- Open Access
A dose-effect relationship for deltaretrovirus-dependent leukemogenesis in sheep
- Carole Pomier1,
- Maria Teresa Sanchez Alcaraz2,
- Christophe Debacq2,
- Agnes Lançon1,
- Pierre Kerkhofs4,
- Lucas Willems2,
- Eric Wattel†1, 3 and
- Franck Mortreux†1Email author
© Pomier et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
- Received: 12 November 2008
- Accepted: 03 April 2009
- Published: 03 April 2009
Retrovirus-induced tumors develop in a broad range of frequencies and after extremely variable periods of time, from only a few days to several decades, depending mainly on virus type. For hitherto unexplained reasons, deltaretroviruses cause hematological malignancies only in a minority of naturally infected organisms and after a very prolonged period of clinical latency.
Here we demonstrate that the development of malignancies in sheep experimentally infected with the deltaretrovirus bovine leukemia virus (BLV) depends only on the level of BLV replication. Animals were experimentally infected with leukemogenic or attenuated, but infectious, BLV molecular clones and monitored prospectively through 8 months for viral replication. As early as 2 weeks after infection and subsequently at any time during follow-up, leukemogenic viruses produced significantly higher absolute levels of reverse transcription (RT), clonal expansion of infected cells, and circulating proviruses with RT- and somatic-dependent mutations than attenuated viruses. These differences were only quantitative, and both kinds of viruses triggered parallel temporal fluctuations of host lymphoid cells, viral loads, infected cell clonality and proliferation.
Deltaretrovirus-associated leukemogenesis in sheep appears to be a two-hit process over time depending on the amounts of first horizontally and then vertically expanded viruses.
- Clonal Expansion
- Bovine Leukemia Virus
- Proviral Load
- Infected Sheep
Oncogenic retroviruses are known to cause cancers by the acquisition and expression of host-derived oncogenes, by the insertional activation of host cell oncogenes, and the expression of viral proteins such as those encoded by the tax or the HBZ genes of human T-cell leukemia virus (HTLV) , or by the envelope gene of the Jaagsiekte sheep retrovirus (JSRV) [2, 3]. Tumors develop in a very broad range of frequencies and after extremely variable periods of time, depending mainly on the virus type, but also on the viral strain, the host genetic background, exogenous cofactors, and combinations thereof. For example, JSRV can induce lung adenocarcinoma in newborn lambs in as little as 10 days following experimental inoculation ; while after infection with acute transforming retroviruses such as the Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) infection, tumors develop after a few weeks in almost all infected chickens . In strong contrast, less than 5% of deltaretrovirus-infected organisms develop leukemia after very prolonged periods of latency. In fact, leukemogenic deltaretroviruses are the least oncogenic retroviruses in term of disease penetrance in their naturally infected host. In humans, adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL) occurs only in about 1–3% of individuals infected with HTLV-1. In monkeys, the incidence of STLV-associated malignancies seems along the same order , while in infected cows BLV triggers leukemia in about 5% of the animals . In addition to a low incidence, deltaretrovirus-associated malignancies commonly develop after a prolonged period of latency that encompasses about two thirds of the predicted lifespan of the respective hosts [6–8]. This very low leukemogenic effect in vivo is in sharp contrast with the extremely high level of oncogenicity that characterizes these viruses ex vivo. They encode proteins such as Tax or HBZ which can transform cells by interfering with numerous cellular pathways involved in tumor promotion and maintenance .
For HTLV-1, infection occurring early in the life of the host is crucial in the development of ATLL. Furthermore, the disease has been found to occur more frequently and more rapidly in individuals suffering from strongyloidiasis or infectious dermatitis, two clinical conditions characterized at the asymptomatic phase of HTLV-1 infection, by extremely high circulating proviral loads [9–11]. Similarly, ATLL cases retrospectively analyzed at the asymptomatic phase of infection have been found to display higher circulating proviral loads than disease-free carriers from the same geographic area . In animal models, such as squirrel monkeys infected with HTLV-1 or sheep infected with BLV, we and others previously observed that deltaretroviral leukemogenesis regularly includes a progressive increase of proviral load related to the proliferation of preleukemic clones [13, 14].
Although they are retrospective or uncontrolled, these data led us to test the hypothesis of a link between intense deltaretroviral replication and subsequent tumor development. It is possible to genetically modulate the oncogenicity of BLV molecular clones without altering their ability to experimentally infect sheep [8, 15, 16]. We reasoned that the prospective comparison of early BLV replication in animals infected with leukemogenic versus attenuated infectious molecular clones would be appropriate for investigating the implication of qualitative and/or quantitative alterations of deltaretrovirus replication in the subsequent development of malignancies.
Next, we tested whether the leukemogenicity of molecularly cloned viruses impacted the level of cell-associated BLV replication. To this end we measured by semiquantitative quadruplicate IPCR the degree of clonal expansion of infected cells over time in each animal (Figures 2C, 2D and 4). The mean number of abundant clones (detected ≥ 2/4 IPCR experiments corresponding to ≥ 62.5 copies per 1 μg of DNA ) in the 30 samples derived from the 6 animals infected with leukemogenic infectious molecular clones varied from 0 in 2 samples to 34; in animals infected with attenuated infectious strains, the numbers varied from 0 in 16 samples to 10 (Figure 2C). The mean ± standard error of mean (s.e.m.) and median of the number of circulating abundant BLV-positive clones were 6.5 ± 1.3 and 4.5 for samples derived from animals infected with leukemogenic clones, and 1.2 ± 0.4 and 0 for samples derived from animals infected with leukemogenic clones. As shown in figure 3C, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p < 10-4, Mann-Whitney test). As described above for proviral load, the number of abundant infected clones was atypically extremely high (n = 34) in the sheep 4535 at the point i+240, thereby increasing the mean value for the leukemogenic BLV infected group. Except for this time-point, the degree of clonal expansion was roughly parallel between animals infected with leukemogenic versus attenuated BLV infectious molecular clones (Figures 2C, 2D and 4), indicating that attenuated viruses do not alter the dynamic of the infection over time. Altogether these results demonstrate that BLV leukemogenicity depends on the degree of vertical transmission of BLV via infected cell clonal expansion.
Genetic variability of retroviruses goes hand in hand with the degree of retroviral replication. In contrast with other retroviruses, members of HTLV-BLV genus involve two distinct routes of genetic variability in vivo including RT- and somatic-associated mechanisms [14, 18–20]. The cycles of reverse transcription govern RT-dependent genetic variability, whereas extended clonal expansion is accompanied by somatic rearrangements of integrated proviruses [19, 20]. Having identified high levels of both BLV replication mechanisms with leukemogenic infectious proviruses, we investigated whether the number of RT- and somatic-dependent substitutions tended to be higher in animals infected with leukemogenic BLV molecular clones. To this end, IPCR products of 12 blood samples, harvested 3 days before, 50 days after seroconversion and 240 days post infection of 4 sheep (2 from each infection category) were cloned and sequenced. As previously described, the alignment of sequenced IPCR products allowed us to clearly distinguish provirus mutations originating from somatic- or RT-dependent rearrangements [14, 18–20]. Overall, 834 sequenced molecular clones were obtained and the alignment of the 3'LTR sequences with respect to their integration sites allowed the identification of 67 distinct infected cellular clones. Their overtime distributions were 26, 17 and 24 infected cellular clones at 3 days before, 50 days after seroconversion and 240 days post-inoculation, respectively. The figure 2E shows the distribution of the mutated cellular clones during the course of infection with leukemogenic or attenuated BLV infectious proviruses. For the leukemogenic-BLV infected sheep, sequence alignments allowed the detection of 4/16, 3/12 and 2/18 mutated cellular clones with RT-associated mutation in their proviral sequences at 3 days before, 50 days after seroconversion and 240 days post-inoculation, respectively. In comparison, at these respective time-points, attenuated infections displayed 2/10, 0/5 and 0/6 cellular clones with RT-associated mutation in proviruses. Although different, these values only reflected the higher amount of clones generated after infection with leukemogenic viruses: 9 substitutions in 46 cellular clones versus 2 in 21 cellular clones, respectively. As shown in figure 2E, similar results were obtained when analyzing the somatic mutation frequencies. Despite an increased number of cellular clones harboring somatic mutated proviruses in the leukemogenic BLV infection, the difference was not significant when the number of detected clones and the amount of sequenced DNA were taken into account for leukemogenic versus attenuated viruses: 4 substitutions in 46 cellular clones (484 sequenced molecular clones, 203 kb of data) versus 1 in 21 cellular clones (350 sequenced molecular clones, 147 kb of data), respectively (Figure 2E). These data indicate that leukemogenic BLV infection, in comparison to infection with attenuated BLV infectious molecular clones, could be characterized by a higher amount of infected cells with mutated proviruses resulting from RT- and/or somatic-dependent events. However, the frequencies of such mutated clones did not change significantly between the two categories of viruses.
This work is the first prospective controlled investigation of a deltaretrovirus-dependent leukemogenesis that takes into account the two time-dependent routes of deltaretroviruses replication [14, 19, 20]. The data show that, as early as 2 weeks after infection and subsequently at any time during follow-up, leukemogenic viruses displayed significantly higher levels of RT and absolute number of RT-dependent mutation loads, clonal expansion, and clonal expansion-dependent somatic mutation loads than attenuated viruses.
The attenuated viruses correspond to mutated proviral sequences that retain infectious capacities while displaying reduced oncogenic clinical effect after experimental infection. To date, no BLV-related malignancy has been described in animals experimentally infected with the mutants used in the present study. Other attenuated BLV proviruses, such as those impaired in the accessory proteins R3 and G4 or transmembrane protein TM can induce lymphoma but at extremely low frequency (≤ 5%) and after a prolonged period of latency . These molecular tools rendered it possible to prospectively compare the replication pattern of leukemogenic versus attenuated BLV strain in vivo.
Decreased circulating proviral loads have been recently evidenced at 7 months after experimental infection of sheep with BLV strains carrying mutations in the genes that encode R3 and G4 accessory proteins . The present results confirm and extend these data with other BLV mutants and reveal that the two routes of BLV replication (i.e. reverse transcription and clonal expansion) distinguish the two kinds of viruses, and therefore are both involved in BLV-dependent leukemogenesis in sheep. Furthermore, by analyzing BLV replication over time, our study demonstrates that the differences in the replicative pattern between leukemogenic and attenuated strains are only quantitative and that both kinds of viruses trigger parallel temporal fluctuations of viral loads, infected cell clonality, and proliferation.
Sheep were experimentally infected by intradermal injection of plasmid DNA, which is not the natural route of infection for BLV. The virus is transmitted horizontally through the transfer of infected cells via direct contact, through milk and blood. The route of infection may influence the subsequent cellular immune response and thereby the replication level. This has been documented with HTLV-1 in experimentally infected adult rats, which display significantly lower levels of cellular immune response after gastrointestinal exposure than after intravenous or intraperitoneal inoculation . Therefore, it will be interesting to test whether the replication and pathogenicity of leukemogenic or attenuated BLV proviruses could be influenced by the route of infection.
Deltaretovirus-associated cancers are diseases of long latency, and the present results suggest that, in addition to the duration of the infection, a dose effect governs BLV associated leukemogenesis. Leukemogenic viruses display an initial burst of intense horizontal RT-dependent replication that is followed by the extensive clonal expansion of infected cells. This expansion results in a disease penetrance rate of ~100% coupled with an extremely short period of clinical latency in sheep. In contrast, the attenuated virus replicates poorly by RT and clonal expansion. It either leaves animals free of tumors or causes disease in a minority of infected animals only after a prolonged period of latency. From these data, it is possible to propose that infection duration and viral dose, which depends on both RT and clonal expansion, are the two key parameters for tumor formation. In this model, the lower the replicative viral rate, the longer the infection course needed for triggering tumors. Knowing that for sheep infected with wild type BLV proviruses, premalignant clones are detected as early as 15 days from experimental infection ; the present results suggest that the burst of RT-dependent BLV replication that characterizes early infection helps to generate premalignant cells whose subsequent extensive clonal expansion contributes to transform.
In conclusion these results validate the use of circulating proviral loads as a clinical prognostic tool for managing deltaretroviral infections and suggest that targeting both RT and clonal expansion would be of interest for preventing associated malignancies.
Experimental BLV infection of sheep
Fourteen one-year-old sheep were kept under controlled conditions at the Veterinary and Agrochemical Research Centre (Machelen, Belgium). The handling of animals and the experimental procedures were approved by the ethics committee and were conducted in accordance with institutional and national guidelines for animal care and use. Twelve sheep were experimentally infected with BLV infectious molecular clones as previously described . Briefly, 100 μg of circular plasmid DNA was mixed with 200 μg of Dotap (Roche Diagnostics), and the mixture was injected intradermally into the back of the sheep. Six animals were infected with the leukemogenic BLV infectious molecular clones pBLV344, pBLVTax106+293 and pBLVA60V (2 animals per clone). The pBLV344 was the wild type infectious molecular clone. The pBLVTax106+293 was mutated in the Tax phosphorylation sites, and pBLVA60V was mutated at the codon 60 of the GP30 transmembrane gene from alanine into valine . Two of the 6 animals, sheep #4535 and #4536, infected with pBLV344 were previously analyzed for BLV replication and genetic variability . Six additional sheep were infected with cloned viruses pBLVCRE3X, pBLVCRX3 and pBLVIG4  (2 animals per clone). The pBLVCRE3X was mutated for CRE imperfect sequences to TGACGTCA  whereas pBLVCRX3 was deleted in R3  and pBLVIG4 harbored a stop codon in the G4 open reading frame. Two of the 6 animals infected with those attenuated infectious viruses, sheep #4537 and #4538, infected with pBLVIG4 were previously analyzed for BLV replication and genetic variability . Two additional sheep, #4533 and 4534, inoculated with a BLV-negative Dotap solution served as uninfected controls. Twice a week, the total leukocyte counts were determined by using a Coulter counter ZN, and the number of lymphocytes was estimated after examination under the microscope after staining with May-Grunwald Giemsa. In parallel, the sera from each sheep were analyzed for BLV seropositivity as described .
Measurement of circulating BLV proviral load
The circulating amounts of BLV proviral sequences were measured by LightCycler quantitative PCR as described . Briefly, the reaction mixture included polymerase (LightCycler Kit Fast Start DNA Master Hybridization Probes; Roche), 2 mM MgCl 2, 500 nM primer BLVQF, 500 nM primer BLVQR, both targeting the Px region, and 100 nM donor probe 3' end labeled with fluorescein and 200 nM acceptor probe 5' end labeled with LC Red640. Standardization of the amount of DNA subjected to quantification was performed with the sheep beta-globin gene as an internal standard .
Detection and quantification of the clonal distribution of circulating BLV positive cells in vivo
BLV integration was analyzed by Inverse Polymerase Chain Reaction (IPCR) as described . Briefly, two micrograms of DNA were digested by 20 U NlaIII and 20 units of MfeI in 1× NlaIII-MfeI buffer for 3 hours at 37°C. MfeI digestion was performed in order to avoid the amplification of a 536 bp segment of the 5' LTR complementary to the set of 3' IPCR primers. One microgram of digested DNA was circularized for 16 hours at 16°C with 20 U of T4 DNA ligase. Samples were analyzed in quadruplicate, as previously described for BLV and HTLV-1 [14, 28]: 4 × 500 ng of circularized DNA were amplified for 39 cycles using 200 μM of the primer pair BLV3'S and BLV3'AS. Amplifications were performed using 3.5 units of the Pfu DNA polymerase with thermal cycling parameters as follows: 95°C 10 minute, 35 × (95°C 1 min, 60°C 1 minute, 72°C 3 minutes), and a final elongation step of 10 minutes at 72°C. The length polymorphism analysis of 3' BLV flanking sequences was performed by making a run-off. This method consists in the linear PCR amplification of the provirus 3' extremities together with their flanking sequences. Two microliters of amplified IPCR products were submitted to 10 cycles of linear PCR with 2 μM of 5'-32P-radiolabeled primer BLV3'RO. Run-off products were analyzed on a 6% sequencing gel. As previously described , the stochastic nature of BLV IPCR was found to appear at BLV integration site frequencies ranging between 25 and 2400 copies of the BLV provirus per mcg of blood DNA. At copy numbers ranging from 1200 to 2400, 62.5 to 1200, and 25 to 62.5, detection was 3/4, 2/4, and 1/4, respectively. Accordingly, DNA samples from BLV infected animals were analyzed in quadruplicate (4 × 0.5 mcg).
Assessment of BLV genetic variability in vivo
The cloning and sequencing of 3'LTR-integration site PCR fragments were performed as previously described . Briefly, purified IPCR products were ligated with SmaI-digested and M13mp18 replicative form DNA. After transformation of Escherichia coli XL1, recombinant M13 plaques were screened by hybridization with the BLV3'RO oligonucleotides. Single-stranded templates were sequenced using fluorescent dideoxynucleotides. The sequenced products were resolved on an Applied Biosystems 377A DNA sequencer with 377A software. Sequence alignments were performed with Sequence Navigator Software.
SPSS statistical software version 11 was used for analyses. The correlation of data was assessed by Spearman's Rho nonparametric method. P < 0.05 was considered significant in all analyses.
This work was supported by the Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer (Comité de la Savoie), the Centre Léon Bérard, the Centre National pour la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (Inserm) and the Sixth Research Framework Programme of the European Union (project INCA LSHC-CT-2005-018704). CP was supported by a bursary from the Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer (Comité de l'Ain). FM is supported by INSERM. LW is supported by the Fonds National pour la Recherche Scientifique (Belgium). EW is supported by the Hospices Civils de Lyon and the University of Lyon. The authors thank Marie-Dominique Reynaud for the preparation of the manuscript.
- Matsuoka M, Jeang KT: Human T-cell leukaemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) infectivity and cellular transformation. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007, 7 (4): 270-280. 10.1038/nrc2111.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu SL, Miller AD: Oncogenic transformation by the jaagsiekte sheep retrovirus envelope protein. Oncogene. 2007, 26 (6): 789-801. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209850.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wootton SK, Halbert CL, Miller AD: Sheep retrovirus structural protein induces lung tumours. Nature. 2005, 434 (7035): 904-907. 10.1038/nature03492.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Verwoerd DW, Payne AL, York DF, Myer MS: Isolation and preliminary characterization of the jaagsiekte retrovirus (JSRV). Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 1983, 50 (4): 309-316.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Svoboda J: Rous sarcoma virus. Intervirology. 1986, 26 (1–2): 1-60. 10.1159/000149682.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blattner WA: Human T-lymphotrophic viruses and diseases of long latency. Ann Intern Med. 1989, 111 (1): 4-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Slattery JP, Franchini G, Gessain A: Genomic evolution, patterns of global dissemination, and interspecies transmission of human and simian T-cell leukemia/lymphotropic viruses. Genome Res. 1999, 9 (6): 525-540.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Willems L, Burny A, Collete D, Dangoisse O, Dequiedt F, Gatot JS, Kerkhofs P, Lefebvre L, Merezak C, Peremans T, et al: Genetic determinants of bovine leukemia virus pathogenesis. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2000, 16 (16): 1787-1795. 10.1089/08892220050193326.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Agape P, Copin MC, Cavrois M, Panelatti G, Plumelle Y, Ossondo-Landeau M, Quist D, Grossat N, Gosselin B, Fenaux P, et al: Implication of HTLV-I infection, strongyloidiasis, and P53 overexpression in the development, response to treatment, and evolution of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas in an endemic area (Martinique, French West Indies). J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1999, 20 (4): 394-402.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gabet A, Kazanji M, Couppie P, Clity E, Pouliquen J, Sainte-Marie D, Aznar C, Wattel E: ATLL-like HTLV-1 replication in infective dermatitis. Br J Haematol. 2003, 123: 406-412. 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04565.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gabet AS, Mortreux F, Talarmin A, Plumelle Y, Leclercq I, Leroy A, Gessain A, Clity E, Joubert M, Wattel E: High circulating proviral load with oligoclonal expansion of HTLV-1 bearing T cells in HTLV-1 carriers with strongyloidiasis [In Process Citation]. Oncogene. 2000, 19 (43): 4954-4960. 10.1038/sj.onc.1203870.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Okayama A, Stuver S, Matsuoka M, Ishizaki J, Tanaka G, Kubuki Y, Mueller N, Hsieh CC, Tachibana N, Tsubouchi H: Role of HTLV-1 proviral DNA load and clonality in the development of adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma in asymptomatic carriers. Int J Cancer. 2004, 110 (4): 621-625. 10.1002/ijc.20144.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mortreux F, Kazanji M, Gabet AS, de Thoisy B, Wattel E: Two-step nature of human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 replication in experimentally infected squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus). J Virol. 2001, 75 (2): 1083-1089. 10.1128/JVI.75.2.1083-1089.2001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moules V, Pomier C, Sibon D, Gabet AS, Reichert M, Kerkhofs P, Willems L, Mortreux F, Wattel E: Fate of premalignant clones during the asymptomatic phase preceding lymphoid malignancy. Cancer Res. 2005, 65 (4): 1234-1243. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1834.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gillet N, Florins A, Boxus M, Burteau C, Nigro A, Vandermeers F, Balon H, Bouzar AB, Defoiche J, Burny A, et al: Mechanisms of leukemogenesis induced by bovine leukemia virus: prospects for novel anti-retroviral therapies in human. Retrovirology. 2007, 4: 18-10.1186/1742-4690-4-18.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Willems L, Kerkhofs P, Dequiedt F, Portetelle D, Mammerickx M, Burny A, Kettmann R: Attenuation of bovine leukemia virus by deletion of R3 and G4 open reading frames. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994, 91 (24): 11532-11536. 10.1073/pnas.91.24.11532.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Debacq C, Sanchez Alcaraz MT, Mortreux F, Kerkhofs P, Kettmann R, Willems L: Reduced proviral loads during primo-infection of sheep by Bovine Leukemia virus attenuated mutants. Retrovirology. 2004, 1: 31-10.1186/1742-4690-1-31.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pomier C, Sanchez Alcaraz MT, Debacq C, Lancon A, Kerkhofs P, Willems L, Wattel E, Mortreux F: Early and transient reverse transcription during primary deltaretroviral infection of sheep. Retrovirology. 2008, 5 (1): 16-10.1186/1742-4690-5-16.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mortreux F, Gabet AS, Wattel E: Molecular and cellular aspects of HTLV-1 associated leukemogenesis in vivo. Leukemia. 2003, 17 (1): 26-38. 10.1038/sj.leu.2402777.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mortreux F, Leclercq I, Gabet AS, Leroy A, Westhof E, Gessain A, Wain-Hobson S, Wattel E: Somatic mutation in human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 provirus and flanking cellular sequences during clonal expansion in vivo. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001, 93 (5): 367-377. 10.1093/jnci/93.5.367.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Florins A, Gillet N, Boxus M, Kerkhofs P, Kettmann R, Willems L: Even attenuated bovine leukemia virus proviruses can be pathogenic in sheep. J Virol. 2007, 81 (18): 10195-10200. 10.1128/JVI.01058-07.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kato H, Koya Y, Ohashi T, Hanabuchi S, Takemura F, Fujii M, Tsujimoto H, Hasegawa A, Kannagi M: Oral administration of human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 induces immune unresponsiveness with persistent infection in adult rats. J Virol. 1998, 72 (9): 7289-7293.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Twizere JC, Kerkhofs P, Burny A, Portetelle D, Kettmann R, Willems L: Discordance between bovine leukemia virus tax immortalization in vitro and oncogenicity in vivo. J Virol. 2000, 74 (21): 9895-9902. 10.1128/JVI.74.21.9895-9902.2000.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gatot JS, Gioia R, Chau TL, Patrascu F, Warnier M, Close P, Chapelle JP, Muraille E, Brown K, Siebenlist U, et al: Lipopolysaccharide-mediated interferon regulatory factor activation involves TBK1-IKKepsilon-dependent Lys(63)-linked polyubiquitination and phosphorylation of TANK/I-TRAF. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282 (43): 31131-31146. 10.1074/jbc.M701690200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Merezak C, Pierreux C, Adam E, Lemaigre F, Rousseau GG, Calomme C, Van Lint C, Christophe D, Kerkhofs P, Burny A, et al: Suboptimal enhancer sequences are required for efficient bovine leukemia virus propagation in vivo: implications for viral latency. J Virol. 2001, 75 (15): 6977-6988. 10.1128/JVI.75.15.6977-6988.2001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Portetelle D, Mammerickx M, Burny A: Use of two monoclonal antibodies in an ELISA test for the detection of antibodies to bovine leukaemia virus envelope protein gp51. J Virol Methods. 1989, 23 (2): 211-222. 10.1016/0166-0934(89)90135-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tajima S, Takahashi M, Takeshima SN, Konnai S, Yin SA, Watarai S, Tanaka Y, Onuma M, Okada K, Aida Y: A mutant form of the tax protein of bovine leukemia virus (BLV), with enhanced transactivation activity, increases expression and propagation of BLV in vitro but not in vivo. J Virol. 2003, 77 (3): 1894-1903. 10.1128/JVI.77.3.1894-1903.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cavrois M, Wain-Hobson S, Wattel E: Stochastic events in the amplification of HTLV-I integration sites by linker-mediated PCR. Res Virol. 1995, 146 (3): 179-1784. 10.1016/0923-2516(96)80578-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.