Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of viral infections of samhd1 KO and wild-type mice and derived cells [12, 13]

From: SAMHD1 knockout mice: modeling retrovirus restriction in vivo

 

Rehwinkel et al. [[12]]

Behrendt et al. [[13]]

In vitro HIV-1 vector infection of cells from samhd1 KO mice compared with wild-type mice

• No effect on the infectivity of HIV-1 vector (wild-type RT) at 1–2 dpi*

5-fold increase of HIV-1 RT mutant (V148I) vector infection in BM-DC, BM-DMs, and MEFs

• ~5-fold increased infectivity of HIV-1 vector (wild-type RT) in BM-DCs at 3 dpi*

Likely dependent on HIV-1 vector strains

In vivo HIV-1 vector transduction of samhd1 KO mice compared with wild-type mice

Effects on HIV-1 vector transduction

• No effect on HIV-1 vector (wild-type RT) at 5–6 dpi*

3-8-fold increase of HIV-1 RT mutant (V148I) in multiple cell types at 5–6 dpi*

• ~4-fold increased HIV-1 vector transduction (wild-type RT) in multiple cell types at 3 dpi*

HIV-1 viral vector used

• pRRLsin.eGFP/ pCMVΔ8.2 vector (encoding Vif, Vpr, Vpu, and Nef)

HIV-1-based pCSGW/ p8.91 vector (no accessory genes)

• HIV-1NL4-3 based GFP reporter vector (pHR.CMVGFP/

pCMVDR8.91)

Amount of HIV-1 vector injected

• Intravenously with 5 × 107 or 1 × 108 293T cell infectious units

• Intravenously with 5 × 106 viral particles

Exogenous Mo-MLV replication

No effect

ND#

Friend virus infection (a type of MLV)

ND#

No effect

Endogenous Mo-MLV replication or mouse retrotransposons

No effect

ND#

Encephalomyocarditis virus infection (a mouse RNA virus that induces IFNα)

No effect

ND#

  1. *dpi, days post-infection; #ND: not done.