Volume 6 Supplement 2

Frontiers of Retrovirology: Complex retroviruses, retroelements and their hosts

Open Access

Analysis of LEDGF/p75 expression regulation

  • Sébastien Desfarges1,
  • Pascal Roulin1,
  • Marie-Laurence Moraz1,
  • Beatriz Hernàndez-Novoa1,
  • Miguel Munoz1 and
  • Angela Ciuffi1
Retrovirology20096(Suppl 2):O20

DOI: 10.1186/1742-4690-6-S2-O20

Published: 24 September 2009

Background

To replicate, retroviruses must insert DNA copies of their RNA genomes into the host genome. This integration process is catalyzed by the viral integrase protein. The site of viral integration has been shown to be non-random and retrovirus-specific. LEDGF/p75, a splice variant encoded by PSIP1 gene and described as a general transcription coactivator, was identified as a tethering factor binding both to chromatin and to lentiviral integrases, thereby affecting integration efficiency as well as integration site selection. LEDGF/p75 is still a poorly characterized protein, and its cellular endogenous function has yet to be fully determined. In order to start unveiling the roles of LEDGF/p75 in the cell, we started to investigate the mechanisms involved in the regulation of LEDGF/p75.

Materials and methods

To identify PSIP1 minimal promoter and associated regulatory elements, we cloned a region starting 5 kb upstream the transcription start site (TSS, +1 reference position) to the ATG start codon (+816), as well as systematic truncations, in a plasmid containing the firefly luciferase reporter gene. These constructs were co-transfected into HEK293 cells with a plasmid encoding the Renilla luciferase under the pTK promoter as an internal control for transfection efficiency. Both luciferase activities were assessed by luminescence as an indicator of promoter activity.

Results

Luciferase assays identified regions -76 to +1 and +1 to +94 as two independent minimal promoters showing respectively a 3.7x and 2.3x increase in luciferase activity. These two independent minimal promoters worked synergistically increasing luciferase activity up to 16.3x as compared to background. Moreover, we identified five regulatory blocks which modulated luciferase activity depending on the DNA region tested, three enhancers (-2007 to -1159, -284 to -171 and +94 to +644) and two silencers (-171 to -76 and +796 to +816). However, the silencing effect of the region -171 to -76 is dependent on the presence of the +94 to +644 region, ruling out the enhancer activity of the latter. Computational analysis of PSIP1 promoter revealed the absence of TATA box and initiator (INR) sequences, classifying this promoter as non-conventional. TATA-less and INR-less promoters are characterized by multiple Sp1 binding sites, involved in the recruitment of the RNA pol II complex. Consistent with this, PSIP1 promoter contains multiple putative Sp1 binding sequences in regions -76 to +1 and +1 to +94.

Conclusion

Based on these data, we proposed a model for PSIP1 promoter activity involving a complex interplay between yet undefined regulatory elements to modulate gene expression.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Microbiology, University Hospital Center and University of Lausanne

Copyright

© Desfarges et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.

Comments

Advertisement