Skip to main content
Fig. 6 | Retrovirology

Fig. 6

From: Distinct gene expression signatures induced by viral transactivators of different HTLV-1 subgroups that confer a different risk of HAM/TSP

Fig. 6

Subgroup-specific Tax molecules do not differ in the transcriptional activation of the CXCL10 promoter via NF-κB. a Schematic representation of the CXCL10 promoter sequence cloned into pGL3-Basic. The firefly luciferase gene was used to monitor the activity of the CXCL10 gene promoter. b These reporter constructs were independently transfected into Jurkat human T-cells and 293T cells with or without the Tax expression plasmid. Luciferase assays were performed 24 h after transfection. There was no difference between Tax-A and Tax-B with respect to transcriptional activity for both the short and long CXCL10 promoters. The data also showed that the Tax mutant M22, which is defective in NF-κB activation, failed to activate the CXCL10 promoters (both short and long). In contrast, the Tax 703 mutant, which can activate NF-κB but not CREB, efficiently activated the CXCL10 promoters (both short and long). c To determine whether either the NF-κB or the AP-1 sequence was required for Tax-mediated activation of the CXCL10 promoter, mutant reporter constructs were co-transfected along with the Tax expression plasmid, and luciferase activity was determined for each of the four mutants. Tax-induced luciferase activity was significantly reduced by mutation in one of the two NF-κB binding site sequence, but not reduced by mutation in the AP-1 site, indicating that Tax transactivation of the CXCL10 involves both κB binding sites. Three independent experiments were performed. Data shown as mean ± SD, n  =  3

Back to article page