Open Access

RNA interference: a multifaceted innate antiviral defense

Retrovirology20085:17

https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4690-5-17

Received: 08 November 2007

Accepted: 01 February 2008

Published: 01 February 2008

Abstract

The RNA interference mechanism utilizes short RNA duplexes to either suppress or induce target gene expression. Post-transcriptional regulation mediated by microRNA is an integral component of innate antiviral defense. The magnitude and the efficiency of viral restriction guided by RNA-based defenses, as well as the full physiological implication of host-pathogen engagement, constitute exciting areas of investigation in the biology of non-coding RNAs.

RNA interference (RNAi) is a highly conserved mechanism for gene silencing in higher eukaryotes [1]. RNAi-based gene silencing utilizes 21-nucleotide duplexes (short interfering RNA or siRNA) consisting of 19 base pairs with 2 nucleotides overhanging each 3' ends. These are derived from longer double-stranded RNA by sequential cleavage with the RNase III enzymes, Drosha and Dicer [25]. The microRNAs (miRNAs) are transcribed as mRNA-like primary miRNA (pri-miRNA) and then processed by the nuclear enzyme Drosha into shorter stem-loop structures (pre-miRNAs) that are exported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, where they are cleaved by Dicer to yield ~21–23 nucleotide long miRNAs containing 5'-phosphate and 3'-hydroxyl termini [2]. Although the two small RNAi effecter molecules have different origins (siRNA is derived from double-stranded RNA transcripts and miRNAs are derived from longer stem-loop structures), both are incorporated into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) for mRNA targeting. In practice, synthetic siRNA duplexes are widely used for loss of function analysis, while endogenous RNAi utilizes miRNAs [6].

Unlike the perfect base-complementarity of the siRNA 'guide' strand and its target mRNA, miRNAs bind their target mRNAs primarily through their 5' nucleotides 2–7, also known as the "seed" sequence. Base-pairing at the seed sequence is important for miRNA-mRNA interaction. However, perfect seed sequence pairing is not always essential for effective translational inhibition of the target mRNA by the miRNA. Thus, a single miRNA could regulate multiple mRNA targets during the stress response [7], and conversely, host miRNAs could target viral RNAs synthesized in mammalian cells in order to defend against infection [8, 9].

A number of recent studies using primary cells have shown that the innate RNAi response is an important component of the mammalian antiviral response. This conclusion was reached based on several findings. Firstly, depletion of RNAi function leads to enhanced viral replication in infected cells. Because of its essential role in processing small hairpin RNA (shRNA) to generate small interfering RNA (siRNA), and its function in producing mature miRNA from pre-miRNA, depletion of Dicer has proven to be a useful tool in investigating the significance of RNAi in viral replication. Intriguingly, mice with attenuated Dicer-1 expression were recently demonstrated to be impaired in miRNA production and were more susceptible to vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) replication [10]. This finding also provided in vivo genetic evidence that specific miRNAs, miR24 and miR93, can influence viral growth in mammals. As expected, mutant VSV (M2) lacking miR24 and miR93 targeting sites were more pathogenic in mice than the wild-type VSV was.

Secondly, a number of reports offer evidence for direct contributions by human miRNAs in regulating retroviral replication. Thus, human miR32 has been shown to limit the replication of primate foamy virus type 1 (PFV-1, a retrovirus akin to HIV-1) [11]. The human miR17/93 cluster was found to impact virus replication in peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated from HIV-1 infected patients [12]. Additionally, Huang et al. [8] recently reported that a cluster of cellular miRNAs (miR-28, miR-125b, miR-150, miR-223 and miR-382) are enriched in resting CD4+ T-cells and may be responsible for directly restricting HIV-1 expression. While the overall quantitative contribution of host cell miRNAs to combating infection still needs to be assessed (for example, individual inhibition of specific miRNAs only modestly relieved the inhibition of virus production, whereas a combination of the five miRNA inhibitors substantially increased virus production in several different HIV strains), it appears from the study by Huang et al. [8] that cellular miRNAs contribute to post-integration latency in HIV-1 infected individuals by recognizing target sequences in 3' UTR of viral mRNAs.

Thirdly, in another viral system, the hepatitis C virus (HCV), cellular miRNAs are apparently a component of the down stream antiviral effectors of the interferon response pathway. In a recent report, Pederson et al. [9] found that IFNβ treatment induced the expression of several cellular miRNAs; eight of these miRNAs have sequence-predicted targets within HCV genomic RNA. The physiological significance of IFNβ-induced miRNAs in regulating HCV replication was established in experiments which blocked these miRNAs using specific antagomirs. Treatment with the antagomirs resulted in the neutralization of IFNβ-mediated antiviral effects.

The evidence for RNA virus-derived miRNAs that influence host gene expression in order to promote viral replication is indirect. However, DNA virus-encoded miRNAs such as HSV-1 miR-LAT, or the SV40 late strand derived miRNA, constitute a direct role for viral miRNAs in modulating host-defenses. The latency-associated transcript (LAT) of herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) is known to inhibit apoptosis and maintain latently infected neurons by generating micro-RNA (miR-LAT, from the exon 1 region of HSV-1 LAT gene) which downregulates the expression of transforming growth factor (TGF-β) and SMAD3 [13]. Thus miR-LAT directly contributes to HSV persistence in a latent form in sensory neurons. SV40 late strand-encoded miRNAs overlap with the viral early mRNA produced from the opposite strand, thus reducing the expression of large T antigen late in the viral replicative cycle [14]. Since SV40 large T antigen is the major target of the host cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response, its downregulation by the viral miRNA allows evasion of host immune surveillance and persistence of the viral infection.

Lastly, the significance of a host miRNA antiviral-defense is consistent with an increasing number of studies suggesting that mammalian viruses have evolved mechanisms that enable them to evade RNAi-based restrictions. Several viruses have exploited the cellular protein Dicer to process small viral RNAs in order to impact viral replication [1517]. Additionally, discrete virus-encoded functions have been shown to subvert cellular RNAi activity [1826]. Currently, the magnitude and efficiency of these RNAi-suppressive functions remain controversial. However, these functions are supported by new data suggesting that the status of cellular RNAi can be dramatically influenced by the physiological stress conditions of the cell [7]. In a recent report, Stern-Ginossar et al., identified major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain B (MICB) as the target of hcmv-miR-Ul122 [27]. MICB is a stress-induced ligand of the natural killer (NK) cell activating receptor NKG2D, which is critical for the NK cell killing of virus-infected cells. This intriguing finding directly links a virus-encoded miRNA to downregulation of the host immune defense.

At this stage of our understanding, it remains unclear how best to model authentic host-virus physiology when studying miRNAs. For instance, Randall et al. [28] recently explored the role of RNAi in regulating HCV replication. The authors employed siRNA-directed loss of function of 62 host cell genes that were known to interact with either HCV RNA or protein to gain an understanding of host-virus interactions. For the most part, depletion of the HCV-interacting genes resulted in inhibition of viral RNA replication with a parallel decline in the release of infectious virus particles. On closer examination, however, the physiological interpretation becomes less clear, since the experiments were conducted using either sub-genomic replicons or replication competent chimeric HCV genomes, but not with authentic HCV strains. The distinction holds added importance when the issue shifts to the role of RNAi/miRNA in viral infection. Here, a particularly intriguing question is the contribution of human miR-122 to the modulation of HCV replication. MiR-122 targets HCV RNA within its highly conserved 5' UTR, and miR-122 appears to be required for viral RNA replication [29]. Yet, perplexingly, there are cell types that lack miR-122 expression and still support HCV replication. Thus, the physiological necessity of miR-122 for HCV replication remains incompletely established particularly since all extant studies employed hepatoma cell lines challenged with either sub-genomic HCV replicons or a replication-competent chimeric HCV genome constructed from two different forms of HCV (genotype 2a). As yet, there are no studies that directly examine the impact of miR-122 on native HCV replication in primary hepatocytes.

Endogenous microRNAs (miRNAs) are carefully controlled cell-type specific regulatory molecules that modulate mRNA expression. Introduction of RNA duplexes into cells can increase or decrease the expression of genes [30]. For example, RNA duplexes targeted to the progesterone receptor (PR) promoter resulted in increased expression of PR RNA and protein [31]. It is yet unclear if the activating RNAs bind directly to DNA, the RNA transcript upstream of the transcription start site or to the antisense transcript. Moreover, miRNA/RNAi functions in primary cells may be quite distinct from those in tumor cell lines. Even though computer based predictions of miRNAs and their targets have seen remarkable improvements in the recent past, functional validation of miRNA-targets in specific tissues and cell types lags far behind [32]. In particular, we need a better understanding of the intracellular compartmentalization and trafficking of miRNAs to make a determination on how specific miRNAs modulate their targets under different physiological conditions [33]. The RNAi directed by endogenous cellular miRNAs represents a greater complexity when compared to that conducted by exogenous synthetic siRNAs, and the need to use primary cells and authentic viral infections puts considerable limitations in interpreting the significance of RNAi responses demonstrated from non-physiological settings (e.g. chimeric HCV replication in tumor cells).

Of caution, several studies suggest that miRNA regulation may be vastly different in tumor cells than in primary cells. In a recent analysis of miRNA expression profiles during antigen specific T cell differentiation [34, 35], the authors noted dynamic changes in the expression of miRNAs. Importantly, Wu et al., [35] argue that a given miRNA hairpin may generate more than one product. Therefore, the designation of a particular sequence for a given miRNA may not adequately describe all the forms of miRNA present within a cell. Such variations might affect the stability or subcellular localization or miRNA target specificity. We are at the early stages of appreciating the influence of structural domains in miRNA that influence its functional efficacy. Moreover, cellular ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes may serve as a reservoir of ncRNA-based post-transcriptional gene regulatory signals [36]. A significant next challenge in miRNA studies may require that we understand better how these reservoirs, RNA-protein complexes, RNA-binding proteins and RNA-editing enzymes are choreographed (Figure 1) to counteract/guide miRNA function [3740]. Thus, while current findings support the relevant interactions between viruses and mammalian cellular miRNAs, the full physiological implication of this host-pathogen engagement awaits further details and additional investigation.
Figure 1

Outlines the regulatory influence of intracellular RNA-Protein complexes, such as processing bodies, P-Bodies and stress granules, SGs; the RNA-binding proteins RBPs and the A-to-I RNA-editing that influence the efficiency of target site recognition and miRNA function (36-40), and are likely to influence RNAi and antiviral defense.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, George Washington University School of Medicine

References

  1. Fire A, Xu S, Montgomery MK, Kostas SA, Driver SE, Mello CC: Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elgans. Nature. 1998, 391: 806-811. 10.1038/35888.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Zamore PD, Tuschl T, Sharp PA, Bartel DP: Double-stranded RNA directs the ATP-dependent cleavage of mRNA at 21–23 nucleotide intervals. Cell. 2000, 101: 25-33. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80620-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernstein E, Caudy AA, Hammond SM, Hannon GJ: Role for a bidentate ribonuclease in the initiation step of RNA interference. Nature. 2001, 409: 363-366. 10.1038/35053110.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Elbashir SM, Harborth J, Lendeckel W, Yalcin A, Weber K, Tuschl T: Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cells. Nature. 2001, 411: 494-498. 10.1038/35078107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hammond SM, Bernstein E, beach D, Hannon GJ: An RNA-directed nuclease mediates post-transcriptional gene silencing in Drosophila cells. Nature. 2000, 404: 293-296. 10.1038/35005107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Nilsen TW: Mechanism of microRNA-mediated gene regulation in animal cells. Trends in Genetic. 2007, 23: 243-249. 10.1016/j.tig.2007.02.011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Leung AKL, Sharp PA: microRNAs: A safeguard against turmoil?. Cell. 2007, 130: 581-585. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Huang J, Wang F, Argyris E, Chen K, Liang Z, Tian H, Huang W, Squires K, Verlingheri G, Zhang H: Cellular microRNAs contribute to HIV-1 latency in resting primary CD4+ T lymphocytes. Nature Medicine. 2007, 13 (10): 1241-1247. 10.1038/nm1639.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Pedersen IM, Cheng G, Wieland S, Volina S, Croce CM, Chisari FV, David M: Interferon modulation of cellular microRNAs as an antiviral mechanism. Nature. 2007, 449: 919-923. 10.1038/nature06205.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Otsuka M, Jing Q, Georgel P, New L, Chen J, Mols J, Kang YJ, Du X, Cook R, Das SC, Pattnaik AK, Beutler B, Han J: Hypersusceptibility of vesicular stomatitis virus infection in dicer1-deficient mice is due to impaired mir24 and miR93 expression. Immunity. 2007, 27: 123-134. 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.05.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lecellier CH, Dunoyer P, Arar K, Lehmann-Che J, Eyquem S, Himber C, Saib A, Voinnet O: A cellular microRNA mediates antiviral defense in human cells. Science. 2005, 308: 557-560. 10.1126/science.1108784.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Triboulet R, Mari B, Lin YL, Chable-Bessia C, Bennasser Y, Lebrigand K, Cardinaud B, Maurin T, Barbry P, Baillat V, Reynes J, Corbeau P, Jeang KT, Benkirane M: Suppression of microRNA-silencing pathway by HIV-1 during virus replication. Science. 2007, 315: 1579-1582. 10.1126/science.1136319.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gupta A, Gartner JJ, Sethupathy P, Hatzigeorgiou AG, Fraser NW: Anti-apoptotic function of a microRNA encoded by the HSV-1 latency-associated transcript. Nature. 2006, 442: 82-85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Sullivan CS, Grundhoff AT, Tevethia S, Pipas JM, Ganem D: SV40-encoded microRNAs regulate viral gene expression and reduce susceptibility to cytotoxic T cells. Nature. 2005, 435: 682-686. 10.1038/nature03576.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Klase Z, Kale P, Winograd R, Gupta MV, Heydarian M, Berro R, McCaffrey T, Kashanchi F: HIV-1 TAR element is processed by Dicer to yield a viral micro-RNA involved in chromatin remodeling of the viral LTR. BMC Mol Biol. 2007, 8: 63-10.1186/1471-2199-8-63.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Peffer S, Sewer A, Lagos-Quintana M, Sheridan R, Sander C, Grâsser FA, van Dyk LF, Ho CK, Shuman S, Chien M, Russo JJ, Ju J, Randall G, Lindenbach BD, Rice CM, Simon V, Ho DD, Zavolan M, Tuschl T: Identification of microRNAs of the herpesvirus family. Nat Methods. 2005, 2: 269-276. 10.1038/nmeth746.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Grey F, Antoniewicz A, Allen E, Saugstad J, Mcshea A, Carrington JC, Nelson J: Identification and characterization of human cytomegalovirus-encoded microRNAs. J Virol. 2005, 79: 12095-12099. 10.1128/JVI.79.18.12095-12099.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Llave C, Kasschau KD, Carrington JC: Virus-encoded suppressor of posttranscriptional gene silencing targets a maintenance step in the silencing pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 13401-13406. 10.1073/pnas.230334397.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mallory AC, Reinhart BJ, Bartel D, Vance VB, Bowman LH: A viral suppressor of RNA silencing differentially regulates the accumulation of short interfering RNAs and micro-RNAs in tobacco. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 15228-15233. 10.1073/pnas.232434999.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sullivan CS, Ganem D: A virus-encoded inhibitor that blocks RNA interference in mammalian cells. J Virol. 2005, 79: 7371-7379. 10.1128/JVI.79.12.7371-7379.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Bennasser Y, Yeung ML, Jeang KT: HIV-1 tar RNA subverts RNA interference in transfected cells through sequestration of TAR RNA binding protein, TRBP. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281: 27674-27678. 10.1074/jbc.C600072200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Yeung ML, Bennasser Y, Myers T, Jiang G, Benkirane M, Jeang KT: Changes in microRNA expression profiles in HIV-1-transfected human cells. Retrovirology. 2005, 2: 81-10.1186/1742-4690-2-81.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gatignol A, Laine S, Clerzius G: Dual role of TRBP in HIV replication and RNA interference: viral diversion of a cellular pathway or evasion from antiviral immunity?. Retrovirology. 2005, 2: 65-10.1186/1742-4690-2-65.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Andersson MG, Haasnoot PC, Xu N, Berenjian S, Berkhout B, Akusjarvi G: Suppression of RNA interference by adenovirus virus associated RNA. J Virol. 2005, 79: 9556-9565. 10.1128/JVI.79.15.9556-9565.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Yeung ML, Benkirane M, Jeang KT: Small non-coding RNAs, mammalian cells, and viruses: regulatory interactions?. Retrovirology. 2007, 4: 74-10.1186/1742-4690-4-74.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Bennasser Y, Le S-Y, Benkirane M, Jeang K-T: Evidence that HIV-1 encodes an siRNA and a suppressor of RNA silencing. Immunity. 2005, 22: 607-619. 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.03.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Stern-Ginossar N, Elefant N, Zimmerman A, Wolf DG, Salen N, Biton M, Horwitz E, Prokocimer Z, Prichard M, Hahn G, Goldman-Wool D, Greenfield C, Yagel S, Hengel H, Altuvia Y, Margalit H, Mandelboim O: Host immune system gene targeting by a viral miRNA. Science. 2007, 317: 376-381. 10.1126/science.1140956.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Randall G, Panis M, Cooper JD, Tellinghuisen TT, Sukhodolets KE, Pfeffer S, Landthaler M, Landgraf P, Kan S, Lindenbach BD, Chien M, Weir DB, Russo JJ, Ju J, Brownstein MJ, Sheridan R, Sander C, Zavolan M, Tuschl T, Rice CM: Cellular cofactors affecting hepatitis C virus infection and replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007, 104 (31): 12884-12889. 10.1073/pnas.0704894104.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Jopling CL, Yi M, Lancaster AM, Lemon SM, Sarnow P: Modulation of hepatitis C virus RNA abundance by a liver-specific microRNA. Science. 2005, 309: 1577-1581. 10.1126/science.1113329.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rossi JJ: Transcriptional activation by small RNA duplexes. Nature Chemical Biology. 2007, 3 (3): 136-137. 10.1038/nchembio0307-136.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Janowski BA, Yonger ST, Hardy DB, Ram R, Huffman KE, Corey DR: Activating gene expression in mammalian cells with promoter-targeted duplex RNAs. Nature. 2007, 3 (3): 166-173.Google Scholar
  32. Kumar A: The silent defense: micro-RNA directed defense against HIV-1 replication. Retrovirology. 2007, 4: 26-10.1186/1742-4690-4-26.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Politz JCR, Zhang F, Pederson T: MicroRNA-206 colocalizes with ribosome-rich regions in both the nucleus and cytoplasm of rat myogenic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103: 18957-18962. 10.1073/pnas.0609466103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Neilson JR, Zheng GX, Burge CB, Sharp PA: Dynamic regulation of miRNA expression in ordered stages of cellular development. Genes Dev. 2007, 21 (5): 578-89. 10.1101/gad.1522907.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Wu H, Neilson JR, Kumar P, Manocha M, Shankar P, Sharp PA, Majunath N: miRNA profiling of naïve, effector and memory CD8 T cells. PLoS ONE. 2007, 2 (10): e1020-10.1371/journal.pone.0001020.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. St Laurent GS, Wahlestedt C: Noncoding RNAs: couplers of analog and digital Information in nervous system function?. Trends in Neurosciences. 2007, 30 (12): 612-621. 10.1016/j.tins.2007.10.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Bhattacharyya SN, Habermacher R, Martine U, Filipowicz W: Relief of microRNA-mediated translational repression in human cells subjected to stress. Cell. 2006, 125: 1111-1124. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.04.031.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kedde M, Strasser MJ, Boldajipour B, Oude Vrielink JAF, Slanchev K, le Sage C, Nagel R, Voorhoeve PM, van Duijse J, Ørom UA, Lund AH, Perrakis A, Raz E, Agami R: RNA-binding protein Dnd1 inhibits microRNA access to target mRNA. Cell. 2007, 131: 1273-1286. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Vasudevan S, Tong Y, Steitz JA: Switching from repression to activation: microRNAs can up-regulate translation. Science. 2007, 318: 1931-1934. 10.1126/science.1149460.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kawahara Y, Zinshteyn B, Sethupathy P, Lizasa H, Hatzigeorgiou AG, Nishikura K: Redirection of silencing targets by adenosine-to-inosine editing of miRNAs. Science. 2007, 315: 1137-1140. 10.1126/science.1138050.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kumar; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement