- Short report
- Open Access
Identification of a high incidence region for retroviral vector integration near exon 1 of the LMO2locus
Retrovirologyvolume 6, Article number: 79 (2009)
Therapeutic retroviral vector integration near the oncogene LMO2 is thought to be a cause of leukemia in X-SCID gene therapy trials. However, no published studies have evaluated the frequency of vector integrations near exon 1 of the LMO2 locus. We identified a high incidence region (HIR) of vector integration using PCR techniques in the upstream region close to the LMO2 transcription start site in the TPA-Mat T cell line. The integration frequency of the HIR was one per 4.46 × 104 cells. This HIR was also found in Jurkat T cells but was absent from HeLa cells. Furthermore, using human cord blood-derived CD34+ cells we identified a HIR in a similar region as the TPA-Mat T cell line. One of the X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency (X-SCID) patients that developed leukemia after gene therapy had a vector integration site in this HIR. Therefore, the descriptions of the location and the integration frequency of the HIR presented here may help us to better understand vector-induced leukemogenesis.
The IL2RG gene encodes the interleukin-2 receptor γ chain (IL-2Rγ) , and mutations in this gene cause X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency (X-SCID) . Gene therapy trials for X-SCID have achieved remarkably successful outcomes [3–5] but have also been associated with leukemogenesis in some patients. Analyses of leukemic cell clones from these patients revealed that the murine leukemia virus (MLV) vector had integrated proximal to the promoter of an oncogene involved in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, L I M - o nly protein 2 (LMO2), resulting in aberrant expression. These findings suggest that retroviral vector integration near the LMO2 promoter is the most likely cause of leukemogenesis in these cases [6–8]. Several oncogenes, including LMO2, have very recently been reported to be target genes for vector integration in two patients that developed leukemia following retroviral-mediated gene therapy [9, 10]. Accordingly, a determination of the frequency of vector integration near the transcription start site (TSS) of LMO2 would be important for understanding the mechanism of the LMO2 insertional mutagenesis observed in the leukemic cell clones. The frequency of vector integrations near the TSS of the LMO2 locus has not been previously described. In the present study, we have detected a region where vectors integrated with high frequency near the TSS of the LMO2 locus in two T cell lines and human cord blood-derived CD34+ cells, and we have subsequently determined the frequency of this vector integration in TPA-Mat and CD34+ cells.
We previously identified 340 integration sites and 15 integration hotspots (defined as ≥ 3 integration sites within a 100-kb region) for MLV vector integration in infected human T cell line clones . A hotspot in intron 2 of the T RAF2- and N CK-interacting k inase (TNIK) gene had three integration sites within 3.5-kb, indicating that this hotspot is an appropriate locus for estimating the integration frequency. We selected clone 705-9, which has an integrated vector in the hotspot region of the TNIK locus . We investigated the sensitivity of the PCR techniques utilized in this study. One copy of the junction sequence between the virus gene and the TNIK gene was amplified from DNA harvested from 705-9 cells, in the presence of 1 μg (1.5 × 105 cells) of genomic DNA from parental TPA-Mat-ecoR cells. A nested PCR using a 3' LTR-specific primer and a TNIK-specific primer showed that one copy of the integrated vector was detectable as a 1.5-kb PCR product (data not shown), demonstrating the sensitivity of this assay.
To estimate the integration frequency in a human T cell line, TPA-Mat-ecoR cells expressing the ecotropic mouse receptor were infected with an ecotropic MLV vector that encoded green fluorescent protein (GFP); the infection efficiency (29 - 46%, based on GFP fluorescence) was similar to that measured in patients in the gene therapy trials . At 48 hours post-infection, genomic DNA was isolated from the cells. This acute infection system is suitable for analyzing the distribution of initial vector integration. The combinations of LTR- and TNIK- or LMO2-specific primers (Additional file 1) used for the PCR reactions are shown in Figure 1A. All resulting PCR products from 186 PCR amplifications (1 μg DNA was used for each PCR amplification, and 186 μg of sample DNA correspond to approximately 2.8 × 107 cells) carried out using LTR- and TNIK-specific primers were cloned and sequenced, and 55 integration sites were mapped within the human genome (Figure 1B and Additional files 2 and 3). For 1613 PCR amplifications (1613 μg of sample DNA corresponds to approximately 2.4 × 108 cells) using LTR- and LMO2-specific primers, 65 integration sites were unevenly distributed in an approximately ± 3-kb region surrounding exon 1 of LMO2 in the human genome (Figure 1C and Additional files 2 and 3). We found a high incidence region (HIR) of vector integration in the region upstream of -1740, near the LMO2 promoter (Figure 1C). A HIR was also observed around the 705-9 cell integration site of the TNIK locus. To confirm the HIR location in the LMO2 locus, we performed additional PCR assays in the region upstream of -3000. Since no integration into the region upstream of -3001 was detected with the indicated primers (Figure 1C and Additional files 2 and 3), we suggest that the HIR in the TPA-Mat-ecoR cells ranges from -1740 (the downstream edge) to -3001 (the upstream edge). We observed multiple-hit integrations that included two or three vector integrations at the same nucleotide position within this HIR of LMO2, as described below. In contrast, no integration was detected downstream (1 ~1500) of exon 1 (0/270) and only a few integrations were found from 1500 to 3000 (3/270). Subsequent analysis using the same primer sets in a second T cell line, Jurkat-ecoR (infection efficiency: 28-36%, based on GFP fluorescence) identified a HIR (-1801 to -2968) in a similar region as the TPA-Mat-ecoR cells. No other integration sites near the LMO2 promoter were detected in Jurkat-ecoR cells (Figure 1D and Additional files 2 and 3).
In a previous report, we found fewer hotspots in HeLa cells than in TPA-Mat cells [11, 13]. In addition, almost none of the genes present in hematopoietic stem cell hotspots were found in HeLa cell hotspots , suggesting that hotspots in these different cell types are distinct. We examined vector integration near the TSS of the LMO2 locus in HeLa cells to address this point. Only a few integrations were observed upstream (-1 ~-3000; 3/540) and downstream (1 ~3000; 1/540) of exon 1 (Figure 1E, Additional files 2 and 3) despite the high infection efficiency of HeLa cells (45 ~58% based on GFP fluorescence). Real-time PCR showed that the vector integration copy number in TPA-Mat-ecoR cells (infection efficiency; 42%, based on GFP fluorescence) was estimated at 2.0 per diploid genome when normalized to interferon γ DNA, or 2.3 per diploid genome according to the 42% GFP fluorescence in the standard curve based on the real-time PCR analyses (Additional file 4). The vector integration copy number in HeLa cells was estimated at 1.4 per diploid genome according to the 45% GFP fluorescence in the standard curve based on the real-time PCR analyses (Additional file 4). The three upstream integration sites (-1740, -1875 and -2068) in HeLa cells were also found in TPA-Mat-ecoR cells with the -1875 integration site also present in Jurkat-ecoR cells (Additional file 3). In the -1740 and -1875 integration sites of the TPA-Mat-ecoR cells, we observed two and three integrated vectors, respectively. All multiple-hit integrations listed in Additional file 3 were derived from independent infection experiments. A previous study demonstrated that the integration sites of MLV vectors showed a weak favoring of active transcription units . To examine whether endogenous LMO2 mRNA-levels correlated with the frequency of vector integration, we analyzed transcription of the LMO2 gene in TPA-Mat, Jurkat, HeLa and the LMO2 expressing K562 cells . Reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR showed that endogenous transcription of the LMO2 gene was only detected in K562 cells (Figure 2A). Thus, the frequency of vector integration in TPA-Mat, Jurkat and HeLa cells is not influenced by the endogenous LMO2 mRNA-level.
Subsequently, we examined whether vector integration would affect LMO2 expression in TPA-Mat-ecoR cells. Endogenous LMO2 mRNA was not detected after vector infection (100%, based on GFP fluorescence) in TPA-Mat-ecoR cells (Figure 2A). We then prepared a series of luciferase reporter gene constructs containing the region between -3020 and +147 of the LMO2 promoter region. The construct pGL3lmo2 (3020) containing the region (-3020 ~+147) was virtually silent compared with the pGL3-basic construct containing a SV40 promoter only (Figure 2B). The insertion of the MLV LTR into a site (-1798) within the HIR, where forward or reverse orientation of the inserted vector was observed (Additional file 3), resulted in significant increases in reporter gene activity. A similar result was obtained by the insertion into another site (-2965), which is an integration site reported in the leukemia patient. Consequently, these results suggest that vector integration at -1798 within the HIR may increase transcriptional activity of the LMO2 gene, similar to the report for vector integration at -2965 in the leukemia patient .
We compared the integration pattern in the TPA-Mat-ecoR cells with the integration sites identified in patients (Pt) 4 and 5 who developed leukemia during the gene therapy trials for treatment of X-SCID [12, 17]. Vector integration into the position detected in Pt4 (Figure 1C) was rare in TPA-Mat-ecoR cells; differences in the integration frequencies between the upstream (-1 ~-3000; 60/533) and downstream (1 ~3000; 3/540) regions of exon 1 (Figure 1C) were observed. In contrast, the integration site (-2965) in Pt5 was located in the HIR (-1740 ~-3001) (Figure 1C). Since CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells have been infected with the MLV vector in the clinical trials, we investigated whether the HIR is found in human CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells. Using the same primer sets in umbilical cord blood CD34+ cells (infection efficiency: 14.7%, based on GFP fluorescence), we have identified an HIR (-1882 to -2971) (18/270) in a similar region as the TPA-Mat-ecoR and Jurkat-ecoR cells (Figure 1F, Additional files 2 and 3). Only a few integrations were found from 1 to -1500 (2/270) (Figure 1F, Additional files 2 and 3). Thus, analyzing the location of the HIR in hematopoietic stem cells in these patients will provide insights into leukemogenic integration sites and may have an impact on future gene therapy trials. The HIR is also a suitable region for analyzing the molecular mechanism of vector integration with target-site preferences [14, 18]. On the other hand, results showing retroviral integration sites 35 kb upstream  and 10.6 kb downstream  of the TSS were reported in the patients, and sites 36.3 kb, 69.2 kb, 68.0 kb, 68.3 kb and 0.9 kb upstream of the LMO2 TSS were detected in a murine leukemia model . This indicates that integrations in the sites or regions which are far from the TSS are closely associated in LMO2-related leukemogenesis. Analysis of the differences and similarities between the HIR near the TSS and the regions far from the TSS will therefore facilitate the elucidation of LMO2-related leukemogenesis in the future and may identify additional HIRs that may exist far from the TSS.
We have attempted to estimate the number of cells that carried an integrated vector in the HIR near exon 1 of the LMO2 locus in the leukemia patients who participated in the gene therapy trials for treatment of X-SCID . The integration frequencies calculated from the HIR data on the TNIK and LMO2 loci were one per 4.18 × 104 cells and one per 4.46 × 104 cells (or one per 1.992 × 105 integrations and one per 2.125 × 105 integrations), respectively (Figure 3, Additional files 4 and 5). This estimate was calculated using the integration frequency data for the HIR that was obtained in the TPA-Mat-ecoR cells as calculated in Figure 3. 133 × 106 transduced cells were infused into Pt5  in the gene therapy trial. Given that at least 1% of the transduced cells could give rise to T cells , Pt5 would have received 30 HIR-targeted cells, which suggests that the frequency of vector integration in the HIR found in TPA-Mat-ecoR cells may have contributed to the observed leukemogenesis in Pt5 in the X-SCID gene therapy trial. Furthermore, we have attempted to estimate the integration frequency of CD34+ cells. The integration frequency of CD34+ cells calculated from the HIR data based on the vector integration copy number of CD34+ and TPA-Mat cells was estimated to be one per 9.00 × 104 integrations or one per 1.89 × 104 cells (Additional file 5). Our estimation for the integration frequency of the HIR suggested that a patient has a substantial chance that the transfused cells would have the vector integration in the HIR near the LMO2. However, not every patient develops leukemia and leukemia development takes several years to occur. Additional factors, such as mutations in other T-cell oncogenes or additional insertional mutagenesis, can contribute to leukemogenesis and were observed in the leukemia patients  and murine leukemia model [19, 20]. Although there is controversy about the contribution of the therapeutic IL2RG gene in the leukemogenesis [6, 7, 19], if the activation of only two genes, LMO2 and the IL2RG, were enough to induce leukemia, more of the patients would have developed leukemia in light of our estimation for the integration frequency and the reports that there are hotspots in the LMO2 locus [14, 21]. Thus three or four factors may be needed for leukemogenesis, and the use of retroviral vectors without a tendency to form HIRs near the LMO2 locus may improve the safety of gene therapy.
In conclusion, the identification of the HIR near exon 1 of the LMO2 locus in the T cell lines and human CD34+ cells may partially explain the mechanism responsible for the LMO2-insertional mutagenesis observed in leukemic cell clones. It may help us to better understand vector-induced leukemogenesis.
Takeshita T, Asao H, Ohtani K, Ishii N, Kumaki S, Tanaka N, Munakata H, Nakamura M, Sugamura K: Cloning of the gamma chain of the human IL-2 receptor. Science. 1992, 257: 379-382. 10.1126/science.1631559.
Noguchi M, Yi H, Rosenblatt HM, Filipovich AH, Adelstein S, Modi WS, McBride OW, Leonard WJ: Interleukin-2 receptor gamma chain mutation results in X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency in humans. Cell. 1993, 73: 147-157. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90167-O.
Cavazzana-Calvo M, Hacein-Bey S, de Saint Basile G, Gross F, Yvon E, Nusbaum P, Selz F, Hue C, Certain S, Casanova JL, et al: Gene therapy of human severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID)-X1 disease. Science. 2000, 288: 669-672. 10.1126/science.288.5466.669.
Hacein-Bey-Abina S, Le Deist F, Carlier F, Bouneaud C, Hue C, De Villartay JP, Thrasher AJ, Wulffraat N, Sorensen R, Dupuis-Girod S, et al: Sustained correction of X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency by ex vivo gene therapy. N Engl J Med. 2002, 346: 1185-1193. 10.1056/NEJMoa012616.
Gaspar HB, Parsley KL, Howe S, King D, Gilmour KC, Sinclair J, Brouns G, Schmidt M, Von Kalle C, Barington T, et al: Gene therapy of X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency by use of a pseudotyped gammaretroviral vector. Lancet. 2004, 364: 2181-2187. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17590-9.
McCormack MP, Rabbitts TH: Activation of the T-cell oncogene LMO2 after gene therapy for X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency. N Engl J Med. 2004, 350: 913-922. 10.1056/NEJMra032207.
Pike-Overzet K, de Ridder D, Weerkamp F, Baert MR, Verstegen MM, Brugman MH, Howe SJ, Reinders MJ, Thrasher AJ, Wagemaker G, et al: Ectopic retroviral expression of LMO2, but not IL2Rgamma, blocks human T-cell development from CD34+ cells: implications for leukemogenesis in gene therapy. Leukemia. 2007, 21: 754-763.
Pike-Overzet K, Burg van der M, Wagemaker G, van Dongen JJ, Staal FJ: New insights and unresolved issues regarding insertional mutagenesis in X-linked SCID gene therapy. Mol Ther. 2007, 15: 1910-1916. 10.1038/sj.mt.6300297.
Hacein-Bey-Abina S, Garrigue A, Wang GP, Soulier J, Lim A, Morillon E, Clappier E, Caccavelli L, Delabesse E, Beldjord K, et al: Insertional oncogenesis in 4 patients after retrovirus-mediated gene therapy of SCID-X1. J Clin Invest. 2008, 118: 3132-3142. 10.1172/JCI35700.
Howe SJ, Mansour MR, Schwarzwaelder K, Bartholomae C, Hubank M, Kempski H, Brugman MH, Pike-Overzet K, Chatters SJ, de Ridder D, et al: Insertional mutagenesis combined with acquired somatic mutations causes leukemogenesis following gene therapy of SCID-X1 patients. J Clin Invest. 2008, 118: 3143-3150. 10.1172/JCI35798.
Tsukahara T, Agawa H, Matsumoto S, Matsuda M, Ueno S, Yamashita Y, Yamada K, Tanaka N, Kojima K, Takeshita T: Murine leukemia virus vector integration favors promoter regions and regional hot spots in a human T-cell line. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006, 345: 1099-1107. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.05.007.
Hacein-Bey-Abina S, Von Kalle C, Schmidt M, McCormack MP, Wulffraat N, Leboulch P, Lim A, Osborne CS, Pawliuk R, Morillon E, et al: LMO2-associated clonal T cell proliferation in two patients after gene therapy for SCID-X1. Science. 2003, 302: 415-419. 10.1126/science.1088547.
Wu X, Li Y, Crise B, Burgess SM: Transcription start regions in the human genome are favored targets for MLV integration. Science. 2003, 300: 1749-1751. 10.1126/science.1083413.
Cattoglio C, Facchini G, Sartori D, Antonelli A, Miccio A, Cassani B, Schmidt M, von Kalle C, Howe S, Thrasher AJ, et al: Hot spots of retroviral integration in human CD34+ hematopoietic cells. Blood. 2007, 110: 1770-1778. 10.1182/blood-2007-01-068759.
Berry C, Hannenhalli S, Leipzig J, Bushman FD: Selection of target sites for mobile DNA integration in the human genome. PLoS Comput Biol. 2006, 2: e157-10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020157.
Hammond SM, Crable SC, Anderson KP: Negative regulatory elements are present in the human LMO2 oncogene and may contribute to its expression in leukemia. Leuk Res. 2005, 29: 89-97. 10.1016/j.leukres.2004.05.013.
Deichmann A, Hacein-Bey-Abina S, Schmidt M, Garrigue A, Brugman MH, Hu J, Glimm H, Gyapay G, Prum B, Fraser CC, et al: Vector integration is nonrandom and clustered and influences the fate of lymphopoiesis in SCID-X1 gene therapy. J Clin Invest. 2007, 117: 2225-2232. 10.1172/JCI31659.
Bushman F, Lewinski M, Ciuffi A, Barr S, Leipzig J, Hannenhalli S, Hoffmann C: Genome-wide analysis of retroviral DNA integration. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005, 3: 848-858. 10.1038/nrmicro1263.
Dave UP, Akagi K, Tripathi R, Cleveland SM, Thompson MA, Yi M, Stephens R, Downing JR, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG: Murine leukemias with retroviral insertions at Lmo2 are predictive of the leukemias induced in SCID-X1 patients following retroviral gene therapy. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5: e1000491-10.1371/journal.pgen.1000491.
Dave UP, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG: Gene therapy insertional mutagenesis insights. Science. 2004, 303: 333-10.1126/science.1091667.
Aiuti A, Cassani B, Andolfi G, Mirolo M, Biasco L, Recchia A, Urbinati F, Valacca C, Scaramuzza S, Aker M, et al: Multilineage hematopoietic reconstitution without clonal selection in ADA-SCID patients treated with stem cell gene therapy. J Clin Invest. 2007, 117: 2233-2240. 10.1172/JCI31666.
We thank Dr. T. Kitamura (University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan) for providing pMXs and gagpol-IRES-brs; Dr. T. Kafri (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA) for providing pcDNA VSV-G, Dr. H. Sakai (Shinshu University, Nagano, Japan) for help with statistical analyses, and Dr. T. Kikuchi (Shinshu University, Nagano, Japan) for critical discussion. We also thank the Instrumental Analysis Research Center for Human and Environmental Science at Shinshu University for technical assistance with DNA sequencing and flow cytometric analyses. This work was supported in part by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B 19790335) (T. Tsukahara) and the Human Resource Development Plan for Cancer (T. Takeshita).
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
KYa, TTs and KYo designed and performed the research and wrote the manuscript. KK performed the research, analyzed the experimental conditions and wrote the manuscript. RO and TS analyzed the experimental conditions including the collection of human cord blood, KS and KK analyzed the experimental conditions including the purification of CD34+ cells. HA, YY, YA, NK, MH, KW and YF performed some of the experiments, generated research tools and participated in discussions. NT and SK provided critical advice. TTa wrote the final manuscript.
Koichiro Yamada, Tomonori Tsukahara, Kazuhisa Yoshino contributed equally to this work.