Identification of interdependent variables that influence coreceptor switch in R5 SHIVSF162P3N-infected macaques
© Zhuang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 28 August 2012
Accepted: 5 December 2012
Published: 13 December 2012
We previously reported that adoption of an “open” envelope glycoprotein (Env) to expose the CD4 binding site for efficient receptor binding and infection of cell targets such as macrophages that express low levels of the receptor represents an early event in the process of coreceptor switch in two rapidly progressing (RP) R5 SHIVSF162P3N-infected rhesus macaques, releasing or reducing Env structural constraints that have been suggested to limit the pathways available for a change in coreceptor preference. Here we extended these studies to two additional RP monkeys with coreceptor switch and three without to confirm and identify additional factors that facilitated the process of phenotypic conversion.
We found that regardless of coreceptor switching, R5 viruses in SHIVSF162P3N-infected RP macaques evolved over time to infect macrophages more efficiently; this was accompanied by increased sCD4 sensitivity, with structural changes in the CD4 binding site, the V3 loop and/or the fusion domain of their Envs that are suggestive of better CD4 contact, CCR5 usage and/or virus fusion. However, sCD4-sensitive variants with improved CD4 binding were observed only in RPs with coreceptor switch. Furthermore, cumulative viral load was higher in RPs with than in those without phenotypic switch, with the latter maintaining a longer period of seroconversion.
Our data suggest that the increased virus replication in the RPs with R5-to-X4 conversion increased the rate of virus evolution and reduction in the availability of target cells with optimal CD4 expression heightened the competition for binding to the receptor. In the absence of immunological restrictions, variants that adopt an “open” Env to expose the CD4 binding site for better CD4 use are selected, allowing structural changes that confer CXCR4-use to be manifested. Viral load, change in target cell population during the course of infection and host immune response therefore are interdependent variables that influence R5 virus evolution and coreceptor switch in SHIVSF162P3N-infected rhesus macaques. Because an "open" Env conformation also renders the virus more susceptible to antibody neutralization, our findings help to explain the infrequent and late appearance of X4 virus in HIV-1 infection when the immune system deteriorates.
KeywordsR5 SHIV Coreceptor switch CD4 binding Macrophage infection
Entry of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is initiated by binding of the gp120 surface subunit of the viral envelope protein (Env) to the cellular receptor CD4 and either the CCR5 (R5 viruses) or CXCR4 (X4 viruses) coreceptor on the target cell . Most HIV-1 transmissions result in a predominantly R5 virus infection [2–4]. With time, X4 variants arise and coexist with R5 variants in ~50% of subtype B infected individuals, and their emergence is associated with rapid CD4+ T cell loss and disease progression [5, 6]. The determinants of phenotypic change from R5 to X4 map largely to the V3 region of the exterior envelope glycoprotein, gp120 , and can be inferred by analysis of the amino acid sequence of this region . The underlying factors for virus coreceptor switch late in infection however remain uncertain, but several hypotheses that include high viral load and evolutionary rate, changes in target cell populations during the course of infection and/or differential immune recognition of X4 and R5 viruses have been proposed [9, 10]. Because the presence of X4 virus is associated with poorer clinical prognosis and is a major limitation to the clinical use of CCR5 inhibitors [11–15], a better understanding of the pathway and selective pressures for the emergence of X4 virus should provide important insights into HIV-1 pathogenesis and treatment.
We recently reported coreceptor switch in macaques infected intravenously (iv), intrarectally (ir) or intravaginally (ivag) with the late R5 SHIVSF162P3N isolate [16–18]. The majority of infected macaques in which X4 virus emerged are rapid progressors (RP), with a clinical course that is characterized by persistent high levels of virus replication, early onset of clinical disease and undetectable or transient antiviral antibody titers that usually wane within 3-4 weeks of virus inoculation. Nevertheless, we showed that the genetic requirements for coreceptor switch in SHIVSF162P3N-infected RPs overlapped with those reported in humans that developed neutralizing antibodies [8, 16, 17, 19, 20], and transitioned similarly through dual-tropic intermediates with reduced replicative capacity and less efficient coreceptor use [21–24]. Furthermore, consistent with findings in HIV-1 infected patients [25–27], the appearance of X4 virus follows rather than precedes the initial decline of CD4+ T cells in the infected macaques. Since the newly emerging CXCR4-using viruses in both hosts are highly sensitive to neutralization with antibodies directed against the CD4 binding site [16, 17, 28, 29], these observations suggest that immunological impairment provides a selective advantage for emergence and expansion of X4 virus. Thus, the mechanistic pathways and selection factors underlying phenotypic conversion are likely similar in some HIV-1 infected patients and in SHIVSF162P3N-infected RP monkeys.
For these reasons, we conducted a study to explore the mechanistic basis and blockade(s) for virus coreceptor switch in two R5 SHIVSF162P3N-infected RPs . We found that R5 viruses evolved over time in these two macaques to become increasingly sensitive to sCD4, indicative of an “open” envelope conformation that exposes the CD4 binding site and improves receptor binding. Indeed, we observed that the increase in sCD4 sensitivity of the evolving R5 viruses correlates with the ability of their Envs to bind CD4 more efficiently as well as to mediate infection of cell targets that express low levels of the receptor. Furthermore, major antigenic changes in Env gp160 of the R5 viruses, including changes in the V3 loop that are important for coreceptor engagement, were seen near and at the time of coreceptor switch, consistent with global changes in Env conformation and structural plasticity that facilitate the remodeling needed to expand or switch to CXCR4 usage. These findings led us to propose that adoption of an "open" Env to expose the CD4 binding site for efficient CD4 binding and infection of CD4low cells represents an early event in the process of coreceptor switch, releasing or reducing Env structural constraints that have been suggested to limit the mutational pathways available for a change in coreceptor preference. Because these studies were limited with respect to the number of animals, and not all R5 SHIVSF162P3N-infected RP macaques exhibited coreceptor switch, the present work is conducted in two additional RPs with and three without tropism switch to verify and extend our earlier observations, and to identify additional factors that facilitated the process of R5-to-X4 conversion.
R5 viruses evolve in RPs with coreceptor switch to infect primary macrophages more efficiently by improving their CD4 binding
Anti-SHIV binding antibody in R5 SHIV SF162P3N -infected RP macaques
With coreceptor switch
Without coreceptor switch
Changes in envelope glycoprotein antigenic structure near and at the time of tropism switch
Marked changes in structure or accessibility of the CD4BS and V3 loop of gp120 and the pre-hairpin intermediate of gp41 were observed near the time of switch in our prior study of two RPs . Accordingly, we probed the structure of the evolving R5 viruses in DE86 and DG08 by assessing their susceptibility to neutralization with the anti-CD4BS mAb b12, the anti-V3 loop mAb 447-52D and T20, which binds a triple-stranded coiled coil activated fusion intermediate composed of the N-terminal heptad repeat (HR-1) region of gp41. Results showed that the changes in sCD4 sensitivity and receptor use of the R5 viruses evolving around the time of coreceptor switch in the two macaques coincided with modulations in Env conformations. For DE86, there was a significant increase in b12 and 447-52D susceptibility for viruses close to (w8) and at the time of (w12) coreceptor switch that may be indicative of changes in the structure and/or accessibility of the CD4 and coreceptor binding sites (Figure 3B). A significant increase in T20 sensitivity of the w12 viruses is suggestive of greater exposure or a longer half-life of the gp41 HR-1 groove on the Envs of these viruses. The changes in the antigenic structure of R5 Envs around the time of coreceptor switch in DG08, the macaque that harbored two independent R5-to-X4 evolutionary pathways, were more complex. Compared to the acute viruses, a statistically significant increase in b12 sensitivity was evident at 8 wpi, and remained so except for the w11 and w12 viruses. T20 sensitivity was also significantly increased, with the exception of viruses prior to (w12) and at the time of switch (w13). Furthermore, a dramatic decrease in 447-52D sensitivity was seen for the w11 viruses. Taken together, the data support Env structural changes near and following the time of switch in DE86 and DG08. These changes involve the V3 domain that is important for coreceptor binding and the fusion peptide in gp41 that can modulate coreceptor specificity . The frequent blood samplings in DG08 (weekly before, during and after tropism switch) provided a more dynamic picture of R5 virus evolution in RPs with multiple and concurrent coreceptor-switching events.
R5 viruses in RPs without coreceptor switch also evolved to infect macrophages more efficiently, but this was not accompanied by an increase in CD4 binding
R5 viruses in RPs without coreceptor switch employ a compensatory mechanism for poor CD4 binding in infection of macrophages and in sCD4 susceptibility
Besides exposure of the CD4BS for efficient CD4 binding, increase sensitivity to sCD4 neutralization and infection of CD4low cells may mean that the conformational changes induced by CD4 binding are altered, that the virus has acquired additional contacts with CD4, or the interaction with CCR5 is improved [42–48]. The greater resistance to PSC-RANTES inhibition of the late viruses (w13) in BT78 is suggestive of better use of the CCR5 coreceptor, and changes in gp41 HR1 has been associated with SIV macrophage tropism [49, 50]. To further understand the mechanistic basis for increase sCD4 sensitivity and infection of CD4low cells of the evolving R5 viruses in BT78 and DN57, their antigenic structure was examined. We found that the late viruses in BT78 (w13) and DN57 (w17, 25 and 30) were significantly more sensitive to IgGb12 (>3–fold), suggesting alteration in the structure of the CD4BS of these viruses that could provide additional CD4 contacts. Changes in susceptibility to the anti-V3 mAb 447-52D were also seen for BT78 and DN57, with significant increase in sensitivity for the late viruses in DN57 that may be indicative of the exposure of the V3 loop. Moreover, the late viruses in DN57 were significantly more sensitive to T20, which has been correlated with enhanced exposure of the HR1 fusion domain in gp41. Similar changes were seen for in CC39, with significant increases in IgGb12 and T20 sensitivity seen for the w6 and w9 viruses. Increase CD4 contact, exposure of the V3 loop and HR1 groove for virus fusion therefore could have compensated for the poor CD4 binding of the late viruses in the three macaques in conferring sCD4 sensitivity and in adapting to less-than-optimal CD4 molecules for entry into primary macrophages.
High-level replication is a strong predictor for R5-to-X4 virus evolution in RPs
In this study, we confirmed adoption of an "open" Env to expose the CD4 binding site for efficient CD4 binding and infection of primary macrophages in two additional RPs with coreceptor switch. Moreover, changes in neutralizing antibody and T20 sensitivity around the time of X4 virus emergence are consistent with a more responsive quaternary configuration of the viral envelope spike. In agreement with reports in HIV-1-infected individuals, high virus replication is a strong predictor for R5-to-X4 conversion in SHIVSF162P3N-infected macaques. A certain level of viremia may provide the conditions optimal for coreceptor switching or, alternatively, the Env changes required for coreceptor switching may predispose to higher levels of virus replication. Adoption of an "open" Env conformation that confers structural flexibility to accommodate mutational changes, and high levels of virus replication to overcome the genetic hurdles for R5-to-X4 evolution therefore contribute to the coreceptor switch in nonhuman primates. Since an "open" Env conformation also renders the virus more susceptible to antibody neutralization, our findings help to explain the infrequent and late appearance of X4 virus in HIV-1 infection when the immune system deteriorates.
Diminished entry efficiency of the evolving R5 viruses following the time of switch, with increase in PSC-RANTES sensitivity that is suggestive of poorer CCR5 usage was seen in DG08 studied here (Figure 2) and in BR24 and CA28 reported earlier . Interestingly, these are the three R5 SHIVSF162P3N-infected RPs that harbored pure X4 virus populations. Decrease in the efficiency of CCR5 usage had also been reported in HIV-1 infected individuals with detectable CXCR4-using variants [6, 34, 35], suggestive of a decline in R5 fitness. HIV-1 and SHIV viruses with a pure X4 phenotype generally have higher replication kinetics in vitro [60–64] and in vivo [65–68]. Coupled with the broader cellular host range of X4 viruses in vivo [69, 70], they are likely to out-compete R5 viruses once established. The decrease in the selective pressure for R5 viruses to maintain optimal replicative capacity and fitness with X4 emergence therefore, could be a reason for the decrease in entry efficiency and CCR5 utilization of R5 viruses in SHIV-infected macaques with pure X4 viruses. Nevertheless, R5 variants persist following the appearance of X4 viruses in these animals, perhaps because of their distinct target cell range [69, 70].
Transmitted/founder viruses in acute and early HIV-1 infection have been reported to be sCD4 resistant and to replicate poorly in monocyte-derived macrophages that express low levels of the CD4 receptor [3, 71, 72]. Neutralization resistance in vitro is often accompanied by an increase in HIV-1 dependence on CD4 for entry [73–75]. Indeed, founder viruses were shown to require high levels of CD4 for entry , which may explain their deficiency in infecting CD4low cells. Consistent with these findings in humans, viruses that are sCD4 resistant and infected primary macrophages less efficiently predominated during acute infection in R5 SHIVSF162P3N-infected RP macaques DE86, BT78, CC39 and DN57, and in the two RPs we previously studied , regardless of coreceptor switching. The exception was DG08, where the acute (w2) viruses were observed to be sCD4 sensitive but did not infect macrophages efficiently. This however, was rapidly replaced two weeks later by variants that are more resistant to sCD4, reinforcing the view that these viruses are selected for during primary infection. As this was observed despite intravenous inoculation (BR24, CA28, DE86, BT78, CC39) which circumvented mucosal barriers, and in macaques that failed to mount a strong humoral or cellular immune response, these factors are unlikely to be playing a role in the early expansion of sCD4-resistant viruses. We speculate that the abundance of target cells with high levels of cell surface CD4 expression in the new hosts maybe an underlying determinant for the expansion and propagation of viruses that are more dependent on CD4 for entry during acute SHIVSF162P3N infection in macaques and HIV-1 infection in humans. Further research on the importance of CD4 receptor density in HIV infection as well as the kinetics of virus replication in infected cells may help to understand the selective forces that govern the biological phenotype of HIV-1 transmitted founder viruses.
Enhanced infection of primary macrophages was seen in the RP macaques at end-stage disease irrespective of coreceptor switch, indicative of a strong selective pressure to replicate in cells with lower CD4 cell-surface expression levels over the infection course. Adaptation to macrophages has also be observed in SIV-infected RP macaques , and isolates from late in disease of HIV-1 infected individuals have been reported to be more macrophage-tropic compared to those from early in infection [78–80], suggestive of similar selection pressure in humans and rhesus monkeys. Presumably, as discussed above, ongoing virus replication in both hosts leads to loss in target cells (e.g., memory T cells) with high receptor expression levels, putting pressure on the virus to change so that it can use CD4 more efficiently to infect alternate CCR5+ cells such as macrophages that express low amounts of receptor. Infection-associated immune activation may also decrease receptor density, since CD4 is down-regulated with T-cell activation [81–83]. In RPs with coreceptor switch (BR24, CA28, DE86, DG08), infection of CD4low cells was achieved by adoption of a less constrained and more “open” Env conformation that exposes the CD4 binding site for better CD4 binding, allowing flexibility in accommodating the structural remodeling needed for the change in coreceptor preference. The V3 loop mutations that confer CXCR4 usage in R5 SHIVSF162P3N-infected RP monkeys and in HIV-1 infected individuals also render the virus sCD4 sensitive, consistent with the notion that improved CD4 binding is a necessary prerequisite for acquisition of CXCR4 use [23, 84, 85]. In RP macaques that did not switch, R5 viruses appeared to have evolved to compensate for inadequate CD4 binding by improving CCR5 usage and/or the requisite post-binding conformational changes for virus entry in response to non-optimal CD4. It is possible that given time, these latter macaques (e.g. BT78, CC39) could also adopt an “open” Env conformation to facilitate CD4 binding and infection of primary macrophages, setting the stage to tropism switch. Alternatively, the presence of host immune response may be a hindering factor. This is best illustrated in DN57, which, contrary to the other RP monkeys, mounted a persistent albeit weak anti-SHIV antibody response. R5 viruses evolved in this macaque to be highly sCD4 sensitive, with IC50 values comparable to those seen in DE86, suggestive of a similar strong selective pressure for better CD4 usage. The evolving R5 viruses in DN57 also infected macrophages efficiently, but this was not accompanied by a corresponding increase in CD4 binding that is indicative of exposure of the receptor binding site. Rather, the Envs in DN57 evolved to adapt to less-than-optimal CD4 density by changes in receptor and/or coreceptor contact, or by acquiring a higher propensity for proceeding to fusion. Thus, although the pressure to infect cell targets that express low levels of CD4 is present in SHIVSF162P3N-infected RP macaques regardless of coreceptor switch, the mechanisms employed to overcome this selective pressure vary depending on other conditions in the host.
In summary, our studies revealed an ordered process of phenotypic switch that is now recapitulated in four R5 SHIVSF162P3N-infected RPs. The data reinforce the view that an interplay between positive (e.g., magnitude of persistent virus replication, evolutionary rate, change in target cell population) and negative (e.g., host immune response) selection forces that differ between individual hosts and at different stages of the infection course governs how R5 viruses respond to the changing environment and shape the frequency of expansion or switch to CXCR4 use. Greater viral burden translates into a faster reduction in the target cell population, higher mutation frequencies of the virus populations and increased chances of X4 evolution. In the absence of immunological constraints in the RPs, and with the conferred selective advantage of expanding cellular host range, X4-associated changes become fixed and these viruses rapidly spread. Since an "open" Env conformation for improved CD4 binding and infection of CD4low cells also renders the virus more susceptible to antibody neutralization, our findings may explain the infrequent and late appearance of X4 virus in typical progressors of HIV-1 infection.
This work used blood from SHIV infected macaques housed at the Tulane National Primate Research Center (TNPRC) in accordance with the Animal Welfare Act and Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. TNPRC is accredited by the Association and Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC #00594). The OLAW animal welfare assurance number for TNPRC is A4499-01 and the USDA registration number is 72-R-002. All procedures were performed on anesthetized animals and post-operative analgesics were administered as needed in accordance with the Tulane IACUC approval.
293T cells and Hela TZM-bl cells expressing CD4, CCR5 and CXCR4 and containing integrated reporter genes for firefly luciferase and β-galactosidase under control of the HIV-1 LTR  were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FCS), 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin and 2 mM L-glutamine. Human peripheral mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were prepared by Ficoll gradient centrifugation, stimulated with phytohemagglutinin (PHA, 3 μg/ml; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in RPMI medium containing 10% FCS, penicillin, streptomycin, L-glutamine and 20 U/ml interleukin-2 (Norvatis, Emeryville, CA). Monocytes were enriched by centrifugation of PBMCs through a 40% percoll cushion followed by plastic adherence, and cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FCS and 5% human AB serum for 5-7 days to allow for differentiation into macrophages .
Detection of antiviral humoral response
SHIV-specific antibodies in serum samples were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (GS HIV-1/HIV-2 PLUS O EIA; Bio-Rad, Redmond, WA). This assay detects antibodies to HIV-1 gp160 and p24, and to the immunodominant region of the transmembrane glycoprotein gp36 of HIV-2. Optical density values at a 1:10 serum dilution that are three times above the cutoff value are considered positive.
Plasmid constructs and pseudotyped virus production
For expression of envelope glycoproteins (Env), viral RNA was prepared from 300-500 μl plasma using a commercially available RNA extraction kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA) followed by reverse-transcription (RT) with Superscript III RT (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and random hexamer primers (Amersham Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ). Full-length gp160 coding sequences were amplified from bulk RT products with primers SH43 (5′-AAGACAGAATTCATGAGAGTGAAGGGGATCAGGAAG-3′) and SH44 (5′-AGAGAGGGATCCTTATAGCAAAGCCCTTTCAAAGCCCT-3′), subcloned into the pCAGGS vector and sequenced for verification. To generate luciferase reporter viruses capable of only a single round of replication, envelope trans-complementation assay was used as previously described . Briefly, Env expression plasmid and the NL4.3LucE-R+ vector were cotransfected with polyethylenimine (PEI, Polyscience, Warrington, PA) into 2.5 × 106 293T cells plated in a 100-mm plate. Cell culture supernatants were harvested 72 hours later, filtered through 0.45-μm filters, and stored at -70°C in 1-ml aliquots. Pseudotyped viruses were quantified for p24 Gag content (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA).
For assessment of Env functionality and entry efficiency, 7 × 103 TZM-bl cells were seeded in 96-well plates 24 hours before use and infected, in triplicates, with 2 ng p24 Gag equivalent of the indicated pseudotyped viruses. Infected cells were cultured for 72 h at 37°C, at which time the cells were harvested, lysed and processed for luciferase activity according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Luciferase Assay System; Promega, Madison, WI). Entry, as quantified by luciferase activity, was measured with an MLX microtiter plate luminometer (Dynex Technologies, Inc., Chantilly, VA). For infection of primary cells, 105 and 106 cells of human PBMCs and macrophage respectively were infected in duplicates with 5 ng p24 Gag equivalent of the indicated pseudotyped viruses in each well of a 96-well plate. Infected cultures were harvested 72 hours later and processed for luciferase activity. To control for differences in Env entry efficiencies, infectivity in macrophages was expressed as a ratio of the infectivity for these cells compared to the infectivity in PBMCs from the same donor.
Receptor and coreceptor usage efficiency
For assessment of receptor usage efficiency, 2 ng p24 equivalent of the indicated pseudotyped viruses in 50 μl were incubated with equal 4-fold serial dilution volumes of CD4-IgG2 fusion protein (sCD4; PRO 542, Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY) for 1 h at 37°C and then added to cells, in duplicate wells, for an additional 2 hours at 37°C. 100 μl of medium was then added to each well and the virus-protein cultures maintained for 72 hours. Control cultures received virus in the absence of sCD4. At the end of the culture period, the cells were lysed and processed for β-galactosidase activity (Galacto-Star System; Applied Biosystems, Bedford, MA). A neutralization curve was generated by plotting the percentage of neutralization vs sCD4 dilution, and 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50) were determined using the Prism 4 software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). For assessment of coreceptor usage efficiency, 7 × 103 TZM-bl cells per well of a 96-well plate were inoculated, in duplicates, with 2 ng p24 Gag antigen equivalent of the indicated pseudotyped virus in the absence or presence of 4-fold dilutions of the CCR5 antagonist PSC-RANTES. The cells were lysed after 72 hours at 37°C, processed for β-galactosidase activity, and IC50 determined using the Prism 4 software.
Soluble gp120-CD4-Ig binding
To examine monomeric gp120-CD4 binding, gp120 glycoproteins from transfected 293T cells were metabolically radiolabeled for 48 hours with 100 μCi/mL [35S]-methionine/cysteine ([35S] protein labeling mix; Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, Mass) in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium lacking methionine and cysteine and supplemented with 5% dialyzed fetal bovine serum. Radiolabeled protein extracts were incubated with either a mixture of sera from HIV-1 infected individuals or CD4-Ig (a fusion protein in which the N-terminal two domains of CD4 are linked to the Fc component of immunoglobulin G ) in the presence of 70 μl of 10% Protein A-Sepharose (American BioSciences Inc, Boulder, CO) for 2 hr at 37ºC. The precipitates were analyzed on NuPAGE Novex Bis-Tris polyacrylamide gels (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), followed by autoradiography and quantification with a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).
Virus neutralization was assessed using TZM-bl cells in 96-well plates. Briefly, equal volumes (50 μl) of pseudotyped viruses (2-3 ng p24 Gag equivalent) and 4-fold serial dilutions of IgG1b12, 443-52D and T20 were incubated for 1 h at 37°C and then added to cells, in duplicate wells, for an additional 2 hours at 37°C. 100 μl of medium was then added to each well and the virus-protein cultures maintained for 72 hours. Control cultures received virus in the absence of blocking agent. At the end of the culture period, the cells were lysed and processed for β-galactosidase activity. A neutralization curve was generated by plotting the percentage of neutralization vs agent dilution, and IC50 determined using the Prism 4 software.
The Mann-Whitney U or unpaired T test was used to evaluate differences in susceptibility to sCD4, 1b12, 447-52D and T20; binding of gp120 to CD4-Ig; and infection of macrophages between the early (w2-4) and the evolving R5 viruses. These tests were also used to examine differences in cumulative viral load between RPs with and without coreceptor switch. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
We thank William Olsen for PRO542, Oliver Hartley for PSC-RANTES, Dennis Burton and Susan Zolla-Pazner for the IgGb12 and 447-52D antibody, respectively, Shibo Jiang for T20, and Hiroshi Mohri for help with statistical analysis. TZM-bl cells (catalog no. 8129 from John C Kappes, Xiaoyun Wu and Tranzyme, Inc.) were obtained through the NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, Division of AIDS, NIAID, NIH. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grants RO1AI084765.
- Berger EA, Murphy PM, Farber JM: Chemokine receptors as HIV-1 coreceptors: roles in viral entry, tropism, and disease. Annu Rev Immunol. 1999, 17: 657-700. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.17.1.657.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Keele BF, Giorgi EE, Salazar-Gonzalez JF, Decker JM, Pham KT, Salazar MG, Sun C, Grayson T, Wang S, Li H, et al: Identification and characterization of transmitted and early founder virus envelopes in primary HIV-1 infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008, 105: 7552-7557. 10.1073/pnas.0802203105.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Salazar-Gonzalez JF, Salazar MG, Keele BF, Learn GH, Giorgi EE, Li H, Decker JM, Wang S, Baalwa J, Kraus MH, et al: Genetic identity, biological phenotype, and evolutionary pathways of transmitted/founder viruses in acute and early HIV-1 infection. J Exp Med. 2009, 206: 1273-1289. 10.1084/jem.20090378.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li H, Bar KJ, Wang S, Decker JM, Chen Y, Sun C, Salazar-Gonzalez JF, Salazar MG, Learn GH, Morgan CJ, et al: High multiplicity infection by HIV-1 in Men who have sex with Men. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6: e1000890-10.1371/journal.ppat.1000890.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koot M, Keet IP, Vos AH, de Goede RE, Roos MT, Coutinho RA, Miedema F, Schellekens PT, Tersmette M: Prognostic value of HIV-1 syncytium-inducing phenotype for rate of CD4+ cell depletion and progression to AIDS. Ann Intern Med. 1993, 118: 681-688.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scarlatti G, Tresoldi E, Bjorndal A, Fredriksson R, Colognesi C, Deng HK, Malnati MS, Plebani A, Siccardi AG, Littman DR, et al: In vivo evolution of HIV-1 co-receptor usage and sensitivity to chemokine-mediated suppression. Nat Med. 1997, 3: 1259-1265. 10.1038/nm1197-1259.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cocchi F, DeVico AL, Garzino-Demo A, Cara A, Gallo RC, Lusso P: The V3 domain of the HIV-1 gp120 envelope glycoprotein is critical for chemokine-mediated blockade of infection. Nat Med. 1996, 2: 1244-1247. 10.1038/nm1196-1244.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fouchier RA, Groenink M, Kootstra NA, Tersmette M, Huisman HG, Miedema F, Schuitemaker H: Phenotype-associated sequence variation in the third variable domain of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120 molecule. J Virol. 1992, 66: 3183-3187.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moore JP, Kitchen SG, Pugach P, Zack JA: The CCR5 and CXCR4 coreceptors–central to understanding the transmission and pathogenesis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2004, 20: 111-126. 10.1089/088922204322749567.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Regoes RR, Bonhoeffer S: The HIV coreceptor switch: a population dynamical perspective. Trends Microbiol. 2005, 13: 269-277. 10.1016/j.tim.2005.04.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gulick RM, Su Z, Flexner C, Hughes MD, Skolnik PR, Wilkin TJ, Gross R, Krambrink A, Coakley E, Greaves WL, et al: Phase 2 study of the safety and efficacy of vicriviroc, a CCR5 inhibitor, in HIV-1-Infected, treatment-experienced patients: AIDS clinical trials group 5211. J Infect Dis. 2007, 196: 304-312. 10.1086/518797.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lalezari J, Thompson M, Kumar P, Piliero P, Davey R, Patterson K, Shachoy-Clark A, Adkison K, Demarest J, Lou Y, et al: Antiviral activity and safety of 873140, a novel CCR5 antagonist, during short-term monotherapy in HIV-infected adults. AIDS. 2005, 19: 1443-1448. 10.1097/01.aids.0000183633.06580.8a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Westby M, Lewis M, Whitcomb J, Youle M, Pozniak AL, James IT, Jenkins TM, Perros M, van der Ryst E: Emergence of CXCR4-using human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) variants in a minority of HIV-1-infected patients following treatment with the CCR5 antagonist maraviroc is from a pretreatment CXCR4-using virus reservoir. J Virol. 2006, 80: 4909-4920. 10.1128/JVI.80.10.4909-4920.2006.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saag M, Goodrich J, Fatkenheuer G, Clotet B, Clumeck N, Sullivan J, Westby M, van der Ryst E, Mayer H: A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of maraviroc in treatment-experienced patients infected with non-R5 HIV-1. J Infect Dis. 2009, 199: 1638-1647. 10.1086/598965.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilkin TJ, Su Z, Krambrink A, Long J, Greaves W, Gross R, Hughes MD, Flexner C, Skolnik PR, Coakley E, et al: Three-year safety and efficacy of vicriviroc, a CCR5 antagonist, in HIV-1-infected treatment-experienced patients. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010, 54: 470-476. 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181e2cba0.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ho SH, Tasca S, Shek L, Li A, Gettie A, Blanchard J, Boden D, Cheng-Mayer C: Coreceptor switch in R5-tropic simian/human immunodeficiency virus-infected macaques. J Virol. 2007, 81: 8621-8633. 10.1128/JVI.00759-07.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ren W, Tasca S, Zhuang K, Gettie A, Blanchard J, Cheng-Mayer C: Different tempo and anatomic location of dual-tropic and X4 virus emergence in a model of R5 simian-human immunodeficiency virus infection. J Virol. 2010, 84: 340-351. 10.1128/JVI.01865-09.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shakirzyanova M, Tsai L, Ren W, Gettie A, Blanchard J, Cheng-Mayer C: Pathogenic consequences of vaginal infection with CCR5-tropic SHIVSF162P3N. J Virol. 2012, 86: 9432-42. 10.1128/JVI.00852-12.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Jong JJ, De Ronde A, Keulen W, Tersmette M, Goudsmit J: Minimal requirements for the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 V3 domain to support the syncytium-inducing phenotype: analysis by single amino acid substitution. J Virol. 1992, 66: 6777-6780.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Speck RF, Wehrly K, Platt EJ, Atchison RE, Charo IF, Kabat D, Chesebro B, Goldsmith MA: Selective employment of chemokine receptors as human immunodeficiency virus type 1 coreceptors determined by individual amino acids within the envelope V3 loop. J Virol. 1997, 71: 7136-7139.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kuiken CL, de Jong JJ, Baan E, Keulen W, Tersmette M, Goudsmit J: Evolution of the V3 envelope domain in proviral sequences and isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 during transition of the viral biological phenotype. J Virol. 1992, 66: 4622-4627.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pastore C, Ramos A, Mosier DE: Intrinsic obstacles to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 coreceptor switching. J Virol. 2004, 78: 7565-7574. 10.1128/JVI.78.14.7565-7574.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tasca S, Ho SH, Cheng-Mayer C: R5X4 viruses are evolutionary, functional, and antigenic intermediates in the pathway of a simian-human immunodeficiency virus coreceptor switch. J Virol. 2008, 82: 7089-7099. 10.1128/JVI.00570-08.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shakirzyanova M, Ren W, Zhuang K, Tasca S, Cheng-Mayer C: Fitness disadvantage of transitional intermediates contributes to dynamic change in the infecting-virus population during coreceptor switch in R5 simian/human immunodeficiency virus-infected macaques. J Virol. 2010, 84: 12862-12871. 10.1128/JVI.01478-10.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koot M, Van Leeuwen R, De Goede RE, Keet IP, Danner S, Eeftinck Schattenkerk JK, Reiss P, Tersmette M, Lange JM, Schuitemaker H: Conversion rate towards a syncytium-inducing (SI) phenotype during different stages of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection and prognostic value of SI phenotype for survival after AIDS diagnosis. J Infect Dis. 1999, 179: 254-258. 10.1086/314539.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Casper C, Naver L, Clevestig P, Belfrage E, Leitner T, Albert J, Lindgren S, Ottenblad C, Bohlin AB, Fenyo EM, Ehrnst A: Coreceptor change appears after immune deficiency is established in children infected with different HIV-1 subtypes. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2002, 18: 343-352. 10.1089/088922202753519124.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Richman DD, Bozzette SA: The impact of the syncytium-inducing phenotype of human immunodeficiency virus on disease progression. J Infect Dis. 1994, 169: 968-974. 10.1093/infdis/169.5.968.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bunnik EM, Quakkelaar ED, van Nuenen AC, Boeser-Nunnink B, Schuitemaker H: Increased neutralization sensitivity of recently emerged CXCR4-using human immunodeficiency virus type 1 strains compared to coexisting CCR5-using variants from the same patient. J Virol. 2007, 81: 525-531. 10.1128/JVI.01983-06.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nabatov AA, Pollakis G, Linnemann T, Kliphius A, Chalaby MI, Paxton WA: Intrapatient alterations in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120 V1V2 and V3 regions differentially modulate coreceptor usage, virus inhibition by CC/CXC chemokines, soluble CD4, and the b12 and 2G12 monoclonal antibodies. J Virol. 2004, 78: 524-530. 10.1128/JVI.78.1.524-530.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhuang K, Finzi A, Tasca S, Shakirzyanova M, Knight H, Westmoreland S, Sodroski J, Cheng-Mayer C: Adoption of an "open" envelope conformation facilitating CD4 binding and structural remodeling precedes coreceptor switch in R5 SHIV-infected macaques. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e21350-10.1371/journal.pone.0021350.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kolchinsky P, Kiprilov E, Sodroski J: Increased neutralization sensitivity of CD4-independent human immunodeficiency virus variants. J Virol. 2001, 75: 2041-2050. 10.1128/JVI.75.5.2041-2050.2001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reeves JD, Gallo SA, Ahmad N, Miamidian JL, Harvey PE, Sharron M, Pohlmann S, Sfakianos JN, Derdeyn CA, Blumenthal R, et al: Sensitivity of HIV-1 to entry inhibitors correlates with envelope/coreceptor affinity, receptor density, and fusion kinetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 16249-16254. 10.1073/pnas.252469399.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ho SH, Trunova N, Gettie A, Blanchard J, Cheng-Mayer C: Different mutational pathways to CXCR4 coreceptor switch of CCR5-using simian-human immunodeficiency virus. J Virol. 2008, 82: 5653-5656. 10.1128/JVI.00145-08.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Low AJ, Marchant D, Brumme CJ, Brumme ZL, Dong W, Sing T, Hogg RS, Montaner JS, Gill V, Cheung PK, Harrigan PR: CD4-dependent characteristics of coreceptor use and HIV type 1 V3 sequence in a large population of therapy-naive individuals. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2008, 24: 219-228. 10.1089/aid.2007.0140.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Coetzer M, Nedellec R, Salkowitz J, McLaughlin S, Liu Y, Heath L, Mullins JI, Mosier DE: Evolution of CCR5 use before and during coreceptor switching. J Virol. 2008, 82: 11758-11766. 10.1128/JVI.01141-08.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huang W, Toma J, Fransen S, Stawiski E, Reeves JD, Whitcomb JM, Parkin N, Petropoulos CJ: Coreceptor tropism can be influenced by amino acid substitutions in the gp41 transmembrane subunit of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope protein. J Virol. 2008, 82: 5584-5593. 10.1128/JVI.02676-07.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jansson M, Popovic M, Karlsson A, Cocchi F, Rossi P, Albert J, Wigzell H: Sensitivity to inhibition by beta-chemokines correlates with biological phenotypes of primary HIV-1 isolates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996, 93: 15382-15387. 10.1073/pnas.93.26.15382.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koning FA, Kwa D, Boeser-Nunnink B, Dekker J, Vingerhoed J, Hiemstra H, Schuitemaker H: Decreasing sensitivity to RANTES (regulated on activation, normally T cell-expressed and -secreted) neutralization of CC chemokine receptor 5-using, non-syncytium-inducing virus variants in the course of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J Infect Dis. 2003, 188: 864-872. 10.1086/377105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karlsson I, Antonsson L, Shi Y, Oberg M, Karlsson A, Albert J, Olde B, Owman C, Jansson M, Fenyo EM: Coevolution of RANTES sensitivity and mode of CCR5 receptor use by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 of the R5 phenotype. J Virol. 2004, 78: 11807-11815. 10.1128/JVI.78.21.11807-11815.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Repits J, Oberg M, Esbjornsson J, Medstrand P, Karlsson A, Albert J, Fenyo EM, Jansson M: Selection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 R5 variants with augmented replicative capacity and reduced sensitivity to entry inhibitors during severe immunodeficiency. J Gen Virol. 2005, 86: 2859-2869. 10.1099/vir.0.81111-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Etemad B, Fellows A, Kwambana B, Kamat A, Feng Y, Lee S, Sagar M: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 V1-to-V5 envelope variants from the chronic phase of infection use CCR5 and fuse more efficiently than those from early after infection. J Virol. 2009, 83: 9694-9708. 10.1128/JVI.00925-09.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Orloff SL, Kennedy MS, Belperron AA, Maddon PJ, McDougal JS: Two mechanisms of soluble CD4 (sCD4)-mediated inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infectivity and their relation to primary HIV-1 isolates with reduced sensitivity to sCD4. J Virol. 1993, 67: 1461-1471.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moore JP, McKeating JA, Huang YX, Ashkenazi A, Ho DD: Virions of primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates resistant to soluble CD4 (sCD4) neutralization differ in sCD4 binding and glycoprotein gp120 retention from sCD4-sensitive isolates. J Virol. 1992, 66: 235-243.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thali M, Furman C, Helseth E, Repke H, Sodroski J: Lack of correlation between soluble CD4-induced shedding of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 exterior envelope glycoprotein and subsequent membrane fusion events. J Virol. 1992, 66: 5516-5524.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stamatatos L, Werner A, Cheng-Mayer C: Differential regulation of cellular tropism and sensitivity to soluble CD4 neutralization by the envelope gp120 of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol. 1994, 68: 4973-4979.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haim H, Si Z, Madani N, Wang L, Courter JR, Princiotto A, Kassa A, DeGrace M, McGee-Estrada K, Mefford M, et al: Soluble CD4 and CD4-mimetic compounds inhibit HIV-1 infection by induction of a short-lived activated state. PLoS Pathog. 2009, 5: e1000360-10.1371/journal.ppat.1000360.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kabat D, Kozak SL, Wehrly K, Chesebro B: Differences in CD4 dependence for infectivity of laboratory-adapted and primary patient isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol. 1994, 68: 2570-2577.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Platt EJ, Wehrly K, Kuhmann SE, Chesebro B, Kabat D: Effects of CCR5 and CD4 cell surface concentrations on infections by macrophagetropic isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol. 1998, 72: 2855-2864.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mori K, Rosenzweig M, Desrosiers RC: Mechanisms for adaptation of simian immunodeficiency virus to replication in alveolar macrophages. J Virol. 2000, 74: 10852-10859. 10.1128/JVI.74.22.10852-10859.2000.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mori K, Ringler DJ, Desrosiers RC: Restricted replication of simian immunodeficiency virus strain 239 in macrophages is determined by env but is not due to restricted entry. J Virol. 1993, 67: 2807-2814.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tasca S, Zhuang K, Gettie A, Knight H, Blanchard J, Westmoreland S, Cheng-Mayer C: Effect of B-cell depletion on coreceptor switching in R5 simian-human immunodeficiency virus infection of rhesus macaques. J Virol. 2011, 85: 3086-3094. 10.1128/JVI.02150-10.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bozzette SA, McCutchan JA, Spector SA, Wright B, Richman DD: A cross-sectional comparison of persons with syncytium- and non-syncytium-inducing human immunodeficiency virus. J Infect Dis. 1993, 168: 1374-1379. 10.1093/infdis/168.6.1374.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brumme ZL, Goodrich J, Mayer HB, Brumme CJ, Henrick BM, Wynhoven B, Asselin JJ, Cheung PK, Hogg RS, Montaner JS, Harrigan PR: Molecular and clinical epidemiology of CXCR4-using HIV-1 in a large population of antiretroviral-naive individuals. J Infect Dis. 2005, 192: 466-474. 10.1086/431519.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Furrer H, Wendland T, Minder C, Christen A, von Overbeck J, Grunow R, Pichler W, Malinverni RP: Association of syncytium-inducing phenotype of HIV-1 with CD4 cell count, viral load and sociodemographic characteristics. AIDS. 1998, 12: 1341-1346. 10.1097/00002030-199811000-00016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Melby T, Despirito M, Demasi R, Heilek-Snyder G, Greenberg ML, Graham N: HIV-1 coreceptor use in triple-class treatment-experienced patients: baseline prevalence, correlates, and relationship to enfuvirtide response. J Infect Dis. 2006, 194: 238-246. 10.1086/504693.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilkin TJ, Su Z, Kuritzkes DR, Hughes M, Flexner C, Gross R, Coakley E, Greaves W, Godfrey C, Skolnik PR, et al: HIV type 1 chemokine coreceptor use among antiretroviral-experienced patients screened for a clinical trial of a CCR5 inhibitor: AIDS Clinical Trial Group A5211. Clinical infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2007, 44: 591-595. 10.1086/511035.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moyle GJ, Wildfire A, Mandalia S, Mayer H, Goodrich J, Whitcomb J, Gazzard BG: Epidemiology and predictive factors for chemokine receptor use in HIV-1 infection. J Infect Dis. 2005, 191: 866-872. 10.1086/428096.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Rij RP, Hazenberg MD, van Benthem BH, Otto SA, Prins M, Miedema F, Schuitemaker H: Early viral load and CD4+ T cell count, but not percentage of CCR5+ or CXCR4+ CD4+ T cells, are associated with R5-to-X4 HIV type 1 virus evolution. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2003, 19: 389-398. 10.1089/088922203765551737.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kassaye S, Johnston E, McColgan B, Kantor R, Zijenah L, Katzenstein D: Envelope coreceptor tropism, drug resistance, and viral evolution among subtype C HIV-1-infected individuals receiving nonsuppressive antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009, 50: 9-18. 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31818ffdff.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wout AB V't, Blaak H, Ran LJ, Brouwer M, Kuiken C, Schuitemaker H: Evolution of syncytium-inducing and non-syncytium-inducing biological virus clones in relation to replication kinetics during the course of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J Virol. 1998, 72: 5099-5107.Google Scholar
- Asjo B, Morfeldt-Manson L, Albert J, Biberfeld G, Karlsson A, Lidman K, Fenyo EM: Replicative capacity of human immunodeficiency virus from patients with varying severity of HIV infection. Lancet. 1986, 2: 660-662.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Connor RI, Mohri H, Cao Y, Ho DD: Increased viral burden and cytopathicity correlate temporally with CD4+ T-lymphocyte decline and clinical progression in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected individuals. J Virol. 1993, 67: 1772-1777.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cheng-Mayer C, Seto D, Tateno M, Levy JA: Biologic features of HIV-1 that correlate with virulence in the host. Science. 1988, 240: 80-82. 10.1126/science.2832945.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harouse JM, Tan RC, Gettie A, Dailey P, Marx PA, Luciw PA, Cheng-Mayer C: In vitro infection of primate PBMC with simian/human immunodeficiency virus, SHIV(SF33A): correlation to in vivo outcome. J Med Primatol. 1998, 27: 81-86. 10.1111/j.1600-0684.1998.tb00230.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Igarashi T, Endo Y, Englund G, Sadjadpour R, Matano T, Buckler C, Buckler-White A, Plishka R, Theodore T, Shibata R, Martin M: Emergence of a highly pathogenic simian/human immunodeficiency virus in a rhesus macaque treated with anti-CD8 mAb during a primary infection with a nonpathogenic virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96: 14049-14054. 10.1073/pnas.96.24.14049.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Joag SV, Li Z, Foresman L, Stephens EB, Zhao LJ, Adany I, Pinson DM, McClure HM, Narayan O: Chimeric simian/human immunodeficiency virus that causes progressive loss of CD4+ T cells and AIDS in pig-tailed macaques. J Virol. 1996, 70: 3189-3197.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reimann KA, Li JT, Veazey R, Halloran M, Park IW, Karlsson GB, Sodroski J, Letvin NL: A chimeric simian/human immunodeficiency virus expressing a primary patient human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolate env causes an AIDS-like disease after in vivo passage in rhesus monkeys. J Virol. 1996, 70: 6922-6928.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harouse JM, Buckner C, Gettie A, Fuller R, Bohm R, Blanchard J, Cheng-Mayer C: CD8+ T cell-mediated CXC chemokine receptor 4-simian/human immunodeficiency virus suppression in dually infected rhesus macaques. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 10977-10982. 10.1073/pnas.1933268100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ho SH, Shek L, Gettie A, Blanchard J, Cheng-Mayer C: V3 loop-determined coreceptor preference dictates the dynamics of CD4+-T-cell loss in simian-human immunodeficiency virus-infected macaques. J Virol. 2005, 79: 12296-12303. 10.1128/JVI.79.19.12296-12303.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nishimura Y, Igarashi T, Donau OK, Buckler-White A, Buckler C, Lafont BA, Goeken RM, Goldstein S, Hirsch VM, Martin MA: Highly pathogenic SHIVs and SIVs target different CD4+ T cell subsets in rhesus monkeys, explaining their divergent clinical courses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 12324-12329. 10.1073/pnas.0404620101.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Isaacman-Beck J, Hermann EA, Yi Y, Ratcliffe SJ, Mulenga J, Allen S, Hunter E, Derdeyn CA, Collman RG: Heterosexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype C: Macrophage tropism, alternative coreceptor use, and the molecular anatomy of CCR5 utilization. J Virol. 2009, 83: 8208-8220. 10.1128/JVI.00296-09.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ochsenbauer C, Edmonds TG, Ding H, Keele BF, Decker J, Salazar MG, Salazar-Gonzalez JF, Shattock R, Haynes BF, Shaw GM, et al: Generation of transmitted/founder HIV-1 infectious molecular clones and characterization of their replication capacity in CD4 T lymphocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages. J Virol. 2012, 86: 2715-2728. 10.1128/JVI.06157-11.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kozak SL, Platt EJ, Madani N, Ferro FE, Peden K, Kabat D: CD4, CXCR-4, and CCR-5 dependencies for infections by primary patient and laboratory-adapted isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol. 1997, 71: 873-882.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Platt EJ, Madani N, Kozak SL, Kabat D: Infectious properties of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 mutants with distinct affinities for the CD4 receptor. J Virol. 1997, 71: 883-890.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sullivan N, Sun Y, Sattentau Q, Thali M, Wu D, Denisova G, Gershoni J, Robinson J, Moore J, Sodroski J: CD4-Induced conformational changes in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120 glycoprotein: consequences for virus entry and neutralization. J Virol. 1998, 72: 4694-4703.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alexander M, Lynch R, Mulenga J, Allen S, Derdeyn CA, Hunter E: Donor and recipient envs from heterosexual human immunodeficiency virus subtype C transmission pairs require high receptor levels for entry. J Virol. 2010, 84: 4100-4104. 10.1128/JVI.02068-09.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brown CR, Czapiga M, Kabat J, Dang Q, Ourmanov I, Nishimura Y, Martin MA, Hirsch VM: Unique pathology in simian immunodeficiency virus-infected rapid progressor macaques is consistent with a pathogenesis distinct from that of classical AIDS. J Virol. 2007, 81: 5594-5606. 10.1128/JVI.00202-07.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gray L, Sterjovski J, Churchill M, Ellery P, Nasr N, Lewin SR, Crowe SM, Wesselingh SL, Cunningham AL, Gorry PR: Uncoupling coreceptor usage of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) from macrophage tropism reveals biological properties of CCR5-restricted HIV-1 isolates from patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Virology. 2005, 337: 384-398. 10.1016/j.virol.2005.04.034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li S, Juarez J, Alali M, Dwyer D, Collman R, Cunningham A, Naif HM: Persistent CCR5 utilization and enhanced macrophage tropism by primary blood human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates from advanced stages of disease and comparison to tissue-derived isolates. J Virol. 1999, 73: 9741-9755.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tuttle DL, Anders CB, Aquino-De Jesus MJ, Poole PP, Lamers SL, Briggs DR, Pomeroy SM, Alexander L, Peden KW, Andiman WA, et al: Increased replication of non-syncytium-inducing HIV type 1 isolates in monocyte-derived macrophages is linked to advanced disease in infected children. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2002, 18: 353-362. 10.1089/088922202753519133.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ebert LM, McColl SR: Up-regulation of CCR5 and CCR6 on distinct subpopulations of antigen-activated CD4+ T lymphocytes. J Immunol. 2002, 168: 65-72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weyand CM, Goronzy J, Fathman CG: Modulation of CD4 by antigenic activation. J Immunol. 1987, 138: 1351-1354.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paillard F, Sterkers G, Vaquero C: Transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of TcR, CD4 and CD8 gene expression during activation of normal human T lymphocytes. EMBO J. 1990, 9: 1867-1872.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hwang SS, Boyle TJ, Lyerly HK, Cullen BR: Identification of envelope V3 loop as the major determinant of CD4 neutralization sensitivity of HIV-1. Science. 1992, 257: 535-537. 10.1126/science.1636088.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- O'Brien WA, Chen IS, Ho DD, Daar ES: Mapping genetic determinants for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 resistance to soluble CD4. J Virol. 1992, 66: 3125-3130.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wei X, Decker JM, Liu H, Zhang Z, Arani RB, Kilby JM, Saag MS, Wu X, Shaw GM, Kappes JC: Emergence of resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in patients receiving fusion inhibitor (T-20) monotherapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002, 46: 1896-1905. 10.1128/AAC.46.6.1896-1905.2002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ho SH, Martin F, Higginbottom A, Partridge LJ, Parthasarathy V, Moseley GW, Lopez P, Cheng-Mayer C, Monk PN: Recombinant extracellular domains of tetraspanin proteins are potent inhibitors of the infection of macrophages by human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol. 2006, 80: 6487-6496. 10.1128/JVI.02539-05.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Connor RI, Chen BK, Choe S, Landau NR: Vpr is required for efficient replication of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 in mononuclear phagocytes. Virology. 1995, 206: 935-944. 10.1006/viro.1995.1016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chowdhury IH, Koyanagi Y, Takamatsu K, Yoshida O, Kobayashi S, Yamamoto N: Evaluation of anti-human immunodeficiency virus effect of recombinant CD4-immunoglobulin in vitro: a good candidate for AIDS treatment. Medical microbiology and immunology. 1991, 180: 183-192.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.