic background for identification of HIV-1 associated changes in HERV transcription pattern than clinical samples and provides the appropriate controls to evaluate expression of HERVs in the absence of HIV-1 infection. We compared HERV transcription levels in three different persistently infected cell lines with the respective uninfected cells. In addition, we investigated the influence of HIV-1 on HERV activity in de novo infected cells. Activated transcription of several class I and class II HERV groups was demonstrated by RetroArray analysis and confirmed by qRT-PCR for five selected HERV subgroups (S71pCRTK-1, HERV-E (4–1), ERV-9, ERV9 Seq59 and HERV-KC4). The extent of HERV up-regulation roughly correlated with production levels of HIV-1 structural proteins in each cell line. Importantly, activation of HERV transcription was reversed by knock-down of HIV-1 transcript levels with HIV-1-specific siRNAs. These results indicate that HIV-1 infection can activate transcription of at least five HERV subgroups.

RetroArray analysis also showed considerable activation of HERV-K (HML-2) elements in de novo infected LC5 cells compared to persistently infected cell lines. This indicates that immediate responses of HERVs to HIV-1 infection may differ from long-term effects. Since the youngest and most active HERVs belong to the HERV-K (HML-2) group and HERV-K (HML-2) proviruses were reported previously to be associated with HIV-1 infection (reviewed in [31]), we examined HERV-K (HML-2) in more detail. A preferential activation of two loci (ERVK-7 and -15) on chromosomes 1q22 and 7q34 was observed in de novo infected LC5 cells, as well as in persistently infected KE37.1 cells, resulting in an 8fold to 10fold increase of overall HERV-K (HML-2) transcription. During three weeks after de novo infection of LC5 cells only slight alterations of the HERV-K (HML-2) transcription pattern were observed Persistently infected LC5 cells, however, showed a completely different HERV-K (HML-2) transcription pattern. The HERV loci activated in de novo infected cells are turned off, but a new provirus, ERVK-6 (7p22.1), is transcribed in addition to the ERVK-20 locus active in uninfected cells. The distinct difference between HERV-K (HML-2) loci transcribed in de novo and in persistently infected cells suggests different modes of interaction with HIV-1.

In contrast to the multiple HERV-K (HML-2) loci previously reported to be activated in HIV-1 infected patients, only few HML-2 loci are influenced by HIV-1 in persistently and de novo infected LC5 cells, as well as in the T-lymphoma cell line KE37.1. Contreras-Galindo et al. report detection of env transcripts derived from 34 different HERV-K (HML-2) loci in plasma of 7 HIV-1 patients [44]. This inconsistency might be explained by the use of LC5 cells in our in vitro experiments, where HML-2 transcription seems to be generally more restricted than in PBMCs (Additional file 3, see also ref. [66]), but also in KE37.1 cells, which display a basal HERV-K (HML-2) transcription pattern very similar to that of PBMCs of healthy persons, only 6 active loci were detected in persistently infected cells. However, also technical problems such as occurrence of genomic DNA from lysed cells in plasma of patients may influence the examination of blood samples [67,37]. A modest increase of class II (HERV-K) elements was also detected by Lefebvre et al. in SupT1 cells infected with a VSV-G pseudotyped HIV vector using SAGE sequencing of the whole transcriptome, but the obtained sequences could not be assigned to specific HERV-K loci or groups such as HERV-K (HML-2) in this study [68].

There are several possible explanations how HIV-1 infection may enhance HERV transcription in infected cells. First it may be a side effect that occurs when HIV-1 impairs cellular antiretroviral functions [69,70]. Viruses use various strategies to communicate with host cells and antagonize cellular restrictions. For example, HIV-1 Vif neutralizes the cytidine deaminase activity of APOBEC3G, and Vpu and Nef may counteract Tetherin. There is evidence that APOBEC proteins have contributed to hypermutation of HERV-K (HML-2) elements before they were genetically fixed in the human genome [71,72]. However, restriction by APOBEC3G as well as Tetherin would require de novo replication of HERVs and reintegration of mutated HERV sequences, which is highly unlikely.

Contreras-Galindo et al. reported detection of 15 recombinant HERV-K (HML-2) transcripts in plasma from 7 HIV-1 infected patients and postulated that these sequences are the products of in vivo recombinations [44]. We also detected some recombinant sequences in all cell types, where several HERV-K (HML-2) loci are active, including PBMCs from healthy donors (Additional file 3). However, these sequences could be easily discriminated from genuine in vivo recombinants and could be explained as artifacts generated by ex vivo recombination during cDNA synthesis and amplification [73]. In vivo recombination would require co-packaging of two different HERV-K (HML-2) transcripts in an infectious HIV-1 particle followed by re-infection and reverse transcription of HERV-K (HML-2) RNA by presumably HIV machinery only then involving template switches. In our opinion, this would be a very rare event. In previous experiments using various retroviral vector systems, we have shown that HIV-1 derived systems co-package almost no HERVs in contrast to particles produced by MLV based packaging cell lines, which contain considerable amounts of HERV transcripts [24]. Therefore, we regard activation of HERV transcription by inhibition of restriction factors requiring re-infection unlikely and not to explain the substantial increase of HERV transcripts derived from different class I and II HERV groups.

Another possibility is the direct or indirect stimulation of HERV LTR promoters by trans-activating HIV-1 proteins binding to responsive HERV sequences or activating/inactivating cellular transcription factors. LTRs of HIV-1 and HERVs share many common features including binding sites for host cell factors required for formation of transcription initiation complexes and sequences involved in post-transcriptional regulation. For example, the HIV-1 Rev protein binds to a response element located within the HERV-K (HML-2) LTR [32]. Binding sites for transcription factors such as AP1, SP1, YY1 or glucocorticoid response elements present in the HIV-1 LTR have been identified in many HERV LTRs (reviewed in [74]). In particular, HERV-K (HML-2) LTRs have been extensively examined in silico and numerous potential transcription factor binding sites and response elements were detected, albeit in most cases the biological functionality has still to be verified [75].

Our experiments using various siRNAs directed against HIV-1 transcripts clearly show that HIV-1 gene products are responsible for up-regulation of at least four different HERV groups, HERV-T, HERV-E, ERV-9 and HERV-K (HML-10) in persistently infected LC5 cells. Recently, a recombinant HIV-1 Tat protein was reported to increase HERV-K (HML-2) transcription in Jurkat T-cells and primary lymphocytes [76]. The authors suggest an involvement of transcription factors NF-κB or NF-AT. Moreover, stimulation of LTRs from different HERV groups, in particular HERV-H, HERV-W and HERV-K (HML-4) by the HTLV-1 Tax protein, another retroviral transactivator with HIV-1 Tat-like functions, has been demonstrated by co-transfection of Jurkat T-cells with HERV-LTR-luciferase constructs and a Tax expressing vector [77]. HIV-1 encoded regulatory proteins like Tat and Nef are known to activate nuclear factors including NF-κB, NFAT and AP1 and thus stimulate HIV transcription [78,79].

To test the hypothesis of an involvement of cellular transcription factors in HIV-1 mediated HERV activation we stimulated Jurkat T-cells to induce a variety of transcription factors including NF-κB, NFAT and AP1 using agents known to activate HIV-1 expresssion [80]. As expected, many HERV groups show increased transcript levels and, moreover, the pattern of activated HERVs includes all HERV groups activated in de novo and in persistently HIV-1 infected cells. From this data we conclude that induction of transcription factor expression plays a crucial role in HIV-1 mediated HERV activation.

Conclusions

In summary, our data demonstrate that productive HIV-1 infection is associated with alterations of HERV transcription patterns in human cells of different origin. Activation of HERV transcription is linked to levels of HIV-1 production in persistently infected cells and may be abrogated by HIV-1-specific siRNA indicating involvement of HIV-1 gene products in HERV activation. There are clear differences between HIV-1 activated HERVs in persistently and in de novo infected cells, suggesting differential modes of activation. Hence, identification of persistently HIV-1 infected cells by means of specifically expressed HERV transcripts/proteins as markers may be of diagnostic value. Furthermore, specific HERV proteins expressed by HIV-1 infected cells could serve as targets for adjuvant immunotherapies.

Methods

Cell culture

All cells were maintained in Biochrom VLE-RPMI 1640 with stable glutamine and 2.0 g/l NaHCO3 and 10% fetal calf serum (Seromed, Berlin, Germany). If applicable, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin was added to the culture. Cells were cultured in an H2O-saturated atmosphere with 5% CO2 at 37°C. The human epithelia cell line LC5 is a HeLa derivative [50,81], and LC5-HIV cells are LC5 cells persistently infected with HIV-1IIIB/LAI [81]. LC5-RIC is a clonal LC5 cell line expressing a fluorescent HIV reporter (DsRed) [55]. The astrocytic cell line 85HG66 was established from a human brain tumor. TH4-7-5 is a persistently with HIV-1IIIB/LAI infected cell clone of 85HG66 cells [49]. The human T-lymphoma cell line KE37.1 and KE37.1-IIIB, the corresponding cell line persistently infected with HIV-1IIIB/LAI, are described in [49]. All cell lines were authenticated by the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ). For de novo infection experiments LC5-RIC cells were infected with an HIV-1 patient isolate P-891 [54,55], cultured for three weeks and sorted for HIV positive cells. To study the time course of HIV-1 infection LC5-RIC cells were infected with HIV-1IIIB/LAI as described [54,55]. 3 days after virus exposure, cells were passaged for the first time and afterwards every 2–3 days when confluence reached 100%. Cells were cultured in the presence of selection antibiotics (Hygromycin B, Geneticin) to ensure ongoing overexpression of CD4 and the HIV-reporter construct [54,55].

P24-antigen analysis

Quantification of p24 antigen in infected cells was performed using the Coulter HIV-1-p24-Antigen-Assay (Beckman Coulter) as described previously [82]. 5% Triton-X was added to the whole-cell extracts and to the supernatants, centrifuged at 13.000 rpm for 5 minutes at room temperature and diluted with PBS to a final concentration of 0.5% TritonX. The p24 ELISA was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

RNA preparation

Total RNA was extracted using a Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit according to the manufacturers protocol. To remove genomic DNA contamination, all mRNA samples were treated with 1 U RNase-free DNase (Promega, Mannheim) per μg RNA. Subsequently, 25 ng of each mRNA preparation was tested by PCR with mixed oligo primers (MOP) [47] omitting the reverse transcription step. Only mRNA preparations negative for amplification products were used for subsequent reverse transcription and MOP multiplex PCR.

cDNA synthesis and microarray experiments

Reverse transcription of mRNA was performed with 1μg total RNA using Superscript II (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim) according to the manufacturers protocol. Three independent RNA isolations were used for microarray analysis. Amplification and labeling of the hybridization probes by MOP PCR, DNA microarray preparation, hybridization and post-processing of retrovirus-specific microarrays were performed as described previously [46,53]. Exclusively arrays showing reproducible hybridization patterns in triplicate subarrays were further evaluated. Hybridized microarrays were scanned using an Affymetrix Scanner GMS 418 (laser power settings, 100%; gain, 50%), and false color mapping was used for image visualization.

Quantification of HERV and HIV-1 transcription by quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR)

For amplification of pol (RT) sequences, the following HERV subgroup-specific pol primers were used for S71pCRTK-1 (group HERV-T): reverse primer 5’-GTACCCCAGGTAGGAAACTCTGGG-3’, forward primer 5’-CCCCTACCCTTTTTGGGG-3’); E4-1 (group HERV-E): reverse primer 5’-GCTTTCTTTCTGATCCTAGGCTGTG-3’, forward primer 5’-CTTTGGGGAGGCGTTGGCTCGAGACC -3’; ERV-9 (group ERV9): reverse primer 5’-CCTCAACTGTTTTAATGTCTTAGGGCGAGG-3’, forward primer 5’-CCCTCATCTGTTTGGTCAGGCCC-3’); seq59 (group ERV9): reverse primer 5’-GTGCTGAGGGCCCTGGTTCCTCTGG-3’, forward primer 5’- CAGGCACAGGCCCAAGATCTAGTTC-3’; HERV-KC4 (group HERV-K (HML-10)): reverse primer 5’-GAATCTCTTCTAATTTGAACCTTTTGAGG-3’, forward primer 5’-CCCACAGTTTGTCAAACTTTTGTAGGC-3’; HIV-1: reverse primer 5’-GTTCATAACCCATCCAAAGGAATGGAGG-3’, forward primer 5’-CCAAAGTAGCATGACAAAAATC-3’. In general, HERV-specific primers for quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) were designed in such a way that for each HERV one primer matched the capture probe sequences used in the corresponding microarray experiments whereas the second primer was located 100 to 150 base pairs upstream of the first primer [46]. For group HERV-K (HML-2), gag-specific primers were used for quantification (forward primer 5’-GGCCATCAGAGTCTAAACCACG-3’, reverse primer 5’-CTGACTTTCTGGGGGTGGCCG-3’) enabling a strict discrimination to other HERV-K groups such as HERV-K (HML-3). HIV-1 transcripts were amplified as described [83].

qRT-PCR was performed with the Roche LightCycler 1.5 System, using LightCycler FastStart DNA Master SYBR Green I-Kit and standard LightCycler protocol (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim). Cycling conditions were a 10 minutes denaturation step at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 10 seconds at 95°C, 5 seconds at 60°C, and 10 seconds at 72°C. RNA-Polymerase II (RPII) transcripts were analyzed as internal standard, using primers given in [84]. To confirm that specific products were amplified, the PCRs were further analyzed by melting curve analysis and by agarose gel electrophoresis. ∆C T-values were calculated as follows: C T (gene of interest) - C T (house keeping gene). The relative transcription was calculated by the 2-∆∆C T method [85]. Furthermore, extensive standardization of PCR reactions was initially performed through melting curve analysis of respective amplicons in order to minimize primer pair formation (data not shown). Absolute quantification of HIV proviral copies was performed as described previously [82].

RNA interference

For down-regulation of HIV-1 gene expression, HIV-1-specific silencing RNAs (siRNA) [56] and non-silencing control RNAs (sin.s.) were synthesized (Qiagen). Transfections were carried out using RNAiFect transfection reagent (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The day before transfection, 1 × 105 target cells were seeded per well of a 12-well plate. 2 μg siRNA per well was used for each transfection. After 24 hours, medium was removed, cells were washed with PBS and new medium was added. Gene silencing was monitored by p24 analysis of the supernatant 72 hours after transfection. Total RNA of siRNA treated cells was extracted using a Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit, reverse transcribed using the Superscript II Kit, and analyzed for HERV transcription using qRT-PCR.

Amplification, cloning, and sequence analysis of HML-2 and HML-3 transcripts

For amplification of HML-2 transcripts, PCR was performed using 2 μl of undiluted cDNA. HERV-K (HML-2)-specific primers gag_plus (5’-GGCCATCAGAGTCTAAACCACG-3’) and gag_minus (5’-GCAGCCCTATTTCTTCGGACC-3’) were used to generate gag gene derived PCR products [58,86]. For amplification of the more divergent HERV-K (HML-3) env genes a multiplex PCR was carried out using the following primer combinations: HML3FOR (5’-TGTCGAGACTGATGCTGAGG-3’), HML3FOR_a (5’-TGTCAAGACTGACTCTGTGG-3’), HML3FOR_b (5’-TGTTGAGACTGATGCTGAGA-3’), HML3FOR_c (5’-TGTTGAGACTGACACTGAGA-3’) and HML3REV (5’- AATGATATGGCCCGCTGTAG-3’), HML3REV_a (5’- AATGATATGGGTTGTTGTAG-3’), HML3REV_b (5’- AATAATATGGCCTGCTGTAG-3’), HML3REV_c (5’-TATGATATGGCCCGCTGTAG-3’), HML3REV_d (5’- CATGATATGGCCCGCTCTAG-3’), HML3REV_e (5’-GATGATATGCCTGCTGTAG-3’), HML3REV_f (5’- CTAGAGCAGGCCATATCAGT-3’). The 50 μl PCR mix contained 1× Expand High Fidelity buffer with MgCl2, 0.2 μM deoxynucleotides, and 2.6 U expand High Fidelity enzyme mix (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim). PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 minutes; 40 cycles at 94°C for 1 minutes, annealing at 57°C for 45 seconds, and elongation at 72°C for 1 minutes, followed by a final elongation step at 72°C for 10 minutes. HML-2-specific gag PCR products were purified (NucleoSpin Extract II, Macherey-Nagel, Düren), cloned into the pGEM T-Easy vector (Promega) and used to transform TOP10F bacterial cells. Plasmid DNA was isolated from insert-containing colonies according to the manufacturer’s protocol (NucleoSpin Plasmid, Macherey-Nagel, Düren). Subsequently, cloned HML-2 cDNAs were analyzed by Sanger sequencing using an Applied Biosystems 3730 × Capillary Sequencer (Seq-IT, Kaiserslautern, Germany). We mapped individual cDNA sequences to their respective genomic loci in the March 2006 (NCBI36/hg18) version of the human genome sequence by using BLAT at the Human Genome Browser, as described previously [58,86].

Stimulation of Jurkat T-cells with PMA/ionomycin and CD3/CD28 antibodies

2 × 106 Jurkat T-cells were incubated with phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) and ionomycin or with antibodies against CD3 and CD28 in conditional complete RPMI medium [60]. For stimulation with PMA/ionomycin 200 ng/ml PMA and 300 ng/ml ionomycin were added directly to the medium (1 ml) and cells were incubated for 3 hours. For stimulation through CD3/CD28 antibody ligation the following antibodies were used to stimulate 2 × 106 cells in 300 μl medium: 1 μg/ml anti-hCD3 (IgG2a), 5 μg/ml anti-hCD28 (IgG1), 2.5 μg/ml anti IgG1, and 2.5 μg/ml anti IgG2a. After 3 hours cells were placed on ice, washed once with cold PBS and RNA was isolated.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Ulrike Protzer for continuous support and encouragement and Ingrid Hülsmeyer, Ute Finkel and Johanna Götz for expert technical assistance.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Virology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health
(2)
Research Unit Cellular Signal Integration, Institute of Molecular Toxicology and Pharmacology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health
(3)
Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Mannheim, University of Heidelberg
(4)
Department of Human Genetics, Center of Human and Molecular Biology, Medical Faculty, University of Saarland
(5)
Department of Wildlife Diseases, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research
(6)
Assay Development and Screening Platform, Institute of Molecular Toxicology and Pharmacology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health

References

  1. Sverdlov E. Retroviruses and primate genome evolution. Georgetown, Texas, USA: Landes Bioscience; 2005.Google Scholar
  2. Belshaw R, Katzourakis A, Paces J, Burt A, Tristem M. High copy number in human endogenous retrovirus families is associated with copying mechanisms in addition to reinfection. Mol Biol Evol. 2005;22:814–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Belshaw R, Pereira V, Katzourakis A, Talbot G, Paces J, Burt A, et al. Long-term reinfection of the human genome by endogenous retroviruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:4894–9.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Mager DL, Medstrand P. Retroviral repeat sequences. In: Cooper D, editor. Nature encyclopedia of the human genome. D. Cooper edition. London, United Kingdom: Nature Publishing Group; 2003. p. 57–63.Google Scholar
  5. Evans LH, Alamgir AS, Owens N, Weber N, Virtaneva K, Barbian K, et al. Mobilization of endogenous retroviruses in mice after infection with an exogenous retrovirus. J Virol. 2009;83:2429–35.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dewannieux M, Harper F, Richaud A, Letzelter C, Ribet D, Pierron G, et al. Identification of an infectious progenitor for the multiple-copy HERV-K human endogenous retroelements. Genome Res. 2006;16:1548–56.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lee YN, Bieniasz PD. Reconstitution of an infectious human endogenous retrovirus. PLoS Pathog. 2007;3:e10.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Heslin DJ, Murcia P, Arnaud F, Van Doorslaer K, Palmarini M, Lenz J. A single amino acid substitution in a segment of the CA protein within Gag that has similarity to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 blocks infectivity of a human endogenous retrovirus K provirus in the human genome. J Virol. 2009;83:1105–14.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. de Parseval N, Lazar V, Casella JF, Benit L, Heidmann T. Survey of human genes of retroviral origin: identification and transcriptome of the genes with coding capacity for complete envelope proteins. J Virol. 2003;77:10414–22.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Jern P, Sperber GO, Blomberg J. Use of endogenous retroviral sequences (ERVs) and structural markers for retroviral phylogenetic inference and taxonomy. Retrovirology. 2005;2:50.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Galli UM, Sauter M, Lecher B, Maurer S, Herbst H, Roemer K, et al. Human endogenous retrovirus rec interferes with germ cell development in mice and may cause carcinoma in situ, the predecessor lesion of germ cell tumors. Oncogene. 2005;24:3223–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Denne M, Sauter M, Armbruester V, Licht JD, Roemer K, Mueller-Lantzsch N. Physical and functional interactions of human endogenous retrovirus proteins Np9 and rec with the promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger protein. J Virol. 2007;81:5607–16.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ruprecht K, Mayer J, Sauter M, Roemer K, Mueller-Lantzsch N. Endogenous retroviruses and cancer. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008;65:3366–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bannert N, Kurth R. Retroelements and the human genome: new perspectives on an old relation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101 Suppl 2:14572–9.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Perron H, Lazarini F, Ruprecht K, Pechoux-Longin C, Seilhean D, Sazdovitch V, et al. Human endogenous retrovirus (HERV)-W ENV and GAG proteins: physiological expression in human brain and pathophysiological modulation in multiple sclerosis lesions. J Neurovirol. 2005;11:23–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Balada E, Ordi-Ros J, Vilardell-Tarres M. Molecular mechanisms mediated by human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) in autoimmunity. Rev Med Virol. 2009;19:273–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hohenadl C, Germaier H, Walchner M, Hagenhofer M, Herrmann M, Sturzl M, et al. Transcriptional activation of endogenous retroviral sequences in human epidermal keratinocytes by UVB irradiation. J Invest Dermatol. 1999;113:587–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kelleher CA, Wilkinson DA, Freeman JD, Mager DL, Gelfand EW. Expression of novel-transposon-containing mRNAs in human T cells. J Gen Virol. 1996;77:1101–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Stengel S, Fiebig U, Kurth R, Denner J. Regulation of human endogenous retrovirus-K expression in melanomas by CpG methylation. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2010;49:401–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Frank O, Jones-Brando L, Leib-Mösch C, Yolken R, Seifarth W. Altered transcriptional activity of human endogenous retroviruses in neuroepithelial cells after infection with Toxoplasma gondii. J Infect Dis. 2006;194:1447–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Nellaker C, Yao Y, Jones-Brando L, Mallet F, Yolken RH, Karlsson H. Transactivation of elements in the human endogenous retrovirus W family by viral infection. Retrovirology. 2006;3:44.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ruprecht K, Obojes K, Wengel V, Gronen F, Kim KS, Perron H, et al. Regulation of human endogenous retrovirus W protein expression by herpes simplex virus type 1: implications for multiple sclerosis. J Neurovirol. 2006;12:65–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sutkowski N, Conrad B, Thorley-Lawson DA, Huber BT. Epstein-Barr virus transactivates the human endogenous retrovirus HERV-K18 that encodes a superantigen. Immunity. 2001;15:579–89.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Zeilfelder U, Frank O, Sparacio S, Schön U, Bosch V, Seifarth W, et al. The potential of retroviral vectors to cotransfer human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) from human packaging cell lines. Gene. 2007;390:175–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hsiao FC, Lin M, Tai A, Chen G, Huber BT. Cutting edge: epstein-barr virus transactivates the HERV-K18 superantigen by docking to the human complement receptor 2 (CD21) on primary B cells. J Immunol. 2006;177:2056–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hsiao FC, Tai AK, Deglon A, Sutkowski N, Longnecker R, Huber BT. EBV LMP-2A employs a novel mechanism to transactivate the HERV-K18 superantigen through its ITAM. Virology. 2009;385:261–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sutkowski N, Chen G, Calderon G, Huber BT. Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein LMP-2A is sufficient for transactivation of the human endogenous retrovirus HERV-K18 superantigen. J Virol. 2004;78:7852–60.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Tai AK, Luka J, Ablashi D, Huber BT. HHV-6A infection induces expression of HERV-K18-encoded superantigen. J Clin Virol. 2009;46:47–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Turcanova VL, Bundgaard B, Hollsberg P. Human herpesvirus-6B induces expression of the human endogenous retrovirus K18-encoded superantigen. J Clin Virol. 2009;46:15–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Assinger A, Yaiw KC, Gottesdorfer I, Leib-Mösch C, Soderberg-Naucler C. Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) induces human endogenous retrovirus (HERV) transcription. Retrovirology. 2013;10:132.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. van der Kuyl AC. HIV infection and HERV expression: a review. Retrovirology. 2012;9:6.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Magin C, Löwer R, Löwer J. cORF and RcRE, the Rev/Rex and RRE/RxRE homologues of the human endogenous retrovirus family HTDV/HERV-K. J Virol. 1999;73:9496–507.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Magin-Lachmann C, Hahn S, Strobel H, Held U, Löwer J, Löwer R. Rec (formerly Corf) function requires interaction with a complex, folded RNA structure within its responsive element rather than binding to a discrete specific binding site. J Virol. 2001;75:10359–71.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Yang J, Bogerd HP, Peng S, Wiegand H, Truant R, Cullen BR. An ancient family of human endogenous retroviruses encodes a functional homolog of the HIV-1 Rev protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:13404–8.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Newman EN, Holmes RK, Craig HM, Klein KC, Lingappa JR, Malim MH, et al. Antiviral function of APOBEC3G can be dissociated from cytidine deaminase activity. Curr Biol. 2005;15:166–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sheehy AM, Gaddis NC, Malim MH. The antiretroviral enzyme APOBEC3G is degraded by the proteasome in response to HIV-1 Vif. Nat Med. 2003;9:1404–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Laderoute MP, Giulivi A, Larocque L, Bellfoy D, Hou Y, Wu HX, et al. The replicative activity of human endogenous retrovirus K102 (HERV-K102) with HIV viremia. Aids. 2007;21:2417–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Garrison KE, Jones RB, Meiklejohn DA, Anwar N, Ndhlovu LC, Chapman JM, et al. T cell responses to human endogenous retroviruses in HIV-1 infection. PLoS Pathog. 2007;3:e165.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. SenGupta D, Tandon R, Vieira RG, Ndhlovu LC, Lown-Hecht R, Ormsby CE, et al. Strong human endogenous retrovirus-specific T cell responses are associated with control of HIV-1 in chronic infection. J Virol. 2011;85:6977–85.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Tandon R, Sengupta D, Ndhlovu LC, Vieira RG, Jones RB, York VA, et al. Identification of human endogenous retrovirus (HERV)-specific T cell responses in vertically HIV-1-infected subjects. J Virol. 2011;85:11526–31.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Jones RB, John VM, Hunter DV, Martin E, Mujib S, Mihajlovic V, et al. Human endogenous retrovirus K (HML-2) Gag- and Env-specific T-cell responses are infrequently detected in HIV-1-infected subjects using standard peptide matrix-based screening. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012;19:288–92.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Contreras-Galindo R, Kaplan MH, Markovitz DM, Lorenzo E, Yamamura Y. Detection of HERV-K (HML-2) viral RNA in plasma of HIV type 1-infected individuals. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2006;22:979–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Contreras-Galindo R, Almodovar-Camacho S, Gonzalez-Ramirez S, Lorenzo E, Yamamura Y. Comparative longitudinal studies of HERV-K and HIV-1 RNA titers in HIV-1-infected patients receiving successful versus unsuccessful highly active antiretroviral therapy. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2007;23:1083–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Contreras-Galindo RA, Kaplan MH, Contreras-Galindo AC, Gonzalez-Hernandez M, Ferlengui I, Giusti F, et al. Characterization of human endogenous retroviral elements in the blood of HIV-1-infected individuals. J Virol. 2012;86:262–76.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Bhardwaj N, Maldarelli F, Mellors J, Coffin JM. HIV-1 infection leads to increased transcription of human endogenous retrovirus HERV-K (HML-2) proviruses in vivo but not to increased virion production. J Virol. 2014;88:11108–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Seifarth W, Frank O, Zeilfelder U, Spiess B, Greenwood AD, Hehlmann R, et al. Comprehensive analysis of human endogenous retrovirus transcriptional activity in human tissues with a retrovirus-specific microarray. J Virol. 2005;79:341–52.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Seifarth W, Spiess B, Zeilfelder U, Speth C, Hehlmann R, Leib-Mösch C. Assessment of retroviral activity using a universal retrovirus chip. J Virol Methods. 2003;112:79–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Seifarth W, Frank O, Schreml J, Leib-Mösch C. RetroArray – a comprehensive diagnostic DNA chip for rapid detection and identification of retroviruses, retroviral contaminants, and mistaken identity of cell lines. In: Duncan SJ, Duncan SJ, Wiley PH, editors. Encyclopedia of DNA Research. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc; 2011.Google Scholar
  49. Brack-Werner R, Kleinschmidt A, Ludvigsen A, Mellert W, Neumann M, Herrmann R, et al. Infection of human brain cells by HIV-1: restricted virus production in chronically infected human glial cell lines. AIDS. 1992;6:273–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Schön U, Diem O, Leitner L, Gunzburg WH, Mager DL, Salmons B, et al. Human endogenous retroviral long terminal repeat sequences as cell type-specific promoters in retroviral vectors. J Virol. 2009;83:12643–50.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Frank O, Verbeke C, Schwarz N, Mayer J, Fabarius A, Hehlmann R, et al. Variable transcriptional activity of endogenous retroviruses in human breast cancer. J Virol. 2008;82:1808–18.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Jurka J, Kapitonov VV, Pavlicek A, Klonowski P, Kohany O, Walichiewicz J. Repbase update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;110:462–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Frank O, Giehl M, Zheng C, Hehlmann R, Leib-Mösch C, Seifarth W. Human endogenous retrovirus expression profiles in samples from brains of patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorders. J Virol. 2005;79:10890–901.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Helfer M, Koppensteiner H, Schneider M, Rebensburg S, Forcisi S, Muller C, et al. The root extract of the medicinal plant Pelargonium sidoides is a potent HIV-1 attachment inhibitor. PLoS One. 2014;9:e87487.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Kremb S, Helfer M, Heller W, Hoffmann D, Wolff H, Kleinschmidt A, et al. EASY-HIT: HIV full-replication technology for broad discovery of multiple classes of HIV inhibitors. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:5257–68.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Ter Brake O, Berkhout B. A novel approach for inhibition of HIV-1 by RNA interference: counteracting viral escape with a second generation of siRNAs. J RNAi Gene Silenc: Int J RNA and Gene Targeting Res. 2005;1:56–65.Google Scholar
  57. Vincendeau M, Kramer S, Hadian K, Rothenaigner I, Bell J, Hauck SM, et al. Control of HIV replication in astrocytes by a family of highly conserved host proteins with a common Rev-interacting domain (Risp). AIDS. 2010;24:2433–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Flockerzi A, Ruggieri A, Frank O, Sauter M, Maldener E, Kopper B, et al. Expression patterns of transcribed human endogenous retrovirus HERV-K (HML-2) loci in human tissues and the need for a HERV Transcriptome Project. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:354.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Mayer J, Sauter M, Racz A, Scherer D, Mueller-Lantzsch N, Meese E. An almost-intact human endogenous retrovirus K on human chromosome 7. Nat Genet. 1999;21:257–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Scharschmidt E, Wegener E, Heissmeyer V, Rao A, Krappmann D. Degradation of Bcl10 induced by T-cell activation negatively regulates NF-kappa B signaling. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:3860–73.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Boulassel MR, Chomont N, Pai NP, Gilmore N, Sekaly RP, Routy JP. CD4 T cell nadir independently predicts the magnitude of the HIV reservoir after prolonged suppressive antiretroviral therapy. J Clin Virol. 2012;53:29–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Chomont N, El-Far M, Ancuta P, Trautmann L, Procopio FA, Yassine-Diab B, et al. HIV reservoir size and persistence are driven by T cell survival and homeostatic proliferation. Nat Med. 2009;15:893–900.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Medstrand P, Lindeskog M, Blomberg J. Expression of human endogenous retroviral sequences in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of healthy individuals. J Gen Virol. 1992;73:2463–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Willer A, Saussele S, Gimbel W, Seifarth W, Kister P, Leib-Mösch C, et al. Two groups of endogenous MMTV related retroviral env transcripts expressed in human tissues. Virus Genes. 1997;15:123–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Sugimoto J, Matsuura N, Kinjo Y, Takasu N, Oda T, Jinno Y. Transcriptionally active HERV-K genes: identification, isolation, and chromosomal mapping. Genomics. 2001;72:137–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Brinzevich D, Young GR, Sebra R, Ayllon J, Maio SM, Deikus G, et al. HIV-1 interacts with human endogenous retrovirus K (HML-2) envelopes derived from human primary lymphocytes. J Virol. 2014;88:6213–23.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Esqueda D, Xu F, Moore Y, Yang Z, Huang G, Lennon PA, et al. Lack of correlation between HERV-K expression and HIV-1 viral load in plasma specimens. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2013;43:122–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Lefebvre G, Desfarges S, Uyttebroeck F, Munoz M, Beerenwinkel N, Rougemont J, et al. Analysis of HIV-1 expression level and sense of transcription by high-throughput sequencing of the infected cell. J Virol. 2011;85:6205–11.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Malim MH, Bieniasz PD. HIV Restriction Factors and Mechanisms of Evasion. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2:a006940.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Wolf D, Goff SP. Host restriction factors blocking retroviral replication. Annu Rev Genet. 2008;42:143–63.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Armitage AE, Katzourakis A, de Oliveira T, Welch JJ, Belshaw R, Bishop KN, et al. Conserved footprints of APOBEC3G on Hypermutated human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and human endogenous retrovirus HERV-K (HML2) sequences. J Virol. 2008;82:8743–61.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Lee YN, Malim MH, Bieniasz PD. Hypermutation of an ancient human retrovirus by APOBEC3G. J Virol. 2008;82:8762–70.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Flockerzi A, Maydt J, Frank O, Ruggieri A, Maldener E, Seifarth W, et al. Expression pattern analysis of transcribed HERV sequences is complicated by ex vivo recombination. Retrovirology. 2007;4:39.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Leib-Mösch C, Seifarth W, Schön U. Influence of human endogenous retroviruses on cellular gene expression. In: Sverdlov ED, editor. Retroviruses and primate evolution. Georgetown, Texas, USA: Landes Bioscience; 2005.Google Scholar
  75. Manghera M, Douville RN. Endogenous retrovirus-K promoter: a landing strip for inflammatory transcription factors? Retrovirology. 2013;10:16.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Gonzalez-Hernandez MJ, Swanson MD, Contreras-Galindo R, Cookinham S, King SR, Noel Jr RJ, et al. Expression of human endogenous retrovirus type K (HML-2) is activated by the Tat protein of HIV-1. J Virol. 2012;86:7790–805.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Toufaily C, Landry S, Leib-Mösch C, Rassart E, Barbeau B. Activation of LTRs from different human endogenous retrovirus (HERV) families by the HTLV-1 tax protein and T-cell activators. Viruses. 2011;3:2146–59.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Fortin JF, Barat C, Beausejour Y, Barbeau B, Tremblay MJ. Hyper-responsiveness to stimulation of human immunodeficiency virus-infected CD4+ T cells requires Nef and Tat virus gene products and results from higher NFAT, NF-kappaB, and AP-1 induction. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:39520–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Fiume G, Vecchio E, De Laurentiis A, Trimboli F, Palmieri C, Pisano A, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus-1 Tat activates NF-kappaB via physical interaction with IkappaB-alpha and p65. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:3548–62.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Spina CA, Anderson J, Archin NM, Bosque A, Chan J, Famiglietti M, et al. An in-depth comparison of latent HIV-1 reactivation in multiple cell model systems and resting CD4+ T cells from aviremic patients. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003834.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Mellert W, Kleinschmidt A, Schmidt J, Festl H, Emler S, Roth WK, et al. Infection of human fibroblasts and osteoblast-like cells with HIV-1. Aids. 1990;4:527–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Rothenaigner I, Kramer S, Ziegler M, Wolff H, Kleinschmidt A, Brack-Werner R. Long-term HIV-1 infection of neural progenitor populations. AIDS. 2007;21:2271–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Vincendeau M, Nagel D, Brenke JK, Brack-Werner R, Hadian K. Heterogenous nuclear ribonucleoprotein Q increases protein expression from HIV-1 Rev-dependent transcripts. Virol J. 2013;10:151.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Radonic A, Thulke S, Mackay IM, Landt O, Siegert W, Nitsche A. Guideline to reference gene selection for quantitative real-time PCR. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;313:856–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2 (−Delta Delta C (T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Laufer G, Mayer J, Mueller BF, Mueller-Lantzsch N, Ruprecht K. Analysis of transcribed human endogenous retrovirus W env loci clarifies the origin of multiple sclerosis-associated retrovirus env sequences. Retrovirology. 2009;6:37.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Mayer J, Blomberg J, Seal RL. A revised nomenclature for transcribed human endogenous retroviral loci. Mob DNA. 2011;2:7.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Kent WJ, Sugnet CW, Furey TS, Roskin KM, Pringle TH, Zahler AM, et al. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 2002;12:996–1006.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Subramanian RP, Wildschutte JH, Russo C, Coffin JM. Identification, characterization, and comparative genomic distribution of the HERV-K (HML-2) group of human endogenous retroviruses. Retrovirology. 2011;8:90.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Mayer J, Stuhr T, Reus K, Maldener E, Kitova M, Asmus F, et al. Haplotype analysis of the human endogenous retrovirus locus HERV-K (HML-2. HOM) and its evolutionary implications. J Mol Evol. 2005;61:706–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Vincendeau et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement