- Open Access
Reduced and highly diverse peripheral HIV-1 reservoir in virally suppressed patients infected with non-B HIV-1 strains in Uganda
Retrovirology volume 19, Article number: 1 (2022)
Our understanding of the peripheral human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reservoir is strongly biased towards subtype B HIV-1 strains, with only limited information available from patients infected with non-B HIV-1 subtypes, which are the predominant viruses seen in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) in Africa and Asia.
In this study, blood samples were obtained from well-suppressed ART-experienced HIV-1 patients monitored in Uganda (n = 62) or the U.S. (n = 50), with plasma HIV-1 loads < 50 copies/ml and CD4+ T-cell counts > 300 cells/ml. The peripheral HIV-1 reservoir, i.e., cell-associated HIV-1 RNA and proviral DNA, was characterized using our novel deep sequencing-based EDITS assay. Ugandan patients were slightly younger (median age 43 vs 49 years) and had slightly lower CD4+ counts (508 vs 772 cells/ml) than U.S. individuals. All Ugandan patients were infected with non-B HIV-1 subtypes (31% A1, 64% D, or 5% C), while all U.S. individuals were infected with subtype B viruses. Unexpectedly, we observed a significantly larger peripheral inducible HIV-1 reservoir in U.S. patients compared to Ugandan individuals (48 vs. 11 cell equivalents/million cells, p < 0.0001). This divergence in reservoir size was verified measuring proviral DNA (206 vs. 88 cell equivalents/million cells, p < 0.0001). However, the peripheral HIV-1 reservoir was more diverse in Ugandan than in U.S. individuals (8.6 vs. 4.7 p-distance, p < 0.0001).
The smaller, but more diverse, peripheral HIV-1 reservoir in Ugandan patients might be associated with viral (e.g., non-B subtype with higher cytopathicity) and/or host (e.g., higher incidence of co-infections or co-morbidities leading to less clonal expansion) factors. This highlights the need to understand reservoir dynamics in diverse populations as part of ongoing efforts to find a functional cure for HIV-1 infection in LMICs.
Although widespread global access to antiretroviral therapy (ART) has led to considerable reductions in HIV/AIDS morbidity and mortality [1, 2], the HIV-1 epidemic continues to affect millions of people worldwide, with the highest burden in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) [3, 4], Unfortunately, while ART effectively controls HIV-1 replication in plasma to below current detection levels, HIV-1 persists mostly in latently-infected effector and transitional memory CD4+ T cells, with minimal decay despite prolonged ART [5,6,7]. This pool of latent proviruses is quickly established after infection, usually leading to a steady source of potentially replication-competent HIV-1 that persists indefinitely even in well suppressed cART-treated people living with HIV-1 (PLWH) . Thus, HIV-1 post-integration latency represents the main obstacle to completely eradicate the virus from infected individuals [8, 9].
In the absence of HIV-1 transcription and virus production, the host immune system is not able to recognize latently HIV-infected cells or target them for elimination [8, 10]. To circumvent this problem, one avenue to eradicate the latent HIV-1 reservoir has been the “shock and kill” strategy, which involves activation of latent HIV-1 by latency reversal agents (LRA) in the presence of ART in conjunction with immunological approaches designed to purge the reactivated cells [11,12,13]. Numerous pre-clinical studies have used multitude of strategies, mainly based on LRAs, to re-activate the HIV-1 reservoir [3, 8, 13, 14]; however, to date no LRA-based therapy—not even the promising histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACIs)—have been able to successfully perturb the HIV-1 reservoir in human clinical trials [8, 15]. It is clear that an incomplete understanding of the molecular nature of proviral latency has hampered progress in this area . Numerous complementary approaches are also being explored for a functional HIV-1 cure, such as stand-alone immunological enhancements, including broadly neutralizing antibodies, direct targeting of the genome with CRISPRs, and induction of permanent epigenetic silencing .
Any successful effort to eradicate latently HIV-infected cells needs to be supported by accurate, reproducible and informative measurements of the proviral reservoir. Many competing methods have been developed to quantify the HIV-1 reservoir and measure the efficacy of strategies to functionally cure PLWH [15, 18, 19]. Effective assays that measure the latent HIV-1 reservoir need exquisite sensitivity, the capacity to distinguish between potentially replication-competent and defective proviruses, and the ability to accurately measure signals resulting from partial proviral activation. The original method for measurement of the latent HIV-1 reservoir was the quantitative viral outgrowth assay (Q-VOA) . This assay uses uninfected but activated, or transformed cells, to exponentially amplify replication-competent HIV-1 released from latently infected cells after T-cell activation [20,21,22]. Unfortunately, Q-VOA is costly and labor intensive, only semi-quantitative and appears to miss many replication-competent proviruses that may not be induced following a single round of T cell activation or are lost due to cytopathic effects arising from ex vivo induction .
The search for an alternative to Q-VOA has led to the development of a series of molecular and/or cell culture-based assays aimed to simplify the quantitation of the HIV-1 reservoir [15, 18, 19]. PCR-based assays that measure total proviral and integrated DNA are technically easier to perform, quantitatively more rigorous and the methodology is well established [23,24,25,26]. Unfortunately, interpretation of proviral DNA measurements is complicated by the presence of a large excess of defective proviruses. This has been partially addressed by the intact proviral DNA assay (IPDA) , which relies on primers that are widely separated in the proviral genome and therefore enrich for sequences arising from intact genomes compared to the majority of deletions seen the in defective proviral population, which are clustered in either the 3′ or 5′ halves of the genome. A complementary method is to use PCR to measure the levels of inducible viral RNA [14, 28]. One of the most refined of these types of assays is the Tat/Rev Induced limiting dilution assay (TILDA), which uses limiting dilution to measure the frequency of CD4+ T cells producing HIV-1 multiply spliced (ms) Tat/Rev RNA upon mitogenic stimulation . Since unspliced HIV-1 RNAs are frequently detected in latently infected cells in the absence of viral production, HIV-1 msRNAs (tat/rev) more accurately reflect active viral production [30, 31]. This assay represents an advance over Q-VOA but still fails to provide accurate quantitation, overcome sampling errors, and provide an adequate dynamic range to compare the efficiencies of various latency reversing agents. The EDITS assay is a PCR-based measuring mature spliced env mRNA in cells that also express functional Tat and Rev . Sequence analysis shows that more than 98% of defective proviruses are unable to generate mature env mRNA . Consequently, most cells expressing env mRNA are also capable of producing replication-competent virus . Recently, two other groups have shown that both singly splice vpu/env mRNA and multiply spliced tat/rev mRNA measurements correlate well with replication competent virus levels [35, 36]. EDITS has been previously used by our group to demonstrate increases in the HIV-1 reservoir during reproductive aging of women  and the impact of IL-15 superagonists on the reduction of HIV-1 reservoirs .
Our general understanding of HIV-1 pathogenesis and response to ART is strongly biased towards subtype B, the predominant HIV-1 subtype in North America and Western Europe [39, 40]. Not surprisingly, most HIV-1 reservoir studies have followed a similar path, being performed in developed countries targeting individuals infected with subtype B HIV-1 strains [8, 15]. With more than two-thirds of the total global number of PLWH in Africa, mainly infected with non-HIV-1 subtypes , there is a clear need to study the HIV-1 reservoir in this population, especially in LMICs with multiple prevalent subtypes [42,44,44]. A few studies have described differences in the HIV-1 reservoir in individuals infected with non-subtype B HIV-1 strains compared to subtype B-infected patients [45, 46], highlighting the need to better understand the role of the immune response, co-infections, and/or viral factors associated with different HIV-1 subtypes in the latent HIV-1 reservoir. In this study, we modified and validated our novel deep sequencing-based EDITS assay  for non-clade B viruses before using it to characterize the peripheral HIV-1 reservoir in PLWH in Uganda. We measured not only the size but the diversity of the HIV-1 reservoir by comparing cell-associated HIV-1 RNA and proviral DNA from Ugandan individuals infected with non-B subtype HIV-1 strains, with U.S. patients infected with subtype B virus. We also evaluated the response of non-B and B subtype HIV-1 reservoirs to different latency reversing agents. The results showed unexpectedly that non-B subtype HIV-1 infections resulted in significantly lower reservoir sizes than those seen in in subtype B HIV-1 infections in the US.
Development of an EDITS assay that accurately quantifies latently HIV-1-infected cells with B and non-B subtypes
Multiple assays have been developed to quantify the HIV-1 reservoir [15, 18, 19], most of them to be performed in North America, Europe, and Australia, where subtype B HIV-1 strains are predominant . Since the main goal of this study was to evaluate the HIV-1 reservoir in Uganda, it was important to test the ability of the modified EDITS assay to measure inducible cell-associated spliced HIV-1 env mRNA in individuals infected with more worldwide prevalent non-B HIV-1 strains. We therefore designed new primer sets that bind in highly conserved regions of the HIV-1 genome (http://www.hiv.lanl.gov/content/sequence/HIV/mainpage.html) and tested these in cells infected with 32 diverse HIV-1 group M strains, including: five subtype A, six subtype B, six subtype C, seven subtype D, four subtype F, one subtype G, one subtype H, and two circulating recombinant form AE (CRF01_AE), plus one HIV-1 group O, one HIV-2 strain and seven multidrug resistant subtype B HIV-1 isolates. As expected, amplicons of the correct sizes were obtained—and number of reads quantified by deep sequencing—from all HIV-1 group M isolates analyzed; however, the primers were not able to amplify the more divergent group O (HIV-1SC-O) and HIV-2CBL-20 strains (Additional file 2: Fig. S1). The specificity of the primers was further tested using nucleic acids from a series of RNA and DNA viruses (i.e., BKV, CMV, HSV-1, HSV-2, VZV, HBV, HCV, and EBV). No cross-reactivity was observed with any of these viruses, as all PCR reactions failed to generate any detectable amplicons (Additional file 2: Fig. S1).
The sensitivity of the nested PCR amplification step was evaluated initially by mixing DNA from the HIV-1 molecular clone pNL4-3 with DNA from a non-HIV plasmid (pUC19). Plasmid DNA was quantified and serial dilutions were used to prepare nine mixtures containing pNL4-3 at 0% to 100% in a background of pUC19, at a final concentration of 0.1 ng/ml. Using both standard and real-time PCR, the system was able to detect 10 fg of pNL4-3 DNA in a background of 0.1 ng/ml of non-HIV DNA total plasmid concentration. Similar results were obtained by standard and real-time PCR, as well as by quantifying the number of reads using deep sequencing (Additional file 3: Fig. S2A).
When evaluating the HIV-1 reservoir it is important to relate PCR values to estimates of the numbers of infected cell (“cell equivalents”). Fully activated cells produce 1000 to 2000 copies of spliced HIV-1 env mRNA per cell and this is relatively uniform due activation of the Tat protein that leads to highly efficient HIV-1 transcription. It is therefore possible to establish a calibration curve relating changes in PCR values to changes in input cell numbers. To establish an initial calibration curve, and determine the cellular limit of detection for the EDITS assay using the new primer sets we initially used ACH-2 cells, a cell line latently infected with a copy of HIV-1LAV per cell , and MT-4, an HIV-negative human T cell line as a control . Cells were counted and serial dilutions were used to prepare seven mixtures containing 0 to 1000 ACH-2 cells in a background of 1 × 106 MT-4 cells. The cell mixtures were activated with 10 μg/ml of Concanavalin A and cell-associated spliced HIV-1 RNA quantified using EDITS as described in “Methods” section. We were able to detect a minimum of 10 HIV+ ACH-2 cells in a milieu of one million HIV− MT-4 cells (0.001%). Equally important, RNA from the two DNase-treated negative controls, i.e., (i) zero ACH-2 cells mixture and (ii) one million ACH-2 cells lacking the reverse transcriptase enzyme in the One-Step RT-PCR step, failed to show any HIV-specific mapped read (Additional file 3: Fig. S2B).
We further refined the analytical sensitivity of the EDITS assay by mimicking the peripheral HIV-1 reservoir in the host using two Jurkat cell lines: Jurkat E4, a cell line latently infected with a single copy of HIV-1 per cell , and Jurkat E6-1, an HIV-negative human T cell lymphoblast . Cells were quantified and serial dilutions were used to prepare ten mixtures containing 0 to 400 Jurkat E4 cells in a background of 1 × 106 Jurkat E6-1 cells. Following cell activation with Concanavalin A, cell-associated spliced HIV-1 RNA was quantified using EDITS assay and proviral DNA assessed by deep sequencing. The EDITS assay was able to accurately detect as low as eight HIV+ cells in one million HIV− cells (r = 0.989, p < 0.0001, Pearson’s coefficient correlation), while the proviral DNA deep sequencing assay detected a minimum of 16 HIV+ cells (r = 0.997, p < 0.0001, Pearson’s coefficient correlation, Additional file 4: Fig. S3).
Finally, we validated the ability of the EDITS assay to quantify the peripheral HIV-1 reservoir by analyzing memory T cells from five ART-experienced, well-suppressed (plasma HIV-1 RNA load < 20 copies/ml) individuals infected with subtype B HIV-1 strains (Cleveland, OH) with (i) the EDITS assay, (ii) proviral DNA deep sequencing assay, and (iii) dPCR test designed to quantif proviral DNA. As expected, all three assays were able to quantify the HIV-1 reservoir in these patients, showing good correlation between EDITS and dPCR (r = 0.969, p < 0.006, Pearson’s coefficient correlation), EDITS and proviral DNA (r = 0.973, p < 0.005), and proviral DNA and dPCR (r = 0.979, p < 0.003, Additional file 5: Fig. S4).
Reduced peripheral HIV-1 reservoir in Ugandan patients compared to HIV-infected individuals in the U.S
For this cross-sectional study we recruited HIV-infected individuals living in Kampala, Uganda (n = 62) and Cleveland, Ohio, USA (n = 50). Overall, Ugandan patients were slightly younger than individuals from the U.S. (median, 43 vs 49 years, p = 0.009), more likely to be female (63% vs 16%, p < 0.001), and reported only heterosexual risk of HIV exposure, while U.S. patients reported more diverse risk factors (p < 0.001, Table 1). Although both groups of individuals had undetectable plasma HIV RNA loads (< 20 copies/ml) at the time of blood collection, compared with U.S. patients, Ugandans had lower CD4+ T-cell counts (median 772 vs 508, p < 0.0001, Table 1). ART history showed that a similar number of individuals in Uganda and in the U.S. had been exposed to ART regimens containing protease (25 vs 27) and/or nucleoside(tide) reverse transcriptase (51 vs 50) inhibitors; however, more Ugandans received non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors than U.S. patients (48 vs 35), while the opposite was true for integrase inhibitors (14 vs 28) and the entry inhibitor maraviroc (0 vs 3, p = 0.011, Table 1). Also, U.S. patients had a longer history of antiretroviral treatment, some starting suboptimal ART in the early 1990s. As expected, U.S. patients were exclusively infected with HIV-1 subtype B strains (n = 50), while individuals in Uganda were infected with HIV-1 subtypes A1 (n = 19), C (n = 3), and D (n = 40, Table 1).
Blood samples from each group of individuals were initially processed in their respective sites (Uganda and USA), following exactly the same protocols and using the same reagents (Fig. 1). An average of 87 million PBMCs were obtained from each individual (range 54 to 188 million), with no difference between Ugandan and U.S. patients (median 79 vs 82, p = 0.081). Memory CD4+ T-cells (mean 17.4 million) were isolated and purity determined (mean 96.7%, range 91.1% to 99.7%) before being activated and analyzed with the EDITS and proviral DNA assays (external or 1st PCR products and proviral DNA from Uganda patients were sent to CWRU for further analysis, Fig. 1). All 112 patient-derived samples, including the respective standard curves, were combined and analyzed in seven deep sequencing runs (mean 83 samples per deep sequencing run, range 47 to 96, Additional file 6: Fig. S5). Overall, deep sequencing metrics were similar among the different runs, including cluster density (mean 1,066 × 103/mm2, range 761 to 1,378), cluster passing filter (mean 93.3%, range 88.3% to 96.5%), error rate (mean 2.46%, range 2.09% to 2.9%), and total reads passing filter (mean 51 × 106 reads, 35 to 65 million, Additional file 6: Fig. S5). As expected, sequencing coverage (i.e., average number of reads that mapped to the sample-specific consensus reference) varied with each sample, ranging from 1 to 371,003 bp for cell-associated spliced HIV-1 RNA and from 252 to 985,303 bp for proviral DNA (Fig. 2A). Consensus sequences from cell-associated spliced HIV-1 RNA and proviral DNA samples were used to construct phylogenetic trees to confirm the HIV-1 subtype initially determined using the DEEPGEN™ Software Tool Suite  and COMET HIV-1  (Fig. 2B). All viruses from both cohorts were CCR5-tropic viruses.
The size of the peripheral HIV-1 reservoir in Ugandan and U.S. patients was initially determined by measuring cell-associated spliced HIV-1 RNA using the EDITS assay and converting the number of reads (show in Fig. 2) to cell numbers based on a calibration curve, as described above (“cell equivalents”) (Additional file 4: Fig. S3–Additional file 7: Fig. S6). Interestingly, Ugandans had a fourfold smaller inducible HIV-1 reservoir than the one calculated for the patients in the U.S. (median 11 vs 48 cell equivalents/million cells, p < 0.0001, unpaired t test, Fig. 3A). A less marked, but still significant, two-fold difference was observed when the peripheral HIV-1 reservoir was quantified based on proviral DNA (median 88 vs 206 cell equivalents/million cells, p < 0.0001, unpaired t test, Fig. 3A). As expected, in both groups of patients the number of latently HIV-infected cells in the periphery was higher when we used proviral DNA vs inducible cell-associated spliced HIV-1 RNA (median 88 vs 11 cell equivalents/million cells, p < 0.0001 in Uganda and 206 vs 48 cell equivalents/million cells, p < 0.0001 in the U.S.). However, the proviral DNA/cell-associated spliced HIV-1 RNA ratio was similar in Ugandan and U.S. HIV-infected individuals (median 5.6 vs 4.2, p = 0.51 unpaired t test, Fig. 3B).
Since the initial steps of the EDITS assay, from blood collection to 1st PCR reaction (Fig. 1), were performed both in Uganda and in the U.S., we decided to verify that the number of resting memory CD4+ T-cells activated with Concanavalin A was exactly the same in both sites (although both laboratories followed the same strict standard operating procedures). For that, extracted DNA from 15 Ugandan and 25 U.S. patients, as well as one million cells from five points of the standard curve generated in USA, were used to PCR amplify a 197 bp fragment of the albumin gene and the amplicons were quantified (Qubit 2.0, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Not surprisingly, the number (one million) of patient-derived resting memory CD4+ T cells from Ugandan and U.S. individuals that were included in the EDITS assay was similar (median 11.8 vs 12.3 ng/µl of albumin, p = 0.163 unpaired t test) and no different than the one million cells used in the standard curves (median 12.3 ng/µl of albumin, Additional file 7: Fig. S6).
To rule out that variations in the induction efficiency of the peripheral HIV-1 reservoir with Concanavalin A could be playing a role in the different reservoir size in patients from Uganda and the U.S., we performed the EDITS assays as described in “Methods” section, but using a variety of different latency reversing conditions. This panel included combinations of IL-15 with HDAC inhibitors and methyltransferase inhibitors, which are known to reverse latency efficiently in B-clade samples (i.e., IL-15 50 ng/ml plus SAHA 500 nM, IL-15 50 ng/ml plus GSK343 500 nM, or IL-15 50 ng/ml plus UNC638 500 nM) [53,55,55]. As shown in Fig. 4, none of these combinations, which mediate epigenetic regulation of gene expression, showed a differential induction of the peripheral HIV-1 reservoir in patients from Uganda (median 11.5 vs 14 vs 8 cell equivalents/million cells, p > 0.891 one-way ANOVA) or the U.S. (median 35 vs 40 vs 31 cell equivalents/million cells, p < 0.952 one-way ANOVA). Moreover, induction of the peripheral HIV-1 reservoir with all three combinations of HIV-1 activation agents confirmed the smaller inducible HIV-1 reservoir in Ugandan individuals, compared to U.S patients, initially determined using Concanavalin A (Fig. 4).
Analysis of clinical and demographics characteristics showed that the size of the peripheral HIV-1 reservoir, measured by cell-associated HIV-1 RNA or proviral DNA, was not significantly associated with age, gender, exposure risk factor, plasma HIV-1 RNA load or CD4+ T cells at collection, or ART history (data not shown). The most evident correlation was with HIV-1 subtype, where all U.S. individuals were infected with subtype B while the Ugandan patients were infected with non-B HIV-1 strains (Table 1, Fig. 2B). Nonetheless, among Ugandans the inducible reservoir size was not associated with HIV-1 subtype (A, C, or D). The inducible HIV-1 reservoir size was not significantly different comparing male and female individuals within the same cohort of patients (median 10 vs 9 cell equivalents/million cells, p = 0.843 in Uganda and 48 vs 53 cell equivalents/million cells p = 0.974, unpaired t test in USA, Additional file 8: Fig. S7); however, comparing individuals from the same gender between both cohorts of patients resembled the overall smaller inducible HIV-1 peripheral reservoir described in Fig. 3A (i.e., male UG vs USA, median 10 vs 48 cell equivalents/million cells, p < 0.0001 and female UG vs USA, 9 vs 53 cell equivalents/million cells p = 0.035, unpaired t test, Additional file 8: Fig. S7). Similar results were obtained when the peripheral HIV-1 reservoir was quantified using proviral DNA (Additional file 8: Fig. S7). The proviral DNA pool in U.S. men was higher than women in this cohort, which probably reflects a higher number of defective proviruses that accumulated during suboptimal therapy, as typically seen in male HIV-infected individuals in the U.S.
Peripheral HIV-1 reservoir in Ugandan patients is more diverse than in HIV-infected individuals from the U.S
The EDITS assay not only quantifies the size of the peripheral reservoir by measuring inducible cell-associated spliced HIV-1 RNA but also, because sequences are obtained, allows assessment of the genetic diversity of the HIV-1 reservoir. We used two different bioinformatics approaches to estimate the HIV-1 quasispecies diversity in both inducible cell-associated spliced HIV-1 RNA and proviral DNA in resting memory CD4+ T cells from Ugandan and U.S. patients. First, we used the myriad of deep sequencing reads to calculate intra-patient HIV-1 diversity based on the p-distance model . Interestingly, the cell-associated spliced HIV-1 RNA reservoir was more diverse in Ugandan patients than in HIV-infected individuals from the U.S. (median 8.6 vs 4.7 substitutions/site, p < 0.0001 unpaired t test); however, no significant difference was observed between both groups of patients when comparing proviral DNA diversity (Fig. 5A). Similar results were obtained by comparing the number of viral haplotypes in the peripheral HIV-1 reservoir determined by cell-associated spliced HIV-1 RNA, i.e., the reservoir from Ugandan patients had more unique HIV-1 variants than latently infected cells in U.S. patients (mean 4.3 vs 3.1, p = 0.025, unpaired t test), while no significant difference in the number of viral haplotypes was observed comparing proviral DNA diversity (Fig. 5B). The overall higher cell-associated spliced HIV-1 RNA diversity in the reservoir in Ugandan patients was confirmed when both p-distance and viral haplotypes were evaluated by subtype, that is, individuals infected with subtype A or D HIV-1 strains had more diverse peripheral reservoirs than patients infected with subtype B viruses (Fig. 5A and B). As expected, the diversity of the reservoir, based on cell-associated spliced HIV-1 RNA, also correlated with the frequency of unique variants within the viral population. In general, Ugandan patients had peripheral reservoirs with more than one viral haplotype, while more U.S. patients had reservoirs with only one unique HIV-1 variant (mean frequency 0.65 vs 0.47, p = 0.0071, unpaired t test), which again was not the case when diversity was determined using proviral DNA (Fig. 5C). Finally, the only parameter—other than subtype B vs non-B HIV-1 subtype—that was associated with inducible reservoir size quantified by cell-associated spliced HIV-1 RNA was HIV-1 RNA diversity (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0003 in Ugandan and U.S. patients, respectively, Fisher’s exact test) but not when the size and diversity of the HIV-1 reservoir was determined by proviral DNA.
Development of accurate measurements of the HIV-1 reservoir from non-subtype B infected patients
Combination antiretroviral therapy can durably suppress HIV-1 replication , effectively reducing this viral infection to a chronic disease; however, therapy must be taken continuously for life to prevent viral rebound. A series of strategies are being investigated to purge the HIV-1 reservoir, so a combination of the immune response and ART could effectively remove any vestige of the virus from the human host . A key step to reach this goal is the development of highly sensitive and accurate methodologies capable of quantifying the HIV-1 reservoir in PLWH across the globe. In this study, we validated our novel deep sequencing-based assay to quantify the peripheral HIV-1 reservoir by measuring basal and inducible cell-associated spliced HIV-1 RNA. The EDITS assay specifically evaluates the multiply spliced env mRNA that spans more than 70% of the proviral genome, strongly enriching for sequences that derive from full-length HIV-1 genomes . We then used EDITS to compare the peripheral HIV-1 reservoir profile in individuals infected with subtype B and non-B HIV-1 strains, showing that Ugandan patients infected with non-B viruses have smaller (fourfold) but more diverse (two-fold) HIV-1 reservoirs compared to U.S. individuals infected with subtype B viruses.
A number of different methodologies for HIV-1 reservoir quantification have been developed over the last two decades [15, 19, 58], although there is no clear correlation among most assays used to quantify latently HIV-infected cells . The main challenge for all these cell-based and/or molecular assays has been the very limited number of latently HIV-infected cells potentially harboring replication-competent virus [3, 8]. Cell (culture)-based methods such as Q-VOA , TILDA , and ultrasensitive p24 ELISAs measure replication-competent viruses but can be labor intensive and might under or overestimate the size of the HIV-1 reservoir . PCR-based assays to detect proviral DNA—either standard, real-time, or digital PCR—are relatively easier to perform but are not able to readily distinguish between replication-competent and defective HIV-1 genomes. An improvement on this was the development of the IPDA assay, which is a digital droplet PCR measurement using sets of widely separated primers to enrich for intact proviral DNA sequences . This is generally regarded as providing an estimate of the upper limit of potentially fully infectious proviruses in the sample. Deep sequencing-based tests, like VOA-UDSA , quantify both defective and potentially replication-competent viruses; however, because of inefficient sampling they may still underestimate the HIV-1 reservoir.
Perhaps the most accurate approach to quantify the true size of the HIV-1 reservoir is to measure cell-associated HIV-1 RNA following activation of CD4+ T cells . Our EDITS assay borrows features from both cell-based and molecular techniques, collecting and enriching for peripheral CD4+ memory T cells, which are activated to induce HIV-1 transcription. RT-PCR and deep sequencing of multiply spliced mRNA is a good surrogate for not only the quantification of the peripheral HIV-1 reservoir but also determining the diversity of full-length HIV-1 genomes that could generate replication-competent viruses . This has been substantiated by viral outgrowth experiments, which have shown that there is a strong correlation between HIV-infected cells carrying inducible spliced mRNAs and cells harboring replication competent viruses [34,36,36, 60]. However, EDITS and related assays can be regarded as providing a lower level estimate of the HIV-1 reservoir since proviral activation ex vivo can be inefficient and a subset of activated cells could be lost due to cytopathic effects during activation. Nonetheless, in a recent side by side comparison of EDITS and IPDA reservoir measurements performed as part of a clinical evaluation of the IL-15 superagonist, N-803, the values obtained by both methods were not significantly different. In this case, the EDITS assay showed a lower standard deviation than the IPDA assay perhaps due to the large number of RNA molecules present in individually activated cells .
The original version of the EDITS assay used barcoded primers to RT-PCR amplify multiply spliced env mRNA products, which were then sequenced in the Personal Genome Machine (PGM) or S5 instruments (ThermoFisher) . Unfortunately, this process was not optimized for clinical testing of divergent HIV-1 isolates since the length of the barcoded primers could affect not only the sensitivity of the assay but also its specificity, including the ability to amplify all non-B HIV-1 subtypes. Moreover, the intrinsic limitation of the PGM or S5 systems to discern insertions and deletions (indels) [61, 62] could affect the evaluation of the HIV-1 reservoir diversity. Therefore, we designed universal (non-barcoded) primers that amplify all HIV-1 subtypes and modified the library preparation and deep sequencing approach to include the MiSeq (Illumina) instrument, minimizing potential issues with the analysis of indels. Similar to other methodologies that are able to quantify the HIV-1 reservoir from individuals infected with non-B subtypes [63,65,66,66], the RT-PCR amplification and deep sequencing steps of the EDITS assay worked with all HIV-1 group M viruses analyzed. More importantly, EDITS matched the analytical sensitivity of other cellular- and/or PCR-based assays [15, 18], accurately detecting as low as eight HIV+ cells per million cells upon stimulation.
Ugandans have reduced HIV-1 reservoirs with higher genetic diversity than U.S. patients
While our general knowledge of the HIV-1 latent reservoir, and potential cure strategies, has been mostly associated with subtype B HIV-1 infections [3, 8], a limited number of studies have analyzed the HIV-1 reservoir in individuals infected with non-B viruses. Similar to our findings, Prodger et al.  used Q-VOA to show that virally suppressed Ugandans had a threefold lower frequency of resting CD4+ T cells, compared with historical observations in U.S. patients. They were also able to demonstrate that whereas both sexes had similar total HIV-1 DNA levels, female patients had significantly fewer resting CD4+ T cells harboring replication-competent virus, as measured by viral outgrowth using QVOA, a feature that was not evident in our data due in part to the under- and over-representation of male individuals in our Ugandan and U.S. cohorts, respectively. A significantly larger HIV-1 reservoir was also described in a small number of patients infected with subtype B HIV-1 strains compared to individuals infected with subtype G or CRF01_AE viruses . More recently, a combination of a TZM-bl cells-based assay (7.4 infectious units/106 cells) and droplet digital PCR (129 HIV-1 copies/106 cells) quantified the reservoir in adolescents infected with subtype C HIV-1 strains in Botswana , showing values similar to the median 11 and 88 cell equivalents/million cells we determined in Ugandan patients using cell-associated RNA and proviral DNA, respectively.
There are several different, and not mutually exclusive hypotheses that could explain the reduced reservoirs sizes seen in the Uganda patients. First, the HIV-1 subtypes themselves could be playing a role in the establishment and size of the latent HIV-1 reservoir. Each HIV-1 subtype has a specific LTR promoter configuration and minor changes in transcription factor binding sites could impact transcriptional activity . For example, it has been long documented that subtype C viruses have additional NF-κB sites and higher replication rates than clade B viruses , suggesting that they may also be more responsive to T-cell activation and, thus, reduced HIV-1 reservoirs in the presence of ART. Also, subtype B HIV-1 nef sequences seems to have higher CD4 and HLA downregulation activities than the rest of the group M HIV-1 subtypes , perhaps contributing to the establishment of larger HIV-1 reservoir in individuals infected with subtype B HIV-1 strains .
An alternative explanation for the difference in the size of the peripheral HIV-1 reservoir in non-B HIV-infected patients relates to the geographic distribution of these non-B viruses, highly prevalent in LMICs . In fact, a number of confounding factors associated with living in these countries could have an impact on the size of the latent HIV-1 reservoir. For example, higher coinfection prevalence compared to countries where subtype B viruses are common, could have an effect in the immunological milieu of HIV-infected individuals in LMICs . It is possible that higher immune activation levels due to chronic infections could be constantly stimulating the HIV-1 reservoir, helping clearing latently HIV-infected cells in ART-experienced and well-suppressed (undetectable plasma HIV RNA load) individuals, as the patients described in this study. It is well known that infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis can be associated with persistent systemic inflammation, which can reactivate and eventually decrease the latent HIV-1 reservoir [72, 73], while bacterial infection can also induce HIV-1 latency in macrophages . On the other hand, individuals co-infected with cytomegalovirus [75, 76], hepatitis C virus , or herpes simplex virus type 2  have been shown to have larger HIV-1 reservoirs, although quantified by measuring proviral DNA. Further studies, most likely in the form of clinical trials and/or longitudinal studies will be necessary to evaluate the role of acute and chronic coinfections in the latent HIV-1 reservoir. Interestingly, a study measuring proviral DNA by real-time PCR in a limited number of Brazilian individuals infected with subtype B, C, or F viruses showed no difference in the HIV-1 reservoir size . Unlike our, and other studies comparing the reservoir in patients infected with different HIV-1 subtypes, these individuals were all recruited in the same geographic region, suggesting that factors other than HIV-1 subtype could be affecting the size and diversity of the peripheral HIV-1 reservoir.
Reservoir size and its complexity is strongly influenced by the clonal expansion of latently HIV-infected cells [80,82,83,84,85,86,87,87]. Early ART seems to limits HIV-1 reservoir size [8, 13], and the complexity of the reservoir has also been shown to be reduced [88, 89]. Treatment interruption studies suggest that a limited number of proviral DNA is responsible for new viremia outbursts following ART interruption [82, 83, 88, 89]. The results from our EDITS assay allows us to assess both the size of the peripheral HIV-1 reservoir by measuring the amount of inducible cell-associated spliced HIV-1 RNA and/or proviral DNA, and also the genetic diversity of the replication-competent and/or proviruses in the memory CD4+ T cells, which is a reflection of clonal diversity in the reservoir cell population. To improve our assessment of clonality we developed a proprietary pipeline to automatically calculate the size of the HIV-1 reservoir (RNA and/or DNA) as well as the p-distance, as a measurement of the intrapatient HIV-1 diversity (quasispecies), to determine the clonality of the peripheral HIV-1 reservoir. The results showed that although the number of latently HIV-infected cells in Ugandan patients is smaller than in U.S. individuals, the cell-associated spliced HIV-1 RNA reservoir was more diverse in people infected with non-B (Uganda) compared to subtype B (USA) HIV-1 strains. Our data is supported by a recent study showing that the HIV-1 reservoir in Zambian individuals infected with subtype C viruses recapitulated the extensive viral diversity accumulated during untreated HIV-1 infection . Thus, it is possible that the same confounder factor(s), responsible for the elevated higher immune activation, could be constantly stimulating latently HIV-infected cells, favoring the clearing and re-seeding of the peripheral HIV-1 reservoir, increasing its diversity while simultaneously reducing its size.
This study has a few limitations. First, we focused exclusively on the peripheral HIV-1 reservoir, quantifying latently-infected CD4+ memory T cells [8, 10, 91, 92], which represent the major and well-defined pool of replication-competent latent HIV-1 . Therefore, additional studies will be needed to evaluate the contribution from distant compartments in individuals infected with non-B HIV-1 subtypes, which cannot be sampled through peripheral blood. We also analyzed the HIV-1 reservoir from patients infected with subtype A or D, with a limited number of subtype C infections, representative of the HIV-1 subtype distribution in Uganda . It will be interesting to expand our findings to the most worldwide prevalent subtype C viruses . It was also difficult to collect a comprehensive clinical history for each one of the 112 patients included in this study. Further studies will need to record past and ongoing viral, bacterial, and/or fungal infections to evaluate their potential role on the latent HIV-1 reservoir and/or perform a longitudinal study where this vital information could be obtained. Finally, we used the well-characterized mitogen Concanavalin A to stimulate the CD4+ memory T cells, showing no difference in the induction of the peripheral HIV-1 reservoir compared to combinations of established LRAs such as SAHA, IL-15, GSK343, and UNC638. Other groups have used a number of agents to stimulate HIV-1 transcription, including anti-CD3/CD28 antibodies and multitude of LRAs [8, 94]; however, we chose this lectin for its cost-effectiveness ratio, aimed to implementing the EDITS assay not only in Uganda but in other LMICs.
In this study we characterized and validated a new version of our deep sequencing-based EDITS assay to accurately measure the size and diversity of the peripheral HIV-1 reservoir. We used this innovative assay to show that Ugandans infected with non-B HIV-1 strains have a reduced but more diverse HIV-1 reservoir, compared to individuals infected with subtype B viruses living in the U.S. Geographic region, HIV-1 subtype, and inducible cell-associated spliced HIV-1 RNA diversity were the only parameters that correlated with the size of the inducible HIV-1 reservoir size, while responding similarly to activation with different latency reversing agents. Further, most likely longitudinal, studies are necessary to discern the contribution of viral (e.g., HIV-1 subtype) and/or host (e.g., co-infections and/or other co-morbidities) factors in the HIV-1 reservoir of people living with HIV in LMICs.
Plasmids, cells, viruses, and compounds
The HIV-1 NL4-3 infectious molecular clone (pNL4-3) was obtained from the NIH HIV Reagent Program, Division of AIDS, NIAID, NIH contributed by Dr. Malcolm Martin. Plasmid pUC19 was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. The following cell lines were obtained through the NIH HIV Reagent Program, Division of AIDS, NIAID, NIH: MT-4 cells contributed by Dr. Douglas Richman, ACH-2 cells contributed by Dr. Thomas Folks, and Jurkat E6-1 cells contributed by Dr. Arthur Weiss. Latently HIV-1-infected Jurkat E4 cells were constructed by Dr. Jonathan Karn’s group . All four cell lines were maintained in RPMI 1640/2 mM L-glutamine medium (Cellgro Mediatech, Manassas, VA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Cellgro Mediatech), 10 mM N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N-2-ethanesulfonic acid buffer (HEPES; Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MI), 100 U of penicillin/ml, and 100 μg of streptomycin/ml (Gibco Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The following HIV-1 isolates were obtained from the NIH HIV Reagent Program, Division of AIDS, NIAID, NIH: HIV-1A-92RW009(11–5), HIV-1A-93RW020(11–12), HIV-1B-92BR014(11–6), HIV-1B-92TH593(11–9), HIV-1B-US714(11–10), HIV-1B-92US727(11–11), HIV-1B-92US076(11–15), HIV-1C-92BR025(11–7), HIV-1D-92UG038(11–4), HIV-1D-93UG065(11–8), HIV-1D-94UG108(11–14), HIV-1F-93BR020(11–13), HIV-1AE-CMU02(11–16), and HIV-2CBL-20 or from Dr. Eric J. Arts’ laboratory at Western University, London, Canada: HIV-1A-V115(09–153), HIV-1A-V120(09–154), HIV-1C-C20(09–155), HIV-1C-C22(09–156), HIV-1C-C18(09–157), HIV-1C-C21(09–158), HIV-1D-V122(09–159), HIV-1D-V126(09–160), HIV-1D-V89(09–161), HIV-1F-CA20(09–163), HIV-1F-V164(09–164). Additional reference material from different HIV-1 group M subtypes was obtained from SeraCare Life Sciences, Inc (Milford, MA): HIV-1SC-A, HIV-1SC-B, HIV-1SC-C, HIV-1SC-D, HIV-1SC-F, HIV-1SC-G, HIV-1SC-H, HIV-1SC-AE, and HIV-1SC-O. Plasma samples derived from individuals infected with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 variants were obtained from the AIDS Clinical Trials Unit (ACTU) at Case Western Reserve University (CWRU)/University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center (UHCMC), with the understanding and written consent of each participant: HIV-1B-13–140, HIV-1B-13–142, HIV-1B-13–145, HIV-1B-13–177, HIV-1B-14–342, HIV-1B-14–344, and HIV-1B-14–356 as described below. Aliquots of additional RNA or DNA viruses were obtained from the Molecular Diagnostics or Medical Microbiology laboratories at UHCMC: BK virus (BKV), Cytomegalovirus (CMV), Herpes simplex virus 1 and 2 (HSV- 1 and HSV-20, and Varicella zoster virus (VZV) or the Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine at CWRU: Hepatitis B virus (HBV), Hepatitis C virus (HCV), and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). Finally, CD4+ memory T cells were treated with the following compounds: the mitogen Concanavalin A (Merck Sigma, Burlington, MA); the histone deacetylase inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA)  (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI); the inhibitor of G9a and GLP histone-lysine methyltransferases, UNC638  (Merck Sigma); GSK343, a potent and selective inhibitor of the histone-lysine N-methyltransferase enzyme EZH2  (Merck Sigma); and recombinant human IL-15 (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ).
Study participants were recruited during routine patient monitoring from two well-characterized cohorts of HIV-infected individuals at the (i) Joint Clinical Research Centre (JCRC) in Kampala, Uganda and (ii) John T. Carey Special Immunology Unit (SIU) at UHCMC in Cleveland, Ohio, USA, between November 2016 and November 2018. Inclusion criteria included antiretroviral (ART)-experienced and well-suppressed (plasma HIV RNA load < 20 copies/ml) HIV-infected male or female individuals, ages 18 or older, with CD4+ T-cell counts equal or greater than 500 cells/mm3. Blood samples, clinical and demographics information was collected with the understanding and written consent of each participant, after the study was reviewed and approved by the JCRC (HS-3012) and UHCMC (01-98-55) institutional review boards.
A modified version of the Envelope Detection by Induced Transcription-based Sequencing (EDITS) assay , based on inducible cell-associated spliced HIV-1 RNA, was used to characterize the peripheral HIV-1 reservoir in patients from Kampala, Uganda and Cleveland, Ohio, USA:
Blood sample collection and cell isolation EDTA-treated venous blood samples (60 ml) were collected and plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were purified by Ficoll-Paque (Millipore Sigma) density gradient centrifugation as described . CD4+ memory T cells (CD4+CD45RO+) were purified using the Memory CD4+ T cell isolation kit (Miltenyi BioteC, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany), counted and purity verified by flow cytometry using the following markers: CD4-FITC, CD8-APC-Cy7, CD45RA-APC, and CD45RO-PE (Becton Dickinson Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ).
Cell activation For each determination, 1 × 106 CD4+ memory T cells were induced for 16 h with 10 μg/ml of the mitogen Concanavalin A (Millipore Sigma, Burlington, MA) in a 24-well plate at 37 °C, allowing maximal activation of the silent HIV-1 provirus . A second aliquot of 1 × 106 CD4+ memory T cells was incubated in cell medium alone to detect any cells carrying fully or partially activated proviruses, a strong indicator of poor suppression and recent new infections, as well as to analyze proviral DNA.
RNA extraction and RT-PCR amplification Total RNA was purified (RNeasy Mini kit, Qiagen, Valencia, CA), treated with DNase I (QIAgen), and eluted in 20 µl of DNase/RNase-free water. The entire 20 µl sample was used as template in a One-Step RT-PCR (external) using Verso 1-step RT-qPCR kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and primers eF546 and eR7609 in a 50 µl reaction mixture with the following cycling conditions: one cycle at 50 °C for 15 min; one cycle at 95 °C for 15 min; and 35 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 60 s. Primers eF546 (5′-GCTTCAAGTAGTGTGTGCCC-3′, HIV-1HXB2 position 546) and eR7609 (5′-CTGAAGATCTCGGACTCATTGT-3′, position 7609) were designed to bind to either side of the HIV-1 Env RNA splice junction, yielding a product of approximately 1.9 kb from the spliced HIV-1 env mRNA, allowing the detection of late spliced HIV-1 transcripts without any potential proviral DNA amplification (limited by the more than 7000 nucleotide spacing of the primers on the HIV-1 genome ). Nested PCR reactions were carried out in 25-µl reactions containing 2 µl of the One-Step RT-PCR (external) product, 2 × Bestaq™ DNA polymerase mastermix (Applied Biological Materials, Richmond, Canada) and barcoded primers nF6026 (5′-Illumina_P5-adapter_Index_i5_CAAGCTTCTCTATCAAAGCAG-3′, position 6026) and nR6373 (5′-Illumina_P7_adapter_Index_i7_TCTGATGCACAAAATAGAGTGG-3′, position 6373) with the following cycling conditions: one cycle at 98˚C for 30 s and 35 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 10 s, and 72 °C for 10 s. A 369-fragment corresponding to vpu/env (HIV-1HXB2 position 6026 to 6394) was amplified and purified (QIAquick PCR purification kit).
Library preparation and deep sequencing Dual barcodes (indices i5 or i7) and Illumina overhang adapter (P5 or P7) sequences were included in primers nF6026 and nR6363 as described in Additional file 1: Table S1. Following DNA purification (Agencourt AMPure XP, Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA), individual barcoded DNA samples were quantified (Qubit 2.0, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and pooled. Paired-end multiplexed libraries (up to 96 samples per deep sequencing run, including 5% PhiX as internal control) were diluted to 20 pM and denatured with NaOH prior to sequencing on the MiSeq system (Illumina, San Diego, CA) using the MiSeq reagent Kit v3 600 cycle (2 × 300 bp, Illumina).
Bioinformatic analysis Indexed reads were demultiplexed and filtered to remove short reads (< 80 bp), generating sample-specific fastq files using BaseSpace (Illumina). We used a modified version of DEEPGEN™ Software Tool Suite  to quantify the number of sample-specific mapped reads. Briefly, to minimize the amount of data loss during mapping due to the high HIV-1 sequence variability and to allow for inter-patient variation across the vpu/env region, sample-specific reference sequences were constructed for this HIV-1 genomic region (position 6026 to 6394 in the HIV-1HXB2 reference strain, GenBank Accession No. K03455). Mapping of reads from each sample occurred in three stages. First, a guide template (reference) for mapping was selected from the Los Alamos HIV Sequence Database (http://www.hiv.lanl.gov/content/sequence/HIV/mainpage.html) by comparing 100 randomly selected reads to the vpu/env region of all full-length sequences present within the HIV Sequence Database, resulting on the selection of a closely related and subtype-specific HIV-1 reference for each sample. This comparison was performed using a k-mer approach that rapidly identifies regions of similarity between any two sequences to select a guide sequence for mapping with minimal divergence from the read data, as such divergence is the primary cause of biased data loss . Following the selection of the subtype-specific HIV-1 reference sequence, reads were mapped and aligned using the mapping algorithm previously described . During mapping site indexes in relation to HIV-1HXB2 were also maintained. Next, to reduce diversity between reads and the reference template, a consensus was generated across each site of the reference sequence and reads re-mapped to this final sample-specific consensus template. Finally, the total number of mapped reads was converted into the equivalent number of cells harboring HIV-1 per 106 cells using a standard curve as described . These internal controls were prepared from activated CD4+ memory T cells (obtained from HIV seronegative individuals) infected with a replication-competent HIV-1-GFP virus, which were sorted by flow cytometry into single wells of a 96-well plate. Samples for the standard curves contained between 1 and 400 HIV-1-infected cells per well and 1 × 106 uninfected cells. These samples were processed, barcoded, pooled, and deep sequenced together with the query samples as an internal control in each deep sequencing run.
Proviral DNA assay
A modified version of the EDITS assay was used to quantify HIV-1 proviruses in patients from Kampala, Uganda and Cleveland, Ohio, USA. Briefly, the second aliquots of 1 × 106 CD4+ memory T cells incubated in cell medium alone were used to isolate DNA (QIAamp DNA Mini kit, Qiagen), eluted in 20 µl of DNase/RNase-free water. External PCR reactions were carried out in a 50-µl mixture containing 5 µl of DNA, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 1 mM MgCl2, 5 units of Pfu Turbo DNA Polymerase (Stratagene, San Diego, CA) and primers Tat-1 and EN70 with the following cycling conditions: one cycle at 95 °C for 5 min; 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 60 s; and one cycle at 72 °C for 10 min. Primers Tat-1 (5′-CCTAAACTAGAGCCCTGGAACCATCC-3′, HIV-1HXB2 position 5846) and EN70 (5′-GGTACACAGGCATGTGTGGCCC-3′, position 6430) were designed to amplify a product of approximately 605 bp from the first exon of Tat to Env. Nested PCR reactions, library preparation, deep sequencing, and bioinformatics analysis (including standard curves) were carried as described above for the EDITS assay.
HIV-1 subtyping and phylogenetic analysis
For each sample dataset, reads spanning nucleotide positions 6026 to 6394 (HIV-1HXB2, 369 bp) were extracted and truncated for phylogenetic analysis. Briefly, consensus sequences were generated for each patient-derived virus using DEEPGEN™ Software Tool Suite , as described above for the EDITS assay, aligned using ClustalW  and their phylogeny reconstructed using the Maximum Likelihood model with bootstrap as the variance estimation method (1000 replicates) as implemented within MEGA 6.1 . HIV-1 subtype, initially predicted by phylogenetic analysis with HIV-1 references sequences obtained from Los Alamos HIV Sequence Database, was confirmed with both the DEEPGEN™ Software Tool Suite  and COMET HIV-1 (Luxembourg Institute of Health, https://comet.lih.lu) .
Intra-patient HIV-1 genetic diversity
Quasispecies diversity in the peripheral HIV-1 reservoir was determined using two complementary methods based on reads spanning nucleotide positions 6026 to 6394 (HIV-1HXB2, 369 bp). First, intra-patient HIV-1 diversity was determined based on the p-distance model as described for deep sequencing . Implemented in the DEEPGEN™ Software Tool Suite , p-distance measures the proportion of different nucleotide sites between two pair of sequences (reads). Next, the number and frequency of unique HIV-1 variants (viral haplotypes) within each clinical sample was determined using CliqueSNV , which accurately assemblies both majority and minority (i.e., frequencies as low as 0.1%) haplotypes and estimate their frequencies within the viral population.
Real-time PCR amplification
Serial dilutions of pNL4-3 mixed with pUC19 were quantified by real-time PCR using primers nF6026 and nR6373. Each 25 µl real-time PCR reaction contained 5 µl DNA, 1 × PCR buffer (Invitrogen), 5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 0.2 µM of each primer, SYBR Green dye diluted 1:2500 (Sigma), and 1.25 U Platinum Taq DNA polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific). PCR conditions consisted in one cycle at 98˚C for 30 s and 35 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 10 s, and 72 °C for 10 s. Real-time PCR amplification, data acquisition, and analysis were performed using the ABI, StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Walthman, MA).
Cell input quantification
Albumin DNA was quantified to verify the cellular input level in the EDITS assay. Briefly, a 197 bp fragment was PCR amplified in 25-µl reactions containing one microliter of cellular DNA, 2 × Bestaq™ DNA polymerase mastermix (Applied Biological Materials) and primers Alb-S (5′-GCTGTCATCTCTTGTGGGCTGT-3′) and Alb-AS (5′-AAACTCATGGGAGCTGCTGGTT-3′) with PCR conditions as described . Amplicons were purified (QIAquick PCR purification kit) and quantified (Qubit 2.0, Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Digital PCR detection of proviruses
Cellular DNA from memory CD4+ T cells from HIV-infected individuals was isolated and quantified as described above. Proviral loads were measured using the QuantStudio® 3D Digital PCR System (ThermoFisher). Briefly, 1500 ng of cellular DNA (per chip) was mixed with Quantstudio® 3D digital PCR mastermix and an HIV-1-specific TaqMan Detection Assay (Life Technologies). PCR mixes were loaded onto QuantStudio® 3D Digital PCR 20 K Chips v2 using a QuantStudio® 3D Digital PCR Chip Loader. Sealed chips were cycled using a Dual Flat BlockGeneAMP® PCR System 9700 (Applied Biosystems) at 96 °C for 10 min, followed by 41 cycles of 60 °C for 2 min and 98 °C for 30 s, with a final extension at 60 °C for 2 min. Fluorescence was measured with a QuantStudio 3D Digital PCR Instrument and analyzed using Analysis Suite dPCR Cloud Software (Thermo Fisher Connect™). The number of human cells represented in each PCR mix was based on the concentration of cellular DNA and mass of the human diploid genome (6.6 × 10−12 g DNA/cell).
Descriptive results are expressed as median values, standard deviations, range, and confidence intervals. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to determine the strength of association between categorical variables. Group means were compared using a 2-sided t-test and group medians were compared using a 2-sided Wilcoxon-Mann–Whitney test. The Fisher’s exact test was used to test for significant association between categorical measures. Cell associated spliced HIV-1 RNA level and proviral DNA levels were log10 transformed and then modeled as a function of each predictor variable (by field site) using a univariate linear model (lm). The cutoff level for significance was set at 0.05 (p < 0.05). All analyses were performed with R version 3.6.2 (https://www.R-project.org) and plotted using GraphPad Prism v.6.0b (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA).
Availability of data and materials
The datasets analyzed in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Envelope Detection by Induced Transcription-based Sequencing (EDITS) assay
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Histone deacetylase inhibitors
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1
Intact proviral DNA assay
Low- and middle-income countries
Latency reversal agents
Polymerase chain reaction
Personal Genome Machine
People living with HIV
Quantitative viral outgrowth assay
Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid
Tat/Rev Induced limiting dilution assay
Paredes R, Clotet B. Clinical management of HIV-1 resistance. Antiviral Res. 2010;85(1):245–65.
Zolopa AR. The evolution of HIV treatment guidelines: current state-of-the-art of ART. Antiviral Res. 2010;85(1):241–4.
Ismail SD, Pankrac J, Ndashimye E, Prodger JL, Abrahams MR, Mann JFS, et al. Addressing an HIV cure in LMIC. Retrovirology. 2021;18(1):21.
Boender TS, Sigaloff KC, McMahon JH, Kiertiburanakul S, Jordan MR, Barcarolo J, et al. Long-term virological outcomes of first-line antiretroviral therapy for HIV-1 in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(9):1453–61.
Saksena NK, Potter SJ. Reservoirs of HIV-1 in vivo: implications for antiretroviral therapy. AIDS Rev. 2003;5(1):3–18.
Puertas MC, Noguera-Julian M, Massanella M, Pou C, Buzon MJ, Clotet B, et al. Lack of concordance between residual viremia and viral variants driving de novo infection of CD4(+) T cells on ART. Retrovirology. 2016;13(1):51.
Barton K, Winckelmann A, Palmer S. HIV-1 reservoirs during suppressive therapy. Trends Microbiol. 2016;24(5):345–55.
Cohn LB, Chomont N, Deeks SG. The biology of the HIV-1 latent reservoir and implications for cure strategies. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;27(4):519–30.
Cohn LB, Silva IT, Oliveira TY, Rosales RA, Parrish EH, Learn GH, et al. HIV-1 integration landscape during latent and active infection. Cell. 2015;160(3):420–32.
Mbonye U, Karn J. The molecular basis for human immunodeficiency virus latency. Annu Rev Virol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-virology-101416-041646.
Siliciano RF, Greene WC. HIV latency. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2011;1(1): a007096.
Richman DD, Margolis DM, Delaney M, Greene WC, Hazuda D, Pomerantz RJ. The challenge of finding a cure for HIV infection. Science. 2009;323(5919):1304–7.
Deeks SG, Autran B, Berkhout B, Benkirane M, Cairns S, Chomont N, et al. Towards an HIV cure: a global scientific strategy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12(8):607–14.
Bullen CK, Laird GM, Durand CM, Siliciano JD, Siliciano RF. New ex vivo approaches distinguish effective and ineffective single agents for reversing HIV-1 latency in vivo. Nat Med. 2014;20(4):425–9.
Abdel-Mohsen M, Richman D, Siliciano RF, Nussenzweig MC, Howell BJ, Martinez-Picado J, et al. Recommendations for measuring HIV reservoir size in cure-directed clinical trials. Nat Med. 2020;26(9):1339–50.
Mbonye U, Karn J. Transcriptional control of HIV latency: cellular signaling pathways, epigenetics, happenstance and the hope for a cure. Virology. 2014;454–455:328–39.
Deeks SG, Archin N, Cannon P, Collins S, Jones RB, de Jong M, et al. Research priorities for an HIV cure: International AIDS Society Global Scientific Strategy 2021. Nat Med. 2021;27(12):2085–98.
Wang Z, Simonetti FR, Siliciano RF, Laird GM. Measuring replication competent HIV-1: advances and challenges in defining the latent reservoir. Retrovirology. 2018;15(1):21.
Bruner KM, Hosmane NN, Siliciano RF. Towards an HIV-1 cure: measuring the latent reservoir. Trends Microbiol. 2015;23(4):192–203.
Laird GM, Eisele EE, Rabi SA, Lai J, Chioma S, Blankson JN, et al. Rapid quantification of the latent reservoir for HIV-1 using a viral outgrowth assay. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9(5): e1003398.
Archin NM, Espeseth A, Parker D, Cheema M, Hazuda D, Margolis DM. Expression of latent HIV induced by the potent HDAC inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2009;25(2):207–12.
Lisco A, Vanpouille C, Tchesnokov EP, Grivel JC, Biancotto A, Brichacek B, et al. Acyclovir is activated into a HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitor in herpesvirus-infected human tissues. Cell Host Microbe. 2008;4(3):260–70.
Vandergeeten C, Fromentin R, Chomont N. The role of cytokines in the establishment, persistence and eradication of the HIV reservoir. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2012;23(4–5):143–9.
Chomont N, El-Far M, Ancuta P, Trautmann L, Procopio FA, Yassine-Diab B, et al. HIV reservoir size and persistence are driven by T cell survival and homeostatic proliferation. Nat Med. 2009;15(8):893–900.
Strain MC, Lada SM, Luong T, Rought SE, Gianella S, Terry VH, et al. Highly precise measurement of HIV DNA by droplet digital PCR. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(4): e55943.
Eriksson S, Graf EH, Dahl V, Strain MC, Yukl SA, Lysenko ES, et al. Comparative analysis of measures of viral reservoirs in HIV-1 eradication studies. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9(2): e1003174.
Bruner KM, Wang Z, Simonetti FR, Bender AM, Kwon KJ, Sengupta S, et al. A quantitative approach for measuring the reservoir of latent HIV-1 proviruses. Nature. 2019;566(7742):120–5.
Vandergeeten C, Fromentin R, Dafonseca S, Lawani MB, Sereti I, Lederman MM, et al. Interleukin-7 promotes HIV persistence during antiretroviral therapy. Blood. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-11-465625.
Procopio FA, Fromentin R, Kulpa DA, Brehm JH, Bebin AG, Strain MC, et al. A novel assay to measure the magnitude of the inducible viral reservoir in HIV-infected individuals. EBioMedicine. 2015;2(8):874–83.
Pasternak AO, Jurriaans S, Bakker M, Prins JM, Berkhout B, Lukashov VV. Cellular levels of HIV unspliced RNA from patients on combination antiretroviral therapy with undetectable plasma viremia predict the therapy outcome. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(12): e8490.
Lewin SR, Vesanen M, Kostrikis L, Hurley A, Duran M, Zhang L, et al. Use of real-time PCR and molecular beacons to detect virus replication in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected individuals on prolonged effective antiretroviral therapy. J Virol. 1999;73(7):6099–103.
Das B, Dobrowolski C, Luttge B, Valadkhan S, Chomont N, Johnston R, et al. Estrogen receptor-1 is a key regulator of HIV-1 latency that imparts gender-specific restrictions on the latent reservoir. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115(33):E7795–804.
Bruner KM, Murray AJ, Pollack RA, Soliman MG, Laskey SB, Capoferri AA, et al. Defective proviruses rapidly accumulate during acute HIV-1 infection. Nat Med. 2016;22(9):1043–9.
Scully EP, Gandhi M, Johnston R, Hoh R, Lockhart A, Dobrowolski C, et al. Sex-based differences in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reservoir activity and residual immune activation. J Infect Dis. 2019;219(7):1084–94.
Zerbato JM, Khoury G, Zhao W, Gartner MJ, Pascoe RD, Rhodes A, et al. Multiply spliced HIV RNA is a predictive measure of virus production ex vivo and in vivo following reversal of HIV latency. EBioMedicine. 2021;65: 103241.
Gao H, Ozantürk AN, Wang Q, Harlan GH, Schmitz AJ, Presti RM, et al. Evaluation of HIV-1 latency reversal and antibody-dependent viral clearance by quantification of singly spliced HIV-1 vpu/env mRNA. J Virol. 2021;95(11):e02124-e2220.
Gianella S, Rawlings SA, Nakazawa M, Chaillon A, Strain M, Layman L, et al. Sex differences in HIV persistence and reservoir size during aging. Clin Infect Dis. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab873.
Miller JS, Davis ZB, Helgeson E, Reilly C, Thorkelson A, Anderson J, et al. Safety and virologic Impact of the IL-15 superagonist N-803 in people living with HIV: a phase 1 trial. Nat Med. 2021 (In press).
Menendez-Arias L. Molecular basis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance: overview and recent developments. Antiviral Res. 2013;98(1):93–120.
Pham QD, Wilson DP, Law MG, Kelleher AD, Zhang L. Global burden of transmitted HIV drug resistance and HIV-exposure categories: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS. 2014;28(18):2751–62.
UNAIDS. Global AIDS update 2021—confronting inequalities—lessons from pandemic responses from 40 years of AIDS. 2021.https://www.unaidsorg/sites/default/files/media_asset/2021-global-aids-update_enpdf. Accessed 21 Oct 2021.
Kantor R, Katzenstein DA, Efron B, Carvalho AP, Wynhoven B, Cane P, et al. Impact of HIV-1 subtype and antiretroviral therapy on protease and reverse transcriptase genotype: results of a global collaboration. PLoS Med. 2005;2(4): e112.
Taylor BS, Sobieszczyk ME, McCutchan FE, Hammer SM. The challenge of HIV-1 subtype diversity. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(15):1590–602.
Bhargava M, Cajas JM, Wainberg MA, Klein MB, Pant PN. Do HIV-1 non-B subtypes differentially impact resistance mutations and clinical disease progression in treated populations? Evidence from a systematic review. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014;17:18944.
Prodger JL, Lai J, Reynolds SJ, Keruly JC, Moore RD, Kasule J, et al. Reduced frequency of cells latently infected with replication-competent human immunodeficiency virus-1 in virally suppressed individuals living in Rakai, Uganda. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65(8):1308–15.
Omondi FH, Chandrarathna S, Mujib S, Brumme CJ, Jin SW, Sudderuddin H, et al. HIV subtype and Nef-mediated immune evasion function correlate with viral reservoir size in early-treated individuals. J Virol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01832-18.
Folks TM, Justement J, Kinter A, Dinarello CA, Fauci AS. Cytokine-induced expression of HIV-1 in a chronically infected promonocyte cell line. Science. 1987;238(4828):800–2.
Harada S, Koyanagi Y, Yamamoto N. Infection of HTLV-III/LAV in HTLV-I-carrying cells MT-2 and MT-4 and application in a plaque assay. Science. 1985;229(4713):563–6.
Pearson R, Kim YK, Hokello J, Lassen K, Friedman J, Tyagi M, et al. Epigenetic silencing of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transcription by formation of restrictive chromatin structures at the viral long terminal repeat drives the progressive entry of HIV into latency. J Virol. 2008;82(24):12291–303.
Weiss A, Wiskocil RL, Stobo JD. The role of T3 surface molecules in the activation of human T cells: a two-stimulus requirement for IL 2 production reflects events occurring at a pre-translational level. J Immunol. 1984;133(1):123–8.
Gibson RM, Meyer AM, Winner D, Archer J, Feyertag F, Ruiz-Mateos E, et al. Sensitive deep sequencing-based HIV-1 genotyping assay to simultaneously determine susceptibility to protease, reverse transcriptase, integrase, and maturation inhibitors, as well as HIV-1 coreceptor tropism. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(4):2167–85.
Struck D, Lawyer G, Ternes AM, Schmit JC, Bercoff DP. COMET: adaptive context-based modeling for ultrafast HIV-1 subtype identification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(18): e144.
Nguyen K, Dobrowolski C, Shukla M, Cho WK, Luttge B, Karn J. Inhibition of the H3K27 demethylase UTX enhances the epigenetic silencing of HIV proviruses and induces HIV-1 DNA hypermethylation but fails to permanently block HIV reactivation. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17(10): e1010014.
Dobrowolski C, Valadkhan S, Graham AC, Shukla M, Ciuffi A, Telenti A, et al. Entry of polarized effector cells into quiescence forces HIV latency. MBio. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00337-19.
Nguyen K, Das B, Dobrowolski C, Karn J. Multiple histone lysine methyltransferases are required for the establishment and maintenance of HIV-1 latency. MBio. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00133-17.
Shao W, Kearney MF, Boltz VF, Spindler JE, Mellors JW, Maldarelli F, et al. PAPNC, a novel method to calculate nucleotide diversity from large scale next generation sequencing data. J Virol Methods. 2014;203:73–80.
Gunthard HF, Saag MS, Benson CA, del Rio C, Eron JJ, Gallant JE, et al. Antiretroviral drugs for treatment and prevention of HIV infection in adults: 2016 Recommendations of the International Antiviral Society-USA panel. JAMA. 2016;316(2):191–210.
Rouzioux C, Richman D. How to best measure HIV reservoirs? Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2013;8(3):170–5.
Lee SK, Zhou S, Baldoni PL, Spielvogel E, Archin NM, Hudgens MG, et al. Quantification of the latent HIV-1 reservoir using ultra deep sequencing and primer ID in a viral outgrowth assay. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;74(2):221–8.
Yukl SA, Kaiser P, Kim P, Telwatte S, Joshi SK, Vu M, et al. HIV latency in isolated patient CD4(+) T cells may be due to blocks in HIV transcriptional elongation, completion, and splicing. Sci Transl Med. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aap9927.
Archer J, Weber J, Henry K, Winner D, Gibson R, Lee L, et al. Use of four next-generation sequencing platforms to determine HIV-1 coreceptor tropism. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(11): e49602.
Quinones-Mateu ME, Avila S, Reyes-Teran G, Martinez MA. Deep sequencing: becoming a critical tool in clinical virology. J Clin Virol. 2014;61(1):9–19.
Bertoldi A, D’Urbano V, Bon I, Verbon A, Rokx C, Boucher C, et al. Development of C-TILDA: A modified TILDA method for reservoir quantification in long term treated patients infected with subtype C HIV-1. J Virol Methods. 2020;276: 113778.
Bosman KJ, Wensing AM, Pijning AE, van Snippenberg WJ, van Ham PM, de Jong DM, et al. Development of sensitive ddPCR assays to reliably quantify the proviral DNA reservoir in all common circulating HIV subtypes and recombinant forms. J Int AIDS Soc. 2018;21(9): e25185.
Vandergeeten C, Fromentin R, Merlini E, Lawani MB, DaFonseca S, Bakeman W, et al. Cross-clade ultrasensitive PCR-based assays to measure HIV persistence in large-cohort studies. J Virol. 2014;88(21):12385–96.
Rutsaert S, De Spiegelaere W, Van Hecke C, De Scheerder MA, Kiselinova M, Vervisch K, et al. In-depth validation of total HIV-1 DNA assays for quantification of various HIV-1 subtypes. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):17274.
Koofhethile CK, Moyo S, Kotokwe KP, Chang C, Mokgethi P, Muchoba L, et al. Detection of inducible replication-competent HIV-1 subtype C provirus despite long-term antiretroviral treatment in perinatally infected adolescents in Botswana. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2021;37(1):16–23.
van der Sluis RM, Pollakis G, van Gerven ML, Berkhout B, Jeeninga RE. Latency profiles of full length HIV-1 molecular clone variants with a subtype specific promoter. Retrovirology. 2011;8:73.
Bachu M, Yalla S, Asokan M, Verma A, Neogi U, Sharma S, et al. Multiple NF-kappaB sites in HIV-1 subtype C long terminal repeat confer superior magnitude of transcription and thereby the enhanced viral predominance. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(53):44714–35.
Mann JK, Byakwaga H, Kuang XT, Le AQ, Brumme CJ, Mwimanzi P, et al. Ability of HIV-1 Nef to downregulate CD4 and HLA class I differs among viral subtypes. Retrovirology. 2013;10:100.
Rossouw T, Tucker JD, van Zyl GU, Sikwesi K, Godfrey C. Barriers to HIV remission research in low- and middle-income countries. J Int AIDS Soc. 2017;20(1):21521.
Larson EC, Novis CL, Martins LJ, Macedo AB, Kimball KE, Bosque A, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis reactivates latent HIV-1 in T cells in vitro. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(9): e0185162.
Olson A, Ragan EJ, Nakiyingi L, Lin N, Jacobson KR, Ellner JJ, et al. Brief report: pulmonary tuberculosis is associated with persistent systemic inflammation and decreased HIV-1 reservoir markers in coinfected Ugandans. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018;79(3):407–11.
Viglianti GA, Planelles V, Hanley TM. Interactions with commensal and pathogenic bacteria induce HIV-1 latency in macrophages through altered transcription factor recruitment to the LTR. J Virol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02141-20.
Christensen-Quick A, Vanpouille C, Lisco A, Gianella S. Cytomegalovirus and HIV persistence: pouring gas on the fire. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2017;33(S1):S23–30.
Slyker JA, Guthrie B, Pankau M, Tapia K, Wamalwa D, Benki-Nugent S, et al. Association between cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus viremia and human immunodeficiency virus DNA levels in the reservoir of Kenyan infants receiving antiretroviral therapy. J Infect Dis. 2021;223(11):1923–7.
Lopez-Huertas MR, Palladino C, Garrido-Arquero M, Esteban-Cartelle B, Sanchez-Carrillo M, Martinez-Roman P, et al. HCV-coinfection is related to an increased HIV-1 reservoir size in cART-treated HIV patients: a cross-sectional study. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):5606.
Stinn T, Kuntz S, Varon D, Huang ML, Selke S, Njikan S, et al. Subclinical genital herpes shedding in HIV/Herpes simplex virus 2-coinfected women during antiretroviral therapy is associated with an increase in HIV tissue reservoirs and potentially promotes HIV evolution. J Virol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01606-20.
Leite TF, Delatorre E, Cortes FH, Ferreira ACG, Cardoso SW, Grinsztejn B, et al. Reduction of HIV-1 reservoir size and diversity after 1 year of cART among Brazilian individuals starting treatment during early stages of acute infection. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:145.
Wiegand A, Spindler J, Hong FF, Shao W, Cyktor JC, Cillo AR, et al. Single-cell analysis of HIV-1 transcriptional activity reveals expression of proviruses in expanded clones during ART. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114(18):E3659–68.
Halvas EK, Joseph KW, Brandt LD, Guo S, Sobolewski MD, Jacobs JL, et al. HIV-1 viremia not suppressible by antiretroviral therapy can originate from large T cell clones producing infectious virus. J Clin Investig. 2020;130(11):5847–57.
Simonetti FR, Sobolewski MD, Fyne E, Shao W, Spindler J, Hattori J, et al. Clonally expanded CD4+ T cells can produce infectious HIV-1 in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113(7):1883–8.
Maldarelli F, Wu X, Su L, Simonetti FR, Shao W, Hill S, et al. HIV latency. Specific HIV integration sites are linked to clonal expansion and persistence of infected cells. Science. 2014;345(6193):179–83.
Wang Z, Gurule EE, Brennan TP, Gerold JM, Kwon KJ, Hosmane NN, et al. Expanded cellular clones carrying replication-competent HIV-1 persist, wax, and wane. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115(11):E2575–84.
Simonetti FR, Zhang H, Soroosh GP, Duan J, Rhodehouse K, Hill AL, et al. Antigen-driven clonal selection shapes the persistence of HIV-1 infected CD4+ T cells in vivo. J Clin Invest. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI145254.
Peluso MJ, Bacchetti P, Ritter KD, Beg S, Lai J, Martin JN, et al. Differential decay of intact and defective proviral DNA in HIV-1-infected individuals on suppressive antiretroviral therapy. 2020. JCI Insight. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.132997.
Hosmane NN, Kwon KJ, Bruner KM, Capoferri AA, Beg S, Rosenbloom DI, et al. Proliferation of latently infected CD4+ T cells carrying replication-competent HIV-1: Potential role in latent reservoir dynamics. J Exp Med. 2017;214(4):959–72.
Anderson JA, Archin NM, Ince W, Parker D, Wiegand A, Coffin JM, et al. Clonal sequences recovered from plasma from patients with residual HIV-1 viremia and on intensified antiretroviral therapy are identical to replicating viral RNAs recovered from circulating resting CD4+ T cells. J Virol. 2011;85(10):5220–3.
Salantes DB, Zheng Y, Mampe F, Srivastava T, Beg S, Lai J, et al. HIV-1 latent reservoir size and diversity are stable following brief treatment interruption. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(7):3102–15.
Brooks K, Jones BR, Dilernia DA, Wilkins DJ, Claiborne DT, McInally S, et al. HIV-1 variants are archived throughout infection and persist in the reservoir. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16(6): e1008378.
Chomont N, DaFonseca S, Vandergeeten C, Ancuta P, Sekaly RP. Maintenance of CD4+ T-cell memory and HIV persistence: keeping memory, keeping HIV. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2011;6(1):30–6.
Finzi D, Blankson J, Siliciano JD, Margolick JB, Chadwick K, Pierson T, et al. Latent infection of CD4+ T cells provides a mechanism for lifelong persistence of HIV-1, even in patients on effective combination therapy. Nat Med. 1999;5(5):512–7.
Kyeyune F, Gibson RM, Nankya I, Venner C, Metha S, Akao J, et al. Low-Frequency drug resistance in HIV-infected Ugandans on antiretroviral treatment is associated with regimen failure. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(6):3380–97.
Archin NM, Margolis DM. Emerging strategies to deplete the HIV reservoir. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2014;27(1):29–35.
Marks PA, Breslow R. Dimethyl sulfoxide to vorinostat: development of this histone deacetylase inhibitor as an anticancer drug. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25(1):84–90.
Vedadi M, Barsyte-Lovejoy D, Liu F, Rival-Gervier S, Allali-Hassani A, Labrie V, et al. A chemical probe selectively inhibits G9a and GLP methyltransferase activity in cells. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7(8):566–74.
Verma SK, Tian X, LaFrance LV, Duquenne C, Suarez DP, Newlander KA, et al. Identification of potent, selective, cell-active inhibitors of the histone lysine methyltransferase EZH2. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2012;3(12):1091–6.
Quinones-Mateu ME, Ball SC, Marozsan AJ, Torre VS, Albright JL, Vanham G, et al. A dual infection/competition assay shows a correlation between ex vivo human immunodeficiency virus type 1 fitness and disease progression. J Virol. 2000;74(19):9222–33.
Archer J, Rambaut A, Taillon BE, Harrigan PR, Lewis M, Robertson DL. The evolutionary analysis of emerging low frequency HIV-1 CXCR4 using variants through time–an ultra-deep approach. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010;6(12): e1001022.
Archer J, Baillie G, Watson SJ, Kellam P, Rambaut A, Robertson DL. Analysis of high-depth sequence data for studying viral diversity: a comparison of next generation sequencing platforms using Segminatr II. BMC Bioinformatics. 2012;13(1):47.
Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(21):2947–8.
Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28(10):2731–9.
Knyazev S, Tsyvina V, Shankar A, Melnyk A, Artyomenko A, Malygina T, et al. Accurate assembly of minority viral haplotypes from next-generation sequencing through efficient noise reduction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab576.
Weber J, Rangel HR, Chakraborty B, Tadele M, Martinez MA, Martinez-Picado J, et al. A Novel TaqMan real-time PCR assay to estimate ex vivo human immunodeficiency virus type 1 fitness in the era of multi-target (pol and env) antiretroviral therapy. J Gen Virol. 2003;84:2217–28.
We thank the study participants attending the Joint Clinical Research Centre in Kampala, Uganda or the John T. Carey Special Immunology Unit at University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center in Cleveland, Ohio, USA. We also thank Professor Eric J. Arts (Western University, London, Canada) and Ram Santhanam (SeraCare Life Sciences, Inc.) for providing access to HIV-1 isolates and HIV-1 reference material, respectively.
J.K. was supported by an amfAR Innovation Grant (109348-59-RGRL) and NIH (R01 AI148083, R01 MH1103601, and R01 DE025464); while M.E.Q-M was partially supported by the CWRU/UH Center for AIDS Research (P30AI036219), NIH/NIAID (R01AI147331), and the Webster Family Chair in Viral Pathogenesis, University of Otago, New Zealand. The CWRU/UH Center for AIDS Research (P30 AI36219) provided support for flow cytometry and sequencing experiments.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was reviewed and approved by the JCRC (HS-3012) and UHCMC (01-98-55) institutional review boards.
Consent for publication
The authors report no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Table S1. Illumina overhang adapter (P5 or P7) and index (i5 or i7) forward and reverse primers used in the EDITS assay.
Specificity of EDITS primers. A Thirty-two HIV-1 group M isolates, as well as eight RNA or DNA viruses (BKV, BK virus; CMV, Cytomegalovirus; HSV-1 and HSV-2, Herpes simplex virus 1 and 2; VZV, Varicella zoster virus; HBV, Hepatitis B virus; HCV, Hepatitis C virus; and EBV, Epstein-Barr virus) were used to RT-PCR amplify a vpu/env 369 bp fragment and used to construct a neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree as described in “Methods” section. HIV-1 subtype-specific clusters are depicted. Bootstrap resampling (1000 data sets) of the multiple alignments, with percentage values above 75% are indicated by an asterisk. s/nt, substitutions per nucleotide. B The same 369 bp amplicons were deep sequenced, analyzed and reads quantified using the DEEPGEN™ Software Tool Suite.
Sensitivity of EDITS primers. A Nested PCR primers nF6026 and nR6773 were evaluated using a serial dilution of DNA from the HIV-1 molecular clone pNL4-3 (0% to 100%) in a background of DNA from the non-HIV plasmid pUC19, at a final concentration of 0.1 ng/ml. DNA mixtures were amplified using Standard and Real-time PCR. Amplicons from the standard PCR were also deep sequenced and vpu/env mapped reads quantified using the DEEPGEN™ Software Tool Suite. Mean mapped reads and standard deviation are depicted. B ACH-2, a cell line latently infected with a copy of HIV-1 per cell, and MT-4, an HIV-negative human T cell line, were quantified and serial dilutions used to prepare seven mixtures containing 0 to 1000 CH-2 cells in a background of one million MT-4cells. Cell mixtures were ctivated with 100 μg/ml of Concanavalin A and cell-associated spliced HIV-1 RNA quantified using EDITS as described in “Methods” section. Mean mapped reads and standard deviation are depicted.
Analytical sensitivity of the EDITS assay. Jurkat E4, a cell line latently infected with a single copy of HIV-1 per cell, and Jurkat E6-1, an HIV-negative human T cell lymphoblast, were quantified and serial dilutions were used to prepare ten mixtures containing 0 to 400 Jurkat E4 cells in a background of one million Jurkat E6-1 cells in eight biological replicates. Cell mixtures were activated and cell-associated spliced HIV-1 RNA and proviral DNA quantified using EDITS assay as described in “Methods” section. Heatmaps indicate the number of HIV-1 vpu/end reads in each of the eight cell mixture replicates. Linear dynamic ranges and regression values (Pearson’s coefficient correlation) describing the relationship between mapped vpu/env reads and number of HIV positive cells in the mixtures are indicated. Median mapped reads and interquartile range are depicted.r, correlation coeficient; p, two-tailed p value.
Validation of the EDITS assay. Memory CD4+ T cells from five ART-experienced, well-suppressed (plasma HIV-1 RNA load < 20 copies/ml) individuals infected with HIV-1 subtype B strains in Cleveland, OH were used to quantify the peripheral HIV-1 reservoir using the EDITS assay, proviral DNA deep sequencing assay, and a dPCR test designed to quantify proviral DNA as described in “Methods” section. Linear dynamic ranges and regression values (Pearson’s coefficient correlation) describing the relationship between the size of the HIV-1 reservoir quantified by each assay are indicated. r, correlation coeficient; p, two-tailed p value.
Relevant metrics generated during each one of the deep sequencing runs corresponding to the EDITS assay and/or the proviral DNA test. Number of samples included in each specific MiSeq run. Clusters Passing Filter (Cluster PF) and Total Reads Passing Filters (Total Reads PF), represent the percentage of generated clusters and number of reads, respectively, that passed an internal quality filtering procedure used by Illumina. Cluster Density indicates the amount of clusters that were generated per flow cell surface area during the cluster generation stage. Error rate was calculated based on the PhiX control samples spiked in each deep sequencing run, showing the number of bases with a mismatch relative to the PhiX sequence. Median values and interquartile range are depicted.
Quantification of number of cells used in the EDITS assay. Cellular DNA was extracted from one million memory CD4+ T cells purified from 15 Ugandan and 25 U.S. patients, as well as one million Jurkat E4 (HIV+)/Jurkat E^-1 (HIV-) cells from five points of the standard curve. One microlliter of cellular DNA was use to PCR amplify a 197 bp fragment of the cellular albumin gene. Amplicons were purified and quantified using Qubit 2.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Unpaired t test was used to compare the concentration of albumin amplicon (ng/ul) between both cohort of patients and the cell mixture from the standard curve. Median values and interquartile range are depicted.
Size of the inducible peripheral HIV-1 reservoir in male and female HIV-infected individuals from Uganda (n = 62) and the U.S. (n =50) estimated by measuring cell-associated spliced HIV-1 RNA (EDITS assay) and proviral DNA. Unpaired t test was used to compare the reservoir size (number of cell equivalents per one million cells) between the different groups of patients. *p < 0.05, **p <0.01, ***p <0.001, ****p <0.0001. Median cell equivalents/million cells and interquartile range are depicted. ♂ male; ♀ female.
About this article
Cite this article
Joussef-Piña, S., Nankya, I., Nalukwago, S. et al. Reduced and highly diverse peripheral HIV-1 reservoir in virally suppressed patients infected with non-B HIV-1 strains in Uganda. Retrovirology 19, 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12977-022-00587-3