- Open Access
Clonal anergy of CD117+chB6+ B cell progenitors induced by avian leukosis virus subgroup J is associated with immunological tolerance
- Shuhai He†1, 2,
- Gaoying Zheng†1,
- Defang Zhou1,
- Gen Li1,
- Mingjun Zhu1,
- Xusheng Du1,
- Jing Zhou1 and
- Ziqiang Cheng1Email authorView ORCID ID profile
© The Author(s) 2019
- Received: 9 September 2018
- Accepted: 24 December 2018
- Published: 3 January 2019
The pathogenesis of immunological tolerance caused by avian leukosis virus subgroup J (ALV-J), an oncogenic retrovirus, is largely unknown.
In this study, the development, differentiation, and immunological capability of B cells and their progenitors infected with ALV-J were studied both morphologically and functionally by using a model of ALV-J congenital infection. Compared with posthatch infection, congenital infection of ALV-J resulted in severe immunological tolerance, which was identified as the absence of detectable specific antivirus antibodies. In congenitally infected chickens, immune organs, particularly the bursa of Fabricius, were poorly developed. Moreover, IgM-and IgG-positive cells and total immunoglobulin levels were significantly decreased in these chickens. Large numbers of bursa follicles with no differentiation into cortex and medulla indicated that B cell development was arrested at the early stage. Flow cytometry analysis further confirmed that ALV-J blocked the differentiation of CD117+chB6+ B cell progenitors in the bursa of Fabricius. Furthermore, both the humoral immunity and the immunological capability of B cells and their progenitors were significantly suppressed, as assessed by (a) the antibody titres against sheep red blood cells and the Marek’s disease virus attenuated serotype 1 vaccine; (b) the proliferative response of B cells against thymus-independent antigen lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in the spleen germinal centres; and (c) the capacities for proliferation, differentiation and immunoglobulin gene class-switch recombination of B cell progenitors in response to LPS and interleukin-4(IL-4) in vitro.
These findings suggested that the anergy of B cells in congenitally infected chickens is caused by the developmental arrest and dysfunction of B cell progenitors, which is an important factor for the immunological tolerance induced by ALV-J.
- Avian leukosis virus subgroup J
- B cell progenitor
- B cell anergy
- Immunological tolerance
- Congenital infection
Avian leukosis virus subgroup J (ALV-J), an oncogenic retrovirus, causes myeloid leukosis and various other neoplastic diseases in both broiler and layer chickens [1, 2]. In addition to causing neoplastic diseases and reducing production performance, the serious effect of ALV-J on birds is immunosuppression [3, 4]. Like other exogenous avian leukosis viruses, ALV-J can be transmitted in vertical or horizontal infection. Generally, chickens infected by the congenital transmission of ALV-J are prone to immunological tolerance. Congenitally infected chickens are characterized by the presence of high levels of virus in the blood and tissues, but the absence of antivirus-specific antibodies [5–7]. In particular, immunological tolerance induced by ALV-J is an essential factor for neoplasia and opportunistic infection [8–10]. However, little is still known about the pathogenesis of immunological tolerance caused by the congenital infection of ALV-J. Previous studies have suggested the presence of lymphocyte depletion in special areas of immune organs and the unusual expression of cytokine genes associated with immunity in chickens that are inoculated with ALV-J after hatching [11–13]. These data indicated that ALV-J has selective effects on lymphocyte type and development stage.
Immunological tolerance is a state of non-response or low-response of B or T cells to a specific antigen. Abnormal development and dysfunction of immune cells infected with virus are also among the causes of immunological tolerance . B cells play an important role in antiviral humoral immunity. However, some viruses, such as influenza virus, can induce B cell anergy . In this state, anergic B cells fail to complete differentiation, to proliferate, and to make antibodies [16, 17]. Experimental data collected in animal models and humans have also shown that the B cell anergy induced by hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) can cause immunological tolerance, especially in the context of congenital infection [18, 19]. Studies in our lab and others have shown that ALV-J has tissue tropism in the lymphocytes of the bursa of Fabricius [20, 21]. ALV-J can alter the expression of genes associated with growth regulation, immune system processes, and neoplasia regulation in bursal cells [22, 23]. Importantly, the bursa of Fabricius, unique to birds, is where B cell differentiation and maturation are induced. B cell precursors gradually develop after colonizing the bursal epithelium and migrate to secondary lymphoid organs after maturation to participate in acquired immunity [24, 25]. These results motivated us to investigate the pathogenesis of immunological tolerance induced by ALV-J from the perspective of whether the virus affects B cell development and function.
Chickens congenitally infected with ALV-J were more prone to immunological tolerance than those horizontally infected, which suggested the possibility that ALV-J might affect early B cell development. Indeed, whether the pro-B cell is normal will determine B cell development and function, such as the development of the bursal follicles, the rearrangement of the antigen receptor gene fragments, and the immunoglobulin (Ig) gene class-switch recombination (CSR) [26, 27]. In the present study, the development, differentiation, and immunological capability of B cells and their progenitors infected with ALV-J were studied both morphologically and functionally in both in vivo and in vitro experiments.
Chickens infected at ED 6 suffered immunological tolerance and showed development arrest of bursal follicles and B cells
As shown in Fig. 1a, b, histopathologically, the immune organs of chickens infected with ALV-J at ED 6 were poorly developed. Particularly, the bursa of Fabricius was characterized by poorly developed bursal follicles, with no differentiation into cortex and medulla, and the bursa of Fabricius had markedly decreased numbers of bursal follicles separated by hyperplastic interstitial connective tissue (Fig. 1a, c). However, despite the stunting of development and the decrease in lymphocyte numbers in the medulla, the bursal follicles in chickens infected with ALV-J at D 1 could differentiate into medulla and cortex as normal chickens (Fig. 1a, c). In chickens infected at ED 6 and D 1, mild depletion of lymphocytes and multiplication of reticular cells were detected in the medulla (Fig. 1b, d). However, the effect of ALV-J on the thymus was not as serious as that observed on the bursa of Fabricius. Compared with chickens infected posthatch, congenital infection of ALV-J (infected at ED 6) resulted in decreased chB6+ B cells in the bursal follicles and spleen (Fig. 3b, c). Collectively, these findings indicated that ALV-J interferes with the development of B cells at the early stage of development in the context of ALV-J congenital infection.
Chickens infected with ALV-J at ED 6 showed decreased numbers of IgM and IgG cells in immune organs and decreased total immunoglobulin in the blood
ALV-J blocked the differentiation of CD117+chB6+ B cell progenitors
An interesting finding is that infection of ALV-J during the embryonic period can cause more (approximately 27%) of B cells to be infected, whereas infection with ALV-J after hatching can only cause a small number (approximately 7%) of B cells to be infected (Fig. 3d, f). Consistent with previous studies, which reported that the positive staining for ALV-J antigen was mainly detected in the medulla , current IHC results showed that these infected B cells were mainly present in the medulla. These positive cells were larger in size and higher in nuclear to cytoplasm ratio compared with other uninfected bursal lymphocytes (Fig. 3e), which suggested that these infected cells were in the early stage of development.
To further investigate whether ALV-J affected the development and differentiation of B cell progenitors, bursal cells in the chickens infected at ED 6 or the uninfected chickens at different ages were used for flow cytometry analysis. The results showed that, at the ages of ED 20, D 4, and D 8, the ratios of CD117+ B cell progenitors to CD117− B cells in the infected chickens were 0.050, 0.061, and 0.073, respectively, but the ratios of CD117+ B cell progenitors to CD117− B cells in uninfected chickens were 0.045, 0.040, and 0.036, respectively (Fig. 3g, h). These data suggested that the differentiation and maturity of B cell progenitors were arrested by ALV-J.
B cell function and responses to antigens and pathogens were impaired in ALV-J congenitally infected chickens
ALV-J inhibited the proliferation, maturity, and Ig gene CSR of B cell progenitors in vitro
As a genus in the family of retroviruses that includes reticuloendotheliosis virus and HIV, ALV-J usually causes haematopoietic cell tumours. However, in the long process of tumour induction, the virus first damages the immune system and causes immunosuppression or immunological tolerance [33, 34]. Regretfully, the potential impact of ALV-J on B cells has been ignored due to fact that the ALV-J mainly targets myeloid lineage cells. Although the pathogenesis of immunological tolerance induced by the virus is complicated, the elimination or inhibition of the activation and proliferation of antigen-specific B and T cells is likely responsible . Consistent with the findings in previous studies, chickens congenitally infected with ALV-J (as mimicked by infection at ED 6 in the current study) were prone to immunological tolerance. Moreover, there were lower values of total IgM and IgG in the blood of chickens infected at ED 6. Here, we demonstrated that the clonal anergy of B cell progenitors induced by ALV-J was associated with immunological tolerance [15, 18, 19].
Combined with previous studies on ALV-J, we considered that ALV-J has a selective effect on the type of lymphocytes and the developmental stage of lymphocytes [36, 37]. Histopathologically, although chicken infection with ALV-J at the embryonic stage and posthatch showed a decrease in thymic medullary lymphocytes, the pathological damage caused by the virus to the thymus was not as significant as the damage caused to the bursa of Fabricius. Therefore, we investigated the relationship between ALV-J and immunological tolerance from the perspective of B cell development and immunological capability. The unique function of B cells in humoral immunity was initially discovered in the bursa of Fabricius . The bursa of Fabricius is the location for Ig gene rearrangement and Ig gene CSR. These crucial findings made it possible to study the effects of ALV-J on B cell development and function. After undergoing productive Ig gene rearrangement and Ig gene CSR, the B cell precursors in the bursa of Fabricius gradually matured and then formed various types of immunoglobulin-producing cells, such as IgM+ or IgG+ cells [39, 40]. Ig CSR is a natural biological process that alters a B cell’s production of antibodies (such as IgM, IgG, or IgA) from one class to another . In the current study, the data from histopathology and flow cytometry analysis indicated that B cell development was arrested at the early stage. In fact, Ig diversity is generated early in lymphocyte development by the random rearrangement of Ig V (D) J region gene segments. B cells with normal development and function represent the most basic condition for antibody production , even if the generation of antigen-specific humoral responses requires the orchestrated coordination of B and T cells. Some studies have suggested that exogenous antigens might induce immunological tolerance of immature B cells in vivo . Our experimental results indicated that the clonal anergy and dysfunction of B cell progenitors induced by ALV-J are important factors for immunological tolerance.
Although there was insufficient evidence to confirm that ALV-J causes B lymphoma, this virus has the capacity to induce lymphocytoma and transform bursal follicles [2, 20, 44]. The previous research results suggested that ALV-J might regulate the genes associated with growth regulation in the bursa of Fabricius [22, 23]. More studies have confirmed that some ALV strains that cause lymphocytic leukaemia, such as RAV-1 and RAV-2, mainly infringe on the B cell precursors in the bursa of Fabricius [45, 46]. These ALV strains blocked the differentiation and emigration of B cells and interfered with the switching of IgM to IgG in B cells. Moreover, the IgM secreted by B lymphoma cells was abnormal [47, 48]. Current data show that the development of B cells and the immune response to specific antigens or pathogen stimulation in infected chickens were severely inhibited when ALV-J infection occurred in early embryonic development. However, the development of B cells in the bursas of Fabricius of posthatch-infected chickens was relatively normal, and the cells produced relatively normal secretory IgM, further confirming that ALV-J affected the early development and function of B cells. As a subgroup of ALVs, it is likely that ALV-J has developed a strategy to affect the development and function of B cell progenitors. Indeed, previous studies have suggested that the specific tolerance against ALV-J infection is due to the expression of envelope glycoproteins with epitopes shared between EAV-HP and ALV-J during embryonic development that would lead to deletion or induction of anergy in ALV-J-responsive immune cells during ontogeny [49–51]. Therefore, these data make us to believe that ALV-J has an important effect on the development of B cell progenitors that leads to the anergy of B cells, which could be associated with immunological tolerance.
These findings suggested that B cell anergy in congenitally infected chickens is caused by the developmental arrest and dysfunction of B cell progenitors, which is an important factor for the immunological tolerance induced by ALV-J. Together, the results presented here will help us to further understand the pathogenicity of ALV-J and the pathogenesis for immunological tolerance induced by ALV-J. Further studies are needed to investigate the molecular mechanism of ALV-J-induced B cell anergy.
To establish a model of congenital infection of ALV-J, 6-day-old embryos (ED 6) were injected with 100 μL 103.8 TCID50 of ALV-J through the allantoic cavity and were incubated in separate incubators. Meanwhile, mock-infected embryos were also incubated. To mimic horizontal infection, the virus was injected into the peritoneal cavity of chicks at one day (D 1) after hatching. The p27 antigen of ALV-J in the cloaca and the total IgM and IgG levels in blood were detected at intervals by ELISA starting at the age of D 2 until the terminal day 28 (D 28). From the age of ED 16 to D 28, the immune organs of chickens (mock, ED 6 infection, and D 1 infection) were sampled every other day and processed for histology (chickens were euthanized with sodium pentobarbital). The development, differentiation, and immunological capability of B cells and are progenitors in vivo and in vitro were assessed by ELISA, IHC, and flow cytometry analysis. All animal experiments described in the present study were approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of Shandong Province (Permit Number of Protocol: 20160124).
Fertilized eggs (n = 320) of Leghorn specific-pathogen-free (SPF) chickens were purchased from the Saisi Company (Jinan, China). ALV-J (NX0101 strain ) was maintained in our laboratory. Chickens of mock infection (n = 120), ED6 infection (n = 120) and D1 infection (n = 50) were fed separately in isolated facilities throughout the experiments. Other reagents/materials described in the relevant sections of this article were purchased from commercial companies.
The bursas of Fabricius, thymes and spleens of chickens (mock, n = 30; ED 6 infection, n = 30; D 1 infection, n = 30) were sampled. These samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde solution and embedded in paraffin wax. Five-micron-thick sections of the middle parts of these immune organs were excised for microscopic examinations. These tissue sections were mounted on triethoxysilane-coated slides before examination with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. Three randomly selected fields in each target tissue section were photographed and quantified to determine the degree of pathological changes. Meanwhile, consecutive sections of these immune organs were prepared for IHC tests.
ELISA for p27 antigen, anti-ALV-J antibody, and total IgM or IgG
Wing vein blood and cloaca swab samples were collected from chickens (mock, n = 30; ED 6 infection, n = 30; D 1 infection, n = 30) at the specified intervals (starting at the D 2 until D 28). Blood samples were centrifuged at 800×g for 10 min and stored at 4 °C for the detection of anti-ALV-J Ab and total IgM and IgG. Anti-ALV-J Ab or p27 antigen was detected using a commercial ELISA test kit (IDEXX USA Inc., Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The levels of p27 antigen of ALV-J or anti-ALV-J Ab were evaluated by calculating the s/p ratio. The value of the cut-off was 0.2 (s/p ratio), as recommended by the manufacturer. Moreover, the total IgM and IgG levels in blood were tested using commercial ELISA test kits (Abcam, Cambridge, USA). In the above tests, each biological sample was tested in triplicate. The p27 antigen-positive chickens were euthanized on the day of detection, and their organs were sampled and preserved for the next tests.
IHC was performed to detect the expression levels of chB6, IgM, IgG, and ALV-J antigen in tissues according to the instructions for the DouMaxVision™ kits (Maixin-Bio Ltd., Fuzhou, China). Primary antibodies include mouse anti-chicken chB6 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) (1:200; Southern Biotech, Birmingham, USA), rabbit anti-chicken IgM mAb (1:800; Abcam, Massachusetts, USA), rabbit anti-chicken IgG mAb (1:800; Jackson, Westgrove, PA), and rabbit anti-chicken ALV-J polyclonal Ab (1:200; made in our laboratory). Secondary antibodies include alkaline phosphatase-labelled goat anti-mouse IgG polymer and horseradish peroxidase-labelled goat anti-rabbit IgG polymer. Briefly, after the antigen was retrieved and blocked with 10% normal goat serum, each tissue section was incubated with primary antibody for 1 h at room temperature, after which the section was washed with PBS three times and incubated with secondary antibody for 15 min at 37 °C. Sections were stained by 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate/nitro blue tetrazolium (BCIP/NBT), 3-amino-9-ethylcarbozole (AEC) or 3, 3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) after rinsing, counterstained by haematoxylin and sealed by an aqueous mounting media. Negative controls were also performed with the same tissues. Six randomly selected fields of positive expression in each target tissue section were photographed and analysed in Image J software to accurately calculate the positive area and to measure the mean optical density.
Flow cytometry analysis for the differentiation of B cell progenitors and the percentage of ALV-J-infected B cells
At the ages of ED 20, D 4, and D 8, erythrocyte-depleted bursal cells from congenitally infected chickens (n = 5 per point of time) and mock-infected chickens (n = 5 per time point) were suspended in cold PBS and stained with mouse anti chicken chB6-FITC mAb and mouse anti chicken CD117-PE mAb (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, USA) for flow cytometry analysis. In addition, erythrocyte-depleted bursal cells from 14-days-old chickens, including mock-infected chickens (n = 10), chickens infected at ED 6 (n = 10), and chickens infected at D 1 (n = 10), were sampled and analysed by flow cytometry for the percentage of ALV-J-infected B cells. Before flow cytometry analysis, these cells were stained with mouse anti-chicken chB6-FITC mAb (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, USA) and PE-labelled ALV-J Ab (PE was purchased from Expedeon Company in the UK, the ALV-J Ab was made in our laboratory). In these tests, mouse IgG1κ-FITC and mouse IgG2a-PE isotype antibodies (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, USA) were also used. Cells were analysed by a BD FACS Aria II instrument (BD Biosciences). Data were analysed using FlowJo (TreeStar) software.
Stimulation by antigen and antibody determination
In this test, the immune responses of chickens against SRBC (Solarbio, China), attenuated MDV serotype 1 vaccine (Harbin Veterinary Medicine Research Institute, china), and LPS (O55:B55; Solarbio, China) were assessed. In brief, 0.5 mL of 6 × 107 SRBC and 0.2 mL of attenuated MDV vaccine were injected into chickens (mock, n = 10; ED6 infection, n = 10; D1 infection, n = 10) through the abdominal cavity and via subcutaneous injection, respectively, at 1, 2, and 2.5 weeks of age. Heparinized blood was sampled by heart puncture 4 days after the second immunization and 7 days after the final immunization. The titres of IgM and IgG-class Abs against SRBC and MDV were tested by ELISA according to the instructions from the commercial ELISA test kit (Chicken anti-MDV Ab (IgM/IgG) ELISA test kit and Chicken anti-SRBC Ab (IgM/IgG) ELISA test kit, Berseebio, China). Furthermore, to investigate the effect of ALV-J on the proliferation capacity of B cells in vivo, both the mock-infected chickens (n = 6) and the congenitally infected chickens (n = 6) were injected with LPS (40 mg/kg) through the abdominal cavity at the age of D 16. After four days, the spleens were collected and processed for IHC. B cells in the spleen were stained with mouse anti-chB6 Ab. Six randomly selected fields of the positive expression in each target tissue section were photographed to accurately calculate the numbers of GCs.
Sorting and culture of B cell progenitors
Erythrocyte-depleted bursal cells from normal chickens (n = 30) on ED20 were labelled with mouse anti-chicken chB6-FITC mAb (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, USA) and mouse anti-chicken CD117-PE mAb (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, USA) and were then sorted by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) according to a modified protocol in a sterile operation . Briefly, for each round of sorting, 1 × 106 bursal cells were labelled with Fixable Aqua Dead Cell Stain (Life Technologies) for the detection of dead cells and stained with 2 μg/mL chB6-FITC mAb and CD117-PE mAb for 30 min at 4 °C. Single cells were sorted by a BD FACS Aria II instrument (BD Biosciences). Meanwhile, mouse IgG1κ-FITC/PE isotype antibody (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, USA) was also used to establish the assay’s validity. The purity of the sorted cells was ≥ 98%, as analysed with FACSDiva software (BD Biosciences). Then, these CD117+chB6+ cells were seeded in 24-well plates at 1 × 106 cells/mL and maintained at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in a culture medium containing IMDM (Gibco, California, USA), 20% chicken serum (Gibco, California, USA), 50 ng/mL chicken stem cell growth factor (SCF) and 20 ng/mL chicken interleukin-7 (IL-7) (Creative Biomart, New York, USA), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin.
Mitogenic assays and detection of Ig gene CSR
The CD117+chB6+ cells were infected by ALV-J and expanded through stimulation with 40 µg/mL lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (O55:B55; Solarbio, China). Culture medium with LPS was half-quantity changed every two days and added to the new medium. Cells were harvested every day for the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) (Solarbio, China) test and flow cytometry analysis of IgM+ and IgG+ cells. The CCK-8 test was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Mouse anti-chicken IgM-FITC mAb (Abcam, Massachusetts, USA) and mouse anti-chicken IgG-FITC mAb (Jackson, Westgrove, PA) were used for the surface labelling of IgM+ and IgG+ cells. Cells were stained with antibodies for 30 min at 4 °C and were then immediately analysed on a BD FACS Aria II instrument after washing. Data were analysed using FlowJo (TreeStar) software.
To detect the Ig gene class-switch of the B cell progenitor response to mitogen in vitro, the CD117+chB6+ cells were plated at 1 × 106 cells/mL in 24-well plates and cultured with IMDM supplemented with 20% chicken serum, 50 ng/mL chicken SCF, 20 ng/mL chicken IL-7, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin. Cells were then stimulated with 40 µg/mL LPS and 20 ng/mL IL-4. After 96 h, cells were harvested and fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde solution. IgM-FITC mAb and IgG-FITC mAb were used for the intracellular staining of IgM and IgG. The flow cytometry analysis was performed as described above.
Multiple sets of data comparisons were measured using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The unpaired t test was used when two groups were compared. The results were accepted as significantly different when p ≤ 0.05, p ≤ 0.01, or p ≤ 0.001. Analysis and plotting of data were performed using GraphPad Prism 6.0 and are expressed as the mean ± SEM.
ZC conceived and designed the research. SH and GZ performed the experiments. SH and DZ analyzed the data. GL, MZ, JZ, and XD contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. SH wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
We are grateful to Dr. Libo Huang and Ms. Li Zhang for their technical assistance. We thank Dr. Guihua Wang and Dr. Chengui Li for their helpful discussion and manuscript revision.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
All authors consented to the publication of this manuscript. The funding agencies had no role in the decision to publish this manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Approval for this study was obtained through the College of Veterinary Medicine of Shandong Agricultural University.
This study was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of China (31672521), the China-UK Partnership on Global Food Security: Combating Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup J for Sustainable Poultry Production (31761133002, BB/R012865/1), the Shandong Modern Agricultural Technology & Industry System (SDAIT-11-04), and the Fund of the Shandong “Double Tops” Program (2017).
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Payne LN. Retrovirus-induced disease in poultry. Poult Sci. 1998;77:1204–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cheng Z, Liu J, Cui Z, Zhang L. Tumors associated with avian leukosis virus subgroup J in layer hens during 2007 to 2009 in China. J Vet Med Sci. 2010;72:1027–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Payne LN, Nair V. The long view: 40 years of avian leukosis research. Avian Pathol. 2012;41:11–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Feng M, Zhang X. Immunity to avian leukosis virus: where are we now and what should we do? Front Immunol. 2016;7:624.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rubin H, Fanshier L, Cornelius A, Hughes WF. Tolerance and immunity in chickens after congenital and contact infection with an avian leukosis virus. Virology. 1962;17:143–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Russell PH, Ahmad K, Howes K, Payne LN. Some chickens which are viraemic with subgroup J avian leukosis virus have antibody-forming cells but no circulating antibody. Res Vet Sci. 1997;63:81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Payne LN, Gillespie AM, Howes K. Myeloid leukaemogenicity and transmission of the HPRS-103 strain of avian leukosis virus. Leukemia. 1992;6:1167–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wen Y, Huang Q, Yang C, Pan L, Wang G, Qi K, Liu H. Characterizing the histopathology of natural co-infection with Marek’s disease virus and subgroup J avian leucosis virus in egg-laying hens. Avian Pathol. 2018;47:83–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cui N, Wang Q, Shi W, Han L, Wang J, Ma X, Li H, Wang F, Su S, Zhao X. Synergy of subgroup J avian leukosis virus and Eimeria tenella to increase pathogenesis in specific-pathogen-free chickens. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2016;177:42–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou D, Xue J, He S, Du X, Zhou J, Li C, Huang L, Nair V, Yao Y, Cheng Z. Reticuloendotheliosis virus and avian leukosis virus subgroup J synergistically increase the accumulation of exosomal miRNAs. Retrovirology. 2018;15:45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dai M, Feng M, Xie T, Li Y, Ruan Z, Shi M, Liao M, Zhang X. ALV-J infection induces chicken monocyte death accompanied with the production of IL-1beta and IL-18. Oncotarget. 2017;8:99889–900.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gao Y, Liu Y, Guan X, Li X, Yun B, Qi X, Wang Y, Gao H, Cui H, Liu C, et al. Differential expression of immune-related cytokine genes in response to J group avian leukosis virus infection in vivo. Mol Immunol. 2015;64:106–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim Y. The effects of cyclophosphamide treatment on the pathogenesis of subgroup J avian leukosis virus (ALV-J) infection in broiler chickens with Marek’s disease virus exposure. J Vet Sci. 2003;4:245.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Soares MP, Teixeira L, Moita LF. Disease tolerance and immunity in host protection against infection. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017;17:83–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nossal GJ, Pike BL. Clonal anergy: persistence in tolerant mice of antigen-binding B lymphocytes incapable of responding to antigen or mitogen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1980;77:1602–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cambier JC, Gauld SB, Merrell KT, Vilen BJ. B-cell anergy: from transgenic models to naturally occurring anergic B cells? Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7:633–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Duty JA, Szodoray P, Zheng NY, Koelsch KA, Zhang Q, Swiatkowski M, Mathias M, Garman L, Helms C, Nakken B, et al. Functional anergy in a subpopulation of naive B cells from healthy humans that express autoreactive immunoglobulin receptors. J Exp Med. 2009;206:139–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hong M, Bertoletti A. Tolerance and immunity to pathogens in early life: insights from HBV infection. Semin Immunopathol. 2017;39:643–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schroeder KM, Agazio A, Torres RM. Immunological tolerance as a barrier to protective HIV humoral immunity. Curr Opin Immunol. 2017;47:26–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Williams SM, Fitzgerald SD, Reed WM, Lee LF, Fadly AM. Tissue tropism and bursal transformation ability of subgroup J avian leukosis virus in White Leghorn chickens. Avian Dis. 2004;48:921–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou J, Zhao GL, Wang XM, Du XS, Su S, Li CG, Nair V, Yao YX, Cheng ZQ. Synergistic viral replication of Marek’s disease virus and avian leukosis virus subgroup J is responsible for the enhanced pathogenicity in the superinfection of chickens. Viruses. 2018;10:271.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hang B, Sang J, Qin A, Qian K, Shao H, Mei M, Ye J. Transcription analysis of the response of chicken bursa of Fabricius to avian leukosis virus subgroup J strain JS09GY3. Virus Res. 2014;188:8–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen G, Li Z, Su S, Chang G, Qiu L, Zhu P, Zhang Y, Xu Q. Identification of key genes fluctuated induced by avian leukemia virus (ALV-J) infection in chicken cells. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2018;54:41–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Weill JC, Reynaud CA. The chicken B cell compartment. Science. 1987;238:1094–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ratcliffe MJ. The ontogeny and cloning of B cells in the bursa of Fabricius. Immunol Today. 1985;6:223–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jalkanen S, Jalkanen M, Granfors K, Toivanen P. Defect in the generation of light-chain diversity in bursectomized chickens. Nature. 1984;311:69–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thompson CB, Challoner PB, Neiman PE. Normal and neoplastic B cell development in the bursa of fabricius. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1986;132:209–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bagust TJ, Fenton SP, Reddy MR. Detection of subgroup J avian leukosis virus infection in Australian meat-type chickens. Aust Vet J. 2004;82:701–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fadly AM, Smith EJ. Isolation and some characteristics of a subgroup J-like avian leukosis virus associated with myeloid leukosis in meat-type chickens in the United States. Avian Dis. 1999;43:391–400.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reynolds JD. Mitotic rate maturation in the Peyer’s patches of fetal sheep and in the bursa of Fabricius of the chick embryo. Eur J Immunol. 1987;17:503.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Paramithiotis E, Michael JHR. B cell emigration directly from the cortex of lymphoid follicles in the bursa of Fabricius. Eur J Immunol. 1994;24:458–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arshad SS, Howes K, Barron GS, Smith LM, Russell PH, Payne LN. Tissue tropism of the HPRS-103 strain of J subgroup avian leukosis virus and of a derivative acutely transforming virus. Vet Pathol. 1997;34:127–37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang R, Verkoczy L, Wiehe K, Alam SM, Nicely NI, Santra S, Bradley T, Pemble CW, Zhang J, Gao F, et al. Initiation of immune tolerance-controlled HIV gp41 neutralizing B cell lineages. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8:33662.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Prendergast AJ, Klenerman P, Goulder PJ. The impact of differential antiviral immunity in children and adults. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12:636–48.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Billingham RE, Brent L, Medawar PB. Actively acquired tolerance of foreign cells. Nature. 1953;172:603–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang F, Wang XW, Chen HB, Liu JZ, Cheng ZQ. The critical time of avian leukosis virus subgroup J-mediated immunosuppression during early stage infection in specific pathogen-free chickens. J Vet Sci. 2011;12:235–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dong X, Zhao P, Chang S, Ju S, Li Y, Meng F, Sun P, Cui Z. Synergistic pathogenic effects of co-infection of subgroup J avian leukosis virus and reticuloendotheliosis virus in broiler chickens. Avian Pathol. 2015;44:43–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Glick B, Chang TS, Jaap RG. The bursa of Fabricius and antibody production. Poult Sci. 1956;35:224–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sayegh CE, Demaries SL, Iacampo S. Development of B cells expressing surface immunoglobulin molecules that lack V(D)J-encoded determinants in the avian embryo bursa of Fabricius. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:10806.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sayegh CE, Ratcliffe MJ. Perinatal deletion of B cells expressing surface Ig molecules that lack V(D)J-encoded determinants in the bursa of Fabricius is not due to intrafollicular competition. J Immunol. 2000;164:5041–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chaudhary N, Wesemann DR. Analyzing immunoglobulin repertoires. Front Immunol. 2018;9:462.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Merrell KT, Benschop RJ, Gauld SB, Aviszus K, Decotericardo D, Wysocki LJ, Cambier JC. Identification of anergic B cells within a wild-type repertoire. Immunity. 2006;25:953–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yarkoni Y, Getahun A, Cambier JC. Molecular underpinning of B-cell anergy. Immunol Rev. 2010;237:249–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Williams SM, Reed WM, Bacon LD, Fadly AM. Response of white leghorn chickens of various genetic lines to infection with avian leukosis virus subgroup. J Avian Dis. 2004;48:61–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Neiman PE. Retrovirus-induced B cell neoplasia in the bursa of Fabricius. Adv Immunol. 1994;56:467–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brandvold KA, Ewert DL, Kent SC, Neiman P, Ruddell A. Blocked B cell differentiation and emigration support the early growth of Myc-induced lymphomas. Oncogene. 2001;20:3226–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fung YK, Fadly AM, Crittenden LB, Kung HJ. On the mechanism of retrovirus-induced avian lymphoid leukosis: deletion and integration of the proviruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1981;78:3418–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Smith EJ, Neumann U, Okazaki W. Immune response to avian leukosis virus infection in chickens: sequential expression of serum immunoglobulins and viral antibodies. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 1979;2:519–29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Smith LM, Toye AA, Howes K, Bumstead N, Payne LN, Venugopal K. Novel endogenous retroviral sequences in the chicken genome closely related to HPRS-103 (subgroup J) avian leukosis virus. J Gen Virol. 1999;80(Pt 1):261.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sacco MA, Howes K, Venugopal K. Intact EAV-HP endogenous retrovirus in Sonnerat’s jungle fowl. J Virol. 2001;75:2029–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sacco MA, Flannery DM, Howes K, Venugopal K. Avian endogenous retrovirus EAV-HP shares regions of identity with avian leukosis virus subgroup J and the avian retrotransposon ART-CH. J Virol. 2000;74:1296.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cui Z, Du Y, Zhang Z, Silva RF. Comparison of Chinese field strains of avian leukosis subgroup J viruses with prototype strain HPRS-103 and United States strains. Avian Dis. 2003;47:1321–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dulwich KL, Giotis ES, Gray A, Nair V, Skinner MA, Broadbent AJ. Differential gene expression in chicken primary B cells infected ex vivo with attenuated and very virulent strains of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV). J Gen Virol. 2017;98:2918–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar