Skip to main content

Advertisement

Use of new resistance markers to predict virologic response to antiretrovirals

Article metrics

  • 793 Accesses

Aim

There can now be little doubt that certain drug-resistance mutations are more likely to emerge in viruses of certain subtypes than others. Two of the best and most practical examples of this are the emergence of the V106M NNRTI mutation and the K65R NRTI mutation in viruses of subtype C.

Methods

It is relevant that the use of newer more sensitive methods have been key in establishing the role that certain drug-resistance mutations may play in both transmitted and acquired drug resistance. In particular, the use of allele-specific PCR assays (AS-PCR) and pyrosequencing have been very useful in providing new insights.

Results

Among the reasons that more ultrasensitive assays may sometimes be needed for more accurate assessments of drug resistance is the differential effect of certain mutations on viral replicative capacity. As an example, the K65R mutation is known to adversely affect HIV replication, and this may be one of the reasons that it is found relatively infrequently among individuals who fail antiretroviral therapy. In contrast, the use of AS-PCR for K65R in subtype C viruses has shown that this method was able to detect the presence of this mutation in an additional 4 of 30 samples who had tested negative by bulk sequencing methods. Now, it also appears as though the transmission of the K65R mutation, while rare, can also be detected in higher numbers by AS-PCR than bulk sequencing, and that this is also more common among subtype C than subtype B viruses. The likely reason is that subtype C viruses are more prone to develop K65R as a consequence of treatment failure and are therefore more likely than subtype B viruses to contain this mutation at the time that transmission takes place. In the case of the M184V mutation, it has also been observed that AS-PCR methods can detect this substitution more efficiently than bulk sequencing among newly-infected individuals.

Discussion

Thus, the reason that some resistance-associated mutations are not commonly observed in newly-infected subjects is not because they impact on the ability of HIV to be transmitted but rather because they may quickly revert to wild-type in the absence of drug pressure and then be rapidly overgrown by wild-type variants.

Author information

Correspondence to Mark A Wainberg.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wainberg, M.A., Toni, T. & Brenner, B.G. Use of new resistance markers to predict virologic response to antiretrovirals. Retrovirology 7, I21 (2010) doi:10.1186/1742-4690-7-S1-I21

Download citation

Keywords

  • Virologic Response
  • Resistance Marker
  • Replicative Capacity
  • Drug Pressure
  • Acquire Drug Resistance