Skip to main content

Table 1 Codeml analyses using site-specific models.

From: Patterns of evolution of host proteins involved in retroviral pathogenesis

TRIM5α

Site-specific Modelsa

ω0b

ω1c

ω2d

LogL

Sites with ω > 1 e

C: M1a

0.00 (34.91%)

1.00 (65.09%)

 

-4117.12

 

D: M2a

0.00 (26.04%)

1.00 (61.67%)

6.37* (12.29%)

-4087.97

11 sites

APOBEC3G

Site-specific Models

ω0

ω1

ω2

LogL

Sites with ω > 1

C: M1a

0.03 (37.56%)

1.00 (62.44%)

 

-4187.55

 

D: M2a

0.00 (28.28%)

1.00 (48.60%)

4.40* (23.11%)

-4148.85

24 sites

TRIM19 (PML)

Site-specific Models

ω0

ω1

ω2

LogL

Sites with ω > 1

C: M1a

0.09 (91.47%)

1.00 (8.53%)

 

-5215.40

 

D: M2a

0.11 (97.25%)

1.00 (0.00%)

2.5 (2.75%)

-5214.46

n/a f

PPIA (Cyclophilin A)

Site-specific Models

ω0

ω1

ω2

LogL

Sites with ω > 1

C: M1a

0.05 (100%)

1.00 (0%)

 

-751.04

 

D: M2a

0.05 (100%)

1.00 (0.00%)

1.00 (0.00%)

-751.04

n/a f

  1. a the likelihood models used are described in the text
  2. b class of sites under purifying selection
  3. c class of sites evolving neutrally
  4. d class of sites that may show KA/KS > 1
  5. e sites pinpointed to be under positive selection by Bayes Empirical Bayes analysis
  6. f test not applicable (M1a and M2a not significantly different)