- Open Access
The mouse "xenotropic" gammaretroviruses and their XPR1 receptor
© Kozak; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
- Received: 19 October 2010
- Accepted: 30 November 2010
- Published: 30 November 2010
The xenotropic/polytropic subgroup of mouse leukemia viruses (MLVs) all rely on the XPR1 receptor for entry, but these viruses vary in tropism, distribution among wild and laboratory mice, pathogenicity, strategies used for transmission, and sensitivity to host restriction factors. Most, but not all, isolates have typical xenotropic or polytropic host range, and these two MLV tropism types have now been detected in humans as viral sequences or as infectious virus, termed XMRV, or xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus. The mouse xenotropic MLVs (X-MLVs) were originally defined by their inability to infect cells of their natural mouse hosts. It is now clear, however, that X-MLVs actually have the broadest host range of the MLVs. Nearly all nonrodent mammals are susceptible to X-MLVs, and all species of wild mice and several common strains of laboratory mice are X-MLV susceptible. The polytropic MLVs, named for their apparent broad host range, show a more limited host range than the X-MLVs in that they fail to infect cells of many mouse species as well as many nonrodent mammals. The co-evolution of these viruses with their receptor and other host factors that affect their replication has produced a heterogeneous group of viruses capable of inducing various diseases, as well as endogenized viral genomes, some of which have been domesticated by their hosts to serve in antiviral defense.
- Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
- Inbred Strain
- Infectious Virus
- House Mouse
- Laboratory Mouse
Classically defined host range subgroups of infectious mouse gammaretroviruses isolated from laboratory mice.
Pathogenicity in Laboratory Mice
M/Pmv (Pmv, Mpmv)
The host range of these 3 MLV subtypes maps to the receptor binding domains (RBDs) of their envelope (Env) glycoproteins, and their RBDs govern the ability of these viruses to interact with their cognate receptors [9–11]. While the E-MLVs use the mCAT-1 receptor for entry , the X-MLVs and P-MLVs both use the XPR1 receptor [13–15] (Table 1) and I will term the set of mouse viruses that use this receptor, X/P-MLVs. Host range differences among the X/P-MLVs are due to sequence polymorphisms in the viral env and in the host receptor gene. These genes evolved in concert, altering virus-receptor interactions and the biological properties of these viruses, and producing an unusually heterogenous set of retrovirus and receptor variants.
Analysis of X/P-MLVs in laboratory and wild mice has detailed their roles in pathogenesis, their acquisition as endogenous elements in the Mus genome, and their interactions with and co-option as host restriction factors. This review will describe the evolutionary history of these viruses with special emphasis on tropism changes, the involvement of these viruses in disease induction in mice, and host factors that affect their replication and their recent transspecies transmission to humans.
Approximately 37% of the Mus genome is comprised of retroelements, and one-third of these are endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) [16, 17]. ERVs represent germline proviral insertions generated by past retroviral infections. While the Class I ERVs that include the MLV ERVs constitute less than 1% of the mouse genome, attention has focused on this relatively small subgroup because of their relationship to the infectious and pathogenic C-type gammaretroviruses.
The MLVs and their endogenous ERV counterparts have the simplest of retrovirus genomes . The MLV ERV genomes contain protein coding sequences for the virus core proteins (gag), enzymes (pro, pol, in) and envelope (env) that are flanked by long terminal repeat sequences (LTRs) that regulate transcription. The gammaretroviruses lack the accessory proteins of immunodeficiency viruses like HIV-1, have only one zinc-finger in nucleocapsid and rely on a translational strategy that reads through the gag termination codon. Many gammaretroviruses also uniquely produce a second, larger and glycosylated form of the Gag precursor polyprotein that uses an alternate, upstream initiation codon [19–21].
All three host-range MLV variants are present as ERVs in laboratory mice, many of which are full-length, with apparently nondefective protein-coding regions. Infectious viruses of all three host range classes can be isolated from mice, but not all ERVs produce virus, and those that do differ significantly in the timing and circumstances of their expression. Chromosomal locations for many of these ERVs in common inbred mouse strains were determined by conventional genetic methods [22–24] and the completion of the mouse genome sequence has allowed for complete characterization of the ERVs carried by the C57BL mouse . ERV locations are, however, strain or strain-lineage specific; the various inbred strains carry multiple non-allelic provirus insertions [24, 26].
Ecotropic MLV ERVs (Emvs)
Distribution of active MLV ERVs and their expression in selected common strains of laboratory mice.
Laboratory Mouse Strainsa
Expressed MLV ERVsb
AKR, C58, HRS, PL, SL, F/St, C3H/Fg
BALB/c, DBA, RF, CBA, NZW, C57BR, C57BL, C3H/He, SJL
NFS, NIH Swiss, C57L, 129, NZB, SWR
C57BL, C57L, BALB/c, DBA, AKR, NZW, HRS
NFS, NIH Swiss, A, 129, SWR
Polytropic MLV ERVs (M/Pmvs)
There are up to 40 copies of P-MLV ERVs in the laboratory mouse genome [24, 33]. The P-MLV ERVs have been divided into two closely related subgroups that differ most notably by the presence or absence of a 27-bp segment in the proline rich domain of env. These 2 P-MLV ERV groups are termed polytropic (Pmvs) and modified polytropic (Mpmvs or mPTs), and there is a smaller subgroup named intermediate polytropic MLVs (iPT), identified in NFS/N mice [34, 35]. I will use the term M/Pmvs to refer to this subgroup of MLV ERVs collectively or when subtype is not known. Although the coding regions of many M/Pmvs have open reading frames , none are apparently capable of producing infectious virus; the reason for this is unknown, but may be due to accumulated mutations  or to LTR defects such as the presence of a 190 bp LTR insertion .
Despite the apparent inability of M/Pmvs to produce infectious virions, cell-to-cell transmission of this subgroup can be detected, and infectious P-MLVs can be produced in the presence of E-MLV infection. Thus, replicating E-MLVs can recombine with M/Pmv ERVs in mice to produce recombinant viruses with M/Pmv env sequences [35, 37–40]; these viruses generally have polytropic host range, but are usually transmitted in viremic mice as pseudotypes of E-MLVs [41, 42]. In the apparent absence of recombination, the transcribed products of M/Pmvs can also be packaged as homodimers into virions of exogenous ecotropic virus, and these "mobilized" M/Pmvs can infect cells, replicate in those new cells, and spread to other cells as pseudotyped virus . Another transmission mechanism allows P-MLVs to completely bypass the need for their cognate receptor. These viruses are able to use alternative receptors in the presence of the soluble RBD glycoprotein for that receptor. Thus, entry defective E-MLVs as well as P-MLVs, but not X-MLVs, can be "transactivated" in this way by E-MLV RBD [44, 45].
Xenotropic MLV ERVs (Xmvs)
Xmvs are present in 1-20 copies per mouse strain [33, 46]. The Xmvs in the sequenced C57BL genome are highly polymorphic, and phylogenetic analysis suggests that these Xmvs fall into 3 clades which may have resulted from 3 separate infections . Some of the laboratory mouse Xmvs produce high levels of virus and other Xmvs can be induced to produce virus, but most Xmvs are not readily capable of producing infectious virus (Table 2). Among the laboratory mice, two strains, NZB and F/St, have a high virus phenotype, producing high titers of X-MLV throughout most of their lives [2, 47, 48]. Other strains rarely produce infectious virus, but cells from many common strains can produce virus following chemical induction or stimulation of spleen cells by bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or in a graft versus host reaction [28, 29, 49, 50].
There are four active proviruses capable of producing virus in laboratory mice (Table 2). One of these proviruses, Bxv1, is a Chromosome 1 (Chr 1) locus sensitive to chemical induction or stimulation by LPS , and is carried by about one-third of the common strains of inbred mice . The Bxv1 provirus has been identified [46, 53], and is present in the sequenced C57BL genome . Expression of Bxv1 is low except in the F/St strain, where the high level of virus expression is linked to the major histocompatibility locus . The 3 additional active Xmvs found in laboratory mice have not been characterized. The high virus NZB mouse carries two loci neither of which maps to Chr 1 [55–57]. Nzv1 produces low levels of X-MLV, but Nzv2 is constitutively active . The fourth active Xmv was identified in MA/My mice, a strain that also carries Bxv1 . Other strains like NFS and SWR carry Xmvs but are rarely or not capable of producing infectious X-MLV [22, 33, 53] (Table 2).
MLV ERV produced proteins
Many ERVs produce viral proteins in the absence of infectious virus. Some of these proteins were initially identified as novel antigens on mouse lymphocytes. Two of the most extensively studied of these antigens, GIX and XenCSA, are Env glycoprotein determinants [58, 59]. These determinants can be detected in virus infected cells, and their expression in mice is associated with specific ERVs and is controlled by host genes linked to the major histocompatibility locus and the retrovirus restriction gene Fv1 [54, 60, 61].
MLVs in cell lines and passaged tumors
The presence of multiple ERVs in the genomes of all laboratory mice can create problems for the use of these animals or established mouse cell lines in research. Many cell lines in common use carry active ERVs, or ERVs that can become active after long term culture of these lines. For example, the macrophage cell line RAW264.7 produces infectious E-MLV and P-MLV . Also, various L cell derivatives like Clone 929 (ATCC CCL-1) and A9 (ATCC CCL-1.4) express Env glycoprotein and are either poorly infectible or completely resistant to infection by E-MLVs as well as P-MLVs (unpublished observations). Because Xmvs like Bxv1 can be induced by immune stimuli, including graft versus host reactions and B cell mitogens [49, 50], it is not surprising to find infectious X-MLVs in hybridomas, or in tumor cells passed in SCID or nude immunodeficiency mice, as many of the strains carrying these mutations also carry Bxv1.
Mus is not native to the Americas, but was introduced with human travelers. American house mice most closely resemble the western European M. domesticus in that they lack Emvs and carry multiple M/Pmv ERVs and few or no Xmvs . One exception to this is found in Lake Casitas, California, where mice carry multiple copies of Xmvs and M/Pmvs . These mice also carry an Emv subtype common to Asian mice [71, 74]. LC mice may thus represent a natural hybrid of European M. domesticus with M. castaneus mice that may have arrived in America with Chinese laborers and cargo.
Some of the wild mouse ERVs are active, and infectious viruses of xenotropic or atypical host ranges have been isolated from lymphoid tissues or cultured cells of Eurasian species and from mice trapped in California [57, 75–79] (Figure 2). M. molossinus carries multiple ERVs capable of producing X-MLVs , one of which has been identified as the active laboratory mouse Bxv1 Xmv . Bxv1 is found in some, but not all M. molossinus breeding lines, but has not been identified in the Xmv-positive progenitors of M. molossinus, M. musculus and M. castaneus. This indicates that the Bxv1 insertion arose relatively recently in the Japanese M. molossinus mice. The presence of Japanese mice among the fancy mouse progenitors of the laboratory strains [80, 81] also suggests that these strains acquired Bxv1 from Japanese mice. Other wild mouse species, like M. dunni and M. spretus, carry only M/Pmvs, and these ERVs, like their laboratory mouse counterparts, do not produce infectious virus. However, M. spretus can, like laboratory mice, produce infectious P-MLVs when inoculated E-MLVs recombine with M/Pmv ERVs .
Many laboratory and wild mice carry ERVs that can produce infectious MLVs, and some wild mouse populations also carry infectious MLVs that have not become endogenized [83, 84]. The various X/P-MLVs isolated from laboratory and wild mouse species differ phenotypically on the basis of host range, variable reactivity with anti-MLV antibodies, cross-interference, cytopathicity, and pathogenicity in mice. Sequence data for these viruses is limited, but comparisons of available env sequences indicate there is significant heterogeneity, particularly in the RDB of the Env glycoprotein. This region is marked by 3 hypervariable segments, VRA, VRB, VRC, where multiple substitutions and indels distinguish the prototypical P-MLVs and X-MLVs. In addition to these sequence polymorphisms, another source of variation comes from the fact that each infectious P-MLV is the product of a recombination between E-MLVs and different endogenous M/Pmvs, and the size of the recombination can vary [82, 85, 86].
Not all laboratory mouse P-MLVs have polytropic host range. Some of these recombinant viruses (R-XC-, SL3-2, GPA-V2, ecotropic recombinants) have ecotropic host range [9, 87–89]. These tropisms are governed by RBD substitutions that lie outside the major host range determinant for MLVs, VRA, which is the most 5' of the 3 variable regions of the env RBD [9, 11, 90]
Among the wild mouse isolates, X-MLVs from M. molossinus and M. castaneus, and P-MLVs from M. spretus resemble the laboratory mouse isolates in their restriction maps and biological properties [78, 91], but X/P-MLVs with atypical host range have also been isolated from wild mice. One such isolate, CasE#1 (or Cas E No. 1), was isolated from a wild-trapped California mouse . It resembles P-MLVs in its ability to produce MCF-type foci and in its interference properties, but, like X-MLVs, it fails to infect laboratory mouse cells and has novel receptor requirements [77–79]. Cz524 MLV was isolated from the wild derived M. musculus strain CZECHII/EiJ, and differs from both P-MLVs and X-MLVs in host range . The env genes of these two wild mouse isolates are not identical to laboratory mouse P-MLVs or X-MLVs, but are related to both [78, 79].
The X-MLV and P-MLV subgroups use the same XPR1 receptor for entry, although they were initially described as 2 host range groups because of their differential ability to infect mouse cells. This receptor was first identified as a P-MLV susceptibility gene and was mapped to distal Chr 1 . Subsequent studies showed that X-MLVs could infect cells derived from wild mice [93–95], and genetic crosses mapped this X-MLV susceptibility as well as the P-MLV resistance of M. castaneus to the same segment of distal Chr 1 [95, 96]. The conclusion that susceptibility to X-MLVs and P-MLVs is governed by a single gene was also supported by the observations that these viruses cross-interfere [77, 97], and that infection by X-MLVs in wild mice is reduced by Rmcf, a host gene that restricts P-MLV infection by receptor interference .
The XPR1 receptor for X-MLVs and P-MLVs has 8 putative transmembrane domains and 4 putative extracellular loops [13–15]. This multiple-membrane-spanning structure is a common feature of the receptors used by the gammaretrovirus family . While this suggests these viruses evolved from a common progenitor, this multi-membrane spanning structure is not representative of all retroviral receptors, some of which, like the lentivirus CD4 receptor and the receptors for alpha- and betaretroviruses have single TM domains . Although the host cell function of XPR1 has not been defined, the other gammaretrovirus receptors with known function have all been identified as transporters of small solutes like phosphate or amino acids . The XPR1 protein may have a similar function as it is homologous to the yeast SYG1 and plant PHO1 genes, which have roles in signal transduction and phosphate sensing and transport, respectively . Recent work has indicated that XPR1 is upregulated following activation of the NF-κB RANKL-RANK signaling pathway in osteoclastogenesis .
All of the viruses that use XPR1 are sensitive to mutational changes in both ECL3 and ELC4, suggesting that residues in these ECLs contribute to a single virus attachment site [78, 79, 101]. Thus, Xpr1 mutants with substitutions in ECL3 but identical ECL4 sequences produce receptors with differential sensitivities for P-MLVs and for the CasE#1 and Cz524 viruses. These same viruses also differ in their infectivity for cells with Xpr1 m , Xpr1 c and Xpr1 sxv , which have identical ECL3 sequences but different deletions in ECL4. The requirement for residues in two XPR1 loops for receptor function is not unusual as other receptors require multiple domains . While these multiple domains in several other retroviral receptors have distinctive roles in virus attachment and entry [105, 106], this has not been shown to be the case for the XPR1 ECL3 and ECL4 domains.
The 5 functionally distinct mouse XPR1 receptor variants are found in different mouse lineages. The species and geographic distribution of these variants indicate that much of this receptor variation is coincident with exposure to MLVs . Most Mus species carry the most permissive XPR1 variant, Xpr1 sxv , which persisted in Mus through much of its evolutionary history (Figure 1). The species with Xpr1 sxv either lack X/P-MLV ERVs or carry only M/PMV ERVs that are not known to produce infectious virus. The 4 restrictive receptor alleles appeared at two distinct time points in Mus evolution. Xpr1 p appeared about 7.5 MYA, shortly after the divergence of Mus from other Murinae [63, 64], and there is no evidence that the mice with this restrictive receptor were exposed to MLVs as they lack MLV ERVs . The other 3 restrictive Xpr1s arose later, in the house mouse complex. This roughly coincides with the acquisition of X/P-MLV ERVs (Figure 1). Two of these 3 restrictive house mouse variants, Xpr1 m and Xpr1 c , like the presence of Xmv sequences in these species, show an apparent species-wide distribution , suggesting these variants provided a survival advantage.
Sequence comparisons of Xpr1 orthologues from Mus and other rodent species indicate that there is substantial polymorphism in the short, virus-binding 13 residue ECL4. This region contains 3 residues that are conserved in all mammalian XPR1 orthologues, but these residues do not contribute to receptor function . While ECL4 sequence variation is due largely to replacement mutations, the three restrictive alleles found in virus-infected house mice, Xpr1 m , Xpr1 n , Xpr1 c , all carry deletions in this region (Figure 5) [101, 102]. The deletions are all different and no deletions in this region are found in other mouse or rodent species, or in any mammalian Xpr1 orthologue. Either the 6 residues involved in these deletions are critical for entry as has been shown for some of them, or decreasing the size of the ECL4 loop may effectively disable receptor function.
The first Xpr1 allele to be recognized, Xpr1 n , was identified in X-MLV resistant laboratory mice, but Xpr1 n is not universal among the common inbred strains of laboratory mice. These widely used common strains were developed largely by William Castle and C. C. Little from fancy mice provided by hobbyists, especially Abbie Lathrop . While these Lathrop/Castle/Little strains have a shared ancestry reflected in their reduced genetic diversity compared to Mus species [107, 108], the various lineages and strains differ in their susceptibility to virus induced disease, and in their ability to produce infectious MLVs or viral proteins (Table 2). While some of these differences can be explained by the presence of ERVs with different levels of activity, receptor variations could also be important factors in these different phenotypes.
While Xpr1 n is carried by the majority of laboratory mice, Xpr1 sxv , which encodes the permissive receptor, has now been identified in several common inbred strains. Cells from these strains can be infected with X-MLV . One of the strains carrying Xpr1 sxv , F/St, is one of the two strains that produce high levels of X-MLVs throughout life (Table 2). The role of the receptor in this phenotype is unclear; however, as F/St viremia requires genes on Chr 17 near the major histocompatibility locus and in the segment of distal Chr 1 which carries the active Xmv provirus Bxv1, as well as Xpr1 [47, 54].
Inbred strains derived from various wild mouse species are available that carry all 4 of the wild mouse Xpr1 variants as well as Xpr1 n . These strains can, in principle, be used to determine if receptor-mediated secondary spread affects virus levels in mice carrying active proviruses like Bxv1. These mice can also be used to develop models to describe the time course, tissue tropism and pathogenic consequences of exogenous infection by the different X/P-MLV host range subtypes, and to determine whether receptor variants affect the type of recombinant viruses that appear.
Infectivity of X/P-MLVs and XMRV on cells of mammalian species
Guinea pig JH4
Chinese hamster Lec8
Sequence comparisons of coding and non-coding domains of XMRV and 5 full length gammaretrovirus genomes.
DG75 X-MLV AF221065
MCF1233 P-MLV U13766
AKV E-MLV J01998
The XMRV virus and X/P-MLV sequences found in humans may have been acquired directly from mice, or after transmission from mice to another species in contact with humans. If there is direct transmission from infected mice, this could be reflected in the geographic distribution of virus and/or receptor type in mice and the worldwide incidence of prostate cancer. Studies have reported very different rates of XMRV detection in prostate cancer patients (reviewed in ), and while these differences may have technical explanations, it is also possible that some of these differences are due to geographic differences in exposure to XMRV. The highest rates of prostate cancer are found in the U.S. and lowest rates are found in Asian countries like Japan, India and China . Rates in Europe are lowest in Eastern European countries. This distribution generally corresponds to the distribution of Xpr1 receptor variants in mouse populations; the most permissive allele, Xpr1 sxv , is found in high tumor incidence areas, and the most restrictive allele, Xpr1 m , is found in low tumor areas like Japan and eastern Europe. Mice in low tumor areas of Asia also carry receptor blocking genes  further indicating that these mice might be poor candidates for zoonotic transmission to humans. While these observations are suggestive of direct transmission between mice and man, it should also be noted that mice in areas of high tumor incidence are not known to carry infectious X/P-MLVs or expressed MLV ERVs.
The transmission of XMRV to humans was likely accompanied by adaptive changes, and the observed sequence and phenotypic differences of XMRV relative to the X/P-MLVs have focused particular attention on the glycogag leader region, LTR and env. XMRV carries unusual deletions in glycogag, a region that in E-MLV influences virus release and sensitivity to interferon  and also inhibits the activity of the host cell antiretroviral factor APOBEC3 . XMRV differs from MLVs in its affinity for and efficient replication in prostate cells, and this has been attributed to the glucocorticoid response element in the XMRV LTR U3 [127–129]. Finally, XMRV has a novel host range and receptor requirements that distinquish it from the mouse X/P-MLVs. Thus, the XPR1 receptor determining residues K500 and T592 produce equivalent receptors for X-MLV but not for XMRV . Also, while the mouse X-MLVs are generally able to infect all mammals, XMRV is uniquely restricted by Chinese hamster and gerbil cells (Table 3), a restriction associated with sequence differences in the receptor determining region of Xpr1 ECL4 . These multiple XMRV differences may represent adaptations acquired through contact with humans or with an as yet undiscovered species before transmission to humans.
The detection of XMRV and P-MLVs in various human patient groups and in blood donors raises questions about the pathogenic and mutagenic potential of these viruses in humans and concerns about the safety of the blood supply. While the involvement of these viruses in human disease is still under investigation, the MLVs were recognized as disease-inducing agents in mice almost 60 years ago . Although most MLVs are generally non-pathogenic or poorly pathogenic in mice, MLVs can and do cause disease in their natural hosts, and the induction of disease can involve X-MLVs and P-MLVs as well as E-MLVs.
Mouse strains carrying active Emvs, like AKR, HRS, and C58, have a high incidence of spontaneous lymphomas, and mice inoculated with specific MLVs can develop diseases such as lymphocytic leukemia, erythroleukemia, immunodeficiencies, and neurological diseases. The naturally occurring and induced neoplastic diseases are generally induced, following a long latency period, by insertional mutagenesis. In this process, novel virus integrations activate genes involved in growth regulation or inactivate tumor suppressor genes [130, 131]. The established role of insertional mutagenesis in MLV-induced disease prompted the characterization of XMRV insertion sites in human prostate cancers . While no common insertion sites were identified near recognized proto-oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes, XMRV integrations were found near cancer breakpoints, common fragile sites, microRNAs, and cancer-related genes.
In mice, MLV-induced neoplastic disease is often associated with the de novo generation of infectious and pathogenic P-MLVs. The disease process generally begins with the establishment of chronic infection with E-MLVs. These viruses can recombine with M/Pmvs and Xmvs to generate recombinant infectious virus with P-MLV host range and increased virulence [133, 134]. These P-MLV recombinants can be cytopathic, which is why they were initially termed mink cell focus-forming viruses or MCF MLVs . Although not all virus-induced diseases are accompanied by the generation of P-MLV recombinants, the importance of MCF MLVs in the disease process is supported by the fact that these recombinants are found in lymphoid tissues of preleukemic mice and can be found in tumors as infectious virus and novel integrations . Also, inoculation of neonatal AKR mice with MCF virus accelerates the appearance of thymomas , and disease is restricted in mice carrying the Rmcf resistance gene that inhibits replication of P-MLV  or in mice inoculated with genetically altered viruses that cannot participate in MCF production .
The recombinations that generate infectious pathogenic P-MLVs involve at least two segments of the viral genome, env and LTR. The LTR sequences are contributed by the active Xmv, Bxv1 [53, 139], and the LTRs of AKR mouse MCFs have duplicated enhancer regions not found in the endogenous Bxv1 proviral sequence . The recombinant env segment in MCF MLVs can vary due to the sequence of the participating M/Pmv  as well as the size of the recombinant segment. Recombinational breakpoints in the MCF env tend to cluster in 2 segments of the 3' half of SUenv or in the 5' end of TMenv [82, 85, 86].
The role of the recombinant env genes in the disease process is incompletely defined, but these substitutions can contribute to the target cell specificity and disease type induced by MCF MLVs. The most well-studied example of disease mediated by viral Env is the rapid erythroleukemia induced by Friend SFFV, a replication-defective MCF-type recombinant. SFFV encodes a unique 52/55 kDa Env-related protein that functions as an oncogene and induces disease by activating signal transduction pathways associated with the erythropoetin receptor and the receptor tyrosine kinase Stk [140–142]. For other pathogenic MCF MLVs, Env may support the in vivo progression of tumors by hampering the immune response. In some cases, Env substitutions may facilitate virus evasion of the immune system , or the ERV-derived env genes expressed in tumors may contribute to a T-cell mediated subversion of immune surveillance that allows for tumor cell proliferation [144, 145].
Preleukemic thymuses can contain large amounts of unintegrated MCF MLV DNA resulting from failure to establish superinfection interference [135, 146]. Such superinfections have been associated with cytopathic killing by other pathogenic retroviruses such as HIV and ALV [147, 148], and superinfection by MCF results in lymphocyte depletion in the thymus of infected mice . This depletion may result from endoplasmic reticulum stress induced apoptosis . The ability of MCF MLVs to evade superinfection interference is unusual since other MLVs effectively prevent multiple infections by receptor downregulation. This phenomenon may be explained by two properties of the MCF Env. First, like some other pathogenic retroviruses, MCFs may have lower receptor-binding affinity [45, 102]. Second, multiple infections can result from the ability of MCFs to use the E-MLV receptor for entry in the presence of soluble E-MLV Env .
Host restriction factors that inhibit replication of gammaretroviruses.
+ (Rmcf genes)
Xpr1receptor polymorphism and glycosylation blocks to entry
Receptor polymorphisms can clearly provide an especially effective antiviral defense. As already noted, 4 of the 5 XPR1 receptor variants in Mus restrict two or more viruses in the X/P-MLV family. These restrictions result from deletion mutations or replacements that have been shown to display a pattern of positive selection suggesting an evolutionary history of genetic conflicts . Furthermore, 3 of the 4 naturally occurring restrictive receptor alleles evolved in virus infected mice, suggesting that these variants provided a survival advantage. Additional restrictive Xpr1 variants are found in non-Mus mammals  (Table 3).
Entry can also be blocked by factors that interfere with receptor function. Glycosylation of cellular proteins is associated with resistance to E-MLVs in rodent cells and X-MLVs in Chinese hamster cells [151–153]. The glycosylation block in hamster cells does not affect all X/P-MLVs; inhibition of glycosylation relieves resistance to most X-MLVs, but not to P-MLVs or to XMRV . Although the XPR1 protein contains multiple sites for N-linked glycosylation including several in the ECL3 receptor determining region, it is not clear whether the glycosylation entry block affects the receptor or another as yet unidentified glycoprotein.
Leukemia virus inactivating factor (LVIF)
Mice produce a serum factor, leukemia virus interfering factor (LVIF), that inactivates X-MLVs . This factor is stable when exposed to acid pH, ether, proteases and temperature extremes . LVIF is separable from immunoglobulin, is found in the lipoprotein fraction of serum and is sensitive to antiserum to apolipoproteins [156, 157]. This factor inactivates X-MLVs and P-MLVs but not E-MLVs or the wild mouse amphotropic MLVs. LVIF is therefore not equivalent to the human serum factor responsible for the complement-mediated lysis of MLVs and other retroviruses [158, 159]. LVIF is produced by some but not all mouse strains, and genetic crosses between these strains show that LVIF is controlled by a single locus that maps to distal Chr 10 . The gene responsible for this factor has not been identified.
ERVs that interfere with exogenous infection
The mouse genome contains several resistance genes associated with production of MLV Env glycoproteins that are thought to restrict virus through receptor interference. These genes include Fv4, which blocks E-MLVs , and the genes Rmcf and Rmcf2 which restrict X/P-MLVs and, in the case of Rmcf, inhibit MCF MLV-induced disease [124, 162–164]. Specific ERVs have been mapped to these resistance genes all of which are defective for virus production but have intact env genes: Fv4 and Rmcf have major deletions [161, 165], and Rmcf2 has a stop codon that prematurely terminates integrase . Fv4, Rcmf, and Rcmf2 reduce or downregulate activity of their cognate receptors, and Fv4 additionally has a defect in the fusion peptide of the TMenv, so incorporation of this Env into virions in virus infected cells results in their reduced infectivity .
There is evidence of additional receptor blocking genes in M. castaneus. Three breeding lines of this species show similar restriction of P-MLV infection. Two of these lines, CAST/Rp and CAST/EiJ, carry Rmcf2. Backcross mice of the third line, CAST/Ncr, show evidence of two unlinked dominant resistance genes (#resistant/total = 87/123 = 0.71, χ2 = 1.2, p = 0.3), and neither of these genes maps to Chr 5 (Rmcf) or Chr 18 (Rmcf2) (unpublished data). These loci, together with Fv4 and Rmcf2, may therefore be representative of a larger set of interference genes found in virus infected mouse species. That such co-opted Env genes are effective as host antiviral factors is confirmed by the identification of comparable interfering env genes in chickens, sheep and cats [167–169].
Fv1 is the oldest known retrovirus resistance gene  and represents a co-opted ERV sequence related to the gag gene of MuERV-L, a Class III ERV that is active in mice, but has no infectious virus counterparts [171, 172]. The Fv1 sequence is found only in mice, and was acquired shortly after the origin of the Mus genus . The laboratory mouse Fv1 has three well-characterized restriction alleles, and there are additional Fv1-like restrictions found in inbred strains and wild mouse species [173–176]. The three major laboratory mouse alleles, termed Fv1 n , Fv1 b , and Fv1 nr produce characteristic patterns of resistance to N-, B-, and NR-tropic MLVs. Cells with the Fv1 null allele are nonrestrictive [94, 175], and NB-tropic viruses are not restricted by Fv1. Fv1 targets the virus capsid; the major determinant that distinguishes N- and B-tropic viruses is at CA position 110, but other target residues in this CA region have also been identified [176–180].
Because X-MLVs fail to infect cells of many laboratory mice, early studies used pseudotypes and recombinant viruses to suggest that X-MLVs are subject to Fv1 restriction [181, 182]. Groom and colleagues  have more recently demonstrated that XMRV is unusual in that it is restricted in cells expressing either Fv1 n or Fv1 b . Infection of X-MLV susceptible inbred strains suggests that XMRV is somewhat more sensitive to Fv1 n , and also indicates that various mouse X-MLVs can be restricted by Fv1 . XMRV carries the Fv1 n restricted residue at capsid target site 110, but its sensitivity to both Fv1 n and Fv1 b and the presence of additional substitutions in its CA gene suggest that the Fv1 target is more complex than previously appreciated.
APOBEC3, like Fv1, is responsible for post-entry restriction of retroviral infection [184, 185]. The mouse and human APOBEC3 genes are under strong positive selection suggesting an antiviral role in evolution [186, 187]. There are 7 human APOBEC3 genes with differing antiviral activity against HIV-1 as well as MLVs; the single mouse APOBEC3 gene blocks HIV-1 and various mouse retroviruses [188–190]. mAPOBEC3 can restrict E-MLVs, and this gene maps to the site of the Friend virus restriction factor Rfv3 [191, 192], a gene that influences the duration of viremia in virus-infected mice . Pmvs but not Xmvs in the sequenced mouse genome show mutational patterns consistent with mAPOBEC3 silencing at the time of integration . The sensitivity of infectious X/P-MLVs to APOBEC3 has not been determined, but XMRV is sensitive to inhibition by A3G, but is less sensitive or insensitive to A3A, A3B, A3C, A3F and A3H. XMRV is also more sensitive to mAPOBEC3 than is Moloney E-MLV [183, 194].
The 2 laboratory mouse alleles of mAPOBEC3 vary in their restriction of Friend E-MLV replication and virus-induced disease, and differ in protein sequence, splicing pattern and expression levels [187, 191, 192, 195]. The more antiviral allele of C57BL mice shows significantly higher levels of expression in mouse tissues [191, 195], and this allele contains an Xmv LTR inserted into an intron . This insertion introduces an intact LTR transcriptional enhancer, and all species and strains with this LTR show elevated mAPOBEC3 expression. This Xmv, acquired in virus-infected mice , may thus represent another example of an ERV sequence that is co-opted by the virus-infected host for an antiviral function, like Fv1 and Rmcf.
Tetherin, also termed BST2, CD317 or HM1.24, is an interferon-inducible host factor that blocks the release of enveloped viruses by tethering budding particles to the cell surface . Tetherin can be antagonized by the VPU accessory protein of HIV-1 or by the Nef protein of SIV or by the envelope glycoproteins of various immunodeficiency viruses [197–201]. The effectiveness of these viral protein antagonists is species specific , and these viral antagonists target different sites in tetherin . Mouse E-MLV is subject to restriction by tetherin , and while the sensitivities of mouse X/P-MLVs to this host factor are unknown, XMRV has now been shown to be sensitive to human, monkey and mouse tetherins . XMRV, as a simple gammaretrovirus, lacks the accessory proteins of the immunodeficiency viruses that antagonize tetherin action, and its Env glycoprotein does not interfere with tetherin activity .
Multiple examples of xenotropism exist among the retroviruses. In addition to X-MLV, viruses that fail to infect cells of their apparent "home" species include the cat RD114-related viruses [203, 204], GALV restriction in mice [205, 206], and restrictions of avian leukosis viruses . However, a half century of work on the MLVs and the availability of multiple inbred strains and wild mouse species have provided a unique look at the natural history of this particular virus-host relationship. The picture that emerges indicates that these X/P-MLVs were acquired as endogenous elements by Mus species with permissive receptors, and subsequent co-evolutionary modifications produced, among other adaptive phenotypes, "xenotropic" MLVs. The receptor mutations responsible for resistance to these X-MLVs were only recently acquired, and these restrictive receptors are only found among the inbred strains descended from early 20th century fancy mouse colonies. It is now clear that the term "xenotropic" is somewhat of a misnomer for mouse viruses that actually infect cells of all Mus species and many common strains of laboratory mice, and that infect more non-Mus mammals than the so-called broad host range polytropic MLVs.
The interacting interfaces of host and pathogen are co-evolutionary battlegrounds, and the effects of the ratchet-like mutational process affecting these entities are particularly obvious for restriction factors like Xpr1 and Fv1. The battleground at the cell surface has produced at least 6 host range X/P-MLV variants that interact with different but overlapping sets of determinants on the XPR1 receptor. At the same time, other factors likely contribute to diversifying selection on the X/P-MLV viral Env glycoprotein, such as the Rmcf-type interfering ERVs and the inactivating LVIF serum factor. The resulting Envs not only vary in tropism, but these viruses have also evolved alternative mechanisms of transmission. Although germline PMV ERVs are effectively silenced, and the Env glycoproteins of infectious recombinant P-MLVs have narrow receptor requirements and reduced receptor binding efficiency, these multiple mechanisms ensure their transmission and also contribute to pathogenicity.
MLV ERVs, as part of the host genome, are also shaped by evolutionary processes. ERV insertions introduce novel regulatory and protein coding sequences into the host genome. While most are silenced, some are co-opted for cellular functions, and the most easily recognized of these domesticated ERVs are those that are linked to antiviral functions. Such ERVs include the oldest recognized restriction factor, Fv1,  as well as X/P-MLV ERV insertions that include the multiple Rmcf-like interference genes, and regulatory elements like the mAPOBEC associated Xmv LTR.
The worldwide distribution of mice that carry MLVs and the broad host range of the X-MLVs suggest that we are only beginning to describe what may be common and widespread interspecies transmissions. The phenotypic diversity among the MLVs doubtless influences the likelihood of their transspecies transmission, and the invading viruses are then subject to additional co-evolutionary pressures. We do not know the evolutionary path taken by XMRV to humans, but multiple sequence and functional variations distinguish this virus from its MLV progenitors. The consequences of this transspecies MLV invasion are unclear, although XMRV pathophysiology is now being evaluated in other species, including primates  as well as in Mus species, like M. pahari, that are permissive for X-MLV and XMRV infection . The fact that all mice carrying infectious X-MLVs have one of 3 restrictive receptors suggests that unchecked X-MLV infection is likely to be deleterious, and the recognition that many mice carry permissive receptors now makes it possible to describe the pathogenic consequences of exogenous X-MLV infection in their natural host. Further characterization of these viruses should further elucidate their evolutionary past and describe their pathogenic potential and the adaptations that favor co-existence of these infectious agents and their new human hosts.
This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, NIAID.
- Gross L: "Spontaneous" leukemia developing in C3 H mice following inoculation in infancy, with AK-leukemic extracts, or AK-embrvos. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1951, 76: 27-32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Levy JA, Pincus T: Demonstration of biological activity of a murine leukemia virus of New Zealand Black mice. Science. 1970, 170: 326-327. 10.1126/science.170.3955.326.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oie HK, Russell EK, Dotson JH, Rhoads JM, Gazdar AF: Host range properties of murine xenotropic and ecotropic type-C viruses. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1976, 56: 423-426.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Levy JA: Host range of murine xenotropic virus: replication in avian cells. Nature. 1975, 253: 140-142. 10.1038/253140a0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Levy JA: Xenotropic viruses: murine leukemia viruses associated with NIH Swiss, NZB, and other mouse strains. Science. 1973, 182: 1151-1153. 10.1126/science.182.4117.1151.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Levy JA: Xenotropic type C viruses. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1978, 79: 111-213.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fischinger PJ, Nomura S, Bolognesi DP: A novel murine oncornavirus with dual eco- and xenotropic properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1975, 72: 5150-5155. 10.1073/pnas.72.12.5150.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hartley JW, Wolford NK, Old LJ, Rowe WP: New class of murine leukemia-virus associated with development of spontaneous lymphomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1977, 74: 789-792. 10.1073/pnas.74.2.789.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vogt M, Haggblom C, Swift S, Haas M: Specific sequences of the env gene determine the host range of two XC-negative viruses of the Rauscher virus complex. Virology. 1986, 154: 420-424. 10.1016/0042-6822(86)90470-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heard JM, Danos O: An amino-terminal fragment of the Friend murine leukemia virus envelope glycoprotein binds the ecotropic receptor. J Virol. 1991, 65: 4026-4032.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Battini JL, Heard JM, Danos O: Receptor choice determinants in the envelope glycoproteins of amphotropic, xenotropic, and polytropic murine leukemia viruses. J Virol. 1992, 66: 1468-1475.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Albritton LM, Tseng L, Scadden D, Cunningham JM: A putative murine ecotropic retrovirus receptor gene encodes a multiple membrane-spanning protein and confers susceptibility to virus infection. Cell. 1989, 57: 659-666. 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90134-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tailor CS, Nouri A, Lee CG, Kozak C, Kabat D: Cloning and characterization of a cell surface receptor for xenotropic and polytropic murine leukemia viruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96: 927-932. 10.1073/pnas.96.3.927.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Battini J-L, Rasko JEJ, Miller AD: A human cell-surface receptor for xenotropic and polytropic murine leukemia viruses: possible role in G protein-coupled signal transduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96: 1385-1390. 10.1073/pnas.96.4.1385.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang Y-L, Guo L, Xu S, Holland CA, Kitamura T, Hunter K, Cunningham JM: Receptors for polytropic and xenotropic mouse leukaemia viruses encoded by a single gene at Rmc1. Nat Genet. 1999, 21: 216-219. 10.1038/6005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Waterston RH, Lindblad-Toh K, Birney E, Rogers J, Abril JF, Agarwal P, Agarwala R, Ainscough R, Alexandersson M, An P, et al: Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature. 2002, 420: 520-562. 10.1038/nature01262.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stocking C, Kozak C: Murine endogenous retroviruses. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008, 65: 3383-3398. 10.1007/s00018-008-8497-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vogt V: Retroviral virions and genomes. Retroviruses. Edited by: Coffin JA, Hughes SH, Varmus HE. 1997, Woodbury, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 27-70.Google Scholar
- Evans LH, Dresler S, Kabat D: Synthesis and glycosylation of polyprotein precursors to the internal core proteins of Friend murine leukemia virus. J Virol. 1977, 24: 865-874.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Edwards SA, Fan H: gag-Related polyproteins of Moloney murine leukemia virus: evidence for independent synthesis of glycosylated and unglycosylated forms. J Virol. 1979, 30: 551-563.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Prats AC, De Billy G, Wang P, Darlix JL: CUG initiation codon used for the synthesis of a cell surface antigen coded by the murine leukemia virus. J Mol Biol. 1989, 205: 363-372. 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90347-1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kozak CA, Rowe WP: Genetic mapping of xenotropic murine leukemia virus-inducing loci in five mouse strains. J Exp Med. 1980, 152: 219-228. 10.1084/jem.152.1.219.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kozak CA, Rowe WP: Genetic mapping of ecotropic murine leukemia virus-inducing loci in six inbred strains. J Exp Med. 1982, 155: 524-534. 10.1084/jem.155.2.524.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frankel WN, Stoye JP, Taylor BA, Coffin JM: A linkage map of endogenous murine leukemia proviruses. Genetics. 1990, 124: 221-236.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jern P, Stoye JP, Coffin JM: Role of APOBEC3 in genetic diversity among endogenous murine leukemia viruses. PLoS Genet. 2007, 3: e183-10.1371/journal.pgen.0030183.PubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Jenkins NA, Copeland NG, Taylor BA, Lee BK: Organization, distribution, and stability of endogenous ecotropic murine leukemia virus DNA sequences in chromosomes of Mus musculus. J Virol. 1982, 43: 26-36.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rowe WP, Pincus T: Quantitative studies of naturally occurring murine leukemia virus infection of AKR mice. J Exp Med. 1972, 135: 429-436. 10.1084/jem.135.2.429.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lowy DR, Rowe WP, Teich N, Hartley JW: Murine leukemia virus: high-frequency activation in vitro by 5-iododeoxyuridine and 5-bromodeoxyuridine. Science. 1971, 174: 155-156. 10.1126/science.174.4005.155.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aaronson SA, Todaro GJ, Scolnick EM: Induction of murine C-type viruses from clonal lines of virus-free BALB/3T3 Cells. Science. 1971, 174: 157-159. 10.1126/science.174.4005.157.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Buckler CE, Staal SP, Rowe WP, Martin MA: Variation in the number of copies and in the genomic organization of ecotropic murine leukemia virus proviral sequences in sublines of AKR mice. J Virol. 1982, 43: 629-640.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Steffen DL, Taylor BA, Weinberg RA: Continuing germ line integration of AKV proviruses during the breeding of AKR mice and derivative recombinant inbred strains. J Virol. 1982, 42: 165-175.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lock LF, Keshet E, Gilbert DJ, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG: Studies of the mechanism of spontaneous germline ecotropic provirus acquisition in mice. EMBO J. 1988, 7: 4169-4177.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- O'Neill RR, Khan AS, Hoggan MD, Hartley JW, Martin MA, Repaske R: Specific hybridization probes demonstrate fewer xenotropic than mink cell focus-forming murine leukemia virus env-related sequences in DNAs from inbred laboratory mice. J Virol. 1986, 58: 359-366.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stoye JP, Coffin JM: The four classes of endogenous murine leukemia virus: structural relationships and potential for recombination. J Virol. 1987, 61: 2659-2669.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Evans LH, Lavignon M, Taylor M, Alamgir AS: Antigenic subclasses of polytropic murine leukemia virus (MLV) isolates reflect three distinct groups of endogenous polytropic MLV-related sequences in NFS/N mice. J Virol. 2003, 77: 10327-10338. 10.1128/JVI.77.19.10327-10338.2003.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Khan AS, Martin MA: Endogenous murine leukemia proviral long terminal repeats contain a unique 190-base-pair insert. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1983, 80: 2699-2703. 10.1073/pnas.80.9.2699.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Elder JH, Gautsch JW, Jensen FC, Lerner RA, Hartley JW, Rowe WP: Biochemical evidence that MCF murine leukemia viruses are envelope (env) gene recombinants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1977, 74: 4676-4680. 10.1073/pnas.74.10.4676.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Khan AS, Rowe WP, Martin MA: Cloning of endogenous murine leukemia virus-related sequences from chromosomal DNA of BALB/c and AKR/J mice: identification of an env progenitor of AKR-247 mink cell focus-forming proviral DNA. J Virol. 1982, 44: 625-636.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chattopadhyay SK, Cloyd MW, Linemeyer DL, Lander MR, Rands E, Lowy DR: Cellular origin and role of mink cell focus-forming viruses in murine thymic lymphomas. Nature. 1982, 295: 25-31. 10.1038/295025a0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rommelaere J, Faller DV, Hopkins N: Characterization and mapping of RNase T1-resistant oligonucleotides derived from the genomes of Akv and MCF murine leukemia viruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1978, 75: 495-499. 10.1073/pnas.75.1.495.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fischinger PJ, Blevins CS, Dunlop NM: Genomic masking of nondefective recombinant murine leukemia virus in Moloney virus stocks. Science. 1978, 201: 457-459. 10.1126/science.663667.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lavignon M, Evans L: A multistep process of leukemogenesis in Moloney murine leukemia virus-infected mice that is modulated by retroviral pseudotyping and interference. J Virol. 1996, 70: 3852-3862.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Evans LH, Alamgir AS, Owens N, Weber N, Virtaneva K, Barbian K, Babar A, Malik F, Rosenke K: Mobilization of endogenous retroviruses in mice after infection with an exogenous retrovirus. J Virol. 2009, 83: 2429-2435. 10.1128/JVI.01926-08.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lavillette D, Ruggieri A, Russell SJ, Cosset FL: Activation of a cell entry pathway common to type C mammalian retroviruses by soluble envelope fragments. J Virol. 2000, 74: 295-304. 10.1128/JVI.74.1.295-304.2000.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wensel DL, Li W, Cunningham JM: A virus-virus interaction circumvents the virus receptor requirement for infection by pathogenic retroviruses. J Virol. 2003, 77: 3460-3469. 10.1128/JVI.77.6.3460-3469.2003.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frankel WN, Stoye JP, Taylor BA, Coffin JM: Genetic analysis of endogenous xenotropic murine leukemia viruses: association with two common mouse mutations and the viral restriction locus Fv-1. J Virol. 1989, 63: 1763-1774.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morse HC, Kozak CA, Yetter RA, Hartley JW: Unique features of retrovirus expression in F/St mice. J Virol. 1982, 43: 1-7.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- East J, Tilly RJ, Tuffrey M, Harvey JJ: The early appearance and subsequent distribution of murine leukaemia virus in NZB embryos. Int J Cancer. 1978, 22: 495-502. 10.1002/ijc.2910220420.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Greenberger JS, Phillips SM, Stephenson JR, Aaronson SA: Induction of mouse type-C RNA virus by lipopolysaccharide. J Immunol. 1975, 115: 317-320.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sherr CJ, Lieber MM, Todaro GJ: Mixed splenocyte cultures and graft versus host reactions selectively induce an S-tropic murine type C virus. Cell. 1974, 1: 55-58. 10.1016/0092-8674(74)90155-X.Google Scholar
- Kozak C, Rowe WP: Genetic mapping of xenotropic leukemia virus-inducing loci in two mouse strains. Science. 1978, 199: 1448-1449. 10.1126/science.204014.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baliji SLQ, Kozak CA: Common inbred strains of the laboratory mouse that are susceptible to infection by mouse xenotropic gammaretroviruses and the human derived XMRV. J Virol. 2010, 84: 12841-12849. 10.1128/JVI.01863-10.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hoggan MD, O'Neill RR, Kozak CA: Nonecotropic murine leukemia viruses in BALB/c and NFS/N mice: characterization of the BALB/c Bxv-1 provirus and the single NFS endogenous xenotrope. J Virol. 1986, 60: 980-986.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yetter RA, Hartley JW, Morse HC: H-2-linked regulation of xenotropic murine leukemia virus expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1983, 80: 505-509. 10.1073/pnas.80.2.505.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Datta SK, Schwartz RS: Mendelian segregation of loci controlling xenotropic virus production in NZB crosses. Virology. 1977, 83: 449-452. 10.1016/0042-6822(77)90193-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Elder JH, Gautsch JW, Jensen FC, Lerner RA, Chused TM, Morse HC, Hartley JW, Rowe WP: Differential expression of two distinct xenotropic viruses in NZB mice. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1980, 15: 493-501. 10.1016/0090-1229(80)90061-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kozak CA, Hartley JW, Morse HC: Laboratory and wild-derived mice with multiple loci for production of xenotropic murine leukemia virus. J Virol. 1984, 51: 77-80.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morse HC, Chused TM, Boehm-Truitt M, Mathieson BJ, Sharrow SO, Hartley JW: XenCSA: cell surface antigens related to the major glycoproteins (gp70) of xenotropic murine leukemia viruses. J Immunol. 1979, 122: 443-454.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Obata Y, Ikeda H, Stockert E, Boyse EA: Relation of GIX antigen of thymocytes to envelope glycoprotein of murine leukemia virus. J Exp Med. 1975, 141: 188-197. 10.1084/jem.141.1.188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Old LJ, Stockert E: Immunogenetics of cell surface antigens of mouse leukemia. Annu Rev Genet. 1977, 11: 127-160. 10.1146/annurev.ge.11.120177.001015.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morse HC, Taylor BA, Kozak CA, Chused TM, Sharrow SO, Hartley JW, Stockert E: Expression on normal lymphocytes of two cell surface antigens, XenCSA and GIX, related to the major glycoproteins (gp70) of murine leukemia viruses. J Immunol. 1982, 128: 2111-2115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hartley JW, Evans LH, Green KY, Naghashfar Z, Macias AR, Zerfas PM, Ward JM: Expression of infectious murine leukemia viruses by RAW264.7 cells, a potential complication for studies with a widely used mouse macrophage cell line. Retrovirology. 2008, 5: 1-10.1186/1742-4690-5-1.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lundrigan BL, Jansa SA, Tucker PK: Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Mus, based on paternally, maternally, and biparentally inherited characters. Systematic Biology. 2002, 51: 410-431. 10.1080/10635150290069878.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Veyrunes F, Dobigny G, Yang F, O'Brien PC, Catalan J, Robinson TJ, Britton-Davidian J: Phylogenomics of the genus Mus (Rodentia; Muridae): extensive genome repatterning is not restricted to the house mouse. Proc Biol Sci. 2006, 273: 2925-2934. 10.1098/rspb.2006.3670.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yonekawa H, Moriwaki K, Gotoh O, Miyashita N, Matsushima Y, Shi L, Cho W, Zhen X, Tagashira Y: Hybrid origin of Japanese mice "Mus musculus molossinus": evidence from restriction analysis of mitochondrial DNA. Mol Biol Evol. 1988, 5: 63-78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boursot P, Auffray JC, Britton-Davidian J, Bonhomme F: The Evolution of House Mice. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 1993, 24: 119-152. 10.1146/annurev.es.24.110193.001003.Google Scholar
- Geraldes A, Basset P, Gibson B, Smith KL, Harr B, Yu HT, Bulatova N, Ziv Y, Nachman MW: Inferring the history of speciation in house mice from autosomal, X-linked, Y-linked and mitochondrial genes. Mol Ecol. 2008, 17: 5349-5363. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.04005.x.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sage R, Atchley WR, Capanna E: House mice as models in systematic biology. Syst Biol. 1993, 42: 523-561.Google Scholar
- Yang H, Bell TA, Churchill GA, Pardo-Manuel de Villena F: On the subspecific origin of the laboratory mouse. Nat Genet. 2007, 39: 1100-1107. 10.1038/ng2087.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morse HCI: Introduction. Origins of inbred mice. Edited by: HCM III. 1978, New York, NY: Academic Press, 1-31.Google Scholar
- Kozak CA, O'Neill RR: Diverse wild mouse origins of xenotropic, mink cell focus-forming, and two types of ecotropic proviral genes. J Virol. 1987, 61: 3082-3088.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tomonaga K, Coffin JM: Structure and distribution of endogenous nonecotropic murine leukemia viruses in wild mice. J Virol. 1998, 72: 8289-8300.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tomonaga K, Coffin JM: Structures of endogenous nonecotropic murine leukemia virus (MLV) long terminal repeats in wild mice: implication for evolution of MLVs. J Virol. 1999, 73: 4327-4340.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Inaguma Y, Miyashita N, Moriwaki K, Huai WC, Jin ML, He XQ, Ikeda H: Acquisition of two endogenous ecotropic murine leukemia viruses in distinct Asian wild mouse populations. J Virol. 1991, 65: 1796-1802.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lieber M, Sherr C, Potter M, Todaro G: Isolation of type-C viruses from the Asian feral mouse Mus musculus molossinus. Int J Cancer. 1975, 15: 211-220. 10.1002/ijc.2910150206.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chattopadhyay SK, Lander MR, Gupta S, Rands E, Lowy DR: Origin of mink cytopathic focus-forming (MCF) viruses: comparison with ecotropic and xenotropic murine leukemia virus genomes. Virology. 1981, 113: 465-483. 10.1016/0042-6822(81)90175-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cloyd MW, Thompson MM, Hartley JW: Host range of mink cell focus-inducing viruses. Virology. 1985, 140: 239-248. 10.1016/0042-6822(85)90362-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yan Y, Knoper RC, Kozak CA: Wild mouse variants of envelope genes of xenotropic/polytropic mouse gammaretroviruses and their XPR1 receptors elucidate receptor determinants of virus entry. J Virol. 2007, 81: 10550-10557. 10.1128/JVI.00933-07.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yan Y, Liu Q, Kozak CA: Six host range variants of the xenotropic/polytropic gammaretroviruses define determinants for entry in the XPR1 cell surface receptor. Retrovirology. 2009, 6: 87-10.1186/1742-4690-6-87.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lathrop AEC, Loeb L: Further investigations on the origin of tumors in mice. J Exp Med. 1918, 28: 475-500. 10.1084/jem.28.4.475.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schwarz E: Origin of the Japanese waltzing mouse. Science. 1942, 95: 46-10.1126/science.95.2454.46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jung YT, Wu T, Kozak CA: Characterization of recombinant nonecotropic murine leukemia viruses from the wild mouse species Mus spretus. J Virol. 2003, 77: 12773-12781. 10.1128/JVI.77.23.12773-12781.2003.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- O'Neill RR, Hartley JW, Repaske R, Kozak CA: Amphotropic proviral envelope sequences are absent from the Mus germ line. J Virol. 1987, 61: 2225-2231.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Voytek P, Kozak CA: Nucleotide sequence and mode of transmission of the wild mouse ecotropic virus, HoMuLV. Virology. 1989, 173: 58-67. 10.1016/0042-6822(89)90221-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alamgir AS, Owens N, Lavignon M, Malik F, Evans LH: Precise identification of endogenous proviruses of NFS/N mice participating in recombination with Moloney ecotropic murine leukemia virus (MuLV) to generate polytropic MuLVs. J Virol. 2005, 79: 4664-4671. 10.1128/JVI.79.8.4664-4671.2005.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jahid S, Bundy LM, Granger SW, Fan H: Chimeras between SRS and Moloney murine leukemia viruses reveal novel determinants in disease specificity and MCF recombinant formation. Virology. 2006, 351: 7-17. 10.1016/j.virol.2006.03.010.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pedersen FS, Crowther RL, Tenney DY, Reimold AM, Haseltine WA: Novel leukaemogenic retroviruses isolated from cell line derived from spontaneous AKR tumour. Nature. 1981, 292: 167-170. 10.1038/292167a0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Famulari NG, Koehne CF, O'Donnell PV: Leukemogenesis by Gross passage A murine leukemia virus: expression of viruses with recombinant env genes in transformed cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1982, 79: 3872-3876. 10.1073/pnas.79.12.3872.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cloyd MW, Chattopadhyay SK: A new class of retrovirus present in many murine leukemia systems. Virology. 1986, 151: 31-40. 10.1016/0042-6822(86)90101-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bahrami S, Duch M, Pedersen FS: Change of tropism of SL3-2 murine leukemia virus, using random mutational libraries. J Virol. 2004, 78: 9343-9351. 10.1128/JVI.78.17.9343-9351.2004.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chattopadhyay SK, Oliff AI, Linemeyer DL, Lander MR, Lowy DR: Genomes of murine leukemia viruses isolated from wild mice. J Virol. 1981, 39: 777-791.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kozak CA: Genetic mapping of a mouse chromosomal locus required for mink cell focus-forming virus replication. J Virol. 1983, 48: 300-303.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hartley JW, Rowe WP: Clonal cell lines from a feral mouse embryo which lack host-range restrictions for murine leukemia viruses. Virology. 1975, 65: 128-134. 10.1016/0042-6822(75)90013-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lander MR, Chattopadhyay SK: A Mus dunni cell line that lacks sequences closely related to endogenous murine leukemia viruses and can be infected by ecotropic, amphotropic, xenotropic, and mink cell focus-forming viruses. J Virol. 1984, 52: 695-698.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kozak CA: Susceptibility of wild mouse cells to exogenous infection with xenotropic leukemia viruses: control by a single dominant locus on chromosome 1. J Virol. 1985, 55: 690-695.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lyu MS, Kozak CA: Genetic basis for resistance to polytropic murine leukemia viruses in the wild mouse species Mus castaneus. J Virol. 1996, 70: 830-833.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chesebro B, Wehrly K: Different murine cell lines manifest unique patterns of interference to superinfection by murine leukemia viruses. Virology. 1985, 141: 119-129. 10.1016/0042-6822(85)90188-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tailor CS, Lavillette D, Marin M, Kabat D: Cell surface receptors for gammaretroviruses. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2003, 281: 29-106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Overbaugh J, Miller AD, Eiden MV: Receptors and entry cofactors for retroviruses include single and multiple transmembrane-spanning proteins as well as newly described glycophosphatidylinositol-anchored and secreted proteins. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2001, 65: 371-389. 10.1128/MMBR.65.3.371-389.2001. table of contentsPubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sharma P, Patntirapong S, Hann S, Hauschka PV: RANKL-RANK signaling regulates expression of xenotropic and polytropic virus receptor (XPR1) in osteoclasts. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010, 399: 129-132. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.07.022.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yan Y, Liu Q, Wollenberg K, Martin C, Buckler-White A, Kozak CA: Evolution of functional and sequence variants of the mammalian XPR1 receptor for mouse xenotropic gammaretroviruses and the human-derived XMRV. J Virol. 2010, 84: 11970-11980. 10.1128/JVI.01549-10.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marin M, Tailor CS, Nouri A, Kozak SL, Kabat D: Polymorphisms of the cell surface receptor control mouse susceptibilities to xenotropic and polytropic leukemia viruses. J Virol. 1999, 73: 9362-9368.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van Hoeven NS, Miller AD: Use of different but overlapping determinants in a retrovirus receptor accounts for non-reciprocal interference between xenotropic and polytropic murine leukemia viruses. Retrovirology. 2005, 2: 76-10.1186/1742-4690-2-76.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brown JK, Fung C, Tailor CS: Comprehensive mapping of receptor-functioning domains in feline leukemia virus subgroup C receptor FLVCR1. J Virol. 2006, 80: 1742-1751. 10.1128/JVI.80.4.1742-1751.2006.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Farrell KB, Russ JL, Murthy RK, Eiden MV: Reassessing the role of region A in Pit1-mediated viral entry. J Virol. 2002, 76: 7683-7693. 10.1128/JVI.76.15.7683-7693.2002.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Manel N, Battini JL, Sitbon M: Human T cell leukemia virus envelope binding and virus entry are mediated by distinct domains of the glucose transporter GLUT1. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280: 29025-29029. 10.1074/jbc.M504549200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Avner P, Amar L, Dandolo L, Guenet JL: Genetic analysis of the mouse using interspecific crosses. Trends Genet. 1988, 4: 18-23. 10.1016/0168-9525(88)90123-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beck JA, Lloyd S, Hafezparast M, Lennon-Pierce M, Eppig JT, Festing MFW, Fisher EMC: Genealogies of mouse inbred strains. Nat Genet. 2000, 24: 23-25. 10.1038/71641.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gardner MB, Chiri A, Dougherty MF, Casagrande J, Estes JD: Congenital transmission of murine leukemia virus from wild mice prone to the development of lymphoma and paralysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1979, 62: 63-70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Portis JL, McAtee FJ, Hayes SF: Horizontal transmission of murine retroviruses. J Virol. 1987, 61: 1037-1044.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marshall J: Taxonomy. The mouse in biomedical research. Edited by: Foster HL SJ, Fox JG. 1981, New York, NY: Academic Press, 1: 17-26.Google Scholar
- Weber WJ: Diseases transmitted by rats and mice. 1982, Fresno, CA: Thomas PublishersGoogle Scholar
- Martin J, Herniou E, Cook J, O'Neill RW, Tristem M: Interclass transmission and phyletic host tracking in murine leukemia virus-related retroviruses. J Virol. 1999, 73: 2442-2449.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Urisman A, Molinaro RJ, Fischer N, Plummer SJ, Casey G, Klein EA, Malathi K, Magi-Galluzzi C, Tubbs RR, Ganem D, et al: Identification of a novel gammaretrovirus in prostate tumors of patients homozygous for R462Q RNASEL variant. PLoS Pathog. 2006, 2: e25-10.1371/journal.ppat.0020025.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dong B, Kim S, Hong S, Das Gupta J, Malathi K, Klein EA, Ganem D, DeRisi JL, Chow SA, Silverman RH: An infectious retrovirus susceptible to an IFN antiviral pathway from human prostate tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007, 104: 1655-1660. 10.1073/pnas.0610291104.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schlaberg R, Choe DJ, Brown KR, Thaker HM, Singh IR: XMRV is present in malignant prostatic epithelium and is associated with prostate cancer, especially high-grade tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106: 16351-16356. 10.1073/pnas.0906922106.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lombardi VC, Ruscetti FW, Das Gupta J, Pfost MA, Hagen KS, Peterson DL, Ruscetti SK, Bagni RK, Petrow-Sadowski C, Gold B, et al: Detection of an infectious retrovirus, XMRV, in blood cells of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Science. 2009, 326: 585-589. 10.1126/science.1179052.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Knouf EC, Metzger MJ, Mitchell PS, Arroyo JD, Chevillet JR, Tewari M, Miller AD: Multiple integrated copies and high-level production of the human retrovirus XMRV (xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus) from 22Rv1 prostate carcinoma cells. J Virol. 2009, 83: 7353-7356. 10.1128/JVI.00546-09.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lo SC, Pripuzova N, Li B, Komaroff AL, Hung GC, Wang R, Alter HJ: Detection of MLV-related virus gene sequences in blood of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and healthy blood donors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010, 107: 15874-15879. 10.1073/pnas.1006901107.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Raisch KP, Pizzato M, Sun HY, Takeuchi Y, Cashdollar LW, Grossberg SE: Molecular cloning, complete sequence, and biological characterization of a xenotropic murine leukemia virus constitutively released from the human B-lymphoblastoid cell line DG-75. Virology. 2003, 308: 83-91. 10.1016/S0042-6822(02)00074-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Courgnaud V, Battini JL, Sitbon M, Mason AL: Mouse retroviruses and chronic fatigue syndrome: Does × (or P) mark the spot?. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010, 107: 15666-15667. 10.1073/pnas.1007944107.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Silverman RH, Nguyen C, Weight CJ, Klein EA: The human retrovirus XMRV in prostate cancer and chronic fatigue syndrome. Nat Rev Urol. 2010, 7: 392-402. 10.1038/nrurol.2010.77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Curado MPEB, Shin HR, Storm H, Ferlay J, Heanue M, Boyle P: Cancer incidence in five continents, vol. IX. IARC scientific publication no 160. 2007, Lyon, France: IARCGoogle Scholar
- Wu T, Yan Y, Kozak CA: Rmcf2, a xenotropic provirus in the Asian mouse species Mus castaneus, blocks infection by polytropic mouse gammaretroviruses. J Virol. 2005, 79: 9677-9684. 10.1128/JVI.79.15.9677-9684.2005.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nitta T, Kuznetsov Y, McPherson A, Fan H: Murine leukemia virus glycosylated Gag (gPr80 gag ) facilitates interferon-sensitive virus release through lipid rafts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010, 107: 1190-1195. 10.1073/pnas.0908660107.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kolokithas A, Rosenke K, Malik F, Hendrick D, Swanson L, Santiago ML, Portis JL, Hasenkrug KJ, Evans LH: The glycosylated Gag protein of a murine leukemia virus inhibits the antiretroviral function of APOBEC3. J Virol. 2010, 84: 10933-10936. 10.1128/JVI.01023-10.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stieler K, Schulz C, Lavanya M, Aepfelbacher M, Stocking C, Fischer N: Host range and cellular tropism of the human exogenous gammaretrovirus XMRV. Virology. 2010, 399: 23-30. 10.1016/j.virol.2009.12.028.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dong B, Silverman RH: Androgen stimulates transcription and replication of xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus. J Virol. 2010, 84: 1648-1651. 10.1128/JVI.01763-09.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rodriguez JJ, Goff SP: Xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus establishes an efficient spreading infection and exhibits enhanced transcriptional activity in prostate carcinoma cells. J Virol. 2010, 84: 2556-2562. 10.1128/JVI.01969-09.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rosenberg N, Jolicoeur P: Retroviral Pathogenesis. Retroviruses. Edited by: Coffin JM, Hughes SH, Varmus HE. 1997, Woodbury, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 475-586.Google Scholar
- Suzuki T, Shen H, Akagi K, Morse HC, Malley JD, Naiman DQ, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG: New genes involved in cancer identified by retroviral tagging. Nat Genet. 2002, 32: 166-174. 10.1038/ng949.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim S, Kim N, Dong B, Boren D, Lee SA, Das Gupta J, Gaughan C, Klein EA, Lee C, Silverman RH, Chow SA: Integration site preference of xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus, a new human retrovirus associated with prostate cancer. J Virol. 2008, 82: 9964-9977. 10.1128/JVI.01299-08.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fan H: Leukemogenesis by Moloney murine leukemia virus: a multistep process. Trends Microbiol. 1997, 5: 74-82. 10.1016/S0966-842X(96)10076-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stoye JP, Moroni C, Coffin JM: Virological events leading to spontaneous AKR thymomas. J Virol. 1991, 65: 1273-1285.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Herr W, Gilbert W: Somatically acquired recombinant murine leukemia proviruses in thymic leukemias of AKR/J mice. J Virol. 1983, 46: 70-82.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cloyd MW, Hartley JW, Rowe WP: Lymphomagenicity of recombinant mink cell focus-inducing murine leukemia viruses. J Exp Med. 1980, 151: 542-552. 10.1084/jem.151.3.542.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Buller RS, Sitbon M, Portis JL: The endogenous mink cell focus-forming (MCF) gp70 linked to the Rmcf gene restricts MCF virus replication in vivo and provides partial resistance to erythroleukemia induced by Friend murine leukemia virus. J Exp Med. 1988, 167: 1535-1546. 10.1084/jem.167.5.1535.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brightman BK, Rein A, Trepp DJ, Fan H: An enhancer variant of Moloney murine leukemia virus defective in leukemogenesis does not generate detectable mink cell focus-inducing virus in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991, 88: 2264-2268. 10.1073/pnas.88.6.2264.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Quint W, Boelens W, van Wezenbeek P, Robanus Maandag E, Berns A: Generation of AKR mink cell focus-forming virus: nucleotide sequence of the 3' end of a somatically acquired AKR-MCF. Virology. 1984, 136: 425-434. 10.1016/0042-6822(84)90178-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li JP, D'Andrea AD, Lodish HF, Baltimore D: Activation of cell growth by binding of Friend spleen focus-forming virus gp55 glycoprotein to the erythropoietin receptor. Nature. 1990, 343: 762-764. 10.1038/343762a0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nishigaki K, Hanson C, Jelacic T, Thompson D, Ruscetti S: Friend spleen focus-forming virus transforms rodent fibroblasts in cooperation with a short form of the receptor tyrosine kinase Stk. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 15488-15493. 10.1073/pnas.0506570102.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moreau-Gachelin F: Multi-stage Friend murine erythroleukemia: molecular insights into oncogenic cooperation. Retrovirology. 2008, 5: 99-10.1186/1742-4690-5-99.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tumas KM, Poszgay JM, Avidan N, Ksiazek SJ, Overmoyer B, Blank KJ, Prystowsky MB: Loss of antigenic epitopes as the result of env gene recombination in retrovirus-induced leukemia in immunocompetent mice. Virology. 1993, 192: 587-595. 10.1006/viro.1993.1075.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mangeney M, Pothlichet J, Renard M, Ducos B, Heidmann T: Endogenous retrovirus expression is required for murine melanoma tumor growth in vivo. Cancer Res. 2005, 65: 2588-2591. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-4231.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pothlichet J, Heidmann T, Mangeney M: A recombinant endogenous retrovirus amplified in a mouse neuroblastoma is involved in tumor growth in vivo. Int J Cancer. 2006, 119: 815-822. 10.1002/ijc.21935.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Herr W, Gilbert W: Free and integrated recombinant murine leukemia virus DNAs appear in preleukemic thymuses of AKR/J mice. J Virol. 1984, 50: 155-162.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Temin HM: Mechanisms of cell killing/cytopathic effects by nonhuman retroviruses. Rev Infect Dis. 1988, 10: 399-405.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cheng-Mayer C, Seto D, Tateno M, Levy JA: Biologic features of HIV-1 that correlate with virulence in the host. Science. 1988, 240: 80-82. 10.1126/science.2832945.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yoshimura FK, Wang T, Yu F, Kim HR, Turner JR: Mink cell focus-forming murine leukemia virus infection induces apoptosis of thymic lymphocytes. J Virol. 2000, 74: 8119-8126. 10.1128/JVI.74.17.8119-8126.2000.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nanua S, Yoshimura FK: Mink epithelial cell killing by pathogenic murine leukemia viruses involves endoplasmic reticulum stress. J Virol. 2004, 78: 12071-12074. 10.1128/JVI.78.21.12071-12074.2004.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eiden MV, Farrell K, Wilson CA: Glycosylation-dependent inactivation of the ecotropic murine leukemia-virus receptor. J Virol. 1994, 68: 626-631.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yan Y, Jung YT, Wu T, Kozak CA: Role of receptor polymorphism and glycosylation in syncytium induction and host range variation of ecotropic mouse gammaretroviruses. Retrovirology. 2008, 5: 2-10.1186/1742-4690-5-2.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller DG, Miller AD: Tunicamycin treatment of CHO cells abrogates multiple blocks to retrovirus infection, one of which is due to a secreted inhibitor. J Virol. 1992, 66: 78-84.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Levy JA, Ihle JN, Oleszko O, Barnes RD: Virus-specific neutralization by a soluble non-immunoglobulin factor found naturally in normal mouse sera. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1975, 72: 5071-5075. 10.1073/pnas.72.12.5071.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leong JC, Kane JP, Oleszko O, Levy JA: Antigen-specific nonimmunoglobulin factor that neutralizes xenotropic virus is associated with mouse serum lipoproteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1977, 74: 276-280. 10.1073/pnas.74.1.276.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fischinger PJ, Ihle JN, Bolognesi DP, Schafer W: Inactivation of murine xenotropic oncornavirus by normal mouse sera is not immunoglobulin-mediated. Virology. 1976, 71: 346-351. 10.1016/0042-6822(76)90118-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kane JP, Hardman DA, Dimpfl JC, Levy JA: Apolipoprotein is responsible for neutralization of xenotropic type C virus by mouse serum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1979, 76: 5957-5961. 10.1073/pnas.76.11.5957.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Welsh RM, Cooper NR, Jensen FC, Oldstone MB: Human serum lyses RNA tumour viruses. Nature. 1975, 257: 612-614. 10.1038/257612a0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takeuchi Y, Porter CD, Strahan KM, Preece AF, Gustafsson K, Cosset FL, Weiss RA, Collins MK: Sensitization of cells and retroviruses to human serum by (α1-3) galactosyltransferase. Nature. 1996, 379: 85-88. 10.1038/379085a0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu TY, Lee CG, Buckler-White A, Kozak CA: Genetic control of a mouse serum lipoprotein factor that inactivates murine leukemia viruses: Evaluation of apolipoprotein F as a candidate. J Virol. 2002, 76: 2279-2286. 10.1128/jvi.76.5.2279-2286.2002.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ikeda H, Laigret F, Martin MA, Repaske R: Characterization of a molecularly cloned retroviral sequence associated with Fv-4 resistance. J Virol. 1985, 55: 768-777.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ruscetti S, Davis L, Feild J, Oliff A: Friend murine leukemia virus-induced leukemia is associated with the formation of mink cell focus-inducing viruses and is blocked in mice expressing endogenous mink cell focus-inducing xenotropic viral envelope genes. J Exp Med. 1981, 154: 907-920. 10.1084/jem.154.3.907.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bassin RH, Ruscetti S, Ali I, Haapala DK, Rein A: Normal DBA/2 mouse cells synthesize a glycoprotein which interferes with MCF virus-infection. Virology. 1982, 123: 139-151. 10.1016/0042-6822(82)90301-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hartley JW, Yetter RA, Morse HC: A mouse gene on chromosome 5 that restricts infectivity of mink cell focus-forming recombinant murine leukemia viruses. J Exp Med. 1983, 158: 16-24. 10.1084/jem.158.1.16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jung YT, Lyu MS, Buckler-White A, Kozak CA: Characterization of a polytropic murine leukemia virus proviral sequence associated with the virus resistance gene Rmcf of DBA/2 mice. J Virol. 2002, 76: 8218-8224. 10.1128/JVI.76.16.8218-8224.2002.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taylor GM, Gao Y, Sanders DA: Fv-4: identification of the defect in Env and the mechanism of resistance to ecotropic murine leukemia virus. J Virol. 2001, 75: 11244-11248. 10.1128/JVI.75.22.11244-11248.2001.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robinson HL, Astrin SM, Senior AM, Salazar FH: Host susceptibility to endogenous viruses: defective, glycoprotein-expressing proviruses interfere with infections. J Virol. 1981, 40: 745-751.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spencer TE, Mura M, Gray CA, Griebel PJ, Palmarini M: Receptor usage and fetal expression of ovine endogenous betaretroviruses: implications for coevolution of endogenous and exogenous retroviruses. J Virol. 2003, 77: 749-753. 10.1128/JVI.77.1.749-753.2003.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- McDougall AS, Terry A, Tzavaras T, Cheney C, Rojko J, Neil JC: Defective endogenous proviruses are expressed in feline lymphoid cells: evidence for a role in natural resistance to subgroup B feline leukemia viruses. J Virol. 1994, 68: 2151-2160.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lilly F: Susceptibility to two strains of Friend leukemia virus in mice. Science. 1967, 155: 461-462. 10.1126/science.155.3761.461.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Best S, LeTissier P, Towers G, Stoye JP: Positional cloning of the mouse retrovirus restriction gene Fv1. Nature. 1996, 382: 826-829. 10.1038/382826a0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Benit L, DeParseval N, Casella JF, Callebaut I, Cordonnier A, Heidmann T: Cloning of a new murine endogenous retrovirus, MuERV-L, with strong similarity to the human HERV-L element and with a gag coding sequence closely related to the Fv1 restriction gene. J Virol. 1997, 71: 5652-5657.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yan Y, Buckler-White A, Wollenberg K, Kozak CA: Origin, antiviral function and evidence for positive selection of the gammaretrovirus restriction gene Fv1 in the genus Mus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106: 3259-3263. 10.1073/pnas.0900181106.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hartley JW, Rowe WP, Huebner RJ: Host-range restrictions of murine leukemia viruses in mouse embryo cell cultures. J Virol. 1970, 5: 221-225.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kozak CA: Analysis of wild-derived mice for Fv-1 and Fv-2 murine leukemia virus restriction loci: a novel wild mouse Fv-1 allele responsible for lack of host range restriction. J Virol. 1985, 55: 281-285.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kozak CA, Chakraborti A: Single amino acid changes in the murine leukemia virus capsid protein gene define the target of Fv1 resistance. Virology. 1996, 225: 300-305. 10.1006/viro.1996.0604.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jung YT, Kozak CA: A single amino acid change in the murine leukemia virus capsid gene responsible for the Fv1 nr phenotype. J Virol. 2000, 74: 5385-5387. 10.1128/JVI.74.11.5385-5387.2000.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stevens A, Bock M, Ellis S, LeTissier P, Bishop KN, Yap MW, Taylor W, Stoye JP: Retroviral capsid determinants of Fv1 NB and NR tropism. J Virol. 2004, 78: 9592-9598. 10.1128/JVI.78.18.9592-9598.2004.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lassaux A, Sitbon M, Battini JL: Residues in the murine leukemia virus capsid that differentially govern resistance to mouse Fv1 and human Ref1 restrictions. J Virol. 2005, 79: 6560-6564. 10.1128/JVI.79.10.6560-6564.2005.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ulm JW, Perron M, Sodroski J, R CM: Complex determinants within the Moloney murine leukemia virus capsid modulate susceptibility of the virus to Fv1 and Ref1-mediated restriction. Virology. 2007, 363: 245-255. 10.1016/j.virol.2006.09.048.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sakai K, Narita H, Adachi A, Tsuruta S, Yorifuji T, Ishimoto A: Fv-1 determinants in xenotropic murine leukemia viruses studied with biological assay systems: Isolation of xenotropic virus with N-tropic Fv-1 activity in the cryptic form. J Virol. 1982, 42: 331-336.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gautsch JW, Elder JH, Jensen FC, Lerner RA: In vitro construction of a B-tropic virus by recombination: B-tropism is a cryptic phenotype of xenotropic murine retroviruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1980, 77: 2989-2993. 10.1073/pnas.77.5.2989.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Groom HCT, Yap MW, Galão RP, Neil SJD, Bishop KN: Susceptibility of xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus (XMRV) to retroviral restriction factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010, 107: 5166-5171. 10.1073/pnas.0913650107.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harris RS, Bishop KN, Sheehy AM, Craig HM, Petersen-Mahrt SK, Watt IN, Neuberger MS, Malim MH: DNA deamination mediates innate immunity to retroviral infection. Cell. 2003, 113: 803-809. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00423-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goila-Gaur R, Strebel K: HIV-1 Vif, APOBEC, and intrinsic immunity. Retrovirology. 2008, 5: 51-10.1186/1742-4690-5-51.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sawyer SL, Emerman M, Malik HS: Ancient adaptive evolution of the primate antiviral DNA-editing enzyme APOBEC3G. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2: E275-10.1371/journal.pbio.0020275.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sanville B, Dolan MA, Wollenberg K, Yan Y, Martin C, Yeung ML, Strebel K, Buckler-White A, Kozak CA: Adaptive evolution of Mus Apobec3 includes retroviral insertion and positive selection at two clusters of residues flanking the substrate groove. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6: e1000974-10.1371/journal.ppat.1000974.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Okeoma CM, Lovsin N, Peterlin BM, Ross SR: APOBEC3 inhibits mouse mammary tumour virus replication in vivo. Nature. 2007, 445: 927-930. 10.1038/nature05540.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Esnault C, Heidmann O, Delebecque F, Dewannieux M, Ribet D, Hance AJ, Heidmann T, Schwartz O: APOBEC3G cytidine deaminase inhibits retrotransposition of endogenous retroviruses. Nature. 2005, 433: 430-433. 10.1038/nature03238.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mikl MC, Watt IN, Lu M, Reik W, Davies SL, Neuberger MS, Rada C: Mice deficient in APOBEC2 and APOBEC3. Mol Cell Biol. 2005, 25: 7270-7277. 10.1128/MCB.25.16.7270-7277.2005.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takeda E, Tsuji-Kawahara S, Sakamoto M, Langlois MA, Neuberger MS, Rada C, Miyazawa M: Mouse APOBEC3 restricts Friend leukemia virus infection and pathogenesis in vivo. J Virol. 2008, 82: 10998-11008. 10.1128/JVI.01311-08.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Santiago ML, Montano M, Benitez R, Messer RJ, Yonemoto W, Chesebro B, Hasenkrug KJ, Greene WC: Apobec3 encodes Rfv3, a gene influencing neutralizing antibody control of retrovirus infection. Science. 2008, 321: 1343-1346. 10.1126/science.1161121.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chesebro B, Wehrly K: Identification of a non-H-2 gene (Rfv-3) influencing recovery from viremia and leukemia induced by Friend virus complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1979, 76: 425-429. 10.1073/pnas.76.1.425.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stieler K, Fischer N: Apobec 3G efficiently reduces infectivity of the human exogenous gammaretrovirus XMRV. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e11738-10.1371/journal.pone.0011738.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Okeoma CM, Petersen J, Ross SR: Expression of murine APOBEC3 alleles in different mouse strains and their effect on mouse mammary tumor virus infection. J Virol. 2009, 83: 3029-3038. 10.1128/JVI.02536-08.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Neil SJD, Zang T, Bieniasz PD: Tetherin inhibits retrovirus release and is antagonized by HIV-1 Vpu. Nature. 2008, 451: 425-U421. 10.1038/nature06553.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van Damme N, Goff D, Katsura C, Jorgenson RL, Mitchell R, Johnson MC, Stephens EB, Guatelli J: The interferon-induced protein BST-2 restricts HIV-1 release and is downregulated from the cell surface by the viral Vpu protein. Cell Host Microbe. 2008, 3: 245-252. 10.1016/j.chom.2008.03.001.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jia B, Serra-Moreno R, Neidermyer W, Rahmberg A, Mackey J, Fofana IB, Johnson WE, Westmoreland S, Evans DT: Species-specific activity of SIV Nef and HIV-1 Vpu in overcoming restriction by tetherin/BST2. PLoS Pathog. 2009, 5: e1000429-10.1371/journal.ppat.1000429.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang F, Wilson SJ, Landford WC, Virgen B, Gregory D, Johnson MC, Munch J, Kirchhoff F, Bieniasz PD, Hatziioannou T: Nef proteins from simian immunodeficiency viruses are tetherin antagonists. Cell Host Microbe. 2009, 6: 54-67. 10.1016/j.chom.2009.05.008.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gupta RK, Mlcochova P, Pelchen-Matthews A, Petit SJ, Mattiuzzo G, Pillay D, Takeuchi Y, Marsh M, Towers GJ: Simian immunodeficiency virus envelope glycoprotein counteracts tetherin/BST-2/CD317 by intracellular sequestration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106: 20889-20894. 10.1073/pnas.0907075106.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Le Tortorec A, Neil SJ: Antagonism to and intracellular sequestration of human tetherin by the human immunodeficiency virus type 2 envelope glycoprotein. J Virol. 2009, 83: 11966-11978. 10.1128/JVI.01515-09.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- McNatt MW, Zang T, Hatziioannou T, Bartlett M, Fofana IB, Johnson WE, Neil SJ, Bieniasz PD: Species-specific activity of HIV-1 Vpu and positive selection of tetherin transmembrane domain variants. PLoS Pathog. 2009, 5: e1000300-10.1371/journal.ppat.1000300.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Livingston DM, Todaro GJ: Endogenous type C virus from a cat cell clone with properties distinct from previously described feline type C virus. Virology. 1973, 53: 142-151. 10.1016/0042-6822(73)90473-X.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sarma PS, Tseng J, Lee YK, Gilden RV: Virus similar to RD114 virus in cat cells. Nat New Biol. 1973, 244: 56-59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Todaro GJ, Lieber MM, Benveniste RE, Sherr CJ: Infectious primate type C viruses: Three isolates belonging to a new subgroup from the brains of normal gibbons. Virology. 1975, 67: 335-343. 10.1016/0042-6822(75)90435-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lieber MM, Sherr CJ, Todaro GJ, Benveniste RE, Callahan R, Coon HG: Isolation from the Asian mouse Mus caroli of an endogenous type C virus related to infectious primate type C viruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1975, 72: 2315-2319. 10.1073/pnas.72.6.2315.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Payne LN: Biology of avian retroviruses. The Retroviridae. Edited by: Levy JA. 1992, New York: Plenum Press, 1: 299-404.Google Scholar
- Qiu X, Swanson P, Luk KC, Tu B, Villinger F, Das Gupta J, Silverman RH, Klein EA, Devare S, Schochetman G, Hackett J: Characterization of antibodies elicited by XMRV infection and development of immunoassays useful for epidemiologic studies. Retrovirology. 2010, 7: 68-PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sakuma T, Tonne JM, Squillace KA, Ohmine S, Thatava T, Peng K-W, Barry MA, Ikeda Y: Early events in XMRV infection of wild-derived mouse, Mus pahari. J Virol. Google Scholar
- Hartley JW, Rowe WP, Capps WI, Huebner RJ: Isolation of naturally occurring viruses of the murine leukemia virus group in tissue culture. J Virol. 1969, 3: 126-132.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guenet JL, Bonhomme F: Wild mice: an ever-increasing contribution to a popular mammalian model. Trends Genet. 2003, 19: 24-31. 10.1016/S0168-9525(02)00007-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Macholan M, Munclinger P, Sugerkova M, Dufkova P, Bimova B, Bozikova E, Zima J, Pialek J: Genetic analysis of autosomal and X-linked markers across a mouse hybrid zone. Evolution. 2007, 61: 746-771. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00065.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.