The frantic play of the concealed HIV envelope cytoplasmic tail
Retrovirology volume 10, Article number: 54 (2013)
Lentiviruses have unusually long envelope (Env) cytoplasmic tails, longer than those of other retroviruses. Whereas the Env ectodomain has received much attention, the gp41 cytoplasmic tail (gp41-CT) is one of the least studied parts of the virus. It displays relatively high conservation compared to the rest of Env. It has been long established that the gp41-CT interacts with the Gag precursor protein to ensure Env incorporation into the virion. The gp41-CT contains distinct motifs and domains that mediate both intensive Env intracellular trafficking and interactions with numerous cellular and viral proteins, optimizing viral infectivity. Although they are not fully understood, a multiplicity of interactions between the gp41-CT and cellular factors have been described over the last decade; these interactions illustrate how Env expression and incorporation into virions is a finely tuned process that has evolved to best exploit the host system with minimized genetic information. This review addresses the structure and topology of the gp41-CT of lentiviruses (mainly HIV and SIV), their domains and believed functions. It also considers the cellular and viral proteins that have been described to interact with the gp41-CT, with a particular focus on subtype-related polymorphisms.
Background: Env and the entry process
The main target cells for the Human Immunodeficiency Virus type 1 (HIV) and Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV) are CD4-expressing cells, namely CD4+ T lymphocytes, dendritic cells (DCs) and macrophages. The first step of the viral cycle, involving anchoring to the target cell membrane and entry, is mediated by the envelope glycoprotein (Env). Env is composed of two non-covalently linked subunits, SU (surface glycoprotein or gp120) and TM (transmembrane glycoprotein or gp41), displayed as heterotrimeric spikes on the surface of virions and infected cells [1–6]. The two Env subunits are the products of the proteolytic cleavage of a highly glycosylated gp160 precursor protein by the cellular protease Furin in the Golgi apparatus. gp120 is responsible for binding to the CD4 receptor and the coreceptor expressed at the cell surface of target cells. gp120 is composed of several variable and constant regions; it comprises a heavily glycosylated outer domain and an inner domain, which are linked by a structure called the bridging sheet. Mature Env thus forms a cage-like structure with an interior void; this cage-like structure is believed to restrict antibody access . gp41 is non-covalently linked to gp120 and the N-terminal ectodomain of gp41 contains a hydrophobic, glycine-rich fusion peptide that mediates fusion of the viral and target cell membranes. Binding of gp120 to the CD4 receptor induces conformational changes that expose the third hypervariable region (V3 loop) of gp120, which in turn binds one of the co-receptors, CCR5 or CXCR4 [8–12]. Binding to the co-receptor triggers further conformational changes within gp41, which adopts the so-called “fusion-active” state required for bringing the viral and cellular membranes into close contact and allowing fusion. These conformational changes involve two leucine zipper-like motifs, the heptad repeat 1 (HR1) and heptad repeat 2 (HR2): HR2 folds in an anti-parallel fashion onto the pre-formed trimer of HR1 helices, allowing HR1 and HR2 to assemble into a highly stable antiparallel six-helix bundle structure, which juxtaposes the viral and cellular membranes, and allows fusion of the viral and cellular membranes [2, 3, 5, 6, 13].
Most of the Env precursor is retained in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) or the cis-Golgi compartments and only a small proportion progresses through the trans-Golgi network (TGN) and reaches the cell membrane [14–17]. As it is synthesized and oligomerizes in the rough ER (RER), Env is extensively N-and O-glycosylated, sulfated and plamitoylated concomitantly with its translation and transit through the TGN [1, 18–24] reviewed in . Glycosylation of gp120 accounts for nearly half of its molecular mass. This substantial glycosylation is believed to ensure correct protein folding and to favor immune escape by providing a glycan shield against neutralizing antibodies. As the disease progresses, viral strains lose potential N-glycosylation sites (PNGs) and display notably reduced glycosylation; these strains are consequently less well shielded from neutralizing antibodies [26, 27]. Nonetheless, such viral strains appear late during infection, concomitantly with the decline in CD4+ T cell counts, such that the immune system is unable to trigger an efficient B-cell response; consequently, evading the immune system is no longer necessary .
Env is the most variable region of the HIV genome, and inter-subtype diversity is typically up to 25-35%. This variability is not evenly distributed throughout the env gene: the gp120 ectodomain is the most variable, the gp41 ectodomain is the least variable, and the gp41 cytoplasmic tail (gp41-CT) lies somewhere in between, with an intermediate level of sequence diversity and phylogenetic evolution . Experimental data obtained from peptides and by sequence analysis and modeling indicate that the structural and physicochemical properties of the gp41-CT are surprisingly highly conserved despite the sequence variations. Presumably, this reflects constraints on its evolution imposed by crucial functional roles. However, these roles have mostly been explored using the NL4-3 reference strain or synthetic peptides.
Aims of the review
The ectodomain of Env has been the subject of much interest and substantial investigations. The structural and functional characterization of the HIV and SIV gp41-CTs has received far less attention, and indeed, there are numerous contradictory results. Early studies of the gp41-CT mainly addressed the immunogenic properties of the Kennedy epitope, or the viroporin properties of the α-helical lentiviral lytic peptides LLP-1, LLP-2 and LLP-3 and their role in viral incorporation and infectivity. The discovery that the gp41-CT interacts with the p55Gag precursor during viral assembly and ensures Env incorporation into virions has led to a reconsideration of the functional importance of this domain. It was, nevertheless, only very recently that its role in modulating Env expression and viral infectivity through a plethora of interactions with cellular partners started to be appreciated. Three recent reviews are relevant: they address the role of the HIV-1 gp41-CT in Env trafficking, incorporation and viral assembly , the biophysical properties and topology of the gp41-CT  and the interactions of the gp41-CT with cellular factors . Parallel spectacular advances in cell and virion imagery, and very recent studies on the biophysical characteristics of mature and immature virions based on Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)  and STED microscopy  provide new insights into the contribution of the gp41-CT to viral fusion efficiency. Here, we review current knowledge on the gp41-CT and its believed structure and function as a regulator of viral infectivity. In particular, we focus on variability and subtype-related specificities, as most studies on the gp41-CT are based on the NL4-3 reference and mutants thereof, in sharp contrast to studies on the Env ectodomain.
Structural determinants and topology of the gp41-CT
Structure of the gp41-CT
The gp41-CT of lentiviruses is unusually long (~150 amino acids) and substantially longer than the tails of other retroviruses (< 50 AA)  (Figure 1A). Although amino acid (AA) sequence identity is not conserved, both secondary structures and various endocytic and trafficking motifs are highly conserved across HIV-1 clades and even among lentiviruses in general [29, 30] (Figure 1B). Immediately downstream from the membrane-spanning domain, gp41-CT has a loop containing the highly immunogenic Kennedy epitope (KE) which is not believed to adopt any particular conformation. The KE in fact harbors three consecutive epitopes (P728DRPEG732, I733EEE736 and E739RDRD743) . Antibodies against the KE (SR1) display neutralizing activity against the infectivity of free virus and impair cell-to-cell spread by inhibiting Env-mediated fusion [36–38]. ERDRD is a conformational epitope and elicits production of neutralizing antibodies; the linear IEEE epitope seems to deflect the humoral response to favor viral immune escape from a neutralizing response against ERDRD .
The KE is followed by three α-helical motifs named lentiviral lytic peptides (LLP)-2 (AA 768 to 793 of NL4-3), LLP-3 (AA 785 to 807) and LLP-1 (AA 828 to 856) [39–41] (Figure 1B). LLP-3 partly overlaps LLP-2, and has been less studied than the other two LLP domains. Biochemical analyses with LLP peptides indicate that although primary amino acid identity is not conserved across clades (with the exception of the more conserved LLP-1), these domains adopt an α-helical structure in a membrane-mimetic environments and random coil conformations in an aqueous environment [29, 30]. Early studies focused on determining the role and biochemical properties of these domains; they were based on synthetic peptides and three-dimensional computer modeling [39, 40, 42] or point mutations and truncation mutants of the gp41-CT, analyzing Env incorporation into virions [43–46] (detailed below), viral infectivity  and syncytia formation . In the peptide form, the LLP domains interact with the plasma membrane [41, 48, 49] and thereby decrease bilayer stability [41, 50] or alter the ionic permeability of membranes [48, 50, 51]. Intracellular localization studies suggested that the LLP helices may lie adjacent to and line the plasma membrane  (Figure 2A). These observations have led to the idea that the LLP domains are involved in fusogenicity, immunogenicity, and in conformational regulation of Env accompanying viral maturation and infectivity (see below, section ‘Viral stiffness, viral maturation and infectivity’).
Functional domains of the gp41-CT
Mutational analyses and work with truncation mutants of specific LLP-1 or LLP2 domains indicate varying Env expression and processing phenotypes, depending on the extent of the truncation and on the cell type. Despite subtle differences in the extent of the truncations studied, it appears that deleting the C-terminal domain of LLP-1 diminishes virion infectivity and cell-to-cell spread, due to decreased Env incorporation into virions [43–46, 52] and to diminished Env expression and stability of the gp41/gp120 heterodimeric complex both at the cell membrane and in virions [44, 53]. Env protein synthesis and processing in transfected HeLa or HEK293 cells is however unaffected by truncations of the C-terminal domain of LLP-1 [43, 46, 53]. Larger truncations, i.e. truncation of the full gp41-CT, or the region downstream from LLP-3 (i.e. deleting upstream from LLP-1), or even LLP-1 deletions or point mutations in this region dictate Env fusion capacity of mature  and immature virions [47, 54]. Some authors attributed this phenotype to failed Env multimerization, a prerequisite for viral infectivity [55, 56]; others proposed that truncation of LLP-1 induces modifications of the helical structure of LLP-2 and/or alterations in the structure of the Env ectodomain, suggesting an inside-out regulation of viral infectivity and fusion capacity [46, 47, 54, 57, 58]. Biochemical studies involving the use of synthetic peptides found that viral infectivity is dependent on interactions of LLP-1 and LLP-2 with the cell membrane [49, 56, 58] and/or with regions of the gp41 ectodomain, and particularly the HR1-HR2 6-helix bundle [29, 59, 60]. For SIVmac239, truncations of the gp41-CT affected the fusion capacity of Env in HeLa-CD4 cells by changing the conformation of the Env gp41 ectodomain  or the amount of gp120 on the surface of the virion due to an unstable gp120-gp41 association . Indirect support for gp41-CT affecting the conformation of the gp41 ectodomain has been provided by studies showing that truncations of the gp41-CT affect the conformation of gp120  and of the gp41 ectodomain ; also, such truncations interfere with the accessibility of these domains to antibodies targeting various epitopes including the CD4 or co-receptor binding sites  or the Membrane Proximal External Region (MPER) (neutralizing antibodies such as 2F5 and 4E10) . In addition, a L49D mutation in the matrix protein (MA) of the p55Gag precursor, which interacts with the gp41-CT (see below, section ‘Viral assembly, Env incorporation into virions and viral infectivity’), is associated with decreased amounts of gp120 at the surface of the virion without affecting gp41 incorporation . This suggests that modifications to the MA/gp41-CT interaction may affect the level of gp120 incorporation . This defect could be reversed by truncating the gp41-CT or disrupting the Y712SPL endocytic motif (i.e. impairing Env down-regulation, see section ‘Env trafficking and sorting through the TGN’). This implies that altering the interaction between p55Gag and the gp41-CT affects the conformation of gp41 and thereby the incorporation of gp120 into virions . Although these reports are descriptive and the proposed mechanisms are divergent, these studies agree that the gp41-CT may modulate the conformation of the Env ectodomain [46, 47, 54, 57, 58] and the stability of the 6-helix bundle [29, 59, 60] thereby affecting fusion capacity and sensitivity to neutralization [57, 63].
The dileucine motifs that span the gp41-CT LLP helices play a role in viral replication, as has been demonstrated through a cumulative mutagenesis approach . Bhakta et al. reported a cumulative effect on the infectivity of free virions and on viral propagation that did not correlate with modifications in viral incorporation or expression at the cell membrane . Importantly, disruption of individual dileucine motifs had only a moderate impact, whereas the cumulative effect was substantial, suggesting a degree of flexibility, and tolerance of mutations of single dileucine motifs . This study reconciles early and more recent reports on the role of the gp41-CT, as it suggests that impaired replicative capacity and viral spread may result from disrupting the hydrophobic properties of the LLP-2 α-helix: this disruption may impair interactions with the cell membrane and/or membrane translocation and interaction with the HR1-HR2 6-helix bundle . Another possible explanation is that altering the biochemical amphipathic properties of the gp41-CT, or simply disrupting the LL dileucine domains, interferes with Env/Env interactions and coalescence [33, 55], thereby affecting infectivity. This issue requires further investigation. Intriguingly, a highly conserved seven AA insertion (NSLKGLR) between R787 and R788 (LLP-2 domain) is found in many subtype C strains where the dileucine motifs spanning the gp41-CT are disrupted (ESS, MM and DPB, unpublished observation). The two supplementary α-helical turns result in three arginine residues being aligned side-by-side on the hydrophilic face of the α-helix. Whether adding these two α-helical turns to LLP-2 modifies its biophysical properties remains to be established.
The gp41-CT also harbors many functional determinants, including internalization motifs, for example: two YxxΦ motifs (Φ representing a hydrophobic AA, generally L in HIV and V in SIV), one immediately downstream from the transmembrane domain (membrane-proximal YxxΦ) and one within LLP-2; a Y802W803 diaromatic motif within LLP-3; two inhibitory sequences named IS1 (AA 750 to 763 of HXB2) and IS2 (AA 764 to 785); and the various dileucine (LL) motifs spanning the gp41-CT (Figure 1B). The role of these motifs in Env trafficking and protein-protein interactions is considered in more detail below (section ‘Interactions of the gp41-CT with cellular factors and intracellular regulators’).
Topology of the gp41-CT
gp41 is generally thought to be a type I membrane-spanning protein, with one α-helical membrane spanning domain (MSD) (AA 671–705) . However, alternative models have been proposed, in which the gp41-CT lies partly outside the virus or the infected cell, crossing the membrane three times [38, 60, 67–71] (Figure 2B and C).
The Kennedy Epitope
Serum from HIV-infected individuals contains antibodies against epitopes within the KE. This has led to the hypothesis that this region is exposed extravirally and extracellularly, consistent with gp41 spanning the membrane three times rather than once [38, 67–70]. In this model, the membrane-spanning domains form three antiparallel β-sheets [30, 71] (Figure 2B). In support of this model, IgG against the gp41-CT-encoded epitopes P728DRPEG732, I733EEE736 and E739RDRD743 bound and neutralized free virions, and protease digestion inhibited antibody binding . Other studies showed that neutralization by these antibodies extended to cell-to-cell fusion . However, this model places the Y712SPL internalization motif outside the cell such that it would not allow and ensure an interaction of Env with cellular partners (see section ‘Env trafficking and sorting through the TGN’). Moreover, experiments performed with amphotericin B methyl ester (AME), a cholesterol-binding compound that interferes with virion-cell membrane fusion, showed that AME-resistant HIV variants contained mutations within the gp41-CT that create a cleavage site for the viral protease within the Y712SPL motif . By cleaving the gp41-CT, HIV mimics the shorter gp41-CT of other retroviruses to restore Env fusogenicity [72, 73]. (In the case of SIV, AME-resistant SIV gp41-CT displayed a premature STOP codon , and the topology of the gp41-CT does not affect its capacity to arise). Cleavage of the gp41-CT by the viral protease is not compatible with this epitope lying outside the virion. A more dynamic view of gp41-CT topology has recently been proposed to reconcile these observations  (reviewed in ). This model posits that the KE can adopt various distinct topologies: inside the virion, the KE would lie intravirally (Figure 2A), whereas in transfected/infected cells, the KE would lie outside the cell (Figure 2B) . In support of this model, the authors present evidence that the gp41-CT of all HIV clades and of SIV share a highly conserved enrichment in arginine over lysine [29, 40]. Arginine-rich peptides may be located within lipid environments and may readily cross biological membranes due to their guanidium group; they can also carry soluble proteins across membranes [74–77]. This dynamic model is compatible with the viral protease cleaving the gp41-CT in the virion under AME selective pressure. Note, however, that the authors compared the location of the KE in virions (i.e. in entities containing MA) with that in cells transfected with a construct encoding Env only rather than in cells transfected with a full HIV coding sequence. The interaction between the gp41-CT and p55Gag(see section ‘Interaction of the gp41-CT with Gag’) is not taken into account in this model and it may not be excluded that the absence of Gag in the experimental setup may bias the topology of the gp41-CT, including that of the KE.
The dynamic topology model still predicts that the Y712SPL internalization motif is outside the cell: this is not consistent with the regulation of Env expression at the plasma membrane of infected cells through adaptor protein (AP)-mediated internalization (see section ‘Env trafficking and sorting through the TGN’). The authors  do not address this point. This dynamic model has been opposed on the grounds that the model for a dynamic intra/extra viral localization of the KE is based solely on indirect observations, and in particular labeling with antibodies raised against this epitope . In a very recent study based on the SIV gp41, it was convincingly shown that the reported surface labeling was due to the release of Env from expressing cells into the supernatant; shed Env subsequently attaches to the surface of cells in the culture . The authors report that transferring supernatant from Env-transfected cells to mock-transfected cells was sufficient for labeling of the mock-transfected cells. Furthermore, the PNG in the KE was never glycosylated, and both serum and monoclonal antibodies against the KE failed to neutralize even highly neutralization-sensitive strains .
Biochemical studies led to the suggestion that LLP-2 may also be a traversing peptide, and that it interacts with the extracellular 6-helix bundle at the moment of fusion  (Figure 2C). LLP-2 exposure may be induced by CD4 and CCR5 binding, and be highly transient, as implied by the observations that antibody binding is observed at 31.5°C but not at 37°C and that LLP-2 peptides bind peptides mimicking the 6-helix bundle in biochemical experiments . The mechanisms underlying this crossing of the membrane are unclear; the exact extent of membrane crossing by LLP-2 has not been investigated, so this remains speculative. As this study was based on a biochemical approach using peptides and antibody binding, the possibility of a biased interpretation due to labeling of shed Env subsequently bound to the cell surface, as described by Postler et al. for KE epitopes , cannot be excluded. Furthermore, the absence of other viral proteins from the Env-transfected cell system pleads for caution in interpreting the results, as indicated by the authors themselves . Furthermore, Steckbeck et al. described the introduction of known epitopes into LLP-2, and failed to detect any extracellular or extraviral labeling, whereas similar epitopes inserted within KE epitopes were successfully detected .
These diverse results are such that caution is still required for any conclusions concerning a cell-versus-virion conformation of Env. It remains unclear whether there are such transient rearrangements and biochemical adjustments of Env in response to modifications in the membrane lipid or protein environment during viral assembly or at the moment of fusion; the corresponding observations may be experimental artifacts that do not reflect to biological realities. No images are available of the conformation and distribution of Env gp41-CT in the immature forming virion or in the mature virion. If the gp41-CT does adopt different topologies and if both the KE and LLP-2 are indeed membrane-traversing peptides, it would be interesting to investigate whether both can be found extracellularly at the same time, or whether such a conformation would be too highly unfavorable.
A series of questions remain unanswered. For example, why is there such strong constraint on the structure of the LLP peptides but not on their sequences? How does this structure favor infectivity, motility or clustering of the Env in the virion? Does the conformation of the gp41-CT change upon virion maturation p55Gag cleavage by the viral protease? Does the gp41-CT really adopt different topologies? If so, what triggers the switch from an intraviral/intracellular to extraviral/extracellular localization of KE or of LLP-2, and how are the KE and LLP-2 retained intravirally or “freed”? And what would the function of transiently exposing the highly immunogenic KE be? Alternatively, if the immune response elicited by the KE is due to Env shedding rather than to extracellular exposure, could this be a viral strategy to evade the immune system, by providing immunodominant domains that are subsequently not accessible to antibodies as they are located inside the virion and infected cells?
Viral assembly, Env incorporation into virions and viral infectivity
Env is produced in the RER and the Golgi network, whereas the p55Gag and p160GagPol protein precursors and the accessory proteins are synthesized by cytosolic ribosomes. Viral assembly thus requires viral components synthesized in distinct cellular compartments and the genomic RNA to come together and to interact at the budding interface. Viral assembly is a highly regulated phenomenon, dictated by intracellular trafficking.
HIV assembly and budding occurs at the plasma membrane (PM) [80–84] in detergent-resistant-membrane lipid raft-enriched domains [73, 85–87] (Figure 3). The p55Gag precursor is a polyprotein, including the structural proteins of HIV, namely the matrix protein (MA) lining the cell-derived viral envelope, the capsid protein (CA), constituting the viral cone-shaped capsid containing the viral RNA genome, the nucleocapsid (NC, p7), associated with the viral RNA genome, and p6, regulating the viral protease, as well as two spacer peptides, SP1 and SP2. MA drives and regulates p55Gag targeting to the PM by preferentially interacting with phosphatidylinositol 4,5 bisphosphate [PI(4,5)P2] [88–90]. Once it has reached the PM, the p55Gag precursor is anchored by its N-terminal myristoylated moiety [91, 92] and stabilized by basic residues 84–88 [89, 90, 92]. The myristoylated moiety is co-translationally coupled to the p55Gag MA domain, and its exposure is regulated by binding to calmodulin: binding to calmodulin induces conformational changes within MA [93, 94] which lead to p55Gag binding to lipid rafts [95–97], where it oligomerises [73, 86, 87, 98], through the C-terminal domain of CA and the α-helical spacer peptide SP1, leading to the formation of the immature lattice [99, 100]. In solution, MA within the p55Gag precursor assembles in trimers . In cholesterol-rich membranes composed of phosphatidylcholine, cholesterol and [PI(4,5)P2], myristoylated MA assembles in hexamers of trimers interconnecting the radially oriented immature p55Gag lattice [99, 102, 103].
Four models of viral assembly and budding have been described exhaustively in three recent reviews [25, 104, 105] and will therefore not be addressed in detail again here. Briefly, the “Passive incorporation model” posits that HIV assembly occurs by random co-localization of p55Gag and Env at the cell membrane; it is supported by the observations that a number of cellular membrane proteins are incorporated into virions without stringent restriction, that HIV-1 can be pseudotyped by a variety of retroviral and non-retroviral envelopes (e.g. alphaviruses, ortho/paramixoviruses, flaviviruses, etc.) [106–109], and by the fact that gp41-CT truncations do not affect Env incorporation in some cell types (e.g. the HeLa cell line) (reviewed in [25, 104]). The three other models, in contrast, propose that p55Gag and Env are co-targeted to assembly platforms in a highly regulated fashion, either through direct p55Gag/Env interaction, or through an indirect interaction mediated by lipid rafts, or by other cellular factors (for details, see ). Indeed, several lines of evidence suggest that p55Gag and the gp41-CT interact [52, 110–118]. However, whether the MA/gp41-CT interaction is direct or involves other partners remains controversial and requires further investigation: coimmunoprecipitation studies and cell-free protein-protein interaction studies suggest a direct interaction between gp41-CT and p55Gag[112, 113, 116], but further interactions involving cellular or other viral proteins, such as adaptins AP-1 through AP-4 or TIP47, lipid rafts themselves and other lipid raft components have also been described. One possible explanation for this diversity of reports is that the interacting partners may have stabilizing or facilitating effects, that are not required at all moments, or that are inessential in some cell types. The observation that gp41-CT truncation alters the localization and affects polarization of the viral capsid at the viral synapse (VS) in some cell types (see section ‘Phenotypes of gp41-CT truncations’) supports this view [119, 120].
Interaction of the gp41-CT with Gag
In the absence of Env, Gag and viral-like particles (VLPs) bud in a non-polarized manner from the epithelial cell membrane suggesting the existence of a p55Gag/Env interaction. Env drives p55Gag accumulation and virion budding from the basolateral surface of polarized cells (MDCK cells in early reports, then extended to all polarized cells) [111, 121, 122]. This polarized release was shown both to be mediated by the Y712SPL motif of the gp41-CT and to require interaction between Env and MA [111, 121, 122]. Likewise, truncation of the gp41-CT of a SIV strain resulted in redistribution of cell surface envelope molecules from localized patches to a diffuse pattern that covered the entire plasma membrane . Conversely, Env glycoproteins produced alone are randomly scattered across the cell plasma membrane, whereas in the presence of p55Gag they are recruited to budding sites, suggesting active recruitment to these sites .
Further evidence that a Gag/Env interaction is required for the process of viral assembly arises from the observation that although truncation of the entire gp41-CT generally has little or no effect on Env incorporation, and even increases Env expression at the cell membrane, deletions downstream of the KE (ablating the LLP domains) or small deletions within LLP-2, severely hamper Env incorporation [43–46, 52]. This defect can be reversed by mutations (V34I) in MA . Conversely, it was reported that mutations in the p55Gag precursor MA protein result in decreased plasma membrane expression of Env , and in lower Env stability and virion incorporation [110, 119, 124, 125]. The discovery that mutations in MA interfere with Env incorporation in ‘non-permissive’ cells and that pseudotyping with shorter Envs (MLV or a truncated HIV-2) or truncating the HIV-1 gp41-CT reversed this impairment confirm that the gp41-CT interacts with the p55Gag precursor [52, 114, 115, 118]. Importantly, these findings have led to the idea that the gp41-CT plays a role in assembly during the late stages of the viral cycle, rather than in Env fusogenicity and in entry during the early stages of the replication cycle [52, 114, 118].
The MA/Env interaction has variously been mapped to L12 and L30 within MA [52, 114, 118], to K32 , and to the MA-CA junction [114–116, 118]. The defect in Env incorporation into virions containing the L12E mutation in MA can be reversed by truncations of the gp41-CT depriving it of the LLP domains [114, 115, 118], and MA AA L30 has been shown to interact with the C-terminus of LLP-2 . Other studies based on progressive HIV-1 or SIV gp41-CT truncation mutants (67 AA, or a central peptide of 93 AA) confirmed that this interaction mapped to LLP-2 [52, 112, 113, 126]. Another group however repeatedly mapped the interaction to the 28 C-terminal AA (i.e. to LLP-1) [47, 54, 116]. Despite the diversity of truncations that have been studied, the observation that removal of 59 to 90 AA from the gp41-CT strongly impairs Env incorporation into virions whereas removing 93 AA from the C-terminus does not affect Env incorporation [115, 118] suggests that LLP-2 does not adopt an appropriate conformation in the absence of LLP-1, and fails to accommodate the p55Gag precursor. Lastly, Env and MA sequences from patient-derived viral strains co-evolved over time , providing further ex vivo support for a gp41-CT/p55Gag interaction.
The gp41-CT/p55Gag interaction seems to tolerate a degree of flexibility, as MA mutations that abolish incorporation of HIV-1 Env do not interfere with the incorporation of heterologous retroviral Envs with short CTs [115, 118] and as HIV can be pseudotyped with a variety of retroviral and non-retroviral Env glycoproteins [106–109]. This contrasts with VSV cores, which cannot be pseudotyped by HIV gp160 . The Env/Env interaction mediated by the gp41-CT , in contrast, is highly specific as recent studies mixing Env glycoproteins from lentiviruses (HIV or SIV) and from two retroviruses (RSV and MLV) to produce pseudovirions show that Env clustering at the plasma membrane is dependent on the Env gp41-CT and is limited to autologous Envs [106, 109]; also in another study, the formation of hybrid pseudovirions was not tolerated, although in this case, the non-retroviral Ebola Env glycoprotein and HIV were mixed .
Viral stiffness, viral maturation and infectivity
It is currently believed that the p55Gag precursor orchestrates viral assembly through interactions with all viral components to be incorporated, and that the gp41-CT/p55Gag interaction is involved in controlling viral infectivity in a maturation-dependent fashion. The efficiency of entry and fusion is lower for immature than mature HIV-1 particles [47, 54, 129]. Similar results have been reported for the SIV Env-CT . This inefficiency can be overcome by truncation of the gp41-CT or by LLP-1 truncations [47, 54, 114].
It has been proposed that the plasticity of the lentiviral particle controls its infectivity and fusion capacity [32, 130]. Immature virions are 14 times stiffer than mature particles . The structural rearrangements associated with p55Gag maturation by the viral protease transform the stiff immature viral particle into a mature particle with a thin protein shell and conical core; its ability to enter cells depends on its softness [32, 130]. p55Gag maturation by the viral protease into its distinct components is a regulated and sequential process with particular kinetics : the first cleavage is that of the SP1-NC, and it induces the structural switch of Gag that controls maturation and activates Env [54, 99]. STED microscopy has recently provided visual evidence of such regulation: Env spikes at the surface of mature virions coalesce into foci, whereas in the less infectious immature virion, Env spikes remain scattered across the virion surface . Proteolytic maturation of p55Gag allows Env lateral motility and clustering into foci [33, 132]. However, although truncation of the gp41-CT also favors Env motility on immature particles, it does not result in Env clustering: this provides evidence that gp41-CT-mediated Env clustering optimizes viral infectivity [33, 132], confirming prior reports showing that LLP-1 and LLP-2 mediate Env clustering , partly via Arg residues . Pang et al.  recently used atomic force microscopy to demonstrate a correlation between viral infectivity and virion stiffness. Using different constructs that separate the Env ‘fusion-activity’ (Env∆CT construct) from the ‘stiffness/softness properties’ (GFP-gp41-CT construct), they found that the gp41-CT stiffens immature virions in a concentration-dependent fashion, thereby impairing infectivity of immature (but not mature) particles . Because VSV-G pseudovirions were similarly affected, the authors conclude that particle stiffness directly regulates immature viral entry . Intriguingly, there was no direct interaction between the Env∆CT and the GFP-gp41-CT constructs, implying that the gp41-CT directly stiffens immature viral particles, and that virion stiffness controls virion fusion capacity . These studies indicate biophysical mechanisms underlying the control of viral infectivity by protease-mediated p55Gag cleavage [32, 33, 132]. Although both groups related viral infectivity to viral stiffness, they draw opposite conclusions about the roles of viral stiffness and of the gp41-CT: Chojnacki et al.  propose that the stiffness of the immature particle interferes with Env motility and clustering through the gp41-CT, whereas Pang et al.  propose that it is viral stiffness itself that is controlled by the gp41-CT through an as yet undefined mechanism possibly involving the arrangement or stability of the immature Gag shell. In other words, stiffness impairs Env motility and gp41-CT-mediated Env clustering and infectivity [33, 132], or, alternatively, stiffness is a consequence of the presence of the gp41-CT . Either way, Env ensures minimal fusion until the virus is mature, suggesting a mechanism whereby unprocessed p55Gag “withholds” Env until full maturation by the viral protease is complete through an inside-out regulation mechanism [54, 58, 129].
Control of viral infectivity
The p55Gag precursor is trafficked to and accumulates at the plasma membrane where it recruits viral components (including Env, viral genomic RNA, viral accessory proteins). However, interactions of the gp41-CT with cellular trafficking regulators (discussed below, ‘Interactions of the gp41-CT with cellular factors and intracellular regulators’) down-modulates Env as soon as it reaches the plasma membrane such that it remains scarce until p55Gag oligomerization is complete or, at least, sufficiently dense in the assembly platforms to ensure efficient viral assembly and release  (Figure 3). This mechanism for the regulation of the surface abundance of Env protein may protect infected cells from Env-dependent cytopathic effects, from Env-induced Fas-mediated apoptosis and/or from Env-specific immune responses [133–137]. During, or shortly after virus release, the viral protease cleaves the p55Gag and p160GagPol precursors, resulting in structural and morphological rearrangements of the virion that enable Env fusion capacity [47, 54, 129]. gp41-CT interacts with p55Gag with higher affinity than with mature MA , and this loosened interaction probably favors changes in Env conformation after viral maturation [47, 54] and Env lateral motility . With the completion of maturation, the virion becomes maximally infectious and can start a new round of infection. The scarcity of Env spikes at the surface of virions appears to be a compromise between efficient fusion capacity, through virion softness, clustering of Env into foci, and immune escape.
This mechanism for controlling infectivity differs from that of other retroviruses, such as Murine Leukemia Virus and Mason-Pfizer monkey virus, where the viral gp41-CT is cleaved by the viral protease in the released virion, resulting in Env becoming fusion competent [138, 139].
Clearly, p55Gag is the main pillar of HIV assembly, and recruits the constituents of HIV virions, orchestrates their assembly and controls infectivity of viral particles. Nevertheless, many questions concerning Env recruitment and incorporation into virions remain unresolved. Do p55Gag and Env interact directly or is this interaction indirect? Or, alternatively, are there many contact points, both direct and indirect? In this case, are these multiple interactions permanent and simultaneous, or is there a sequential order important for the control of viral assembly and/or infectivity? Which Env determinants are involved? Many cellular proteins have been described to interact with the gp41-CT (detailed below, section ‘Interactions of the gp41-CT with cellular factors and intracellular regulators’), but it is not known which bridge the p55Gag/Env interaction and which serve other purposes. It is unclear which are, as a consequence, incorporated in newly synthesized viral particle, and if they are, whether they are included passively or contribute to the initial steps of the following infection round.
Phenotypes of gp41-CT truncations
Despite numerous studies addressing the role of the gp41-CT domain, the roles of particular determinants remain poorly documented. One reason why the gp41-CT remains poorly understood is that the effects of gp41-CT truncations and/or mutations are cell-type dependent. For example, many transformed T-cell lines (e.g. the cell lines H9, MT-2, Jurkat, and CEMx174) and primary target cells of HIV (primary CD4+ T cells and macrophages) do not sustain replicative spread of viruses with a truncated gp41-CT; these cells are referred to as ‘non-permissive’ for gp41-CT truncation. Other cells, in contrast, such as the T cell lines MT-4 and C8166 and several laboratory cell lines (HEK293T, HeLa, and COS) are less affected by full or partial truncations of the gp41-CT and sustain replication of the corresponding viruses (termed ‘permissive’ cells) [43–45, 119, 120, 140–142]. Truncation of gp41-CT decreases Env incorporation into virions by about 10-fold in ‘non-permissive’ cell lines and in primary HIV target cells (i.e. primary PBMCs and monocyte-derived-macrophages), but has a much smaller effect in ‘permissive cells’ [119, 120]. An illustrative example, albeit extreme, is that truncation mutants have different effects in macrophages , perhaps owing to differentiation and culture conditions. Compromised infectivity and replication capacity in ‘non-permissive’ cells has been linked to altered localization of the viral capsid that failed to accumulate and polarize at the viral synapse [119, 120], but not to increased gp120 shedding from virions nor to reduced Env cell-surface expression [110, 119, 120, 140]. HIV and SIV viral particles contain relatively small amounts of Env (~7-14 Env trimers/virion) [143–145], due to both the massive recycling of neo-synthesized Env and to Env shedding. These findings and comparisons are thus difficult to interpret and their biological relevance is unclear.
It is not clear how gp41-CT truncations may impact Env incorporation into virions without affecting Env expression at the PM or Env trafficking through the ER and Golgi networks, as one could expect Env incorporation into virions to be related to the amount of Env at the PM. One possible explanation is that inherent differences between cell types in the expression or localization of host factors play a role in viral assembly; this would account for the cell-type dependent phenotypes of gp41-CT truncations and mutations. A second possible explanation is that because the gp41-CT activates the NF-κB canonical pathway , gp41-CT truncations interfere with the cell activation status (see section ‘Activation of transcription’). Cell types and cell lines differ in their basal activation levels and in their dependence on NF-κB, and it is therefore conceivable that truncations of the gp41-CT could translate into cell-type-dependent phenotypes .
One recent study  compared the infectivity of sub-saturating titers of wild-type and of a HIV-1 gp41-CT-truncated mutant in various gp41-CT truncation ‘permissive’ (MT-4, C8166) and ‘non-permissive’ (H9, MT-2, Jurkat, CEM-SS) cell lines: the ‘permissive’ and ‘non-permissive’ phenotypes of target cells correlated with the level of gene expression, and particularly of p55Gag production and processing to mature capsid (CA), rather than with Env incorporation into the virion . In ‘non-permissive’ cells, viral assembly was compromised as a consequence of p55Gag failing to accumulate and polarize at the viral synapse (VS), whereas in ‘permissive’ cell lines, high levels of p55Gag overrode and compensated for the absence of the gp41-CT . This study could reconcile the cell-type dependence of Env incorporation with a dual role for the gp41-CT, being involved in Env incorporation into virions and polarized budding on one hand and in cell activation and regulating viral gene transcription on the other.
The situation is more clear-cut for the SIV gp41-CT. SIV Env truncations have been reported to arise spontaneously when culturing SIV in human cell lines, and then to revert back following culture in simian cells [146–149]. These truncations increased Env surface expression, fusogenicity [61, 150] and infectivity in vitro[147, 151]. These SIV gp41-CT truncation mutants are replication competent both in vitro and in vivo, but lack full pathogenicity in vivo: macaques infected with a LLP-1- and LLP-2-defective SIVmac239 initially had viremia, but the viral load declined with time to below the detection threshold; the infected macaques never progressed to AIDS . A similar phenotype has been reported for HIV-2 [147, 153]. Spontaneous truncations of the gp41-CT of SIV cultured in human cell lines and reversion in rhesus PBMCs may reflect the presence of a restriction factor whose action is inhibited by the gp41-CT in rhesus cells, but which is absent from human PBMCs or ineffective against SIV . Alternatively, spontaneous truncations of the gp41-CT in human PBMCs or T cell lines may improve viral infectivity by enhancing Env expression and thereby incorporation into virions. The truncation of the SIV gp41-CT observed in human cell lines may remove signals mediating Env trafficking such that the higher Env density at the surface of SIV virions is preserved. Further studies to elucidate how these phenomena are related and the real consequences of Env levels in the virion may reveal new leads for the development of strategies to control viral assembly.
Interactions of the gp41-CT with cellular factors and intracellular regulators
A number of cell factors have been described to interact with the gp41-CT: in some cases, the interactions have simply been described without any evidence of significance, and in others, the significance is controversial. Nonetheless, most of these interactions between the gp41-CT and cellular factors contribute to improving viral replication, by promoting viral gene expression, enhancing viral infectivity, or interfering with intrinsic cellular restriction factors or immunity. Innate immunity has developed many (often interferon-induced) pathways to counter gene expression and the late stages of the viral replication cycle, namely assembly and budding, as these are essential steps for viral propagation. It seems likely that such factors are, at least in part, responsible for the cell-type-dependent phenotypes observed.
Env trafficking and sorting through the trans Golgi network (TGN)
Golgi retrieval signals function to return proteins which have left the Golgi to that compartment; Golgi retention signals, by contrast, are generally found in the transmembrane domain of Golgi and ER resident proteins. The main Golgi retrieval signals are cytoplasmic domain tyrosine-based or dileucine motifs [154, 155]. The gp41-CT contains both Golgi retrieval (tyrosine-based and dileucine-based) and Golgi retention motifs . They regulate Env trafficking through the endocytic pathway [157–159].
AP-mediated Env endocytosis
As soon as Env comes into contact with the plasma membrane, it is endocytosed. Time course analyses show that 50% of Env, but only 15% of a gp41-CT-truncated Env, is internalized after 60 minutes ; and similar time courses have been reported using a chimeric CD4 molecule fused to the gp41-CT . These observations indicate that the gp41-CT mediates endocytosis. Env is endocytosed via interactions with the clathrin adaptor complex (AP proteins) [157–159]. Clathrin adaptors sort and direct proteins through the endocytic pathway. The highly conserved Y712SPL motif of HIV (and Y721XXΦ of SIV) immediately downstream from the transmembrane region has been implicated in regulating Env intracellular trafficking by binding clathrin adaptor AP-2 μ (medium) chains [157–159] (Figure 3 and 4). The Y712SPL motif can also interact with the AP-1 and AP-3 adaptor complexes through μ1 and μ3A, respectively . Whereas the interaction of the gp41-CT Y712SPL motif with AP-2 leads to Env internalization, interaction with AP-1 regulates Env trafficking through the TGN and addresses Env to the basolateral PM in polarized cells  (Figure 3 and 4). The AP-2 adaptor complex also mediates p55Gag internalization through Y132 and V135 at the MA-CA junction , and the AP-1 μ  and AP-3 β and δ subunits contribute to p55Gag release. They do so by transporting it to intracellular sites of active budding, such as MVBs and the PM [162, 163] and/or by facilitating its interaction with other cellular partners such as Tsg101 . The interaction between Env and various proteins of the AP clathrin adaptor complex may therefore be involved in the p55Gag/gp41-CT interaction and determine the fate of Env (targeting to the lysosomal compartment for degradation, or to the basolateral plasma membrane for incorporation into virions).
Y712SPL-mediated endocytosis is suppressed in the presence of the HIV-1 p55Gag precursor polyprotein [133, 164]. This suggests that p55Gag interferes with the Env/AP-2 interaction and that the amount of Env at the cell surface is regulated by the AP-2 versus p55Gag balance. AP-2 may thus eliminate any Env protein that is not associated with p55Gag and that is therefore not destined for incorporation into virions [133, 164]. Env internalization may proceed until sufficient p55Gag has been synthesized and has accumulated at the site of viral assembly, at which point, p55Gag would interact with Env directly or indirectly, thereby trapping Env into the nascent virion [133, 165]. In the case of SIV, mutating the Y721 in agp41-CT truncated Env resulted in increased Env expression at the plasma membrane, whereas mutations of Y721 in a full-length gp41-CT context had little impact on Env expression at the plasma membrane [123, 166]. Presumably, other motifs involved in endocytic regulation overcome the single mutation.
Additional distal determinants also regulate Env internalization . These have now been identified as being the most distal C-terminal dileucine motif [167, 168] and/or IS1 and IS2 Golgi retention sequences . Recruitment of AP-1  and AP-2  by the most C-terminal dileucine motif ensures correct post-Golgi routing of Env, and restricts cell surface expression of Env in conjunction with the membrane-proximal Y712SPL motif [167, 168] (Figure 3 and 4).
Both the Y712SPL motif and the most C-terminal dileucine motif are extremely well conserved across HIV-1 subtypes (except subtype C), and also in HIV-2 and SIV strains, evidence of their importance (Figure 1B). Similar signals in cellular proteins or in the glycoproteins of other viruses (e.g. alpha herpesviruses) affect endocytosis as well as intracellular trafficking in endosomes and the TGN, and can determine basolateral versus apical sorting (reviewed in [169, 170]). It is nevertheless intriguing that subtype C viruses harbor a LQ rather than LL (dileucine) at this position in over 60% of cases. As the requirement for an intact C-terminal dileucine motif for correct interaction with AP-1 and with Nef (see below, section ‘Assembly’) seems to be quite stringent , these observations raise three possibilities: (i) other motifs are involved, or (ii) Env trafficking differs between subtypes, and differences in sub-cellular localization are less detrimental to viral assembly and infectivity than previously believed, or (iii) subtype C Env internalization is less efficient and more Env is expressed at the surface of infected cells and possibly on virions of subtype C than of other subtypes; this could be a cause or consequence of the weaker antibody response or of the lower replicative capacity.
Another tyrosine-based motif, Y768HRL, is present in the gp41-CT. Although this motif also interacts with AP-1, AP-2 and AP-3, it is not involved in endocytosis of Env, perhaps because of its localization in the gp41-CT, but may mediate NF-κB gene expression  (see below, section ‘Activation of Transcription’). Likewise, one or two other YxxΦ motifs are present in various SIV strains and in HIV-2, but none has been shown to mediate endocytosis .
Most Env is retained in the ER, and from there ubiquitinated and degraded by the proteasome. Only a small proportion actually reaches the Golgi and proceeds to the cell surface. Nevertheless, Env is also retained in the Golgi . The IS1 (AA 750–763) and IS2 (AA 764–785) regions in the gp41-CT reduce Env surface expression by retaining Env in the Golgi, independently of AP-1 and AP-2  (Figure 4). These sequences include LL (or IL motifs, which behave similarly to LL in Golgi retrieval ), and result in retention in the Golgi of gp160 and of chimeric proteins composed of the gp41-CT fused to the CD4 receptor or to immunoglobulin extracellular/transmembrane domains. These sequences are also highly conserved across subtypes  (Figure 1B).
The leucine-zipper domain, LLP-3, also contains a highly conserved Y802W803 diaromatic motif. This motif has been found to be involved in the retrograde transport of Mannose-6-Phosphate Receptors and in lipid droplet biogenesis. The Y802W803 motif in Env ensures the retrograde transport of Env from late endosomes to the TGN (Figure 3) and thereby contributes to the regulation of the intracellular distribution of Env, and to Env incorporation into the virion, particularly in macrophages [165, 172–175]. Lopez-Vergèz et al. reported that TIP47 is required for the p55Gag/gp41-CT interaction . Disruption of the p55Gag/TIP47 interaction through mutations in MA or by TIP47 knock-down causes p55Gag to localize in scattered dots in the vicinity of the PM. These observations led to the suggestion that TIP47 acts as a linker between Env and p55Gag, and serves as a bridge for efficient Env incorporation . However, other authors report not being able to reproduce these findings .
Rab7A and other RabGTPases
Rab proteins are early and late-endosome associated GTPases that regulate specific steps in intracellular membrane trafficking. They recruit tethering, docking and fusion factors, as well as the actin- and microtubule-based motor proteins that facilitate vesicle traffic [176–180]. In a study aiming to identify cellular trafficking factors involved in HIV assembly and budding, Caillet et al. report that Rab4A, Rab6A, Rab8A, Rab9A, and Rab11A moderately decreased viral infection (by 30-60%) in HeLa cells, probably in relation to their roles as regulators of the exocytic pathway [173, 181, 182]. Rab7A knock-down resulted in a?>?30-fold decrease in viral propagation . Rab7A is involved in regulating exit from the late endosome/MVB by controlling the maturation and fusion of late endosomes and phagosomes with lysosomes, their intracellular motility when loaded with lipids, and their interaction with the cytoskeleton for migration along microtubules [176, 178–180, 183–185]. Of particular interest is the finding that Rab7A has a dual activity. Rab7A knock-down experiments using siRNA also showed that Rab7A regulated and allowed gp160 processing to gp120?+?gp41 and incorporation of mature Env into particles (Figure 3). The authors propose that Rab7A may either ensure correct Env trafficking through furin-containing compartments, or ensure appropriate co-localization of Env and/or of furin; alternatively, Rab7A may modulate Env expression, and in the absence of Rab7A, Env is expressed to levels that exceed the processing capacity of furin .
Rab7A knock-down also interfered with viral release, resulting in the accumulation of gp160 and viral components at the PM, reminiscent of a BST-2/Tetherin phenotype . The authors report that Rab7A is required for sorting BST-2/Tetherin to lysosomes for degradation through molecular mechanisms that remain to be elucidated  (Figure 3). Rab7A is also involved in the late maturation of the final autophagic vacuoles [186, 187].
Strikingly, the role of Rab7A shares similarities with that of Nef (see section ‘Nef’ below) in mediating increased Env at the PM  and in intercepting the autophagic processing of Gag to increase virion assembly and egress [189, 190]; both also affect traffic through the endocytic pathway . It would be interesting to find out whether Nef intersects the Rab7A or Rab5 signaling cascades.
Rab9A is a mediator of late endosome-to-TGN trafficking involved in the replication of many viruses, including Marburg Virus, Filoviruses and Measles. It interacts with TIP47 and PRA1 (prenylated Rab acceptor 1), both cellular interacting partners of gp41-CT . PRA1 has been reported to interact with lentiviral gp41-CT (SIV, HIV-1 and 2, EIAV and FIV) in a 2-hybrid system  without modulating viral release, infectivity or Env incorporation . The significance of these interactions remains unclear, but as both Rab9A and PRA-1 are involved in vesicular trafficking, it is possible that they participate in regulating Env trafficking through the Golgi.
Detergent-resistant lipid rafts
Detergent-resistant lipid rafts are cellular microdomains enriched in cholesterol and sphingolipids and which contain proteins. Lipid rafts are thought to play an important role in many cellular processes including signal transduction, membrane trafficking, protein oligomerization, cytoskeletal organization, and pathogen entry (reviewed in [193–195]). Lipid rafts are thought to be central to the assembly and infectivity of numerous enveloped viruses, including lentiviruses. The lipid bilayer of HIV virions is highly enriched in cholesterol and sphingomyelin, both of which are major components of lipid rafts [196, 197]. Also, p55Gag and Env and have been co-localized with lipid raft-associated proteins [73, 85–87]. Env incorporation into lipid rafts optimizes its incorporation into virions and confers viral infectivity . Conversely, excluding HIV from lipid rafts impairs viral infectivity [85, 199–203]. The 12 C-terminal amino acids of LLP-1 and portions of LLP-3 [43, 44, 49, 204], and also palmitoylated cysteines C764 and C837, and bulky hydrophobic side chains, have been implicated in targeting Env to lipid rafts [198, 205] (Figure 4). In contrast to the reports by Bhattacharya [198, 206], Chan et al.  found that Cys to Ser and Cys to Ala mutations had no significant effect on Env expression, trafficking, interaction with lipid rafts and incorporation into virions, or on the fusion efficiency or infectivity in single-cycle infections, despite decreased palmytoylation of Env .
Other studies argue against any substantial direct targeting of Env to lipid rafts, and suggest, rather, that it is p55Gag that recruits and anchors Env to lipid rafts . Various observations imply that p55Gag drives Env to lipid rafts. First, mutation of residue S4 in MA abolishes the interaction of p55Gag with lipid rafts resulting in reduced Env incorporation into virions, presumably by inhibiting the ability of p55Gag to target or hold Env within raft microdomains . Second, independent studies have reported that in the absence of p55Gag, or in the presence of MA or gp41-CT mutations that abolish Env incorporation into virions, Env was not found associated with detergent-resistant membranes [198, 206]. The observation that neither the cysteine residue in LLP-1 nor the presence of bulky AA is conserved between subtypes raises further doubts about a direct interaction between Env and lipid rafts. This polymorphic flexibility is more consistent with the view that Env is recruited to lipid rafts through p55Gag, and/or that other determinants are also involved. Nonetheless, it cannot be excluded that under certain circumstances, particularly in transfection experiments involving strong viral gene overexpression, Env may be passively incorporated into virions; a phenomenon of this type would explain the contrasting results reported.
In the cases of other enveloped viruses, such as Influenza Virus  and Respiratory Syncytial Virus , the matrix/lipid raft interaction is favored by, or even dependent on, the presence of the respective envelope cytoplasmic tails. Whether lentiviral gp41-CTs also somehow influence the MA/lipid raft interaction has not been described.
Interplay between the Env gp41-CT and the viral accessory protein Nef has been reported to increase viral infectivity [211, 212]. The viral accessory protein Nef is a pleiotropic non-enzymatic, myristoylated, HIV and SIV lentivirus pathogenesis factor. Nef increases viral infectivity through various, not fully elucidated, mechanisms involving immune escape [213–216] (reviewed in ), increased viral infectivity and propagation [106, 212, 218–222], and perturbed immune activation, thereby promoting a favorable environment for viral replication [90, 216, 219, 223–227]). Most of Nef’s functions are due to its ability to influence the cellular environment, mainly through protein-protein interactions which interfere with cell-receptor trafficking or are involved in T cell receptor (TCR)-induced signaling .
It has been proposed that Nef promotes Env gp160 precursor processing and PM expression of the mature gp120 and gp41 products by abrogating their retention in the cis-Golgi [106, 212], and by specifically augmenting Env accumulation at the PM . Enhanced Env at the PM was found to be dependent on the C-terminal dileucine motif of the gp41-CT and on the C-terminal residues of Nef (positions 181–210), and it was suggested that Nef increases Env incorporation into virions . Whether the gp41-CT Golgi retention sequences IS1 and IS2 are also involved has not been investigated.
Others have proposed that Nef may modulate cell signaling thereby altering intracellular trafficking and augmenting Env accumulation in late endosomes/MVBs . Nef-insensitive Env glycoproteins from various enveloped viruses share pH-dependence (Influenza-HA, VSV-G and HCV), and most importantly, lack endocytic traffic motifs, budding in compartments other than MVBs (HCV) or at the cell PM (Influenza-HA, VSV-G). Glycoproteins needing Nef for optimal assembly harbor determinants of intracellular trafficking through the endocytic pathway and assemble in MVBs [106, 229]. Furthermore, the role of Nef in Env and p55Gag precursor co-localization could be linked, at least to some extent, to Gag expression levels, and this may explain the cell-dependence and the gp41-CT ‘permissive’ versus ‘non-permissive’ phenotypes. The incorporation into pseudovirions of some retroviral and lentiviral Envs is increased in the presence of Nef, but not for those for which Env incorporation was already optimal . Sandrin et al. conclude from these observations that Nef expression optimizes co-localization of retroviral Envs with p55Gag in late endosomes/MVBs specifically for those Envs that inherently do not accumulate in the endosomal pathway . This is consistent with the observation that Nef [231–233], the gp41-CT [167, 168] and p55Gag[160–163] all interact with adaptins AP-1 through 3, suggesting these intermediates may be involved. It would be interesting to assess whether this observation is relevant to the findings of another study: the absence of the scaffold protein Dlg1 was described to restrict late steps of the HIV cycle due to Gag and Env rerouting and sequestration in a tetraspannin-rich (CD63+ and CD82+) late-endosome and plasma-membrane-related compartment .
Nef also interacts directly with the p55Gag and p160GagPol precursors via p6* in the overlap region between p6 and pol[234, 235], and increases p55Gag and p160GagPol processing and egress via AIP-1/ALIX, a critical intermediate in the formation and proliferation of multivesicular bodies (MVBs) [221, 233, 234]. It has been suggested that the Nef-induced p55Gag accumulation in late endosomes/MVBs is linked to autophagy. Autophagy is a cell survival and host defense mechanism by which cells degrade their own cytoplasmic constituents during starvation and microbial invasion; it involves clearing damaged organelles, macromolecular aggregates and intracellular microbes through double-membrane vacuoles, termed autophagosomes, which typically mature into amphisomes or autolysosomes after fusing with MVBs or lysosomes [236–238]. Nef has been suggested to increase virion assembly and egress by intercepting the autophagy process [189, 190]; however, the mechanisms of HIV p55Gag incorporation into the autophagosome leading to the release of HIV Gag particles into the extracellular environment remain largely unknown.
It is important to keep in mind, however, that recent work to identify the localization of HIV assembly in different cell types, and particularly in 293T cells and in macrophages, were performed using viral-like particles (VLPs) and VSV-G pseudotypes which target the p55Gag precursor to the PM. From there, it either buds releasing new infectious viral particles or is endocytosed and accumulates in late endosomes and MVBs [80, 81, 239]. Most of these studies are based on the use of VLP and of pseudovirions comprising a heterologous Env, and on large p55Gag or VLP/pseudovirion input, i.e. high Gag overexpression. The precise fate of p55Gag precursor protein that has not budded from the PM and that has been endocytosed into late endosomes and MVBs is not known; more importantly, it remains to be established how and where Env and Nef interplay with the p55Gag precursor to allow the release of fully infectious virions.
The Nef/gp41 interplay also involves other mechanisms independent of the gp41-CT and of its trafficking domains. Another function of Nef is to promote the biogenesis of viral assembly platforms including rafts and MVBs [221, 222]. Nef can accumulate in lipid rafts and thereby contribute to infectivity of progeny virions by increasing the incorporation of lipids into viral membranes . Whether Nef further favors or stabilizes the insufficient interaction of Env with lipid rafts, in conjunction or not with Gag, is still not known. In another study, the N-terminal region of Nef and its myristoylated moiety was shown to decrease the sensitivity of the gp41 ectodomain to neutralization by antibodies targeting the MPER epitopes that are embedded in the virion lipid bilayer (2F5 and 4E10) [240–242] and thereby contribute to viral escape from the humoral immune response . This activity did not affect Env incorporation into virions, and the authors suggest that the susceptibility of neutralization to these epitopes may be modulated by Nef-mediated alteration of the lipid bilayer composition .
The consequences of Nef deletions, like those of gp41-CT truncations, are cell-type dependent [244, 245]. In ‘Nef non-permissive’ cells, Nef deletion affects the early stages of viral infection and only slightly modulates the late stages of the viral replication cycle (assembly, release and maturation) [244, 245]. Although there has been no direct pair-wise comparative study of gp41-CT truncations and Nef deletion mutants to our knowledge, it is interesting that there is some overlap between the gp41-CT and Nef ‘permissive’/’non-permissive’ phenotypes (e.g. MT-4 cells are ‘permissive’ to both, whereas primary CD4 cells and macrophages, and H9, Jurkat and CEMx174 cells are ‘non-permissive’ to both [119, 120, 244, 245]). The reported effects of gp41-CT truncations and of Nef deletions on viral replication can differ in a given ‘non-permissive’ cell type (e.g. C1866 cells are ‘permissive’ to gp41-CT truncations [119, 120] but are partially ‘non-permissive’ to Nef truncations) [244, 245], although such comparisons should be interpreted with caution as the results come from different groups with different experimental set-ups. Day et al. reported that the incorporation of an Env Y712A mutant into virions was impaired in the absence of Nef in MT-4 cells but not in HEK293 cells . This is intriguing because MT-4 cells are ‘permissive’ to both gp41-CT truncation and Nef deletion. One would have expected the Env Y712A ∆Nef double mutant not to display impaired Env incorporation when produced in this cell type. One possible explanation is that in gp41-CT ‘permissive’ cells, Nef plays a “compensatory” role: in the absence of Nef, the gp41-CT ‘permissive’ cell-line becomes ‘non-permissive’ to gp41-CT mutations. Alternatively, the correct routing of Env and/or Nef to intracellular trafficking compartments may play a crucial role in viral assembly and Env incorporation. Mutations disrupting the Y712SPL endocytic motif and truncation mutants may behave differently.
Calmodulin is a calcium-induced mediator of FAS-mediated apoptosis. The gp41-CT binds calmodulin [246, 247] and induces apoptosis of T cells, thereby accounting for most of the CD4+ T cell decline that characterizes HIV infection [134, 248]. Amino acids Ala835, Ala838 and Ile842 of LLP-1 have been identified as being involved in calmodulin binding and inducing Ca2+ flux and DNA fragmentation in transfected cells [134, 136, 137, 246, 247] (Figure 4). Point mutations of the gp41-CT (A835W, A838W, A838I, and I842R) eliminate co-immunoprecipitation of Env with calmodulin but have no significant effect on viral production or Env expression [135, 137]. Therefore, active Env cycling through the endocytic pathway may prevent Env-mediated apoptosis and thereby avoid premature cell-death and ensure viral assembly [133, 164]. Because the gp41-CT/calmodulin interaction is deleterious to the virus by itself, it is likely that this interaction is “collateral damage” from other actions of calmodulin in viral assembly. These other actions include ensuring the conformational changes of MA so as to expose the myristoylated moiety that docks p55Gag in assembly platforms at the PM [73, 86, 87, 93, 94, 98].
Although independent reports have described Ala835 as being the calmodulin-binding site [136, 137], Ala835 is not conserved across clades, and there is a Leu, Ile, Thr or Phe at the corresponding position in some strains. Possibly, polymorphism at this position explains the diverse calmodulin-binding activity of Envs and correlates with their apoptotic potential; indeed, the A835W mutation used in many studies fully abolishes the ability of the gp41-CT to bind calmodulin. If this were the case, late, more cytopathic or apoptosis-inducing Envs would be expected to all have an Ala835 and to bind more calmodulin, whereas the less pathogenic, early and chronic-infection viral isolates would be expected to bind less calmodulin and be more polymorphic at this position.
The dileucine motifs of LLP-2/LLP-3 (AA 790–800), and more specifically the dileucine motif L799L800 immediately upstream from the Y802W803 diaromatic motif, has been found to interact with prohibitin 1/2 (Phb) . These proteins are produced almost ubiquitously; they are localized in numerous cellular compartments including mitochondria, the plasma membrane PM and the nucleus, and are also associated with lipid rafts. Disruption of the gp41-CT/Phb association, like gp41-CT truncation mutants, impairs cell-to-cell transmission in ‘non-permissive’ cells  (Figure 3 and 4). It is however not known whether this association genuinely contributes to the cell-to-cell transmission capacity of diverse HIV Envs or whether they are passively bound to gp41 at the time of assembly into lipid rafts. The L799L800 motif is not conserved between subtypes and is in many cases replaced by Val, particularly in subtype C. Nonetheless, in this work, the gp41-CT/Phb association was disrupted only when both Leu residues were mutated: single mutants were unaffected . These findings suggest that this interaction, or interactions of this L799L800 motif with other cellular factors, is important enough to be preserved despite sequence variation. Moreover, this motif is also involved in interacting with p155-RhoGEF to block RhoA activation [250, 251] (see section ‘Activation of transcription’ below), but there is no indication to date that these two paths converge.
Activation of transcription
It was recently shown that the gp41-CT of HIV-1 activates NF-κB via the canonical pathway by interacting directly with TFG-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) . TAK1 activates the transcription factors NF-κB and AP-1. TAK1 is itself activated by cytokines and microbial pathogens, and phosphorylates IκB, routing it for proteasomal degradation, thereby allowing NF-κB to translocate into the nucleus . The gp41-CT/TAK1 interaction maps to the N-terminus of LLP-2 (C764-L775) and involves Y768 in the second YxxL motif  (Figure 3 and 4). The HIV-1 LTR contains 2 (or 3, depending on subtype) NF-κB-binding sites . The authors show that HIV mutants lacking the NF-κB-activating domains were more heavily dependent on cellular activation for replication, and thereby elegantly demonstrated that the gp41-CT contributes to viral replication in sub-optimally activated T lymphocytes by inducing the canonical NF-κB pathway . In the case of SIV, the gp41-CT also activates the NF-κB pathway, but by acting upstream from TAK1, on a factor that has not yet been identified . One of the functions of SIV and HIV Nef is to increase cellular activation in a manner similar to that induced by TCR engagement [90, 228, 254–257] in a NF-κB-independent manner [224, 226, 258, 259]. Consequently, it has been suggested that Nef and Env may act in concert to progressively and steadily activate gene expression resulting in a positive feedback loop . Alternatively, the early viral gene product Nef and the late gene product Env gp41-CT may act at different times or stages in the viral replication cycle, and induce different activation pathways , thereby fulfilling the requirement for two independent stimuli to fully activate T cells [260, 261].
Luman (LZIP or CREB3) is a transcription factor belonging to the CREB/ATF family; it has been linked to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response. Luman activates the transcription of genes involved in ER-associated degradation of unfolded proteins [262–264]. The ER-membrane-bound form of luman is inactive; proteolytic cleavage releases an active form which enters the nucleus . This activated form of luman interferes with Tat-mediated HIV transcription . gp41-CT interacts with the ER-bound inactive precursor of luman, decreases its stability and targets it for degradation, thereby indirectly promoting LTR-mediated transcription (Figure 3). This interaction maps to residues 751–768, the region lying between the KE and LLP-2  (Figure 4), and partly overlaps the gp41-CT region that interacts with TAK1 (C764-L775) . Whether these two mechanisms somehow overlap or converge has not been explored.
Activation of RhoA through p155-RhoGEF inhibits HIV replication by affecting gene expression . The gp41-CT of HIV interacts with p155-RhoGEF and thereby relieves the RhoA-induced inhibition [250, 251]. This interaction involves L799 in LLP-3. L799 is highly conserved, and is part of the dileucine motif interacting with Phb1/2  which tolerates polymorphic changes (Figure 4). Mutations in gp41-CT leading to loss of interaction with p115-RhoGEF impair HIV-1 replication in the human Jurkat T cell line (‘non-permissive’ to gp41-CT truncations) [250, 251]. p155-RhoGEF is a specific guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) involved in actin cytoskeletal organization rearrangements  through activation of RhoA GTPase, which is in turn involved in actin stress fiber organization, cell cycle progress through G1 and cell proliferation. Nonetheless, the gp41-CT-mediated relief of RhoA-mediated viral inhibition seems to be independent of the stress fiber formation function of RhoA and to involve other, as yet unknown, RhoA-mediated mechanisms . Furthermore, whether this viral inhibition also applies in ‘permissive’ T cells or whether it is restricted to ‘non-permissive’ is not known: both relevant studies used ‘non-permissive’ cells. Comparisons between ‘permissive’ and ‘non-permissive’ cells may provide some clues as to the mechanism of action of this cellular factor in the HIV replication cycle.
Immune evasion: countering intrinsic restriction/countering antiviral restriction factors
Tetherin (BST-2 or CD317) is an interferon-inducible transmembrane protein that restricts the release of nascent viral particles from infected cells by tethering them to the PM [266, 267] reviewed in [268, 269]. HIV-1 counteracts tetherin activity through Vpu (HIV-1) [266, 267] which enhances ESCRT-dependent sorting for lysosomal degradation [270, 271], whereas SIV Nef , and the HIV-2 Env ectodomain  counteract tetherin by intracellular sequestration through internalization motifs. One recent study reported that a Nef-deleted SIV strain acquired compensatory changes within the gp41-CT that restored resistance to rhesus tetherin through direct gp41-CT/tetherin interaction that sequestered tetherin . The alterations of the SIV gp41-CT involved a tyrosine-based internalization motif similar to the HIV-2 gp41-CT , underlining the importance of countering tetherin and of Env trafficking for lentiviral replication. No such evolution has been reported for HIV-1.
Numerous cellular proteins have been described to interact with the gp41-CT. Some of these proteins and interactions have been studied in detail, particularly those involved in Env internalization and trafficking through the TGN. However, in many cases, the role or the mechanisms of these interactions have not been documented. In some cases, the results and interpretations are controversial, and raise questions about whether the proteins are really involved in the viral replication cycle as active partners, or whether they are passively incorporated into the assembly platform, where they make only a limited if any contribution to viral replication. Different studies have been performed using different cell types and cell lines, each with their specific characteristics. Thus, there are issues about whether they reflect phenotypes of cell types relevant to the HIV replication cycle in vivo. Similarly, do these experimental models reflect the context of cell-to-cell transmission where the vicinity of cells and cell contacts are determinant parameters of viral infection and transmission? Some motifs involved in Env internalization and trafficking, as well as those involved in interaction with lipid rafts and in enhanced viral gene expression, are highly conserved across subtypes; others seems to display non-negligible sequence variation. It would be useful to assess whether such apparent tolerance identifies interactions that are less vital for viral replication, or whether the virus has acquired other compensatory polymorphisms to override decreased efficiency of that particular interaction.
Initially considered to be inessential for the HIV replication cycle, the gp41-CT has now been demonstrated to be a pleiotropic domain: it is required for viral infectivity by ensuring Env incorporation into the virion on one hand, and contributing to enhanced viral replication in target cells through many still incompletely understood interactions on the other. Work on the gp41-CT has revealed that lentiviral assembly relies on finely coordinated interactions between diverse viral components subverting cell trafficking and activation factors. The virus thereby optimizes the infectious capacity of the neo-synthesized particle, prevents immune responses and preserves the virus-producing host cell until viral release. The uncontrolled release of immature virions would not only hinder viral propagation and be deleterious to the long-term maintenance of viral infection, but would also provoke a series of bystander effects, including Env-induced apoptosis, Env-mediated disruptive effects, and sensitivity to humoral immune responses.
The Env expressed on the surface of infected cells and of virions is one of the most powerful escape mechanisms developed by HIV. Its extreme variability, dense glycosylation and its very efficient cell-to-cell spreading capacity ensure extremely effective virus shielding. This shielding is further strengthened by the only weak expression of Env at the surface of infected cells and of virions, resulting from its late expression during the viral replication cycle, intense cycling and down-regulation through the TGN. Interference with cellular trafficking factors further contributes to viral masking. These latter functions are all fulfilled by the gp41-CT. Indeed, despite some sequence divergence between subtypes, structural motifs and some sequences motifs in the gp41-CT are strongly conserved. In particular, elements involved in Env trafficking from the plasma membrane through the endocytic and TGN compartments are conserved, underscoring their importance for viral replication and propagation. Other motifs involved in protein-protein interactions are not conserved providing evidence of subtype-related specificities. Such differences between subtypes have been poorly studied to date. The fine balance between sequence variability and highly controlled protein trafficking and dynamics allows the virus to optimize viral infectivity and viral propagation. The viral determinants that are poorly tolerant to polymorphic variation may well be interesting subjects for investigations to elucidate the subtle control of viral assembly, budding and release. Such work may lead to the identification of interactions that are possible targets for new antiviral strategies.
Hepatitis C virus
Human Immunodeficiency Virus
Lentiviral lytic peptide
Membrane proximal external region
Multi vesicular bodies
Nuclear Factor -κB
Potential N-glycosylation site
Rough endoplasmic reticulum
Simian Immunodeficiency virus
TGF-β-interacting factor 1
T cell receptor
trans Golgi network
Tail-interacting Factor 47 kDa
Vesicular stomatitis virus-glycoprotein.
Earl PL, Doms RW, Moss B: Oligomeric structure of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoprotein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990, 87: 648-652. 10.1073/pnas.87.2.648.
Chan DC, Fass D, Berger JM, Kim PS: Core structure of gp41 from the HIV envelope glycoprotein. Cell. 1997, 89: 263-273. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80205-6.
Kwong PD, Wyatt R, Robinson J, Sweet RW, Sodroski J, Hendrickson WA: Structure of an HIV gp120 envelope glycoprotein in complex with the CD4 receptor and a neutralizing human antibody. Nature. 1998, 393: 648-659. 10.1038/31405.
Moore JP, Doms RW: The entry of entry inhibitors: a fusion of science and medicine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 10598-10602. 10.1073/pnas.1932511100.
Weissenhorn W, Dessen A, Harrison SC, Skehel JJ, Wiley DC: Atomic structure of the ectodomain from HIV-1 gp41. Nature. 1997, 387: 426-430. 10.1038/387426a0.
Wyatt R, Kwong PD, Desjardins E, Sweet RW, Robinson J, Hendrickson WA, Sodroski JG: The antigenic structure of the HIV gp120 envelope glycoprotein. Nature. 1998, 393: 705-711. 10.1038/31514.
Mao Y, Wang L, Gu C, Herschhorn A, Xiang SH, Haim H, Yang X, Sodroski J: Subunit organization of the membrane-bound HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein trimer. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012, 19: 893-899. 10.1038/nsmb.2351.
Alkhatib G, Combadiere C, Broder CC, Feng Y, Kennedy PE, Murphy PM, Berger EA: CC CKR5: a RANTES, MIP-1alpha, MIP-1beta receptor as a fusion cofactor for macrophage-tropic HIV-1. Science. 1996, 272: 1955-1958. 10.1126/science.272.5270.1955.
Deng H, Liu R, Ellmeier W, Choe S, Unutmaz D, Burkhart M, Di Marzio P, Marmon S, Sutton RE, Hill CM, et al: Identification of a major co-receptor for primary isolates of HIV-1. Nature. 1996, 381: 661-666. 10.1038/381661a0.
Feng Y, Broder CC, Kennedy PE, Berger EA: HIV-1 entry cofactor: functional cDNA cloning of a seven-transmembrane, G protein-coupled receptor. Science. 1996, 272: 872-877. 10.1126/science.272.5263.872.
Choe H, Farzan M, Sun Y, Sullivan N, Rollins B, Ponath PD, Wu L, Mackay CR, LaRosa G, Newman W, et al: The beta-chemokine receptors CCR3 and CCR5 facilitate infection by primary HIV-1 isolates. Cell. 1996, 85: 1135-1148. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81313-6.
Dragic T, Litwin V, Allaway GP, Martin SR, Huang Y, Nagashima KA, Cayanan C, Maddon PJ, Koup RA, Moore JP, Paxton WA: HIV-1 entry into CD4+ cells is mediated by the chemokine receptor CC-CKR-5. Nature. 1996, 381: 667-673. 10.1038/381667a0.
Tan K, Liu J, Wang J, Shen S, Lu M: Atomic structure of a thermostable subdomain of HIV-1 gp41. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94: 12303-12308. 10.1073/pnas.94.23.12303.
Crise B, Buonocore L, Rose JK: CD4 is retained in the endoplasmic reticulum by the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 glycoprotein precursor. J Virol. 1990, 64: 5585-5593.
Willey RL, Bonifacino JS, Potts BJ, Martin MA, Klausner RD: Biosynthesis, cleavage, and degradation of the human immunodeficiency virus 1 envelope glycoprotein gp160. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988, 85: 9580-9584. 10.1073/pnas.85.24.9580.
Earl PL, Moss B, Doms RW: Folding, interaction with GRP78-BiP, assembly, and transport of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope protein. J Virol. 1991, 65: 2047-2055.
Courageot J, Fenouillet E, Bastiani P, Miquelis R: Intracellular degradation of the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein. Evidence for, and some characteristics of, an endoplasmic reticulum degradation pathway. Eur J Biochem. 1999, 260: 482-489.
Bernstein HB, Compans RW: Sulfation of the human immunodeficiency virus envelope glycoprotein. J Virol. 1992, 66: 6953-6959.
Allan JS, Coligan JE, Barin F, McLane MF, Sodroski JG, Rosen CA, Haseltine WA, Lee TH, Essex M: Major glycoprotein antigens that induce antibodies in AIDS patients are encoded by HTLV-III. Science. 1985, 228: 1091-1094. 10.1126/science.2986290.
Bernstein HB, Tucker SP, Hunter E, Schutzbach JS, Compans RW: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoprotein is modified by O-linked oligosaccharides. J Virol. 1994, 68: 463-468.
Leonard CK, Spellman MW, Riddle L, Harris RJ, Thomas JN, Gregory TJ: Assignment of intrachain disulfide bonds and characterization of potential glycosylation sites of the type 1 recombinant human immunodeficiency virus envelope glycoprotein (gp120) expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. J Biol Chem. 1990, 265: 10373-10382.
Earl PL, Koenig S, Moss B: Biological and immunological properties of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoprotein: analysis of proteins with truncations and deletions expressed by recombinant vaccinia viruses. J Virol. 1991, 65: 31-41.
Schawaller M, Smith GE, Skehel JJ, Wiley DC: Studies with crosslinking reagents on the oligomeric structure of the env glycoprotein of HIV. Virology. 1989, 172: 367-369. 10.1016/0042-6822(89)90142-6.
Fenouillet E, Jones IM: The glycosylation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transmembrane glycoprotein (gp41) is important for the efficient intracellular transport of the envelope precursor gp160. J Gen Virol. 1995, 76 (Pt 6): 1509-1514.
Checkley MA, Luttge BG, Freed EO: HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein biosynthesis, trafficking, and incorporation. J Mol Biol. 2011, 410: 582-608. 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.04.042.
Bunnik EM, Pisas L, Van Nuenen AC, Schuitemaker H: Autologous neutralizing humoral immunity and evolution of the viral envelope in the course of subtype B human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J Virol. 2008, 82: 7932-7941. 10.1128/JVI.00757-08.
Borggren M, Repits J, Sterjovski J, Uchtenhagen H, Churchill MJ, Karlsson A, Albert J, Achour A, Gorry PR, Fenyo EM, Jansson M: Increased sensitivity to broadly neutralizing antibodies of end-stage disease R5 HIV-1 correlates with evolution in Env glycosylation and charge. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e20135-10.1371/journal.pone.0020135.
Fenyo EM, Esbjornsson J, Medstrand P, Jansson M: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 biological variation and coreceptor use: from concept to clinical significance. J Intern Med. 2011, 270: 520-531. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02455.x.
Steckbeck JD, Craigo JK, Barnes CO, Montelaro RC: Highly conserved structural properties of the C-terminal tail of HIV-1 gp41 protein despite substantial sequence variation among diverse clades: implications for functions in viral replication. J Biol Chem. 2011, 286: 27156-27166. 10.1074/jbc.M111.258855.
Steckbeck JD, Kuhlmann AS, Montelaro RC: C-terminal tail of human immunodeficiency virus gp41: functionally rich and structurally enigmatic. J Gen Virol. 2012, 94: 1-19.
Postler TS, Desrosiers RC: The Tale of the Long Tail: the Cytoplasmic Domain of HIV-1 gp41. J Virol. 2012, 87: 2-15.
Pang HB, Hevroni L, Kol N, Eckert DM, Tsvitov M, Kay MS, Rousso I: Virion stiffness regulates immature HIV-1 entry. Retrovirology. 2013, 10: 4-10.1186/1742-4690-10-4.
Chojnacki J, Staudt T, Glass B, Bingen P, Engelhardt J, Anders M, Schneider J, Muller B, Hell SW, Krausslich HG: Maturation-dependent HIV-1 surface protein redistribution revealed by fluorescence nanoscopy. Science. 2012, 338: 524-528. 10.1126/science.1226359.
Hunter E, Swanstrom R: Retrovirus envelope glycoproteins. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1990, 157: 187-253. 10.1007/978-3-642-75218-6_7.
Buratti E, McLain L, Tisminetzky S, Cleveland SM, Dimmock NJ, Baralle FE: The neutralizing antibody response against a conserved region of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp41 (amino acid residues 731–752) is uniquely directed against a conformational epitope. J Gen Virol. 1998, 79 (Pt 11): 2709-2716.
Reading SA, Heap CJ, Dimmock NJ: A novel monoclonal antibody specific to the C-terminal tail of the gp41 envelope transmembrane protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 that preferentially neutralizes virus after it has attached to the target cell and inhibits the production of infectious progeny. Virology. 2003, 315: 362-372. 10.1016/S0042-6822(03)00533-6.
Heap CJ, Reading SA, Dimmock NJ: An antibody specific for the C-terminal tail of the gp41 transmembrane protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 mediates post-attachment neutralization, probably through inhibition of virus-cell fusion. J Gen Virol. 2005, 86: 1499-1507. 10.1099/vir.0.80414-0.
Cheung L, McLain L, Hollier MJ, Reading SA, Dimmock NJ: Part of the C-terminal tail of the envelope gp41 transmembrane glycoprotein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 is exposed on the surface of infected cells and is involved in virus-mediated cell fusion. J Gen Virol. 2005, 86: 131-138. 10.1099/vir.0.80439-0.
Eisenberg D, Wesson M: The most highly amphiphilic alpha-helices include two amino acid segments in human immunodeficiency virus glycoprotein 41. Biopolymers. 1990, 29: 171-177. 10.1002/bip.360290122.
Miller MA, Garry RF, Jaynes JM, Montelaro RC: A structural correlation between lentivirus transmembrane proteins and natural cytolytic peptides. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1991, 7: 511-519. 10.1089/aid.1991.7.511.
Kliger Y, Shai Y: A leucine zipper-like sequence from the cytoplasmic tail of the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein binds and perturbs lipid bilayers. Biochemistry. 1997, 36: 5157-5169. 10.1021/bi962935r.
Venable RM, Pastor RW, Brooks BR, Carson FW: Theoretically determined three-dimensional structures for amphipathic segments of the HIV-1 gp41 envelope protein. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1989, 5: 7-22. 10.1089/aid.1989.5.7.
Dubay JW, Roberts SJ, Hahn BH, Hunter E: Truncation of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transmembrane glycoprotein cytoplasmic domain blocks virus infectivity. J Virol. 1992, 66: 6616-6625.
Yu X, Yuan X, McLane MF, Lee TH, Essex M: Mutations in the cytoplasmic domain of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transmembrane protein impair the incorporation of Env proteins into mature virions. J Virol. 1993, 67: 213-221.
Piller SC, Dubay JW, Derdeyn CA, Hunter E: Mutational analysis of conserved domains within the cytoplasmic tail of gp41 from human immunodeficiency virus type 1: effects on glycoprotein incorporation and infectivity. J Virol. 2000, 74: 11717-11723. 10.1128/JVI.74.24.11717-11723.2000.
Kalia V, Sarkar S, Gupta P, Montelaro RC: Rational site-directed mutations of the LLP-1 and LLP-2 lentivirus lytic peptide domains in the intracytoplasmic tail of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp41 indicate common functions in cell-cell fusion but distinct roles in virion envelope incorporation. J Virol. 2003, 77: 3634-3646. 10.1128/JVI.77.6.3634-3646.2003.
Jiang J, Aiken C: Maturation-dependent human immunodeficiency virus type 1 particle fusion requires a carboxyl-terminal region of the gp41 cytoplasmic tail. J Virol. 2007, 81: 9999-10008. 10.1128/JVI.00592-07.
Miller MA, Cloyd MW, Liebmann J, Rinaldo CR, Islam KR, Wang SZ, Mietzner TA, Montelaro RC: Alterations in cell membrane permeability by the lentivirus lytic peptide (LLP-1) of HIV-1 transmembrane protein. Virology. 1993, 196: 89-100. 10.1006/viro.1993.1457.
Chen SS, Lee SF, Wang CT: Cellular membrane-binding ability of the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope transmembrane protein gp41. J Virol. 2001, 75: 9925-9938. 10.1128/JVI.75.20.9925-9938.2001.
Chernomordik L, Chanturiya AN, Suss-Toby E, Nora E, Zimmerberg J: An amphipathic peptide from the C-terminal region of the human immunodeficiency virus envelope glycoprotein causes pore formation in membranes. J Virol. 1994, 68: 7115-7123.
Comardelle AM, Norris CH, Plymale DR, Gatti PJ, Choi B, Fermin CD, Haislip AM, Tencza SB, Mietzner TA, Montelaro RC, Garry RF: A synthetic peptide corresponding to the carboxy terminus of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transmembrane glycoprotein induces alterations in the ionic permeability of Xenopus laevis oocytes. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1997, 13: 1525-1532. 10.1089/aid.1997.13.1525.
Murakami T, Freed EO: Genetic evidence for an interaction between human immunodeficiency virus type 1 matrix and alpha-helix 2 of the gp41 cytoplasmic tail. J Virol. 2000, 74: 3548-3554. 10.1128/JVI.74.8.3548-3554.2000.
Gabuzda DH, Lever A, Terwilliger E, Sodroski J: Effects of deletions in the cytoplasmic domain on biological functions of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoproteins. J Virol. 1992, 66: 3306-3315.
Wyma DJ, Jiang J, Shi J, Zhou J, Lineberger JE, Miller MD, Aiken C: Coupling of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 fusion to virion maturation: a novel role of the gp41 cytoplasmic tail. J Virol. 2004, 78: 3429-3435. 10.1128/JVI.78.7.3429-3435.2004.
Lee SF, Wang CT, Liang JY, Hong SL, Huang CC, Chen SS: Multimerization potential of the cytoplasmic domain of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transmembrane glycoprotein gp41. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 15809-15819. 10.1074/jbc.M000601200.
Zhu Y, Lu L, Chao L, Chen YH: Important changes in biochemical properties and function of mutated LLP12 domain of HIV-1 gp41. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2007, 70: 311-318. 10.1111/j.1747-0285.2007.00564.x.
Edwards TG, Wyss S, Reeves JD, Zolla-Pazner S, Hoxie JA, Doms RW, Baribaud F: Truncation of the cytoplasmic domain induces exposure of conserved regions in the ectodomain of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope protein. J Virol. 2002, 76: 2683-2691. 10.1128/JVI.76.6.2683-2691.2002.
Wyss S, Dimitrov AS, Baribaud F, Edwards TG, Blumenthal R, Hoxie JA: Regulation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoprotein fusion by a membrane-interactive domain in the gp41 cytoplasmic tail. J Virol. 2005, 79: 12231-12241. 10.1128/JVI.79.19.12231-12241.2005.
Abrahamyan LG, Mkrtchyan SR, Binley J, Lu M, Melikyan GB, Cohen FS: The cytoplasmic tail slows the folding of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Env from a late prebundle configuration into the six-helix bundle. J Virol. 2005, 79: 106-115. 10.1128/JVI.79.1.106-115.2005.
Lu L, Zhu Y, Huang J, Chen X, Yang H, Jiang S, Chen YH: Surface exposure of the HIV-1 env cytoplasmic tail LLP2 domain during the membrane fusion process: interaction with gp41 fusion core. J Biol Chem. 2008, 283: 16723-16731. 10.1074/jbc.M801083200.
Spies CP, Compans RW: Effects of cytoplasmic domain length on cell surface expression and syncytium-forming capacity of the simian immunodeficiency virus envelope glycoprotein. Virology. 1994, 203: 8-19. 10.1006/viro.1994.1449.
Affranchino JL, Gonzalez SA: Mutations at the C-terminus of the simian immunodeficiency virus envelope glycoprotein affect gp120-gp41 stability on virions. Virology. 2006, 347: 217-225. 10.1016/j.virol.2005.11.032.
Durham ND, Yewdall AW, Chen P, Lee R, Zony C, Robinson JE, Chen BK: Neutralization resistance of virological synapse-mediated HIV-1 Infection is regulated by the gp41 cytoplasmic tail. J Virol. 2012, 86: 7484-7495. 10.1128/JVI.00230-12.
Davis MR, Jiang J, Zhou J, Freed EO, Aiken C: A mutation in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Gag protein destabilizes the interaction of the envelope protein subunits gp120 and gp41. J Virol. 2006, 80: 2405-2417. 10.1128/JVI.80.5.2405-2417.2006.
Bhakta SJ, Shang L, Prince JL, Claiborne DT, Hunter E: Mutagenesis of tyrosine and di-leucine motifs in the HIV-1 envelope cytoplasmic domain results in a loss of Env-mediated fusion and infectivity. Retrovirology. 2011, 8: 37-10.1186/1742-4690-8-37.
Haffar OK, Dowbenko DJ, Berman PW: Topogenic analysis of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoprotein, gp160, in microsomal membranes. J Cell Biol. 1988, 107: 1677-1687. 10.1083/jcb.107.5.1677.
Kennedy RC, Henkel RD, Pauletti D, Allan JS, Lee TH, Essex M, Dreesman GR: Antiserum to a synthetic peptide recognizes the HTLV-III envelope glycoprotein. Science. 1986, 231: 1556-1559. 10.1126/science.3006246.
Chanh TC, Dreesman GR, Kanda P, Linette GP, Sparrow JT, Ho DD, Kennedy RC: Induction of anti-HIV neutralizing antibodies by synthetic peptides. EMBO J. 1986, 5: 3065-3071.
Cleveland SM, McLain L, Cheung L, Jones TD, Hollier M, Dimmock NJ: A region of the C-terminal tail of the gp41 envelope glycoprotein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 contains a neutralizing epitope: evidence for its exposure on the surface of the virion. J Gen Virol. 2003, 84: 591-602. 10.1099/vir.0.18630-0.
Hollier MJ, Dimmock NJ: The C-terminal tail of the gp41 transmembrane envelope glycoprotein of HIV-1 clades A, B, C, and D may exist in two conformations: an analysis of sequence, structure, and function. Virology. 2005, 337: 284-296. 10.1016/j.virol.2005.04.015.
Steckbeck JD, Sun C, Sturgeon TJ, Montelaro RC: Topology of the C-terminal tail of HIV-1 gp41: differential exposure of the Kennedy epitope on cell and viral membranes. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e15261-10.1371/journal.pone.0015261.
Waheed AA, Ablan SD, Roser JD, Sowder RC, Schaffner CP, Chertova E, Freed EO: HIV-1 escape from the entry-inhibiting effects of a cholesterol-binding compound via cleavage of gp41 by the viral protease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007, 104: 8467-8471. 10.1073/pnas.0701443104.
Waheed AA, Ablan SD, Sowder RC, Roser JD, Schaffner CP, Chertova E, Freed EO: Effect of mutations in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease on cleavage of the gp41 cytoplasmic tail. J Virol. 2010, 84: 3121-3126. 10.1128/JVI.02002-09.
Futaki S, Nakase I, Suzuki T, Nameki D, Kodama E, Matsuoka M, Sugiura Y: RNase S complex bearing arginine-rich peptide and anti-HIV activity. J Mol Recognit. 2005, 18: 169-174. 10.1002/jmr.725.
Mitchell DJ, Kim DT, Steinman L, Fathman CG, Rothbard JB: Polyarginine enters cells more efficiently than other polycationic homopolymers. J Pept Res. 2000, 56: 318-325. 10.1034/j.1399-3011.2000.00723.x.
Tung CH, Weissleder R: Arginine containing peptides as delivery vectors. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2003, 55: 281-294. 10.1016/S0169-409X(02)00183-7.
Viard M, Ablan SD, Zhou M, Veenstra TD, Freed EO, Raviv Y, Blumenthal R: Photoinduced reactivity of the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein with a membrane-embedded probe reveals insertion of portions of the HIV-1 Gp41 cytoplasmic tail into the viral membrane. Biochemistry. 2008, 47: 1977-1983. 10.1021/bi701920f.
Postler TS, Martinez-Navio JM, Yuste E, Desrosiers RC: Evidence against extracellular exposure of a highly immunogenic region in the C-terminal domain of the simian immunodeficiency virus gp41 transmembrane protein. J Virol. 2012, 86: 1145-1157. 10.1128/JVI.06463-11.
Postler TS, Desrosiers RC: The cytoplasmic domain of the HIV-1 glycoprotein gp41 induces NF-kappaB activation through TGF-beta-activated kinase 1. Cell Host Microbe. 2012, 11: 181-193. 10.1016/j.chom.2011.12.005.
Jouvenet N, Neil SJ, Bess C, Johnson MC, Virgen CA, Simon SM, Bieniasz PD: Plasma membrane is the site of productive HIV-1 particle assembly. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4: e435-10.1371/journal.pbio.0040435.
Welsch S, Keppler OT, Habermann A, Allespach I, Krijnse-Locker J, Krausslich HG: HIV-1 buds predominantly at the plasma membrane of primary human macrophages. PLoS Pathog. 2007, 3: e36-10.1371/journal.ppat.0030036.
Deneka M, Pelchen-Matthews A, Byland R, Ruiz-Mateos E, Marsh M: In macrophages, HIV-1 assembles into an intracellular plasma membrane domain containing the tetraspanins CD81, CD9, and CD53. J Cell Biol. 2007, 177: 329-341. 10.1083/jcb.200609050.
Adamson CS, Freed EO: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 assembly, release, and maturation. Adv Pharmacol. 2007, 55: 347-387.
Bieniasz PD: The cell biology of HIV-1 virion genesis. Cell Host Microbe. 2009, 5: 550-558. 10.1016/j.chom.2009.05.015.
Ono A, Freed EO: Plasma membrane rafts play a critical role in HIV-1 assembly and release. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 13925-13930. 10.1073/pnas.241320298.
Ono A, Freed EO: Role of lipid rafts in virus replication. Adv Virus Res. 2005, 64: 311-358.
Waheed AA, Freed EO: Lipids and membrane microdomains in HIV-1 replication. Virus Res. 2009, 143: 162-176. 10.1016/j.virusres.2009.04.007.
Ono A, Ablan SD, Lockett SJ, Nagashima K, Freed EO: Phosphatidylinositol (4,5) bisphosphate regulates HIV-1 Gag targeting to the plasma membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 14889-14894. 10.1073/pnas.0405596101.
Chukkapalli V, Hogue IB, Boyko V, Hu WS, Ono A: Interaction between the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Gag matrix domain and phosphatidylinositol-(4,5)-bisphosphate is essential for efficient gag membrane binding. J Virol. 2008, 82: 2405-2417. 10.1128/JVI.01614-07.
Simmons A, Aluvihare V, McMichael A: Nef triggers a transcriptional program in T cells imitating single-signal T cell activation and inducing HIV virulence mediators. Immunity. 2001, 14: 763-777. 10.1016/S1074-7613(01)00158-3.
Zhou W, Parent LJ, Wills JW, Resh MD: Identification of a membrane-binding domain within the amino-terminal region of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Gag protein which interacts with acidic phospholipids. J Virol. 1994, 68: 2556-2569.
Ono A, Orenstein JM, Freed EO: Role of the Gag matrix domain in targeting human immunodeficiency virus type 1 assembly. J Virol. 2000, 74: 2855-2866. 10.1128/JVI.74.6.2855-2866.2000.
Chow JY, Jeffries CM, Kwan AH, Guss JM, Trewhella J: Calmodulin disrupts the structure of the HIV-1 MA protein. J Mol Biol. 2010, 400: 702-714. 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.05.022.
Ghanam RH, Fernandez TF, Fledderman EL, Saad JS: Binding of calmodulin to the HIV-1 matrix protein triggers myristate exposure. J Biol Chem. 2010, 285: 41911-41920. 10.1074/jbc.M110.179093.
Zhou W, Resh MD: Differential membrane binding of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 matrix protein. J Virol. 1996, 70: 8540-8548.
Spearman P, Horton R, Ratner L, Kuli-Zade I: Membrane binding of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 matrix protein in vivo supports a conformational myristyl switch mechanism. J Virol. 1997, 71: 6582-6592.
Scarlata S, Carter C: Role of HIV-1 Gag domains in viral assembly. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003, 1614: 62-72. 10.1016/S0005-2736(03)00163-9.
Ono A, Waheed AA, Joshi A, Freed EO: Association of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gag with membrane does not require highly basic sequences in the nucleocapsid: use of a novel Gag multimerization assay. J Virol. 2005, 79: 14131-14140. 10.1128/JVI.79.22.14131-14140.2005.
Wright ER, Schooler JB, Ding HJ, Kieffer C, Fillmore C, Sundquist WI, Jensen GJ: Electron cryotomography of immature HIV-1 virions reveals the structure of the CA and SP1 Gag shells. EMBO J. 2007, 26: 2218-2226. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601664.
Jouvenet N, Bieniasz PD, Simon SM: Imaging the biogenesis of individual HIV-1 virions in live cells. Nature. 2008, 454: 236-240. 10.1038/nature06998.
Hill CP, Worthylake D, Bancroft DP, Christensen AM, Sundquist WI: Crystal structures of the trimeric human immunodeficiency virus type 1 matrix protein: implications for membrane association and assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996, 93: 3099-3104. 10.1073/pnas.93.7.3099.
Briggs JA, Riches JD, Glass B, Bartonova V, Zanetti G, Krausslich HG: Structure and assembly of immature HIV. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106: 11090-11095. 10.1073/pnas.0903535106.
Alfadhli A, Barklis RL, Barklis E: HIV-1 matrix organizes as a hexamer of trimers on membranes containing phosphatidylinositol-(4,5)-bisphosphate. Virology. 2009, 387: 466-472. 10.1016/j.virol.2009.02.048.
Murakami T: Retroviral env glycoprotein trafficking and incorporation into virions. Mol Biol Int. 2012, 2012: 682850-
Ghanam RH, Samal AB, Fernandez TF, Saad JS: Role of the HIV-1 matrix protein in gag intracellular trafficking and targeting to the plasma membrane for virus assembly. Front Microbiol. 2012, 3: 55-
Sandrin V, Cosset FL: Intracellular versus cell surface assembly of retroviral pseudotypes is determined by the cellular localization of the viral glycoprotein, its capacity to interact with Gag, and the expression of the Nef protein. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281: 528-542.
Sandrin V, Russell SJ, Cosset FL: Targeting retroviral and lentiviral vectors. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2003, 281: 137-178. 10.1007/978-3-642-19012-4_4.
Leung K, Kim JO, Ganesh L, Kabat J, Schwartz O, Nabel GJ: HIV-1 assembly: viral glycoproteins segregate quantally to lipid rafts that associate individually with HIV-1 capsids and virions. Cell Host Microbe. 2008, 3: 285-292. 10.1016/j.chom.2008.04.004.
Jorgenson RL, Vogt VM, Johnson MC: Foreign glycoproteins can be actively recruited to virus assembly sites during pseudotyping. J Virol. 2009, 83: 4060-4067. 10.1128/JVI.02425-08.
Lee YM, Tang XB, Cimakasky LM, Hildreth JE, Yu XF: Mutations in the matrix protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 inhibit surface expression and virion incorporation of viral envelope glycoproteins in CD4+ T lymphocytes. J Virol. 1997, 71: 1443-1452.
Owens RJ, Dubay JW, Hunter E, Compans RW: Human immunodeficiency virus envelope protein determines the site of virus release in polarized epithelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991, 88: 3987-3991. 10.1073/pnas.88.9.3987.
Cosson P: Direct interaction between the envelope and matrix proteins of HIV-1. EMBO J. 1996, 15: 5783-5788.
Hourioux C, Brand D, Sizaret PY, Lemiale F, Lebigot S, Barin F, Roingeard P: Identification of the glycoprotein 41(TM) cytoplasmic tail domains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 that interact with Pr55Gag particles. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2000, 16: 1141-1147. 10.1089/088922200414983.
Freed EO, Martin MA: Virion incorporation of envelope glycoproteins with long but not short cytoplasmic tails is blocked by specific, single amino acid substitutions in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 matrix. J Virol. 1995, 69: 1984-1989.
Mammano F, Kondo E, Sodroski J, Bukovsky A, Gottlinger HG: Rescue of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 matrix protein mutants by envelope glycoproteins with short cytoplasmic domains. J Virol. 1995, 69: 3824-3830.
Wyma DJ, Kotov A, Aiken C: Evidence for a stable interaction of gp41 with Pr55(Gag) in immature human immunodeficiency virus type 1 particles. J Virol. 2000, 74: 9381-9387. 10.1128/JVI.74.20.9381-9387.2000.
Celma CC, Manrique JM, Affranchino JL, Hunter E, Gonzalez SA: Domains in the simian immunodeficiency virus gp41 cytoplasmic tail required for envelope incorporation into particles. Virology. 2001, 283: 253-261. 10.1006/viro.2001.0869.
Freed EO, Martin MA: Domains of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 matrix and gp41 cytoplasmic tail required for envelope incorporation into virions. J Virol. 1996, 70: 341-351.
Murakami T, Freed EO: The long cytoplasmic tail of gp41 is required in a cell type-dependent manner for HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein incorporation into virions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 343-348. 10.1073/pnas.97.1.343.
Akari H, Fukumori T, Adachi A: Cell-dependent requirement of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp41 cytoplasmic tail for Env incorporation into virions. J Virol. 2000, 74: 4891-4893. 10.1128/JVI.74.10.4891-4893.2000.
Lodge R, Gottlinger H, Gabuzda D, Cohen EA, Lemay G: The intracytoplasmic domain of gp41 mediates polarized budding of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in MDCK cells. J Virol. 1994, 68: 4857-4861.
Lodge R, Lalonde JP, Lemay G, Cohen EA: The membrane-proximal intracytoplasmic tyrosine residue of HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein is critical for basolateral targeting of viral budding in MDCK cells. EMBO J. 1997, 16: 695-705. 10.1093/emboj/16.4.695.
LaBranche CC, Sauter MM, Haggarty BS, Vance PJ, Romano J, Hart TK, Bugelski PJ, Marsh M, Hoxie JA: A single amino acid change in the cytoplasmic domain of the simian immunodeficiency virus transmembrane molecule increases envelope glycoprotein expression on infected cells. J Virol. 1995, 69: 5217-5227.
Yu X, Yuan X, Matsuda Z, Lee TH, Essex M: The matrix protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 is required for incorporation of viral envelope protein into mature virions. J Virol. 1992, 66: 4966-4971.
Dorfman T, Mammano F, Haseltine WA, Gottlinger HG: Role of the matrix protein in the virion association of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoprotein. J Virol. 1994, 68: 1689-1696.
Gonzalez SA, Burny A, Affranchino JL: Identification of domains in the simian immunodeficiency virus matrix protein essential for assembly and envelope glycoprotein incorporation. J Virol. 1996, 70: 6384-6389.
Beaumont E, Vendrame D, Verrier B, Roch E, Biron F, Barin F, Mammano F, Brand D: Matrix and envelope coevolution revealed in a patient monitored since primary infection with human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol. 2009, 83: 9875-9889. 10.1128/JVI.01213-09.
Owens RJ, Rose JK: Cytoplasmic domain requirement for incorporation of a foreign envelope protein into vesicular stomatitis virus. J Virol. 1993, 67: 360-365.
Murakami T, Ablan S, Freed EO, Tanaka Y: Regulation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Env-mediated membrane fusion by viral protease activity. J Virol. 2004, 78: 1026-1031. 10.1128/JVI.78.2.1026-1031.2004.
Kol N, Shi Y, Tsvitov M, Barlam D, Shneck RZ, Kay MS, Rousso I: A stiffness switch in human immunodeficiency virus. Biophys J. 2007, 92: 1777-1783. 10.1529/biophysj.106.093914.
Pettit SC, Moody MD, Wehbie RS, Kaplan AH, Nantermet PV, Klein CA, Swanstrom R: The p2 domain of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Gag regulates sequential proteolytic processing and is required to produce fully infectious virions. J Virol. 1994, 68: 8017-8027.
Muranyi W, Malkusch S, Muller B, Heilemann M, Krausslich HG: Super-resolution microscopy reveals specific recruitment of HIV-1 envelope proteins to viral assembly sites dependent on the envelope C-terminal tail. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9: e1003198-10.1371/journal.ppat.1003198.
Egan MA, Carruth LM, Rowell JF, Yu X, Siliciano RF: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope protein endocytosis mediated by a highly conserved intrinsic internalization signal in the cytoplasmic domain of gp41 is suppressed in the presence of the Pr55gag precursor protein. J Virol. 1996, 70: 6547-6556.
Micoli KJ, Pan G, Wu Y, Williams JP, Cook WJ, McDonald JM: Requirement of calmodulin binding by HIV-1 gp160 for enhanced FAS-mediated apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 1233-1240. 10.1074/jbc.275.2.1233.
Radding W, Pan ZQ, Hunter E, Johnston P, Williams JP, McDonald JM: Expression of HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein alters cellular calmodulin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996, 218: 192-197. 10.1006/bbrc.1996.0034.
Ishikawa H, Sasaki M, Noda S, Koga Y: Apoptosis induction by the binding of the carboxyl terminus of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp160 to calmodulin. J Virol. 1998, 72: 6574-6580.
Micoli KJ, Mamaeva O, Piller SC, Barker JL, Pan G, Hunter E, McDonald JM: Point mutations in the C-terminus of HIV-1 gp160 reduce apoptosis and calmodulin binding without affecting viral replication. Virology. 2006, 344: 468-479. 10.1016/j.virol.2005.08.033.
Rein A, Mirro J, Haynes JG, Ernst SM, Nagashima K: Function of the cytoplasmic domain of a retroviral transmembrane protein: p15E-p2E cleavage activates the membrane fusion capability of the murine leukemia virus Env protein. J Virol. 1994, 68: 1773-1781.
Brody BA, Rhee SS, Hunter E: Postassembly cleavage of a retroviral glycoprotein cytoplasmic domain removes a necessary incorporation signal and activates fusion activity. J Virol. 1994, 68: 4620-4627.
Wilk T, Pfeiffer T, Bosch V: Retained in vitro infectivity and cytopathogenicity of HIV-1 despite truncation of the C-terminal tail of the env gene product. Virology. 1992, 189: 167-177. 10.1016/0042-6822(92)90692-I.
Emerson V, Haller C, Pfeiffer T, Fackler OT, Bosch V: Role of the C-terminal domain of the HIV-1 glycoprotein in cell-to-cell viral transmission between T lymphocytes. Retrovirology. 2010, 7: 43-10.1186/1742-4690-7-43.
Iwatani Y, Ueno T, Nishimura A, Zhang X, Hattori T, Ishimoto A, Ito M, Sakai H: Modification of virus infectivity by cytoplasmic tail of HIV-1 TM protein. Virus Res. 2001, 74: 75-87. 10.1016/S0168-1702(00)00249-5.
Zhu P, Chertova E, Bess J, Lifson JD, Arthur LO, Liu J, Taylor KA, Roux KH: Electron tomography analysis of envelope glycoprotein trimers on HIV and simian immunodeficiency virus virions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 15812-15817. 10.1073/pnas.2634931100.
Yuste E, Reeves JD, Doms RW, Desrosiers RC: Modulation of Env content in virions of simian immunodeficiency virus: correlation with cell surface expression and virion infectivity. J Virol. 2004, 78: 6775-6785. 10.1128/JVI.78.13.6775-6785.2004.
Chertova E, Bess JW, Crise BJ, Sowder IR, Schaden TM, Hilburn JM, Hoxie JA, Benveniste RE, Lifson JD, Henderson LE, Arthur LO: Envelope glycoprotein incorporation, not shedding of surface envelope glycoprotein (gp120/SU), Is the primary determinant of SU content of purified human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and simian immunodeficiency virus. J Virol. 2002, 76: 5315-5325. 10.1128/JVI.76.11.5315-5325.2002.
Tsujimoto H, Cooper RW, Kodama T, Fukasawa M, Miura T, Ohta Y, Ishikawa K, Nakai M, Frost E, Roelants GE, et al: Isolation and characterization of simian immunodeficiency virus from mandrills in Africa and its relationship to other human and simian immunodeficiency viruses. J Virol. 1988, 62: 4044-4050.
Chakrabarti L, Emerman M, Tiollais P, Sonigo P: The cytoplasmic domain of simian immunodeficiency virus transmembrane protein modulates infectivity. J Virol. 1989, 63: 4395-4403.
Hirsch VM, Edmondson P, Murphey-Corb M, Arbeille B, Johnson PR, Mullins JI: SIV adaptation to human cells. Nature. 1989, 341: 573-574. 10.1038/341573a0.
Kodama T, Wooley DP, Naidu YM, Kestler HW, Daniel MD, Li Y, Desrosiers RC: Significance of premature stop codons in env of simian immunodeficiency virus. J Virol. 1989, 63: 4709-4714.
Ritter GD, Mulligan MJ, Lydy SL, Compans RW: Cell fusion activity of the simian immunodeficiency virus envelope protein is modulated by the intracytoplasmic domain. Virology. 1993, 197: 255-264. 10.1006/viro.1993.1586.
Zingler K, Littman DR: Truncation of the cytoplasmic domain of the simian immunodeficiency virus envelope glycoprotein increases env incorporation into particles and fusogenicity and infectivity. J Virol. 1993, 67: 2824-2831.
Shacklett BL, Weber CJ, Shaw KE, Keddie EM, Gardner MB, Sonigo P, Luciw PA: The intracytoplasmic domain of the Env transmembrane protein is a locus for attenuation of simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac in rhesus macaques. J Virol. 2000, 74: 5836-5844. 10.1128/JVI.74.13.5836-5844.2000.
Mulligan MJ, Yamshchikov GV, Ritter GD, Gao F, Jin MJ, Nail CD, Spies CP, Hahn BH, Compans RW: Cytoplasmic domain truncation enhances fusion activity by the exterior glycoprotein complex of human immunodeficiency virus type 2 in selected cell types. J Virol. 1992, 66: 3971-3975.
Nilsson T, Warren G: Retention and retrieval in the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi apparatus. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1994, 6: 517-521. 10.1016/0955-0674(94)90070-1.
Munro S: An investigation of the role of transmembrane domains in Golgi protein retention. EMBO J. 1995, 14: 4695-4704.
Bultmann A, Muranyi W, Seed B, Haas J: Identification of two sequences in the cytoplasmic tail of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoprotein that inhibit cell surface expression. J Virol. 2001, 75: 5263-5276. 10.1128/JVI.75.11.5263-5276.2001.
Rowell JF, Stanhope PE, Siliciano RF: Endocytosis of endogenously synthesized HIV-1 envelope protein. Mechanism and role in processing for association with class II MHC. J Immunol. 1995, 155: 473-488.
Ohno H, Fournier MC, Poy G, Bonifacino JS: Structural determinants of interaction of tyrosine-based sorting signals with the adaptor medium chains. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271: 29009-29015. 10.1074/jbc.271.46.29009.
Ohno H, Aguilar RC, Fournier MC, Hennecke S, Cosson P, Bonifacino JS: Interaction of endocytic signals from the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein complex with members of the adaptor medium chain family. Virology. 1997, 238: 305-315. 10.1006/viro.1997.8839.
Batonick M, Favre M, Boge M, Spearman P, Honing S, Thali M: Interaction of HIV-1 Gag with the clathrin-associated adaptor AP-2. Virology. 2005, 342: 190-200. 10.1016/j.virol.2005.08.001.
Camus G, Segura-Morales C, Molle D, Lopez-Verges S, Begon-Pescia C, Cazevieille C, Schu P, Bertrand E, Berlioz-Torrent C, Basyuk E: The clathrin adaptor complex AP-1 binds HIV-1 and MLV Gag and facilitates their budding. Mol Biol Cell. 2007, 18: 3193-3203. 10.1091/mbc.E06-12-1147.
Dong X, Li H, Derdowski A, Ding L, Burnett A, Chen X, Peters TR, Dermody TS, Woodruff E, Wang JJ, Spearman P: AP-3 directs the intracellular trafficking of HIV-1 Gag and plays a key role in particle assembly. Cell. 2005, 120: 663-674. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.023.
Liu L, Sutton J, Woodruff E, Villalta F, Spearman P, Dong X: Defective HIV-1 particle assembly in AP-3-deficient cells derived from patients with Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome type 2. J Virol. 2012, 86: 11242-11253. 10.1128/JVI.00544-12.
Berlioz-Torrent C, Shacklett BL, Erdtmann L, Delamarre L, Bouchaert I, Sonigo P, Dokhelar MC, Benarous R: Interactions of the cytoplasmic domains of human and simian retroviral transmembrane proteins with components of the clathrin adaptor complexes modulate intracellular and cell surface expression of envelope glycoproteins. J Virol. 1999, 73: 1350-1361.
Lopez-Verges S, Camus G, Blot G, Beauvoir R, Benarous R, Berlioz-Torrent C: Tail-interacting protein TIP47 is a connector between Gag and Env and is required for Env incorporation into HIV-1 virions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103: 14947-14952. 10.1073/pnas.0602941103.
Bowers K, Pelchen-Matthews A, Honing S, Vance PJ, Creary L, Haggarty BS, Romano J, Ballensiefen W, Hoxie JA, Marsh M: The simian immunodeficiency virus envelope glycoprotein contains multiple signals that regulate its cell surface expression and endocytosis. Traffic. 2000, 1: 661-674. 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2000.010810.x.
Wyss S, Berlioz-Torrent C, Boge M, Blot G, Honing S, Benarous R, Thali M: The highly conserved C-terminal dileucine motif in the cytosolic domain of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoprotein is critical for its association with the AP-1 clathrin adaptor [correction of adapter]. J Virol. 2001, 75: 2982-2992. 10.1128/JVI.75.6.2982-2992.2001.
Byland R, Vance PJ, Hoxie JA, Marsh M: A conserved dileucine motif mediates clathrin and AP-2-dependent endocytosis of the HIV-1 envelope protein. Mol Biol Cell. 2007, 18: 414-425.
Dingwell KS, Johnson DC: The herpes simplex virus gE-gI complex facilitates cell-to-cell spread and binds to components of cell junctions. J Virol. 1998, 72: 8933-8942.
Johnson DC, Huber MT: Directed egress of animal viruses promotes cell-to-cell spread. J Virol. 2002, 76: 1-8. 10.1128/JVI.76.1.1-8.2002.
Orsini MJ, Parent JL, Mundell SJ, Marchese A, Benovic JL: Trafficking of the HIV coreceptor CXCR4. Role of arrestins and identification of residues in the c-terminal tail that mediate receptor internalization. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 31076-31086. 10.1074/jbc.274.43.31076.
Blot G, Janvier K, Le Panse S, Benarous R, Berlioz-Torrent C: Targeting of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope to the trans-Golgi network through binding to TIP47 is required for env incorporation into virions and infectivity. J Virol. 2003, 77: 6931-6945. 10.1128/JVI.77.12.6931-6945.2003.
Murray JL, Mavrakis M, McDonald NJ, Yilla M, Sheng J, Bellini WJ, Zhao L, Le Doux JM, Shaw MW, Luo CC, et al: Rab9 GTPase is required for replication of human immunodeficiency virus type 1, filoviruses, and measles virus. J Virol. 2005, 79: 11742-11751. 10.1128/JVI.79.18.11742-11751.2005.
Lambele M, Labrosse B, Roch E, Moreau A, Verrier B, Barin F, Roingeard P, Mammano F, Brand D: Impact of natural polymorphism within the gp41 cytoplasmic tail of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 on the intracellular distribution of envelope glycoproteins and viral assembly. J Virol. 2007, 81: 125-140. 10.1128/JVI.01659-06.
Bauby H, Lopez-Verges S, Hoeffel G, Delcroix-Genete D, Janvier K, Mammano F, Hosmalin A, Berlioz-Torrent C: TIP47 is required for the production of infectious HIV-1 particles from primary macrophages. Traffic. 2010, 11: 455-467. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2010.01036.x.
Feng Y, Press B, Wandinger-Ness A: Rab 7: an important regulator of late endocytic membrane traffic. J Cell Biol. 1995, 131: 1435-1452. 10.1083/jcb.131.6.1435.
Chavrier P, Parton RG, Hauri HP, Simons K, Zerial M: Localization of low molecular weight GTP binding proteins to exocytic and endocytic compartments. Cell. 1990, 62: 317-329. 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90369-P.
Vitelli R, Santillo M, Lattero D, Chiariello M, Bifulco M, Bruni CB, Bucci C: Role of the small GTPase Rab7 in the late endocytic pathway. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272: 4391-4397. 10.1074/jbc.272.7.4391.
Vieira OV, Bucci C, Harrison RE, Trimble WS, Lanzetti L, Gruenberg J, Schreiber AD, Stahl PD, Grinstein S: Modulation of Rab5 and Rab7 recruitment to phagosomes by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Mol Cell Biol. 2003, 23: 2501-2514. 10.1128/MCB.23.7.2501-2514.2003.
Wang T, Ming Z, Xiaochun W, Hong W: Rab7: role of its protein interaction cascades in endo-lysosomal traffic. Cell Signal. 2011, 23: 516-521. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2010.09.012.
Brass AL, Dykxhoorn DM, Benita Y, Yan N, Engelman A, Xavier RJ, Lieberman J, Elledge SJ: Identification of host proteins required for HIV infection through a functional genomic screen. Science. 2008, 319: 921-926. 10.1126/science.1152725.
Caillet M, Janvier K, Pelchen-Matthews A, Delcroix-Genete D, Camus G, Marsh M, Berlioz-Torrent C: Rab7A is required for efficient production of infectious HIV-1. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7: e1002347-10.1371/journal.ppat.1002347.
Bucci C, Thomsen P, Nicoziani P, McCarthy J, Van Deurs B: Rab7: a key to lysosome biogenesis. Mol Biol Cell. 2000, 11: 467-480. 10.1091/mbc.11.2.467.
Lebrand C, Corti M, Goodson H, Cosson P, Cavalli V, Mayran N, Faure J, Gruenberg J: Late endosome motility depends on lipids via the small GTPase Rab7. EMBO J. 2002, 21: 1289-1300. 10.1093/emboj/21.6.1289.
Ceresa BP: Bahr SJ: rab7 activity affects epidermal growth factor:epidermal growth factor receptor degradation by regulating endocytic trafficking from the late endosome. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281: 1099-1106.
Jager S, Bucci C, Tanida I, Ueno T, Kominami E, Saftig P, Eskelinen EL: Role for Rab7 in maturation of late autophagic vacuoles. J Cell Sci. 2004, 117: 4837-4848. 10.1242/jcs.01370.
Gutierrez MG, Munafo DB, Beron W, Colombo MI: Rab7 is required for the normal progression of the autophagic pathway in mammalian cells. J Cell Sci. 2004, 117: 2687-2697. 10.1242/jcs.01114.
Schiavoni I, Muratori C, Piacentini V, Giammarioli AM, Federico M: The HIV-1 Nef protein: how an AIDS pathogenetic factor turns to a tool for combating AIDS. Curr Drug Targets Immune Endocr Metabol Disord. 2004, 4: 19-27. 10.2174/1568008043339983.
Kyei GB, Dinkins C, Davis AS, Roberts E, Singh SB, Dong C, Wu L, Kominami E, Ueno T, Yamamoto A, et al: Autophagy pathway intersects with HIV-1 biosynthesis and regulates viral yields in macrophages. J Cell Biol. 2009, 186: 255-268. 10.1083/jcb.200903070.
Dinkins C, Arko-Mensah J, Deretic V: Autophagy and HIV. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2010, 21: 712-718. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2010.04.004.
Evans DT, Tillman KC, Desrosiers RC: Envelope glycoprotein cytoplasmic domains from diverse lentiviruses interact with the prenylated Rab acceptor. J Virol. 2002, 76: 327-337. 10.1128/JVI.76.1.327-337.2002.
Blancou P, Evans DT, Desrosiers RC: PRA1 co-localizes with envelope but does not influence primate lentivirus production, infectivity or envelope incorporation. J Gen Virol. 2005, 86: 1785-1790. 10.1099/vir.0.80873-0.
Brown DA, London E: Structure and function of sphingolipid- and cholesterol-rich membrane rafts. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 17221-17224. 10.1074/jbc.R000005200.
Simons K, Gerl MJ: Revitalizing membrane rafts: new tools and insights. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010, 11: 688-699. 10.1038/nrm2977.
Munro S: Lipid rafts: elusive or illusive?. Cell. 2003, 115: 377-388. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00882-1.
Aloia RC, Tian H, Jensen FC: Lipid composition and fluidity of the human immunodeficiency virus envelope and host cell plasma membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993, 90: 5181-5185. 10.1073/pnas.90.11.5181.
Brugger B, Glass B, Haberkant P, Leibrecht I, Wieland FT, Krausslich HG: The HIV lipidome: a raft with an unusual composition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103: 2641-2646. 10.1073/pnas.0511136103.
Bhattacharya J, Peters PJ, Clapham PR: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoproteins that lack cytoplasmic domain cysteines: impact on association with membrane lipid rafts and incorporation onto budding virus particles. J Virol. 2004, 78: 5500-5506. 10.1128/JVI.78.10.5500-5506.2004.
Campbell S, Oshima M, Mirro J, Nagashima K, Rein A: Reversal by dithiothreitol treatment of the block in murine leukemia virus maturation induced by disulfide cross-linking. J Virol. 2002, 76: 10050-10055. 10.1128/JVI.76.19.10050-10055.2002.
Guyader M, Kiyokawa E, Abrami L, Turelli P, Trono D: Role for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 membrane cholesterol in viral internalization. J Virol. 2002, 76: 10356-10364. 10.1128/JVI.76.20.10356-10364.2002.
Graham DR, Chertova E, Hilburn JM, Arthur LO, Hildreth JE: Cholesterol depletion of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and simian immunodeficiency virus with beta-cyclodextrin inactivates and permeabilizes the virions: evidence for virion-associated lipid rafts. J Virol. 2003, 77: 8237-8248. 10.1128/JVI.77.15.8237-8248.2003.
Liao Z, Graham DR, Hildreth JE: Lipid rafts and HIV pathogenesis: virion-associated cholesterol is required for fusion and infection of susceptible cells. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2003, 19: 675-687. 10.1089/088922203322280900.
Campbell S, Gaus K, Bittman R, Jessup W, Crowe S, Mak J: The raft-promoting property of virion-associated cholesterol, but not the presence of virion-associated Brij 98 rafts, is a determinant of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infectivity. J Virol. 2004, 78: 10556-10565. 10.1128/JVI.78.19.10556-10565.2004.
Yang P, Ai LS, Huang SC, Li HF, Chan WE, Chang CW, Ko CY, Chen SS: The cytoplasmic domain of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transmembrane protein gp41 harbors lipid raft association determinants. J Virol. 2010, 84: 59-75. 10.1128/JVI.00899-09.
Rousso I, Mixon MB, Chen BK, Kim PS: Palmitoylation of the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein is critical for viral infectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 13523-13525. 10.1073/pnas.240459697.
Bhattacharya J, Repik A, Clapham PR: Gag regulates association of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope with detergent-resistant membranes. J Virol. 2006, 80: 5292-5300. 10.1128/JVI.01469-05.
Chan WE, Lin HH, Chen SS: Wild-type-like viral replication potential of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope mutants lacking palmitoylation signals. J Virol. 2005, 79: 8374-8387. 10.1128/JVI.79.13.8374-8387.2005.
Bhatia AK, Kaushik R, Campbell NA, Pontow SE, Ratner L: Mutation of critical serine residues in HIV-1 matrix result in an envelope incorporation defect which can be rescued by truncation of the gp41 cytoplasmic tail. Virology. 2009, 384: 233-241. 10.1016/j.virol.2008.10.047.
Ali A, Avalos RT, Ponimaskin E, Nayak DP: Influenza virus assembly: effect of influenza virus glycoproteins on the membrane association of M1 protein. J Virol. 2000, 74: 8709-8719. 10.1128/JVI.74.18.8709-8719.2000.
Henderson G, Murray J, Yeo RP: Sorting of the respiratory syncytial virus matrix protein into detergent-resistant structures is dependent on cell-surface expression of the glycoproteins. Virology. 2002, 300: 244-254. 10.1006/viro.2002.1540.
Day JR, Munk C, Guatelli JC: The membrane-proximal tyrosine-based sorting signal of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp41 is required for optimal viral infectivity. J Virol. 2004, 78: 1069-1079. 10.1128/JVI.78.3.1069-1079.2004.
Schiavoni I, Trapp S, Santarcangelo AC, Piacentini V, Pugliese K, Baur A, Federico M: HIV-1 Nef enhances both membrane expression and virion incorporation of Env products. A model for the Nef-dependent increase of HIV-1 infectivity. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 22996-23006. 10.1074/jbc.M312453200.
Bresnahan PA, Yonemoto W, Ferrell S, Williams-Herman D, Geleziunas R, Greene WC: A dileucine motif in HIV-1 Nef acts as an internalization signal for CD4 downregulation and binds the AP-1 clathrin adaptor. Curr Biol. 1998, 8: 1235-1238. 10.1016/S0960-9822(07)00517-9.
Adnan S, Balamurugan A, Trocha A, Bennett MS, Ng HL, Ali A, Brander C, Yang OO: Nef interference with HIV-1-specific CTL antiviral activity is epitope specific. Blood. 2006, 108: 3414-3419. 10.1182/blood-2006-06-030668.
Schaefer MR, Wonderlich ER, Roeth JF, Leonard JA, Collins KL: HIV-1 Nef targets MHC-I and CD4 for degradation via a final common beta-COP-dependent pathway in T cells. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4: e1000131-10.1371/journal.ppat.1000131.
El-Far M, Isabelle C, Chomont N, Bourbonniere M, Fonseca S, Ancuta P, Peretz Y, Chouikh Y, Halwani R, Schwartz O, et al: Down-Regulation of CTLA-4 by HIV-1 Nef Protein. PLoS One. 2013, 8: e54295-10.1371/journal.pone.0054295.
Stolp B, Fackler OT: How HIV takes advantage of the cytoskeleton in entry and replication. Viruses. 2011, 3: 293-311. 10.3390/v3040293.
Miller MD, Warmerdam MT, Gaston I, Greene WC, Feinberg MB: The human immunodeficiency virus-1 nef gene product: a positive factor for viral infection and replication in primary lymphocytes and macrophages. J Exp Med. 1994, 179: 101-113. 10.1084/jem.179.1.101.
Roeth JF, Collins KL: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Nef: adapting to intracellular trafficking pathways. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2006, 70: 548-563. 10.1128/MMBR.00042-05.
Zhou J, Aiken C: Nef enhances human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infectivity resulting from intervirion fusion: evidence supporting a role for Nef at the virion envelope. J Virol. 2001, 75: 5851-5859. 10.1128/JVI.75.13.5851-5859.2001.
Stumptner-Cuvelette P, Jouve M, Helft J, Dugast M, Glouzman AS, Jooss K, Raposo G, Benaroch P: Human immunodeficiency virus-1 Nef expression induces intracellular accumulation of multivesicular bodies and major histocompatibility complex class II complexes: potential role of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Mol Biol Cell. 2003, 14: 4857-4870. 10.1091/mbc.E03-04-0211.
Zheng YH, Plemenitas A, Fielding CJ, Peterlin BM: Nef increases the synthesis of and transports cholesterol to lipid rafts and HIV-1 progeny virions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 8460-8465. 10.1073/pnas.1437453100.
St Gelais C, Coleman CM, Wang JH, Wu L: HIV-1 Nef Enhances Dendritic Cell-Mediated Viral Transmission to CD4(+) T Cells and Promotes T-Cell Activation. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e34521-10.1371/journal.pone.0034521.
Wolf D, Witte V, Clark P, Blume K, Lichtenheld MG, Baur AS: HIV Nef enhances Tat-mediated viral transcription through a hnRNP-K-nucleated signaling complex. Cell Host Microbe. 2008, 4: 398-408. 10.1016/j.chom.2008.08.013.
Omoto S, Fujii YR: Regulation of human immunodeficiency virus 1 transcription by nef microRNA. J Gen Virol. 2005, 86: 751-755. 10.1099/vir.0.80449-0.
Witte V, Laffert B, Gintschel P, Krautkramer E, Blume K, Fackler OT, Baur AS: Induction of HIV transcription by Nef involves Lck activation and protein kinase C theta raft recruitment leading to activation of ERK1/2 but not NF kappa B. J Immunol. 2008, 181: 8425-8432.
Neri F, Giolo G, Potesta M, Petrini S, Doria M: The HIV-1 Nef protein has a dual role in T cell receptor signaling in infected CD4+ T lymphocytes. Virology. 2011, 410: 316-326. 10.1016/j.virol.2010.11.018.
Arold ST, Baur AS: Dynamic Nef and Nef dynamics: how structure could explain the complex activities of this small HIV protein. Trends Biochem Sci. 2001, 26: 356-363. 10.1016/S0968-0004(01)01846-1.
Chazal N, Singer G, Aiken C, Hammarskjold ML, Rekosh D: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 particles pseudotyped with envelope proteins that fuse at low pH no longer require Nef for optimal infectivity. J Virol. 2001, 75: 4014-4018. 10.1128/JVI.75.8.4014-4018.2001.
Perugi F, Muriaux D, Ramirez BC, Chabani S, Decroly E, Darlix JL, Blot V, Pique C: Human Discs Large is a new negative regulator of human immunodeficiency virus-1 infectivity. Mol Biol Cell. 2009, 20: 498-508. 10.1091/mbc.E08-02-0189.
Coleman SH, Van Damme N, Day JR, Noviello CM, Hitchin D, Madrid R, Benichou S, Guatelli JC: Leucine-specific, functional interactions between human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Nef and adaptor protein complexes. J Virol. 2005, 79: 2066-2078. 10.1128/JVI.79.4.2066-2078.2005.
Madrid R, Janvier K, Hitchin D, Day J, Coleman S, Noviello C, Bouchet J, Benmerah A, Guatelli J, Benichou S: Nef-induced alteration of the early/recycling endosomal compartment correlates with enhancement of HIV-1 infectivity. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280: 5032-5044.
Costa LJ, Chen N, Lopes A, Aguiar RS, Tanuri A, Plemenitas A, Peterlin BM: Interactions between Nef and AIP1 proliferate multivesicular bodies and facilitate egress of HIV-1. Retrovirology. 2006, 3: 33-10.1186/1742-4690-3-33.
Costa LJ, Zheng YH, Sabotic J, Mak J, Fackler OT, Peterlin BM: Nef binds p6* in GagPol during replication of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol. 2004, 78: 5311-5323. 10.1128/JVI.78.10.5311-5323.2004.
Leiherer A, Ludwig C, Wagner R: Influence of extended mutations of the HIV-1 transframe protein p6 on Nef-dependent viral replication and infectivity in vitro. Virology. 2009, 387: 200-210. 10.1016/j.virol.2009.01.042.
He C, Klionsky DJ: Regulation mechanisms and signaling pathways of autophagy. Annu Rev Genet. 2009, 43: 67-93. 10.1146/annurev-genet-102808-114910.
Fader CM, Colombo MI: Autophagy and multivesicular bodies: two closely related partners. Cell Death Differ. 2009, 16: 70-78. 10.1038/cdd.2008.168.
Noda T, Yoshimori T: Molecular basis of canonical and bactericidal autophagy. Int Immunol. 2009, 21: 1199-1204. 10.1093/intimm/dxp088.
Welsch S, Muller B, Krausslich HG: More than one door - Budding of enveloped viruses through cellular membranes. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581: 2089-2097. 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.03.060.
Schibli DJ, Montelaro RC, Vogel HJ: The membrane-proximal tryptophan-rich region of the HIV glycoprotein, gp41, forms a well-defined helix in dodecylphosphocholine micelles. Biochemistry. 2001, 40: 9570-9578. 10.1021/bi010640u.
Sun ZY, Oh KJ, Kim M, Yu J, Brusic V, Song L, Qiao Z, Wang JH, Wagner G, Reinherz EL: HIV-1 broadly neutralizing antibody extracts its epitope from a kinked gp41 ectodomain region on the viral membrane. Immunity. 2008, 28: 52-63. 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.11.018.
Buzon V, Natrajan G, Schibli D, Campelo F, Kozlov MM, Weissenhorn W: Crystal structure of HIV-1 gp41 including both fusion peptide and membrane proximal external regions. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6: e1000880-10.1371/journal.ppat.1000880.
Lai RP, Yan J, Heeney J, McClure MO, Gottlinger H, Luban J, Pizzato M: Nef decreases HIV-1 sensitivity to neutralizing antibodies that target the membrane-proximal external region of TMgp41. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7: e1002442-10.1371/journal.ppat.1002442.
Tokunaga K, Kojima A, Kurata T, Ikuta K, Inubushi R, Shimano R, Kawamura M, Akari H, Koyama AH, Adachi A: Producer cell-dependent requirement of the Nef protein for efficient entry of HIV-1 into cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998, 250: 565-568. 10.1006/bbrc.1998.9346.
Tokunaga K, Kojima A, Kurata T, Ikuta K, Akari H, Koyama AH, Kawamura M, Inubushi R, Shimano R, Adachi A: Enhancement of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infectivity by Nef is producer cell-dependent. J Gen Virol. 1998, 79 (Pt 10): 2447-2453.
Srinivas SK, Srinivas RV, Anantharamaiah GM, Compans RW, Segrest JP: Cytosolic domain of the human immunodeficiency virus envelope glycoproteins binds to calmodulin and inhibits calmodulin-regulated proteins. J Biol Chem. 1993, 268: 22895-22899.
Tencza SB, Mietzner TA, Montelaro RC: Calmodulin-binding function of LLP segments from the HIV type 1 transmembrane protein is conserved among natural sequence variants. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1997, 13: 263-269. 10.1089/aid.1997.13.263.
Pan Z, Radding W, Zhou T, Hunter E, Mountz J, McDonald JM: Role of calmodulin in HIV-potentiated Fas-mediated apoptosis. Am J Pathol. 1996, 149: 903-910.
Emerson V, Holtkotte D, Pfeiffer T, Wang IH, Schnolzer M, Kempf T, Bosch V: Identification of the cellular prohibitin 1/prohibitin 2 heterodimer as an interaction partner of the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain of the HIV-1 glycoprotein. J Virol. 2010, 84: 1355-1365. 10.1128/JVI.01641-09.
Zhang H, Wang L, Kao S, Whitehead IP, Hart MJ, Liu B, Duus K, Burridge K, Der CJ, Su L: Functional interaction between the cytoplasmic leucine-zipper domain of HIV-1 gp41 and p115-RhoGEF. Curr Biol. 1999, 9: 1271-1274. 10.1016/S0960-9822(99)80511-9.
Wang L, Zhang H, Solski PA, Hart MJ, Der CJ, Su L: Modulation of HIV-1 replication by a novel RhoA effector activity. J Immunol. 2000, 164: 5369-5374.
Adhikari A, Xu M, Chen ZJ: Ubiquitin-mediated activation of TAK1 and IKK. Oncogene. 2007, 26: 3214-3226. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210413.
Nabel G, Baltimore D: An inducible transcription factor activates expression of human immunodeficiency virus in T cells. Nature. 1987, 326: 711-713. 10.1038/326711a0.
Saksela K, Cheng G, Baltimore D: Proline-rich (PxxP) motifs in HIV-1 Nef bind to SH3 domains of a subset of Src kinases and are required for the enhanced growth of Nef?+?viruses but not for down-regulation of CD4. EMBO J. 1995, 14: 484-491.
Alexander L, Du Z, Rosenzweig M, Jung JU, Desrosiers RC: A role for natural simian immunodeficiency virus and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 nef alleles in lymphocyte activation. J Virol. 1997, 71: 6094-6099.
Wang JK, Kiyokawa E, Verdin E, Trono D: The Nef protein of HIV-1 associates with rafts and primes T cells for activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 394-399. 10.1073/pnas.97.1.394.
Fenard D, Yonemoto W, De Noronha C, Cavrois M, Williams SA, Greene WC: Nef is physically recruited into the immunological synapse and potentiates T cell activation early after TCR engagement. J Immunol. 2005, 175: 6050-6057.
Biggs TE, Cooke SJ, Barton CH, Harris MP, Saksela K, Mann DA: Induction of activator protein 1 (AP-1) in macrophages by human immunodeficiency virus type-1 NEF is a cell-type-specific response that requires both hck and MAPK signaling events. J Mol Biol. 1999, 290: 21-35. 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2849.
Schrager JA, Minassian V, Marsh JW: HIV Nef increases T cell ERK MAP kinase activity. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 6137-6142. 10.1074/jbc.M107322200.
Janeway CA, Bottomly K: Signals and signs for lymphocyte responses. Cell. 1994, 76: 275-285. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90335-2.
Linsley PS, Ledbetter JA: The role of the CD28 receptor during T cell responses to antigen. Annu Rev Immunol. 1993, 11: 191-212. 10.1146/annurev.iy.11.040193.001203.
DenBoer LM, Hardy-Smith PW, Hogan MR, Cockram GP, Audas TE, Lu R: Luman is capable of binding and activating transcription from the unfolded protein response element. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005, 331: 113-119. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.03.141.