Open Access

Reservoir cells no longer detectable after a heterologous SHIV challenge with the synthetic HIV-1 Tat Oyi vaccine

  • Jennifer D Watkins1,
  • Sophie Lancelot1,
  • Grant R Campbell3,
  • Didier Esquieu2,
  • Jean de Mareuil1,
  • Sandrine Opi4,
  • Sylvie Annappa2,
  • Jean-Pierre Salles2 and
  • Erwann P Loret1Email author
Retrovirology20063:8

DOI: 10.1186/1742-4690-3-8

Received: 21 October 2005

Accepted: 27 January 2006

Published: 27 January 2006

Abstract

Background

Extra-cellular roles of Tat might be the main cause of maintenance of HIV-1 infected CD4 T cells or reservoir cells. We developed a synthetic vaccine based on a Tat variant of 101 residues called Tat Oyi, which was identified in HIV infected patients in Africa who did not progress to AIDS. We compared, using rabbits, different adjuvants authorized for human use to test on ELISA the recognition of Tat variants from the five main HIV-1 subtypes. A formulation was tested on macaques followed by a SHIV challenge with a European strain.

Results

Tat Oyi with Montanide or Calcium Phosphate gave rabbit sera able to recognize all Tat variants. Five on seven Tat Oyi vaccinated macaques showed a better control of viremia compared to control macaques and an increase of CD8 T cells was observed only on Tat Oyi vaccinated macaques. Reservoir cells were not detectable at 56 days post-challenge in all Tat Oyi vaccinated macaques but not in the controls.

Conclusion

The Tat Oyi vaccine should be efficient worldwide. No toxicity was observed on rabbits and macaques. We show in vivo that antibodies against Tat could restore the cellular immunity and make it possible the elimination of reservoir cells.

Background

The HIV-1 Tat protein plays important roles in the virus life cycle and maintenance of HIV-1 infected CD4+ T cells [1, 2]. It is a trans-activating regulatory protein that stimulates efficient transcription of the viral genome, which requires structural changes of Tat to bind to a RNA stem-loop structure called TAR [3, 4]. However, Tat differs from other HIV-1 regulatory proteins because it is rapidly secreted by CD4+ T cells following HIV-1 infection, and extra-cellular Tat is suspected to be directly involved in the collapse of the cellular immune response against HIV-infected cells [2] and directly contributes to the pathology of AIDS [5]. Extra-cellular Tat inhibits macrophage responses by binding to the Fas ligand membrane receptor [6] and inhibits cytotoxic T cell (CTL) responses due to its ability to cross cell membranes and induce apoptosis of uninfected T cells [7, 8] via interaction with tubulin [810]. In addition, a number of studies have shown that the presence of antibodies against Tat blocks the replication of HIV-1 in vitro and is related to non-progression to AIDS [1113]. Moreover, it has been shown that a HIV-1 Tat-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte response is inversely correlated with rapid progression to AIDS [14]. Further studies have emphasized the hypothesis that anti-Tat CTLs are important in controlling virus replication early after primary infection [14, 15].

The discovery of the extra-cellular functions of Tat in the inhibition of the cellular immune response against HIV-infected cells constitute the rationale to develop a vaccine against HIV targeting Tat [16]. However, the development of a Tat vaccine may face the same problems encountered with HIV-1 envelope proteins as Tat exists in different sizes (86 to 101 residues) and mutations exist that induce structural heterogeneity [17]. The 2D NMR studies of two active Tat variants from Europe and Africa confirmed this structural heterogeneity, although a similar folding appears to exist among Tat variants [1820]. Currently, there are five main HIV-1 subtypes in the world: subtypes A (25 %) and C (50 %) are predominant and are found mainly in Africa, India and South America; subtype B (12 %) is found mainly in Europe and North-America; subtype D (6%) is found in Africa and subtype E (4 %)(a recombinant form known as CRF_01AE), is found mainly in South East Asia [21]. Tat variability follows this geographical diversity with mutations of up to 38 % observed among Tat variants from A, B, C, D and E HIV-1 subtypes that do not alter Tat functions but do not allow cross recognition with Tat antibodies [22].

Up to now, the two main vaccine strategies against Tat use a recombinant protein corresponding to a short 86 residue version of a subtype-B European Tat variant that is either inactivated [11] or has full activity [23]. These two approaches were tested on macaques followed by a homologous SHIV challenge [24, 25]. A significant decrease of viremia was observed in these two studies carried out respectively on Cynomolgus [24] and Rhesus macaques [25], without showing complete protection during primary infection. A recent study showed long term control of infection following homologous SHIV challenge on Tat-vaccinated Cynomolgus macaques [26]. However, immunization with a subtype B Tat variant of 86 residues does not stimulate an efficient response against subtype A and C Tat variants [27]. Moreover, most Tat variants found in the field are of 101 residues [4].

Over the last 20 years, several HIV vaccine studies have been tested using a homologous SHIV/macaque model and some have met with success [28]. However, these were not followed by success in clinical trials [29], possibly due to the high genetic diversity of HIV-1. This is why heterologous SHIV challenge in macaques, using a genetically distinct virus, is now recommended to determine if a vaccine can be effective against HIV-1 infection in humans and corresponds to the most significant in vivo experiment after clinical trials [28].

The interest to develop a Tat vaccine rose with the discovery that seropositive long-term non-Progressor (LTNP) patients had a higher level of Tat antibodies than seropositive Rapid Progressor (RP) patients [13]. However, LTNP patients are unable to eradicate HIV since they still have HIV released from reservoir cells. Another category of patients, the highly exposed persistently seronegative (HEPS), appears to be more interesting since they were in contact with the virus, they have developed a strong cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response against viral proteins and have retro converted to become seronegative [30]. There is a very low prevalence of HEPS among adults and it could be possible that the HEPS phenotype is due to innate immunity [31].

Although HEPS patients have normally no detectable virus, it was possible to isolate and clone a HIV-1 strain from patients in a cohort in Gabon [32] that could be now classified as HEPS. This strain called HIV-1 Oyi has genes similar to regular HIV-1 strains except the tat gene, which had mutations never found in other Tat variants [16]. The epidemiological survey was carried out on a sample of 750 pregnant women and 25 were identified as seropositive [32]. From these 25 seropositive women, 23 rapidly retro converted and became HEPS. All the HEPS women were infected with HIV-1 Oyi. The high proportion of HEPS phenotype in this cohort (92%) indicated that the retro conversion was probably due to an acquired immunity and not an innate immunity. Ten years after the publication of this epidemiological survey, the 23 women were in good health and the HIV was no longer detectable in their blood [22]. Immunization with Tat Oyi raises antibodies in rabbits that are able to recognize different Tat variants even with mutations of up to 38 %, which is not possible with other Tat variants [22]. Tat Oyi appears to induce a humoral immune response against three-dimensional epitopes that are conserved in Tat variants in spite of 38% mutations [22]. Moreover, Tat Oyi has a similar structure to active Tat but is unable to trans-activate [20].

This study is the first step of pre-clinical studies of a vaccine using a synthetic protein of 101 residues. Synthetic vaccines are developed for many years because they could be safer regarding biological vaccines, i e vaccines made from inactivated pathogens or recombinant proteins. However, most of the vaccines commercially available up to now have a biological origin. Very few synthetic vaccines were able to demonstrate their efficacy in vivo against a pathogen such as bacteria or virus due to the short size of the peptides that can constitute only linear epitopes, while 3D epitopes are the most susceptible to trigger an immune response that neutralize a pathogen. This is why, one of the objective of this study was to determine a vaccine formulation suitable for human use to prepare clinical trials, as a previous study with Tat Oyi was carried out using complete Freund adjuvant [22]. We evaluated the antibody responses raised in rabbits by Tat Oyi complemented with adjuvants authorized for human use and we determined formulations providing similar results previously obtained with the Freund adjuvant [22]. Vaccination with Tat Oyi on seven Rhesus macaques provided an excellent model to test in vivo the efficacy of this synthetic vaccine before clinical trials. Furthermore, the vaccinated macaques were challenged with a European SHIV. This was a heterologous SHIV challenge and no success in heterologous SHIV were published until now.

Results and discussion

We selected four adjuvants (Calcium phosphate, Montanide, Adju-Phos and Alhydrogel) to develop different vaccine formulations with our synthetic protein Tat Oyi. The usual dose of aluminium for human vaccines is around 0.5 mg [33] and at this concentration, approximately 90 % of 100 μg of Tat Oyi adsorbed to both aluminium containing adjuvants (Adju-Phos and Alhydrogel). For these two reasons, we decided to carry out our inoculations at 0.5 mg Al per dose of vaccine for both Adju-Phos and Alhydrogel. For the calcium phosphate gel, we achieved 92 % adsorption using 1 mg Ca per 500 μl dose while only 62% adsorption using 0.5 mg Ca in the same volume. Montanide adjuvant (70 %) was used because it is a metabolizable oil that can be used for human vaccination and has chemical properties similar to those found in the Freund adjuvant as used in our first vaccination studies [22].

Twelve rabbits were immunized with the four formulations (three rabbits for each formulation) and we analyzed the antibody responses against five Tat variants representative of subtypes A, B, C, D, and E (Table I). No antibody response was observed using the calcium phosphate gel and the aluminium phosphate adjuvants at 60 days post-inoculation. However, at 90 days post-inoculation, a strong antibody response was observed using these two adjuvants against five Tat variants (Table I). The best humoral response against Tat oyi was obtained using Montanide ISA720 (titer: 128,000 against Tat Oyi) at both 60 and 90 days post-inoculation. However, Montanide ISA720 and Calcium phosphate appear to be the most suitable adjuvants to complement the synthetic protein Tat Oyi, due to the absence of toxicity and the heterologuous immunity compared with different Tat variants observed after vaccination (Table I).
Table I

Titre of pooled rabbit sera against different Tat variants (60 and 90 days post-inoculation)

 

Montanide ISA720 J60

Montanide ISA720 J90

Preimmune

 

titre

mean

SD

titre

mean

SD

titre

mean

SD

Oyi

128,000

6,700E-02

1,500E-03

128,000

7,000E-02

2,646E-03

320

6,733E-02

2,082E-03

Ug11RP

16,000

6,867E-02

1,443E-03

16,000

6,867E-02

2,309E-03

160

6,867E-02

1,155E-03

Eli

32,000

7,017E-02

1,041E-03

64,000

7,000E-02

1,000E-03

160

7,200E-02

2,000E-03

96Bw

8,000

7,400E-02

3,279E-03

16,000

6,933E-02

5,774E-04

320

8,000E-02

6,000E-03

CM240

32,000

6,683E-02

5,774E-04

1,000

6,600E-02

1,732E-03

320

6,767E-02

1,155E-03

HXB2

64,000

6,233E-02

1,041E-03

16,000

6,844E-02

2,143E-03

160

6,033E-02

2,887E-03

 

Aluminium Hydroxide J60

Aluminium Hydroxide J90

Preimmune

 

titre

mean

SD

titre

mean

SD

titre

mean

SD

Oyi

64,000

6,700E-02

8,660E-04

16,000

6,767E-02

2,082E-03

80

6,700E-02

8,660E-04

Ug11RP

16,000

6,850E-02

5,000E-04

2,000

6,700E-02

9,313E-10

160

6,850E-02

5,000E-04

Eli

64,000

6,550E-02

9,313E-10

8,000

6,533E-02

5,774E-04

160

6,550E-02

9,313E-10

96Bw

32,000

7,167E-02

2,887E-04

1,000

6,733E-02

1,528E-03

160

7,167E-02

2,887E-04

CM240

32,000

6,967E-02

7,638E-04

1,000

6,633E-02

5,774E-04

80

6,967E-02

7,638E-04

HXB2

64,000

6,650E-02

1,000E-03

16,000

6,500E-02

1,000E-03

160

6,650E-02

1,000E-03

 

Calcium Phosphate Gel J90

Preimmune

   
 

titre

mean

SD

titre

mean

SD

   

Oyi

32,000

8,033E-02

1,528E-03

160

6,700E-02

2,887E-03

   

Ug11RP

16,000

6,750E-02

2,517E-03

320

6,733E-02

5,774E-04

   

Eli

32,000

7,975E-02

3,786E-03

160

7,567E-02

1,155E-03

   

96Bw

8,000

7,000E-02

2,000E-03

320

6,567E-02

5,774E-04

   

CM240

16,000

7,150E-02

3,215E-03

320

6,733E-02

1,528E-03

   

HXB2

128,000

6,600E-02

3,606E-03

80

6,533E-02

5,774E-04

   
 

Aluminium Phosphate J90

Preimmune

   
 

titre

mean

SD

titre

mean

SD

   

Oyi

32,000

6,900E-02

2,082E-03

320

6,800E-02

1,000E-03

   

Ug11RP

16,000

6,800E-02

2,082E-03

80

6,700E-02

1,414E-03

   

Eli

32,000

6,875E-02

2,646E-03

320

7,067E-02

1,528E-03

   

96Bw

8,000

6,875E-02

2,309E-03

160

7,367E-02

3,215E-03

   

CM240

16,000

7,075E-02

1,528E-03

160

7,433E-02

1,155E-03

   

HXB2

32,000

6,825E-02

2,309E-03

160

7,100E-02

2,646E-03

   

Titre corresponds to the reciprocal of the last positive dilution obtained by ELISA (cut-off : mean of preimmune sera + 3 S.D.)

A heterologous SHIV-BX08 challenge carried out on seven macaques vaccinated with Tat Oyi/Montanide ISA720 and four control macaques vaccinated with β-galactosidase that were used also as control for another vaccine trial [34]. Figure 1 shows the viremia as revealed by SHIV RNA copy number in the sera of macaques after SHIV challenge. Similarly to what is observed in human a couple of months after HIV infection, both Tat Oyi vaccinated macaques and controls had an undetectable viremia 63 days after the SHIV challenge (Fig 1). In addition, virus isolation and cytoviremia was measured by co-cultivation of PBMC's with non-infected human cells at the day of challenge and each week afterwards and allow to estimate the level of reservoir cells (Fig 2). Five on seven Tat Oyi vaccinated macaques showed a better control of viremia compared to control macaques (Fig 1). Reservoir cells were not detectable at 56 days post-challenge in all Tat Oyi vaccinated macaques but not in the controls (Fig. 2).
Figure 1

Viral load of rhesus macaques vaccinated with Tat Oyi (panel A) and control macaques vaccinated with β-gal (panel B) following SHIV challenge (SHIV-BX08). The 965 (white square), 966 (no symbol), 969 (black circle), 975 (black square), 9611 (white circle), 9711 (white triangle) and 9712 (black triangle) macaques are the Tat Oyi vaccinated macaques. The 963 (white square), 964 (black square), 978 (white circle) and 9610 (black circle) Macaques are the controls vaccinated with β-gal. Two vaccinated macaques (965 and 969) on five had a viremia up to or superior to 1 millions RNA copies/ml that similar to controls. Macaque 966 had a viremia almost undetectable after the first SHIV challenge and remained at the same level in spite of a second challenge with SHIV 162P 3.2 seven weeks after the first challenge. The other macaques were not challenged twice. Control macaque 963 had an unexpected low viremia. Panel C: Grey bars indicate the post infection viremia in the plasma at two weeks and the black bars indicate viremia at nine weeks post-infection of the challenged macaques. Macaque 966 has a higher viremia at nine weeks due to its second SHIV challenge.

Figure 2

HIV infected CD4 T cell (reservoir cells) in rhesus macaques vaccinated with Tat Oyi (panel A) and control macaques vaccinated with β-gal (panel B) following SHIV challenge. The 965 (white square), 966 (no symbol), 969 (black circle), 975 (black square), 9611 (white circle), 9711 (white triangle) and 9712 (black triangle) Macaques are the Tat Oyi vaccinated Macaques. The 963 (white square), 964 (black square), 978 (white circle) and 9610 (black circle) Macaques are the controls vaccinated with β-gal. The upper panel shows that no reservoir cells were detectable in the seven Tat Oyi vaccinated macaques after 56 days although macaques 965 and 969 had high viremia peaks (Fig 1). Interestingly, no reservoir cells were detectable at any time for macaque 966 even after its second SHIV challenge.

It has been shown in SHIV challenge that plasma viremia in the first peak does not correlate with survival whereas plasma viremia levels of the second peak at or about six weeks post-infection were highly predictive of relative survival [35]. In our vaccine trial, panel C in figure 1 shows that plasma viral RNA levels were significantly lower in the vaccinated Macaques compared to the controls at nine weeks post-infection (p = 0.009 using Mann-Whitney test). While we did not observe major differences in the level of CD4 cells between vaccinated and non vaccinated macaques (data not shown), we did observe an augmentation of the number of CD8 lymphocytes in Tat Oyi vaccinated macaques (Fig. 3). However, we did not determine if these CD8 are HIV specific CTL. It is interesting to observe that before the SHIV challenge, control macaques had a higher level of CD8 compared to Tat Oyi vaccinated macaques. Control macaques were immunized with the Semliki Forest Virus (SFV) lac Z expressing β-galactosidase that boost the CD8 response [34]. This high level of CD8 were not HIV specific in control macaques and they had no antibodies against Tat. Therefore, we think that the decreased level of CD8+ cells in control macaques after the SHIV challenge could be due to extracellular Tat, since the SHIV infection should have increased the CD8 response as observed for SFV.
Figure 3

CD8+ cell count of challenged Macaques. The 963, 964, 978 and 9610 Macaques are the controls. The 965, 966, 969, 975, 9611, 9711 and 9712 Macaques are the vaccinated Macaques. Striped histograms represent the CD8+ cell count at the day of challenge. Black histograms represent the CD8+ cell count 9 weeks post-challenge whilst grey histograms represent the CD8+ cell count 18 weeks post-challenge.

All Tat-vaccinated macaques, with the exception of Macaque 969, developed a strong anti-Tat antibody response (Fig 4), which correlated with an efficient reduction in viremia at nine weeks post-infection (Fig 1C). This was best demonstrated by monkey 965, which had a strong anti-Tat antibody titer and a significantly reduced viremia nine weeks post-infection despite a high viremia in the primary phase (Fig 1C). To a lesser extent, macaque 9711 shows the same relationship between the level of anti-Tat antibody and the viremia at nine weeks (Fig 1C). Moreover, the control of viremia in Tat Oyi vaccinated macaques was not due to antibodies raised against the HIV envelope proteins since the four SHIV challenged control macaques had high anti-gp120 antibody titers. Overall, gp120 antibody titres were similar in control and Tat Oyi vaccinated macaques (Fig 5).
Figure 4

Antibody response against Tat for the seven macaques vaccinated with Tat Oyi. The 965 (white square), 966 (no symbol), 969 (black circle), 975 (black square), 9611 (white circle), 9711 (white triangle) and 9712 (black triangle) Macaques are the Tat Oyi vaccinated Macaques. Macaque 966 in the top had the best response against Tat and turned to have the best control of the viremia with no reservoir cells detected (Fig 1 & 2). The left axis shows the OD of 1/100 sera dilution.

Figure 5

Antibodies titers against GP120. The 965 (white square), 966 (no symbol), 969 (black circle), 975 (black square), 9611 (white circle), 9711 (white triangle) and 9712 (black triangle) Macaques are the Tat Oyi vaccinated Macaques. The 963 (white square), 964 (black square), 978 (white circle) and 9610 (black circle) Macaques are the controls vaccinated with β-gal. Six from the seven macaques vaccinated with Tat Oyi had a high level of GP120 antibodies (panel A) similar to the macaques controls (panel B). Antibodies against GP120 appears to not have play a role in the elimination of reservoir cells. This is well illustrated with macaque 966 (Panel A) that had no antibody against GP120 after the first challenge SHIV and a low level of antibodies after its second SHIV challenge.

Macaque 966 did react differently from the other Tat Oyi vaccinated macaques and is the most interesting. It was the one to have an almost complete immunity against SHIV BX08 with a viremia peak around 300 RNA copies per ml whilst most of the others macaques had viremia peaks between 100 000 and 3 000 000 RNA copies per ml (Fig 1). Interestingly, almost no antibodies against gp120 were detectable and no virus could be isolated from cultured PBMC's (Fig 2). To verify this strong immunity, macaque 966 was challenged a second time with another heterologous SHIV 162P 3.2 seven weeks after the SHIV BX08 challenge (Roger Legrand, Personal communication). This second challenge explains the higher viremia peak at nine weeks post-infection compared to the other Tat Oyi vaccinated macaques (Fig 1C), which rapidly decreased to an undetectable level. It is interesting also to note that antibodies against gp120 were observed with macaque 966 following the second SHIV challenge that also rapidly declined (Fig 5). Results observed with macaque 966 are very important and constitute the best proof of concept for the Tat Oyi vaccine and its rational as previously described [22]. Macaque 966 had the highest titer of anti-Tat antibody (Fig 4), the lowest viremia (Fig 2) and no detectable virus from cultured PBMCs (Fig 1). Macaque 965 had nearly identical level of anti Tat antibodies but was not able to control its viremia as macaque 966. It is possible that innate immunity helped macaque 966, but it is interesting to note that antibodies against gp120 disappeared rapidly for macaque 966 (Fig 5), similarly to what was observed with the patients infected by HIV-1 Oyi in Gabon [32] and HEPS patients [30].

Conflicting results appears in Tat vaccine studies in nonhuman primate viral challenges models ranging from no protection [34, 3638] to significant [39, 24, 25], long term protection [26]. Although these conflicting results could be explained by differences in immunization regimen, viral stock, route of viral challenge and animal species, the result of two studies using similar viral vector expressing Tat, Env and Gag and giving opposite conclusion is puzzling [36, 39]. One study shows the efficacy of vectored Tat but not Gag and Env [39], while another study showed efficacy of vectored Gag and Env but not Tat [36]. These conflicting results could be due to a homologous challenge in the first study [39] and a heterologuous challenge in the second study, since the second study use the Tat Jr sequence instead of the homologuous Tat Bru sequence for the vaccine [36]. HIV-1 Jr and HIV-1 Bru are B subtypes but their Tat sequences have non conservative mutations inducing conformational changes [16]. The mutations between the vaccine and the challenge virus might explain the lack of efficacy of the Tat vectored vaccine in the second study [36]. Of course, the second study more closely resembled reality since a vaccinated person will not likely be exposed a homologous virus infection. It is possible that the study by Silvera et al. would have had an different outcome had heterologous gag and env genes been used in the SHIV challenge [36]. These studies outline how mutations can affect Tat cross recognition as shown in former studies [22, 27].

Conclusion

Three adjuvants authorized for human use trigger an immune response with Tat Oyi similar to what was observed with the complete Freund adjuvant in a former study [22]. No local or systemic toxicity or adverse effects were observed in rabbits and macaques with vaccine doses superior to those planed for clinical trials. Furthermore, the synthetic protein Tat Oyi is pharmacologically stable in solution for at least a period of one month, which is a requirement for mass vaccination (data not shown). Although a low viremia was not achieved for all macaques, reservoir cells were no longer detectable 56 days after a heterologuous challenge. Taken together, these results suggest that a Tat Oyi synthetic protein could be an excellent component of a vaccine targeting HIV-1 and could provide an appropriate treatment against HIV-1 in both developing and industrial countries. On a fundamental point of view, the decreased level of CD8 cells in the control macaques suggests an important role of extra cellular Tat in the immunodeficiency induced by the HIV-1. We hope to be able to confirm in phase I/II clinical trial with seropositive patients that a therapeutical effect can be obtained from the Tat Oyi vaccination. This therapeutic effect might result, firstly, in a reduced viremia and stable CD4 cells level following an interruption of the antiretroviral treatment. We believe this vaccine will not prevent sero negative people from HIV infection, however it could avoid the collapse of the cellular immunity, and therefore a therapeutic effect could be expected with the eradication of the virus titres and viral reservoir as is observed with HEPS patients. This vaccine could be also the only affordable therapy for millions of seropositive patients that have no access to antiretroviral treatment.

Methods

Tat variants and adjuvant formulations

Tat variants were assembled in solid phase synthesis with an ABI 433A peptide synthesizer with FASTMoc chemistry according to the method of Barany and Merrifield [40] as previously described [20, 41]. The calcium Phosphate gel adjuvant was obtained from Brenntag Biosector (Denmark). The adjuvant based on a metabolizable oil with a mannide mono-oleate emulsifier called Montanide ISA720 was obtained from SEPPIC Ltd (Paris, France). The two aluminum-containing adjuvants, aluminum hydroxide (Alhydrogel 2 %, Superfos Biosector a/s,) and aluminum phosphate (Adju-Phos, Superfos Biosector a/s), were kindly provided by Vedbaeck (Denmark). Experiments were conducted to assess the presence of soluble antigen in the supernatant liquid of adsorbed experimental vaccines. Tat Oyi was added to the gel and gently shaken for 24 h at room temperature. Samples were centrifuged at 313 g for 15 min at room temperature. Supernatant was aspirated and protein concentration was determined using Bradford reagent. Protein adsorption by aluminum-containing adjuvants was studied in 500 μl suspensions containing a quantity of adjuvant equivalent to 0.7, 0.5 or 0.3 mg Al.

Immunization protocols for rabbits and macaques

Twelve specific pathogen-free New Zealand rabbits (Elevage Scientifique des Dombes, Romans, France) were immunized with 100 μg of Tat Oyi and four different formulations (three rabbits for each formulation): aluminum hydroxide (0.5 mg of Al) in phosphate buffer 20 mM pH 6.5; aluminum phosphate (0.5 mg of Al) in sodium acetate buffer 20 mM pH 6.5; calcium phosphate gel (1 mg of Ca) in phosphate buffer 20 mM pH 7; and Montanide ISA720 (70%) in phosphate buffer 20 mM pH 6.5. Each rabbit was boosted three times at 20, 40 and 75 days after the first immunization. Sera were collected before immunization, and then 60 and 90 days after the first immunization. No death or injuries were observed during or as a consequence of the immunization for the full time of the experiment. The study on Macaques included eleven rhesus macaques of Chinese origin. These macaques were housed at the Primate Research Center at Rennemoulins (Institut Pasteur, France) and handled under ketamine hydrochloride anesthesia (Rhone-Mérieux, Lyon, France) according to European guidelines for animal care (Journal Officiel des Communautés Européennes, L358, 18 décembre 1986). The animals were checked to be virus-isolation negative, as well as sero-negative for SIV and simian retrovirus type D before entering the study. Seven macaques were immunized subcutaneously with Tat Oyi (100 μg) and the adjuvant Montanide ISA 720. Boosts were given at 1, 2 and 3 months after the first immunization. The control was four macaques immunized with the Semliki Forest Virus lac Z expressing β-galactosidase [34]. No death or injuries were observed during or as a consequence of the immunization for the full time of the experiment.

SHIV challenge

The seven macaques vaccinated with Tat Oyi were included in a SHIV challenge assay called RIVAC sponsored by the ANRS. The purpose of the RIVAC assay was to compare ten vaccine approaches on five to seven macaques with the same SHIV challenge model. Only results obtained with three vaccine approaches have been published [34]. The challenge strain was SHIV-BX08, derived from SIVmac239 [34]. This is a hybrid virus expressing the gp120 subunit of the R5, clade B, primary HIV-1 isolate BX08 and the gp41 subunit of HIV-1 LAI [42]. The tat and rev genes are also from HIV-LAI, whereas the gag, pol, vif, vpx and nef genes are from SIVmac239. The animals were challenged intra-rectally (IR) seven months after the first immunization. The virus stock used for challenge was amplified on human PBMC and 10-fold serial dilutions where used for inoculation of rhesus macaques. The undiluted challenge dose contained 337 +/- 331 AID50 for IR administration, as determined by the method of Spouge [43]. Tat vaccinated and control animals were sedated with ketamine hydrochloride (10 mg/kg i.m.)

Serological tests

ELISA were carried out as previously described [22] with a minor change. Maxisorp U96 immunoplates (Nunc) were coated with 100 μl of Tat Oyi diluted at 2,3 μg/ml in phosphate buffer 100 mM pH 6 overnight at 4°C. This experiment was repeated three times.

HIV infected CD4 T cell or reservoir cell count

Reservoir cells counts was carried out with the cell-associated viral load method [44]. Virus isolation was carried out by co-cultivation of macaque PBMC with PHA-stimulated human (donor) PBMC. Viral RNA was extracted from 200 μl of plasma collected on EDTA using the High Pure RNA Kit from Roche (Mannheim, Germany) and stored frozen at -80°C. 10 μl of the extracted material were then submitted to reverse transcription and PCR for amplification as described previously [34].

Cell count

Counting of CD4+, CD8+, CD3+ and CD20+ cells was performed as described previously [45].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of serological data was carried out using the Mann-Whitney test or one-way Anova test using Minitab Release 14. We considered that the difference between two samples was significant if the P-value was less than 0.05.

List of abbreviations

HIV: 

human immunodeficiency virus

PBMC: 

Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell

Tat: 

Trans activator protein

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Anne-Marie Aubertin and Roger Le Grand for fruitful discussion. We thank Marie-Joëlle Frachette for providing complementary data about RIVAC assay. We acknowledge the contribution of Mourad Mekaouch (CNRS, Joseph Aiguier), Dr M.B. Nanteza and the Medical Research Council (U.K.) Program on AIDS in Uganda for the provision of sequence data for isolate Ug11RP. This work was supported by Conseil Régional Provence Alpes Côtes-d'Azur, ConseilGénéral des Bouches-du-Rhones, Ville de Marseille and association Faire Face Au SIDA. J.W. has a scholarship from the Conseil Régional Provence Alpes Côtes-d'Azur/SYNPROSIS. G.C. has a scholarship from the Entente Cordiale program between the UK and France and the Scottish International Education Trust. EPL thanks the Université de la Méditerranée for its support of this work.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
UMR Univ. Med./CNRS FRE 2737, Faculté de Pharmacie, Université de la Méditerranée
(2)
SynProsis, Hôtel Technologique BP 100, Technopôle de Château Gombert
(3)
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of California San Diego
(4)
Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology, NIAID, National Institutes of Health

References

  1. Fisher AG, Feinberg MB, Josephs SF, Harper ME, Marselle LM, Reyes G, Gonda MA, Aldovini A, Debouk C, Gallo RC: The trans-activator gene of HTLV-III is essential for virus replication. Nature. 1986, 320: 367-371. 10.1038/320367a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Jeang KT, Xiao H, Rich EA: Multifaceted Activities of the HIV-1 Transactivator of Transcription, Tat. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 28837-28840. 10.1074/jbc.274.41.28837.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Berkhout B, Gatignol A, Rabson AB, Jeang KT: TAR-independent activation of the HIV-1 LTR: evidence that tat requires specific regions of the promoter. Cell. 1990, 62: 757-767. 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90120-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Loret EP, Georgel P, Johnson WC, Ho PS: Circular dichroism and molecular modeling yield a structure for the complex of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 trans-activation response RNA and the binding region of Tat, the trans-acting transcriptional activator. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992, 89: 9734-9738.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ensoli B, Barillari G, Salahuddin SZ, Gallo RC, Wong-Staal F: Tat protein of HIV-1 stimulates growth of cells derived from Kaposi's sarcoma lesions of AIDS patients. Nature. 1990, 345: 84-86. 10.1038/345084a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen SS, Li C, Ding L, Cao Y, Pardee AB, Shevach EM, Cohen DI: Pronounced acute immunosuppression in vivo mediated by HIV Tat challenge. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999, 96: 10842-10847. 10.1073/pnas.96.19.10842.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Li CJ, Friedman DJ, Wang C, Metelev V, Pardee AB: Induction of apoptosis in uninfected lymphocytes by HIV-1 Tat protein. Science. 1995, 293: 1503-1506.Google Scholar
  8. Campbell GR, Pasquier E, Watkins J, Bourgarel-Rey V, Peyrot V, Esquieu D, Barbier P, de Mareuil J, Braguer D, Kaleebu P, Yirrell DL, Loret EP: The glutamine-rich region of the HIV-1 Tat protein is involved in T-cell apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 48197-48204. 10.1074/jbc.M406195200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen D, Wang M, Zhou S, Zhou Q: HIV-1 Tat targets microtubules to induce apoptosis, a process promoted by the pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 relative Bim. EMBO J. 2002, 21: 6801-6810. 10.1093/emboj/cdf683.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. de Mareuil J, Carre M, Barbier P, Campbell GR, Lancelot S, Opi S, Esquieu D, Watkins JD, Prevot C, Braguer D, Peyrot V, Loret EP: HIV-1 Tat protein enhances microtubule polymerization. Retrovirology. 2005, 2: 5-10.1186/1742-4690-2-5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Zagury JF, Sill A, Blattner W, Lachgar A, Le Buanec H, Richardson M, Rappaport J, Hendel H, Bizzini B, Gringeri A, Carcagno M, Criscuolo M, Burny A, Gallo RC, Zagury D: Antibodies to the HIV-1 Tat protein correlated with nonprogression to AIDS: a rationale for the use of Tat toxoid as an HIV-1 vaccine. J Hum Virol. 1998, 4: 282-292.Google Scholar
  12. Re MC, Vignoli M, Furlini G, Gibellini D, Colangeli V, Vitone F, La Placa M: Antibodies against full-length Tat protein and some low-molecular-weight Tat-peptides correlate with low or undetectable viral load in HIV-1 seropositive patients. J Clin Virol. 2001, 21: 81-89. 10.1016/S1386-6532(00)00189-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Belliard G, Romieu A, Zagury JF, Dali H, Chaloin O, Le Grand R, Loret E, Briand JP, Roques B, Desgranges C, Muller S: Specificity and effect on apoptosis of Tat antibodies from vaccinated and SHIV-infected rhesus macaques and HIV-infected individuals. Vaccine. 2003, 21: 3186-3199. 10.1016/S0264-410X(03)00233-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Van Baalen CA, Pontesilli O, Huisman RC, Geretti AM, Klein MR, de Wolf F, Miedema F, Gruters RA, Osterhaus AD: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Rev- and Tat-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte frequencies inversely correlate with rapid progression to AIDS. J Gen Virol. 1997, 78: 1913-1918.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Addo MM, Altfeld M, Rosenberg ES, Eldridge RL, Philips MN, Habeeb K, Khatri A, Brander C, Robbins GK, Mazzara GP, Goulder PJ, Walker BD, HIV Controller Study Collaboration: The HIV-1 regulatory proteins Tat and Rev are frequently targeted by cytotoxic T lymphocytes derived from HIV-1-infected individuals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001, 98: 1781-1786. 10.1073/pnas.98.4.1781.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gregoire CJ, Loret EP: Conformational heterogeneity in two regions of TAT results in structural variations of this protein as a function of HIV-1 isolates. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271: 22641-22646. 10.1074/jbc.271.37.22641.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gallo RC: Tat as one key to HIV-induced immune pathogenesis and Tat (correction of Pat) toxoid as an important component of a vaccine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999, 96: 8324-8326. 10.1073/pnas.96.15.8324.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Peloponese JM, Gregoire C, Opi S, Esquieu D, Sturgis J, Lebrun E, Meurs E, Collette Y, Olive D, Aubertin AM, Witvrow M, Pannecouque C, De Clercq E, Bailly C, Lebreton J, Loret EP: 1H-13C nuclear magnetic resonance assignment and structural characterization of HIV-1 Tat protein. C R Acad Sci III. 2000, 323: 883-894.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gregoire C, Peloponese JM, Esquieu D, Opi S, Campbell G, Solomiac M, Lebrun E, Lebreton J, Loret EP: Homonuclear (1)H-NMR assignment and structural characterization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat Mal protein. Biopolymers. 2001, 62: 324-335. 10.1002/bip.10000.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Peloponese JM, Collette Y, Gregoire C, Bailly C, Campese D, Meurs EF, Olive D, Loret EP: Full peptide synthesis, purification, and characterization of six Tat variants. Differences observed between HIV-1 isolates from Africa and other continents. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 11473-11478. 10.1074/jbc.274.17.11473.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Osmanov S, Pattou C, Walker N, Schwardlander B, Esparza J, WHO-UNAIDS Network for HIV Isolation and Characterization: Estimated global distribution and regional spread of HIV-1 genetic subtypes in the year 2000. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2002, 29: 184-190.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Opi S, Peloponese JM, Esquieu D, Campbell G, de Mareuil J, Walburger A, Solomiac M, Gregoire C, Bouveret E, Yirrell DL, Loret EP: Tat HIV-1 Primary and Tertiary Structures Critical to Immune Response Against Non-homologous Variants. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 35915-35919. 10.1074/jbc.M204393200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ensoli B, Cafaro A: HIV-1 Tat vaccines. Virus Res. 2002, 82: 91-101. 10.1016/S0168-1702(01)00393-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Cafaro A, Caputo A, Fracasso C, Maggiorella MT, Goletti D, Baroncelli S, Pace M, Sernicola L, Koanga-Mogtomo ML, Betti M, Borsetti A, Belli R, Akerblom L, Corrias F, Butto S, Heeney J, Verani P, Titti F, Ensoli B: Control of SHIV-89.6P-infection of cynomolgus monkeys by HIV-1 Tat protein vaccine. Nat Med. 1999, 5: 643-650. 10.1038/9488.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Pauza CD, Trivedi P, Wallace M, Ruckwardt TJ, Le Buanec H, Lu W, Bizzini B, Burny A, Zagury D, Gallo RC: Vaccination with tat toxoid attenuates disease in simian/HIV-challenged macaques. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000, 97: 3515-3519. 10.1073/pnas.070049797.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Maggiorella MT, Baroncelli S, Michelini Z, Fanales-Belasio E, Moretti S, Sernicola L, Cara A, Negri DR, Butto S, Fiorelli V, Tripiciano A, Scoglio A, Caputo A, Borsetti A, Ridolfi B, Bona R, ten Haaft P, Macchia I, Leone P, Pavone-Cossut MR, Nappi F, Ciccozzi M, Heeney J, Titti F, Cafaro A, Ensoli B: Long-term protection against SHIV89.6P replication in HIV-1 Tat vaccinated cynomolgus monkeys. Vaccine. 2004, 22: 3258-3269. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.03.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Opi S, Peloponese JM, Esquieu D, Watkins J, Campbell G, De Mareuil J, Jeang KT, Yirrell DL, Kaleebu P, Loret EP: Full-length HIV-1 Tat protein necessary for a vaccine. Vaccine. 2004, 22: 3105-3111. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.01.057.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Feinberg MB, Moore JP: AIDS vaccine models: challenging challenge viruses. Nat Med. 2002, 8: 207-210. 10.1038/nm0302-207.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Vanichseni S, Tappero JW, Pitisuttithum P, Kitayaporn D, Mastro TD, Vimutisunthorn E, van Griensvan F, Heyward WL, Francis DP, Choopanya K, Bangkok Vaccine Evaluation Group: Recruitment, screening and characteristics of injection drug users participating in the AIDSVAX B/E HIV vaccine trial, Bangkok, Thailand. AIDS. 2004, 18: 311-316. 10.1097/00002030-200401230-00022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rowland-Jones SL, Pinheiro S, Kaul R, Hansasuta P, Gillespie G, Dong T, Plummer FA, Bwayo JB, Fidler S, Weber J, McMichael A, Appay V: How important is the 'quality' of the cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response in protection against HIV infection?. Immunol Lett. 2001, 79: 15-20. 10.1016/S0165-2478(01)00261-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Beattie T, Rowland-Jones S, Kaul R: HIV-1 and AIDS: what are protective immune responses?. J HIV Ther. 2002, 7: 35-39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Huet T, Dazza MC, Brun-Vezinet F, Roelants GE, Wain-Hobson S: A highly defective HIV-1 strain isolated from a healthy Gabonese individual presenting an atypical western blot. AIDS. 1989, 3: 707-715.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Allen TM, Mortara L, Mothe BR, Liebl M, Jing P, Calore B, Piekarczyk M, Ruddersdorf R, O'Connor DH, Wang X, Wang C, Allison DB, Altman JD, Sette A, Desrosiers RC, Sutter G, Watkins DI: Tat-vaccinated macaques do not control simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac239 replication. J Virol. 2002, 76: 4108-4112. 10.1128/JVI.76.8.4108-4112.2002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Verrier B, Le Grand R, Ataman-Onal Y, Terrat C, Guillon C, Durand PY, Hurtrel B, Aubertin AM, Sutter G, Erfle V, Girard M: Evaluation in rhesus macaques of Tat and Rev-targeted immunization as a preventive vaccine against mucosal challenge with SHIV-BX08. DNA Cell Biol. 2002, 21: 653-658. 10.1089/104454902760330183.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Watson A, Ranchalis J, Travis B, McClure J, Sutton W, Johnson PR, Hu SL, Haigwood NL: Plasma viremia in macaques infected with simian immunodeficiency virus: plasma viral load early in infection predicts survival. J Virol. 1997, 71: 284-290.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Gupta RK: Aluminum compounds as vaccine adjuvants. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1998, 32: 155-172. 10.1016/S0169-409X(98)00008-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Stittelaar KJ, Gruters RA, Schutten M, van Baalen CA, van Amerongen G, Cranage M, Liljestrom P, Sutter G, Osterhaus AD: Comparison of the efficacy of early versus late viral proteins in vaccination against SIV. Vaccine. 2002, 20: 2921-2927. 10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00219-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Liang X, Casimiro DR, Schleif WA, Wang F, Davies ME, Zhang ZQ, Fu TM, Finnefrock AC, Handt L, Citron MP, Heidecker G, Tang A, Chen M, Wilson KA, Gabryelski L, McElhaugh M, Carella A, Moyer C, Huang L, Vitelli S, Patel D, Lin J, Emini EA, Shiver JW: Gag and Env but not Tat show efficacy against simian-human immunodeficiency virus 89.6P challenge in Mamu-A*01-negative rhesus monkeys. J Virol. 2005, 19: 12321-31. 10.1128/JVI.79.19.12321-12331.2005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Silvera P, Richardson MW, Greenhouse J, Yalley Ogunro J, Shaw N, Mirchandani J, Khalili K, Zagury JF, Lewis MG, Rappaport J: Outcome of simian-human immunodeficiency virus strain 89.6p challenge following vaccination of rhesus macaques with human immunodeficiency virus Tat protein. J Virol. 2002, 76: 3800-3809. 10.1128/JVI.76.8.3800-3809.2002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Barany G, Merrifield RB: The Peptide: Analysis, Synthesis, Biology. Edited by: Gross E, Meinhofer J. 1980, Academic Press, New York, 2: 1-284.Google Scholar
  41. Esquieu D, Peloponese JM, Opi S, Gregoire C, de Mareuil J, Watkins J, Campbell G, Dunot JP, Sturgis J, Witvrouw M, Pannecouque C, De Clercq E, Montembault M, Giang VT, Villiéras M, Fargeas V, Lebreton J, Loret EP: Discovery of a Tat HIV-1 inhibitor Through Computer-Aided Drug Design. Spectroscopy. 2003, 17: 639-645.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Moog C, Fleury HJ, Pellegrin I, Kirn A, Aubertin AM: Autologous and heterologous neutralizing antibody responses following initial seroconversion in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected individuals. J Virol. 1997, 71: 3734-3741.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Spouge JL: Statistical analysis of sparse infection data and its implications for retroviral treatment trials in primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992, 89: 7581-7585.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Aubertin AM, Le Grand R, Wang Y, Beyer C, Tao L, Neildez O, Barre-Sinoussi F, Hurtrel B, Moog C, Lehner T, Girard M: Generation of CD8+ T cell-generated suppressor factor and beta-chemokines by targeted iliac lymph node immunization in rhesus monkeys challenged with SHIV-89.6P by the rectal route. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2000, 16: 381-392. 10.1089/088922200309269.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Estaquier J, Monceaux V, Cumont MC, Aubertin AM, Hurtrel B, Ameisen JC: Early changes in peripheral blood T cells during primary infection of rhesus macaques with a pathogenic SIV. J Med Primatol. 2000, 29: 127-135. 10.1034/j.1600-0684.2000.290305.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Watkins et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.